China censors some tariff-related content on social media
HONG KONG (Reuters) - China began censoring some tariff-related content on social media on Wednesday after U.S. "reciprocal" tariffs on dozens of countries took effect, including massive 104% duties on Chinese goods, while posts criticising the U.S. were top hits.
Hashtags and searches for "tariff" or "104" were mostly blocked on social media platform Weibo, with pages showing an error message.
Other hashtags, particularly the U.S. having an egg shortage, were amongst the most viewed on Weibo. State broadcaster CCTV started a hashtag "#UShastradewarandaneggshortage."
The U.S. is "waving the tariff stick in a high profile manner, imposing tariffs on EU steel and aluminium products.. but also writing letters to European countries in a low voice, urgently asking for eggs," CCTV said in a post on Weibo.
Beijing announced counter-tariffs on the U.S. last week and has vowed to fight what it views as blackmail.
Internet censors have also allowed mocking U.S. comments to proliferate on Chinese social media, depicting the United States as a globally irresponsible trading partner, as China prepares the stage for a wider trade fight with the world's biggest economy
China controls the internet through a system known as the "Great Firewall" and social media posts are routinely censored when deemed detrimental to national interests. Foreign social media networks such as Instagram and X are blocked, a system that has created a captive market for domestic alternatives.
Beijing lawyer Pang Jiulin, who has more than 10.5 million followers on his Weibo account, said China's share of exports to the U.S. would quickly be replaced by countries such as Vietnam and India, and Chinese companies would lose the opportunity to continue exporting to the U.S.
In the face of U.S. economic aggression, China has no way out but to "fight to the end" he said.
"If China also increases tariffs to 104%, the prices of American goods including Apple and Tesla will soar, and Chinese will pay a greater price for their favourite American goods."
Hitting back with its own tariffs and export controls may not be very effective, given China ships to the U.S. about three times as much goods than around the $160 billion it imports. But it may be the only option if Beijing believes it has a higher pain threshold than Washington has.
Chinese stocks tumbled on Monday with the Shanghai Composite Index down 7% on Monday in its worst day in five years, but they closed higher on Wednesday, buoyed by state pledges to support local markets.
Prominent Chinese commentator Hu Xijin said on Wednesday that Trump's team was "really delusional".
"They are at war not only with the whole world, but also with the most basic rules of human society, so their chances of victory are zero," Hu said.
"Their reciprocal tariffs will be nailed to the pillar of shame in history for future generations to laugh at."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
Ohio State president says he feels 'no pressure' after White House complaints
Carter's comments come shortly after the Trump administration announced the school — of which Vice President JD Vance is an alum — is one of 60 universities it has deemed may have antisemitic practices and policies on campus. Still, Carter said he is 'not feeling a lot of pressure.' 'We know how we acted during the time of the protests. We never had an encampment here at Ohio State,' he said, adding that some students did try to occupy tents in campus but were dispersed. 'I'm confident that as this plays out forward, that we're going to be just fine,' he said. Carter also appeared to agree with Vance's assertions that higher education has started to build a 'reputation' of being 'controlled by left wing foundations.' 'There was this conversation about the potential indoctrination of students, or that institutions were leaning very liberal,' Carter said. 'We as administrators of higher education maybe ought to listen to the American public and say, maybe we haven't always gotten it right. So I'm here to say, here at the Ohio State University, we have paid attention to that.' The Trump administration has been embroiled in battles with universities over hiring and admissions practices for several months. mixed in with complaints about general 'wokeness.' Most notably, the administration threatened to withhold federal funding from Ivy League schools including Harvard and Columbia.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Analysis-Out-gunned Europe accepts least-worst US trade deal
By Mark John LONDON (Reuters) -In the end, Europe found it lacked the leverage to pull Donald Trump's America into a trade pact on its terms and so has signed up to a deal it can just about stomach - albeit one that is clearly skewed in the U.S.'s favour. As such, Sunday's agreement on a blanket 15% tariff after a months-long stand-off is a reality check on the aspirations of the 27-country European Union to become an economic power able to stand up to the likes of the United States or China. The cold shower is all the more bracing given that the EU has long portrayed itself as an export superpower and champion of rules-based commerce for the benefit both of its own soft power and the global economy as a whole. For sure, the new tariff that will now be applied is a lot more digestible than the 30% "reciprocal" tariff which Trump threatened to invoke in a few days. While it should ensure Europe avoids recession, it will likely keep its economy in the doldrums: it sits somewhere between two tariff scenarios the European Central Bank last month forecast would mean 0.5-0.9% economic growth this year compared to just over 1% in a trade tension-free environment. But this is nonetheless a landing point that would have been scarcely imaginable only months ago in the pre-Trump 2.0 era, when the EU along with much of the world could count on U.S. tariffs averaging out at around 1.5%. Even when Britain agreed a baseline tariff of 10% with the United States back in May, EU officials were adamant they could do better and - convinced the bloc had the economic heft to square up to Trump - pushed for a "zero-for-zero" tariff pact. It took a few weeks of fruitless talks with their U.S. counterparts for the Europeans to accept that 10% was the best they could get and a few weeks more to take the same 15% baseline which the United States agreed with Japan last week. "The EU does not have more leverage than the U.S., and the Trump administration is not rushing things," said one senior official in a European capital who was being briefed on last week's