
Panama dam project sparks fury
MAGDALENA Martinez has lived next to the Indio River all her life, but a planned dam aimed at shielding the Panama Canal from drought now threatens to swallow her home.
The 49-year-old is one of hundreds of residents opposed to a new artificial lake that would feed the vital interoceanic waterway at the centre of diplomatic tensions with the United States.
'I feel sick about this threat we're facing,' said Martinez, who shares her wooden house with a metal roof with her husband and five of her 13 children in Boca de Uracillo.
'We don't know where we're going to go,' she said.
Martinez's entire family was born in the small village surrounded by lush mountains, whose residents earn a living growing crops, including cassava and corn, and raising animals.
The community says it is determined to prevent its homes being sacrificed to help the world's multi-billion dollar global shipping industry.
A sign that reads 'Rivers Without Dams' hangs in the small town of Limon.
'We have to fight to the end,' said 44-year-old resident Yturbide Sanchez.
Hundreds of flag-waving villagers in motorised canoes navigated the Indio River last month to protest the planned dam, which would force thousands of families to relocate.
'We don't want them to take away the river water – we need it,' said 48-year-old farmer Ariel Troya.
'If the project goes ahead, it will take away our entire future,' Troya added.
The Panama Canal Authority (ACP), the autonomous public entity that operates the waterway, decided to build the reservoir to cope with severe droughts like the one seen in 2023, which forced a drastic reduction in ship traffic.
The century-old shortcut between the Atlantic and Pacific oceans relies on once-abundant rainwater stored in two artificial lakes that also supply drinking water.
Used mainly by customers from the United States, China and Japan, the canal operates by using a system of locks to raise and lower ships and releases millions of litres of fresh water for each vessel that passes.
The planned new reservoir covering around 4,600ha would supply water through a 9km tunnel to one of the existing lakes.
The project 'meets a need identified a long time ago: it's the water of the future,' said Karina Vergara, an environmental and social manager at the ACP.
Work is expected to begin in 2027 and be completed by 2032, with an investment of approximately US$1.6bil.
Of that, US$400mil is earmarked to compensate and relocate around 2,500 people from several villages.
An aerial view of the village of La Boca de Uracillo. The village will be destroyed when the dam is built. — AFP
'We have a firm commitment to dialogue and reaching agreements' with those affected, Vergara said.
If the reservoir isn't built, 'we'll regret it in 15 years,' she said.
Civil society groups warn that in total around 12,000 people could be affected by the project – which has the backing of President Jose Raul Mulino – since it would affect the entire Indio River basin.
The 80km-long Panama Canal handles 6% of global maritime trade and is the engine of the Panamanian economy.
It is also at the centre of a diplomatic row due to US President Donald Trump's repeated threats to 'take back' the waterway – which was handed over to Panama in 1999 – from alleged Chinese control.
In the village of Limon, about 15 minutes from Boca de Uracillo by motorised canoe, residents also refuse to abandon their homes.
'We're not going to leave. They'll have to remove us by force,' said Maricel Sanchez, a 25-year-old university student.
Villagers are relying on their lands to see them through retirement, farmer Olegario Cedeno said in the house where he lives with his wife and three children, surrounded by chickens, hens and parrots.
'We will give our lives in this fight.' — AFP

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Straits Times
3 hours ago
- New Straits Times
ICC seeks arrest of Taliban leaders over persecution of women
THE HAGUE: The International Criminal Court on Tuesday issued arrest warrants for two senior Taliban leaders, accusing them of crimes against humanity for persecuting women and girls. Judges said there were "reasonable grounds" to suspect Taliban Supreme Leader Hibatullah Akhundzada and chief justice Abdul Hakim Haqqani of committing gender-based persecution. "While the Taliban have imposed certain rules and prohibitions on the population as a whole, they have specifically targeted girls and women by reason of their gender, depriving them of fundamental rights and freedoms," the court said in a statement. The Taliban had "severely deprived" girls and women of the rights to education, privacy and family life and the freedoms of movement, expression, thought, conscience and religion, ICC judges said. "In addition, other persons were targeted because certain expressions of sexuality and/or gender identity were regarded as inconsistent with the Taliban's policy on gender." The court said the alleged crimes had been committed between August 15, 2021, when the Taliban seized power, and continued until at least January 20, 2025. Taliban authorities rejected the warrants as "nonsense". The ICC warrants "won't affect the strong commitment and dedication to sharia (Islamic law)" of Taliban authorities, spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid said in a statement. The ICC, based in The Hague, was set up to rule on the world's worst crimes, such as war crimes and crimes against humanity. It has no police force of its own and relies on member states to carry out its arrest warrants -- with mixed results. In theory, this means anyone subject to an ICC arrest warrant cannot travel to a member state for fear of being detained. After sweeping back to power in August 2021, the Taliban authorities pledged a softer rule than their first stint from 1996 to 2001. But they quickly imposed restrictions on women and girls that the United Nations has labelled "gender apartheid". Edicts in line with their interpretation of Islamic law handed down by Akhundzada, who rules by decree from the movement's birthplace in southern Kandahar, have squeezed women and girls out of public life. The Taliban government barred girls from secondary school and women from university in the first 18 months after they ousted the US-backed government, making Afghanistan the only country in the world to impose such bans. Authorities imposed restrictions on women working for non-governmental groups and other employment, with thousands of women losing government jobs -- or being paid to stay at home. Beauty salons have been closed and women blocked from visiting public parks, gyms and baths as well as travelling long distances without a male chaperone. A "vice and virtue" law announced last year ordered women not to sing or recite poetry in public and for their voices and bodies to be "concealed" outside the home. The ICC prosecutor's office welcomed the warrants as "an important vindication and acknowledgement of the rights of Afghan women and girls." "Through the Taliban's deprivation of fundamental rights to education, privacy and family life... Afghan women and girls were increasingly erased from public life," said ICC prosecutors. "The decision of the judges of the ICC affirms that their rights are valuable, and that their plight and voices matter." When requesting the arrest warrants in January, chief prosecutor Karim Khan warned that he would seek warrants for other Taliban officials. Agnes Callamard, secretary general of Amnesty International, said the ICC warrants gave hope to women and girls inside and outside of Afghanistan.


