Syria's government signs a breakthrough deal with Kurdish-led authorities in the northeast
Advertisement
The deal also says all Syrians will be part of the political process, no matter their religion or ethnicity.
Syria's new rulers are struggling to exert their authority across the country and reach political settlements with other minority communities, notably the
Earlier Monday, Syria's government announced the end of the
The Defense Ministry's announcement came after a surprise attack by gunmen from the Alawite community on a police patrol near the port city of Latakia on Thursday spiraled into widespread clashes across Syria's coastal region. The Assad family are Alawites.
'To the remaining remnants of the defeated regime and its fleeing officers, our message is clear and explicit,' said Defense Ministry spokesperson Colonel Hassan Abdel-Ghani. 'If you return, we will also return, and you will find before you men who do not know how to retreat and who will not have mercy on those whose hands are stained with the blood of the innocent.'
Advertisement
Abdel-Ghani said security forces will continue searching for sleeper cells and remnants of the insurgency of former government loyalists.
Though the government's counter-offensive was able to largely contain the insurgency, footage surfaced of what appeared to be retaliatory attacks targeting the broader minority Alawite community, an offshoot of Shia Islam whose adherents live mainly in the western coastal region.
Sajid Allah Al-Deek, a security official in the coastal region, told the Associated Press that security forces were deployed in the area from the Latakia governorate to Jableh and that the coastal highway is functioning again after being closed because of the fighting.
'The civilians have begun returning to their homes,' Al-Deek said, adding that authorities have started detaining those blamed for acts of violence.
Imad Baytar said his father, who worked for a taxi company, had gone from Jableh to Damascus and on his way back over the weekend, 'he was killed in the checkpoint.' Baytar blamed Assad supporters for the killing.
The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, a Britain-based war monitor, said 1,130 people were killed in the clashes, including 830 civilians. The AP could not independently verify these numbers.
Al-Sharaa said the retaliatory attacks against Alawite civilians and mistreatment of prisoners were isolated incidents and vowed to crack down on the perpetrators as he formed a committee to investigate.
Still, the events alarmed Western governments, who have been urged to lift economic sanctions on Syria.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio in a statement Sunday urged Syrian authorities to 'hold the perpetrators of these massacres' accountable. Rubio said the United States 'stands with Syria's religious and ethnic minorities, including its Christian, Druze, Alawite, and Kurdish communities.'
Advertisement
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
19 minutes ago
El Salvador's top human rights group flees President Bukele's ongoing crackdown on dissent
MEXICO CITY -- El Salvador's top human rights organization, Cristosal, announced Thursday it is leaving the country because of mounting harassment and legal threats by the government of President Nayib Bukele. The organization has been one of the most visible critics of Bukele, documenting abuses in the strongman's war on the country's gangs and the detention of hundreds of Venezuelan deportees in an agreement with U.S. President Donald Trump. Bukele's government has long targeted opponents, but Cristosal Executive Director Noah Bullock said things reached a tipping point in recent months as Bukele has grown empowered by his alliance with Trump. 'The clear targeting of our organization has made us choose between exile or prison," Bullock said in an interview with the Associated Press. 'The Bukele administration has unleashed a wave of repression over the past few months ... There's been an exodus of civil society leaders, professionals and even businessmen.' El Salvador 's government did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Cristosal has been working in El Salvador since 2000, when it was founded by Evangelical bishops in order to address human rights and democratic concerns following the country's brutal civil war. On Thursday, the human rights organization announced that it packed up its offices and moved 20 employees from the Central American nation to neighboring Guatemala and Honduras. Cristosal quietly got staff and their families out before publicly announcing they were leaving out of fear that they could be targeted by the Bukele government. The decision came after its top anti-corruption lawyer Ruth López was jailed in June on enrichment charges, which the organization denies. Cristosal's legal team has supported hundreds of cases alleging the government arbitrarily detained innocent people in its crackdown on gangs, and has unlawfully detained Venezuelans deported from the U.S. López headed many of those investigations. In a court appearance in June, she appeared shackled and escorted by police. 'They're not going to silence me, I want a public trial,' she shouted. 'I'm a political prisoner.' For years, the organization said staff have been followed around by police officers, had their phones tapped by spyware like Pegasus, and been subject to legal attacks and defamation campaigns. But López's court appearance was the moment that Bullock said he knew they would have to leave the country. At the same time, the government has arrested more critics, while others have quietly fled the country. In late May, El Salvador's Congress passed a 'foreign agents' law, championed by the populist president. It resembles legislation implemented by governments in Nicaragua, Venezuela, Russia, Belarus and China to silence and criminalize dissent by exerting pressure on organizations that rely on overseas funding. Bullock said the the law would make it easier for the government to criminalize staff and cripple the organization economically. Cristosal's flight from the country marks another blow to checks and balances in a country where Bukele has virtually consolidated control of the government. Bullock said no longer being able to work in the country will make it significantly harder for the organization to continue their ongoing legal work, particularly supporting those detained with little access to due process.