negotiations as they closed in around the 15% level. That official and others pointed to the pressure from Europe's export-oriented businesses to clinch a deal and so ease the levels of uncertainty starting to hit businesses from Finland's Nokia to Swedish steelmaker SSAB. "We were dealt a bad hand. This deal is the best possible play under the circumstances," said one EU diplomat. "Recent months have clearly shown how damaging uncertainty in global trade is for European businesses." NOW WHAT? That imbalance - or what the trade negotiators have been calling "asymmetry" - is manifest in the final deal. Not only is it expected that the EU will now call off any retaliation and remain open to U.S. goods on existing terms, but it has also pledged $600 billion of investment in the United States. The time-frame for that remains undefined, as do other details of the accord for now. As talks unfolded, it became clear that the EU came to the conclusion it had more to lose from all-out confrontation. The retaliatory measures it threatened totalled some 93 billion euros - less than half its U.S. goods trade surplus of nearly 200 billion euros. True, a growing number of EU capitals were also ready to envisage wide-ranging anti-coercion measures that would have allowed the bloc to target the services trade in which the United States had a surplus of some $75 billion last year. But even then, there was no clear majority for targeting the U.S. digital services which European citizens enjoy and for which there are scant homegrown alternatives - from Netflix to Uber to Microsoft cloud services. It remains to be seen whether this will encourage European leaders to accelerate the economic reforms and diversification of trading allies to which they have long paid lip service but which have been held back by national divisions. Describing the deal as a painful compromise that was an "existential threat" for many of its members, Germany's BGA wholesale and export association said it was time for Europe to reduce its reliance on its biggest trading partner. "Let's look on the past months as a wake-up call," said BGA President Dirk Jandura. "Europe must now prepare itself strategically for the future - we need new trade deals with the biggest industrial powers of the world." (Additional reporting by Jan Strupczewski in Brussels; Christian Kraemer and Maria Martinez in Berlin; Writing by Mark John; Editing by Nick Zieminski) Sign in to access your portfolio
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
EU suspends $1.7B in aid to Ukraine after Zelensky curbs watchdog agencies
The European Union is freezing $1.7 billion in aid to Ukraine because President Volodymyr Zelensky approved a bill curbing the war-torn nation's top anti-corruption agencies. The EU said it is withholding more than a third of its funding meant to reward Ukraine for good governance standards after Zelensky signed the controversial bill last week, according to the New York Times on Saturday. The new law gives a politically appointed Ukrainian prosecutor general more power over Kyiv's National Anti-Corruption Bureau (NABU) and the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office (SAPO). Advertisement While Zelensky quickly also put measures into place to ensure the agencies' independence after national outcry — the first wartime protests against his administration — concerns remain over his commitment to route out the corruption that has plagued Ukraine for decades. 5 Protests erupt in Kyiv last week after Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky approved a bill curbing the nation's top anti-corruption agencies. Getty Images 5 Zelensky quickly put measures in place to strengthen the agencies' independence following mass backlash in Ukraine and around the world. Getty Images The EU established its Ukraine Facility fund last year to reward Kyiv, pledging nearly $60 million over three years to help its war recovery efforts and prepare the country to enter the bloc. Advertisement But Kyiv has fallen short of meeting the EU's standards, with European officials slamming last Wednesday's rush legislation. The EU's decision to withhold some of the funds from Ukraine is not final and that the money pledge can be restored as long as Ukraine meets its requirements, officials said. Marta Kos, the EU's commissioner for expansion, said the bloc was 'seriously concerned' over Ukraine's move to inject political influence into the two agencies tasked with prosecuting corruption at the highest level. Advertisement 5 Last week's protest was the first of its kind since Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022. REUTERS 5 Critics demand Ukraine keep its vow to eliminate corruption in Kyiv, a promise made during the 2014 'Revolution of Dignity.' AFP via Getty Images The NABU and SAPO were established after Ukraine's 'Revolution of Dignity' in 2014, when leaders promised the public to weed out decades of corruption in Kyiv after ousting pro-Russian President Viktor Yanukovych. Zelensky had vowed to keep the anti-corruption efforts going through his administration, but his criticism over the agencies grew louder when they began investigating and charging people inside his inner circle, including former Deputy Prime Minister Oleksiy Chernyshov. Advertisement The president initially claimed that a tighter leash was needed against the NABU and SAPO to rid the two agencies of 'Russian influence' and to address why some cases have been stalled for years. 5 Opponents say internal corruption is hindering Ukraine's ability to defend itself against the Russian invasion. Global Images Ukraine via Getty Images But thousands of Ukrainians then took to the streets to demand the NABU and SAPO remain independent, claiming that the rampant corruption in Kyiv is hurting the nation's ability to defend itself against the ongoing Russian invasion. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer was among the world leaders who called Zelensky to roll back the bill and ensure the corruption issues are addressed. Kyiv also has until Thursday to appoint a head of its Economic Security Bureau to continue receiving assistance from the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF had vowed to provide Ukraine with $15.6 billion in aid to be distributed over four years as long as Kyiv moves forward with its anti-corruption campaign. Zelensky had previously refused to appoint Oleksandr Tsyvinskyi, the man who led the case against Chernyshov, as the head of the bureau despite a nomination from an independent commission. The position remains open, with no word yet on who would fill it.