The Sun
6 hours ago
- The Sun
Scramble to assess broader damage from 25% US tariff
PETALING JAYA: Malaysian businesses and national-level economic groups are scrambling to assess the broader damage from the United States' 25% tariff on Malaysian products that is set to go into effect on Aug 1. The tariff is part of a wider US push to reshore manufacturing and limit dependence on strategic imports. In addition to electrical and electronic (E&E) products, sectors likely to be affected include rubber gloves, semiconductor components, industrial machinery and palm oil derivatives. Penang Chinese Town Hall president Tan Sri Tan Khoon Hai warned that the sudden move would undercut Malaysia's cost competitiveness in the US market. 'This move may strain Malaysia-US trade ties and shake investor confidence, especially among foreign investors who use Malaysia as a manufacturing base to access American markets,' he told theSun. He said exporters risk losing market share to countries such as Vietnam and Thailand, which are not facing similar tariff pressures. The higher landed cost of Malaysian goods, he added, could price local products out of the US market and divert future investments elsewhere. Tan highlighted that the E&E sector – Malaysia's top export to the US – will be hit hardest, with glove and machinery producers also vulnerable due to thin global margins. Calling for immediate federal action, Tan urged a delay in expanding the Sales and Service Tax and postponement of the electricity tariff hike, warning these would add to producers' burden. He also suggested Bank Negara Malaysia consider lowering the base lending rate. He further proposed creating a 'tariff buffer fund' offering tax deductions over three to five years for companies importing key machinery. Tan also called for deeper Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership integration and proposed transforming Penang into a regional semiconductor hub, backed by university partnerships and a Penang Talent Reskilling Fund focusing on artificial intelligence, green technology and automation. Senior fellow at the Malay Economic Action Council (MTEM) and executive council member of Dewan Perniagaan Melayu Malaysia Datuk Yazid Othman stressed that the government must confront the reality of shrinking national revenue and act swiftly. 'The government must accept the reality that national revenue projections will decline and respond appropriately by focusing on further strengthening the domestic economy and alternative markets, while at the same time protecting SMEs from becoming victims of dumping of cheap imports,' he said. Yazid also called for a recalibrated fiscal policy to stimulate economic activity and raise household income.


The Sun
8 hours ago
- The Sun
Qatar says ‘we will need time' for Gaza ceasefire
DOHA: Negotiations for a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas are continuing but 'need time', host Qatar cautioned on Tuesday, after US President Donald Trump voiced optimism about a possible breakthrough. A fresh round of indirect talks, after 21 months of fighting in Gaza, began on Sunday, with Qatar's foreign ministry spokesman Majed al-Ansari confirming discussions had gone into a third day. 'I don't think that I can give any timeline at the moment, but I can say right now that we will need time for this,' Majed Al-Ansari told reporters at a regular briefing, when asked if a deal was close. Qatar, along with fellow mediators the United States and Egypt, has brokered back-and-forth talks aimed at a truce since the earliest days of the war, which erupted with Hamas's October 7, 2023 attack on Israel. With the exception of a week-long truce in November 2023 and a two-month halt that began in January 2025, the indirect talks, principally held in Doha and Cairo, have failed to end the hostilities. Trump, during Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's visit to Washington, earlier said the Doha talks were going 'very well' and that Hamas 'want to have that ceasefire'. Ansari declined to go into detail about the negotiations, but said they were focused on a framework for talks. 'What is happening right now is that both delegations are in Doha, we are speaking with them separately on a framework for the talks,' he said. 'So talks have not begun, as of yet, but we are talking to both sides over that framework,' he added. Ansari noted 'positive engagement' and said the fact that the negotiating teams hadn't left the Qatari capital was 'always a good sign'. Two Palestinian sources close to the discussions earlier told AFP the proposed deal included a 60-day truce, during which Hamas would release 10 living hostages and several bodies in exchange for Palestinians detained by Israel. However, they said, the group was also demanding certain conditions for Israel's withdrawal, guarantees against a resumption of fighting during negotiations, and the return of the UN-led aid distribution system. At the outset of the talks, Netanyahu said Hamas's response to a US-backed ceasefire proposal, conveyed through mediators, contained 'unacceptable' demands. – AFP