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Angela Rayner's reforms will crush jobs, business chiefs warn
Angela Rayner's workers' rights reforms will 'pull the ladder of employment away', the head of the British Chamber of Commerce (BCC) has warned. Shevaun Haviland, a former No10 official, warned that more rigid employment rules meant companies could 'see their entire employment model disappear'. Rather than adjust, Ms Haviland warned many businesses would 'stop recruiting altogether'. Writing in The Telegraph, the BCC chief said: 'With nearly 1m young people unemployed, this also risks making it even harder for the next generation of workers to get their foot in the door. 'Now is the time for the Government to take a step back and act on the very genuine concerns that employers are raising about some key proposals in the Bill.' Ms Haviland also called on the Chancellor to rule out further tax rises for businesses in the autumn, saying that the combination of excessive regulation and high taxation had left companies 'wading through treacle'. The intervention comes as Labour's Employment Rights Bill is further debated in the House of Lords. The legislation, which is being overseen by Ms Rayner, the Deputy Prime Minister, has been called the biggest upgrade to workers' rights in a generation. The reforms include plans to make it easier for workers to strike and do their jobs from home, 'day-one' rights against unfair dismissal and a ban on zero-hours contracts. However, the scale, speed and cost of the reforms have alarmed business leaders, who fear the new rules will trigger a blizzard of tribunal claims that will tie up companies in the courts. Lord Wolfson, the boss of Next, told peers earlier this week that it also risks leaving businesses 'chronically overstaffed' by making it harder to employ part-time workers. Ms Rayner has so far resisted pressure to water down the changes. However, Labour recently extended the timeline for the implementation of the new rules in a slight concession to businesses. Stronger paternity leave rights and whistleblowing protections will be rolled out by April 2026. However, the right to take companies to court for unfair dismissal from the first day of employment, and a right for staff to work from home will now not come into force until 2027, which was later than expected. Ms Haviland said businesses still needed more time. She called on ministers to 'slow the pace of change, to give business proper time to adapt'. Opponents are desperately trying to soften the reforms before they become law, with some peers this week backing a move to keep workers on zero-hours contracts. Paul Nowak, head of the TUC unions, said peers siding with bad bosses were 'out of touch and defying the will of the public'. A Government spokesman said: 'We take the views of business groups like the BCC seriously and have worked closely with employers on our proposals to ensure the Employment Rights Bill works for both workers and businesses across the UK. 'The bill will benefit more than half of all workers in the UK and we've seen 380,000 jobs added since the start of this Parliament. We remain committed to ensuring our Plan for Change delivers economic growth and secures jobs for working people.' The Government is going too far and too fast By Shevaun Haviland, British Chamber of Commerce director general Later this year, the Government will pass the most far-reaching employment law changes in nearly three decades. In that moment, it will set in motion reforms that will affect every business and every worker. No company will be left untouched. The ambition is immense, and the Government is absolutely right to push for the best deal for British workers. But at the British Chambers of Commerce we represent tens of thousands of businesses up and down the country. I talk to them every day, and there is one message they keep giving back to me: they're worried. They're worried about reforms they feel they were never properly consulted on – changes that could fundamentally alter their business models or make it harder to talk to their own workers. Above all, they're worried about the speed with which the changes are coming. In our recent survey, 77pc of businesses said they thought the pace of implementation was wrong. Because business plans for the long-term. When the Government talks about giving a year to adapt, it thinks it's being generous. In reality, that's a significant challenge for businesses, especially SMEs, who might see their entire employment model disappear. Don't just take my word for it. Instead, listen to the manufacturer in the East Midlands who told us they can't afford 'extensive background checks or HR support' as a small business. For them, these reforms add to the cost, complexity and risk of employing people. So, their answer to the Government's plan to give employees access to slow and expensive employment tribunals on their first day is simple: they'll stop recruiting altogether. Just think about that. The Government is pushing ahead with legislation that will pull the ladder of employment away from those trying to get into the job market. And with nearly 1m young people unemployed, this also risks making it even harder for the next generation of workers to get their foot in the door. Meanwhile, it is also pledging the most radical overhaul of trade union laws in a generation. Good industrial relations are vital, and every employee deserves fair rights at work. But the Employment Rights Bill makes it easier to call strikes, and faster to carry them out. As the legislation stands, just 2pc of the workforce would need to be in a union for it to gain recognition. And it is doing all of this when just 2pc of firms think that more trade union involvement would have a beneficial impact on their business and its workforce. So, it can't be any surprise that nearly four fifths of businesses have told us they don't think the Government has properly assessed the impact of its policies. We agree. The additional cost of all of this is a major concern. When the Government did its initial assessment of the plans, it estimated the cost to business stood at £5bn. This cost is being piled on top of the billions already being taken from firms by the increase in National Insurance. Nearly a year on, with the Government's focus now turning to implementation, we remain no less concerned about the costs to business and firms' ability to cope with the enormous scale of changes to come. Now is the time for the Government to take a step back and act on the very genuine concerns employers are raising about some key proposals in the Bill. It should remove counterproductive provisions on trade union thresholds and ensure employers have legal rights to dismiss new employees who are underperforming, without an employment tribunal. It needs to properly assess the costs it is going to impose. And it should slow the pace of change, to give business proper time to adapt. And, as we look to the Budget in autumn, we have one message for the Chancellor: no new taxes on business. The increase in employer National Insurance contributions has stopped businesses investing in growth, and the Employment Rights Bill is yet another burden. British business has the power to be the engine of growth for our economy, but right now companies feel like they are wading through treacle. It cannot continue. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
New York Post
39 minutes ago
- New York Post
US-based Wells Fargo banker blocked from leaving China after arriving for work trip: report
A Wells Fargo banker traveling on business has been blocked from leaving China after recently arriving there for a work trip, according to a report. Chenyue Mao, an Atlanta-based managing director at Wells Fargo, is facing an exit ban after entering China in recent weeks, sources familiar with the matter told the Wall Street Journal. Mao, who was born in Shanghai, was traveling there internationally on business, according to her automated email response. Advertisement 3 Chenyue Mao is a managing director at Wells Fargo. Trade Reboot Wells Fargo quickly suspended all travel to China following news of the exit ban, sources told the Journal. It could not immediately be determined when Mao was detained or why she is facing an exit ban. 'We are closely tracking this situation and working through the appropriate channels so our employee can return to the United States as soon as possible,' a Wells Fargo spokesperson told The Post in a statement. Advertisement Mao recently attended an industry conference in Brazil late last month, according to a news release. The longtime Wells Fargo employee – who started with the company in 2012 – specializes in international factoring, a process that allows companies to sell unpaid invoices to a third party, known in this case as the factor, for immediate cash. Mao worked with Chinese companies and industry groups on international factoring matters, and sometimes traveled to China on business, according to the Journal. Advertisement She was recently named chairwoman of FCI, formerly called Factors Chain International, at the group's annual meeting in Rio de Janeiro in June. 3 Mao is facing an exit ban after entering China in recent weeks, according to a report. Facebook/Chenyue Mao Mao posted about the new role on LinkedIn just two weeks ago and thanked colleagues for their messages of congratulations. FCI and the Chinese Embassy did not immediately respond to The Post's requests for comment. Advertisement These exit bans have become increasingly common in China, where people are often blocked from leaving for civil disputes, not crimes. Beijing has invoked travel bans to use as intimidation tactics or even to create leverage over another company or foreign government. Wells Fargo, however, does not have a notable presence in China. 3 Wells Fargo has suspended all travel to China, a source told the Wall Street Journal. REUTERS The brutal bans can last for months or even years, and people are often unaware they're facing such a ban until they try to leave. In late 2023, Charles Wang Zhonhe, an executive at Japanese-based financial services firm Nomura, was banned from leaving mainland China after a business trip. He has since returned to Hong Kong. Michael Chan, a Kroll executive who holds a Hong Kong passport, was also unable to exit the country from mainland China in 2023. He was still in China as of May. The bans have prompted some companies to cancel business trips or create new policies that discourage employees from entering the country alone.
