Review completed into Ministers who owe, or are owed, cash due to pension error
the Department of Public Expenditure
has said.
However, the department said it will not disclose the numbers involved or the details regarding those affected.
Minister for Public Expenditure Jack Chambers
said in June that 'serious and systemic operational issues' had been identified at the
National Shared Services Office
(NSSO), which handles pension payments.
He said the issues related to 'superannuation deductions and additional superannuation contributions with respect to
salaries
, allowances or gifted income'.
READ MORE
[
Ministers receive pay increases in new Cabinet under public sector deal
Opens in new window
]
At the time, it was estimated that the amounts that would need to be recouped from Ministers and former members of the Government would range from hundreds of euros to just above €30,000. It was also forecast that some Ministers could be owed money, ranging from several hundred euros up to about €20,000.
It is understood that part of the problem arose from the treatment of part of Ministers' income returned to the State in recent years, and how their pension deductions were calculated as a result.
Mr Chambers told the Dáil earlier this month that a review concerning Ministers 'who may have been impacted regarding contributions and additional superannuation contributions, has been completed'.
Will Fianna Fáil and Sinn Féin abstain from the presidential race?
Listen |
40:42
He said
those Ministers
identified as being affected were being contacted and engagement was ongoing.
'I understand from the National Shared Services Office that many recoupment plans are now in place.'
[
Junior ministers to be paid extra €45,846 on top of TD salaries
Opens in new window
]
Mr Chambers said his department and the NSSO had 'put new measures and controls in place to ensure these matters do not recur'.
The department this weekend said it would not be providing details regarding the number of Ministers who had been affected by the pension calculation errors.
'As the numbers concerned are relatively small, it would not be appropriate to provide details on an anonymised basis or to provide the numbers concerned, as to do so could identify the individuals involved,' it said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Moves to revive referendum on joining EU patent court as business groups contacted on timing
There have been tentative moves to revive the delayed referendum on Ireland's participation in the European Union's Unified Patent Court (UPC), with the Government seeking views of business groups on the timing of a rescheduled vote. The referendum on Ireland joining the 18 other EU member states that have signed up to the UPC system was originally pencilled in for June 2024 on the same day as the local and European elections. However, the holding of the UPC referendum was thrown into doubt amid the fallout from the defeat of the family and care referendums three months earlier. Soon afterwards the then-government announced it would be deferring the vote. Peter Burke , then minister for enterprise, said at the time: 'While the government continues to believe that joining the UPC is essential and that the referendum should be pursued, it is clear to me that more time is needed for public discourse and engagement on the matter to help inform the debate.' READ MORE The UPC is designed to provide a one-stop shop court for litigation on patents. The court's decisions will be binding on participating EU member states. Ireland joining in the UPC has been long called for by business groups and sectors such as the pharmaceutical industry. The Department of Enterprise has contacted business organisations and government departments about the referendum. Records released under the Freedom of Information Act include a letter from senior Department of Enterprise official John Newham to the American Chamber of Commerce Ireland (AmCham). The March 28th letter set out how the legislation on the UPC referendum was pending committee and final stages in the Seanad. Mr Newham, the assistant secretary general, wrote that 'once the legislative process has been concluded an order setting a date for the referendum will issue'. He wrote that the timing of any further advancement of the Bill would be subject to a decision by Government and it would decide a referendum date 'in due course'. He noted the last government 'had concluded that a broader public conversation' on the UPC 'was essential before a referendum was held' and he sought feedback 'in order to assess if sufficient engagement is being held on the matter'. Mr Newham asked for information on 'any initiatives undertaken or planned to assist public understanding of this critical issue'. He also sought 'views on the appropriate timing of a referendum'. Enterprise Ireland , IDA Ireland and Research Ireland were among government agencies contacted by the department as it sought feedback on public awareness of the UPC referendum. The Department of Enterprise confirmed that other organisations contacted included Chambers Ireland , Ibec , the Irish Congress of Trade Unions and BioPharmaChem Ireland, all of which, like AmCham sent responses. AmCham, which represents US companies in Ireland, responded on April 30th, saying: 'It is of the utmost importance that an informed discussion occurs to generate public engagement with the topic.' It said it would work with its members to advance discussion and consideration of the UPC. AmCham said a member survey from 2024 showed that 41 per cent of respondents supported Ireland joining the UPC and 58 per cent were neutral on the matter. The organisation said it would be holding a webinar 'outlining the impact for Ireland, with key expert and member perspectives' and it would also be developing a fact sheet on the UPC for dissemination among members. In response to queries AmCham told The Irish Times: 'While we continue to work with members on this topic, a webinar has not taken place.' It said that the timing of the referendum was 'a matter for Government'. A Department of Enterprise statement said: 'While the Government remains committed to holding the referendum, the timing remains under consideration at this juncture.'
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on funding for nature: not an optional extra
Two developments, one national and one at EU level, have caused legitimate alarm and anger among environmental NGOs. They regard them both as 'gutting' commitments to green measures at the very moment when we should be supporting the development of coherent nature recovery plans under the flagship Nature Restoration Law. It is understandable that such measures slip down the priority list, given the multiple challenges our societies are facing. But this is not acceptable. The existential threats of climate change and biodiversity collapses remain. So it is disturbing that the European Commission's proposal for its next budget indicates that the EU Life Programme – the dedicated fund for environment, nature and climate action – is likely to be repealed. Life's proven return on investment can be seen in many Irish rural communities, exemplified by the Burren Programme. 'It would gut one of the EU's most effective tools just when we need it most,' according to the European Environmental Bureau, which represents 190 member organisations and 30 million individual supporters. It should be listened to. READ MORE Meanwhile, the Environmental Pillar, the national platform for environmental charities, uses similar language to describe the Government's revised National Development Plan: 'the gutting of nature from the Infrastructure, Climate & Nature Fund to finance transport, energy and water infrastructure projects in the National Development Plan is very alarming' the group says, as it undermines guarantees on nature restoration. It certainly seems to make nonsense of the current consultations on developing and implementing the National Nature Restoration Plan with farmers, fishers and environmentalists. Funding for this plan is naturally a key concern for all involved, and if it is not ring-fenced it will inevitably shift to areas of more immediate concern. We cannot continue to consider the health of our natural landscape and climate as an optional extra in planning; if it does not inform the core of our thinking, everything else is undermined.
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
John Mulqueen on Ireland's influential role in fighting anti-Semitism and Franco's fascists
In rejecting the allegation by a powerful Trump ally that the Occupied Territories Bill illustrates how Ireland is heading down an 'anti-Semitic path' (Republican Senator Jim Risch), the Taoiseach might be tempted to explain that Irish and American anti-fascists fought together against anti-Semitism during the Spanish Civil War. Additionally, in October 1936, ten weeks after the generals rebelled against the elected government in Spain, Irish and Jewish immigrants in London defeated Oswald Mosley's British Union of Fascists in the Battle of Cable Street. As the Blackshirts prepared to march from the Tower of London through what Mosley described as a 'Jew-ridden and communistic' East End, barricades were erected to block them at Cable Street. The large Jewish community in the area, mostly refugees from pogroms in Tsarist Russia, lived alongside Irish immigrants, who were mainly dockers. The anti-fascists, locals and reinforcements, chanted 'they shall not pass' – the slogan of the Spanish Republic – and prevented mounted police from forcing a way through for the march. Mosley, a rising star in British politics, with influential backing from the Daily Mail, never recovered from this. READ MORE Max Levitas, a Dubliner who grew up in Portobello, known as 'Little Jerusalem', participated in the Cable Street engagement, with his trade unionist father and older brother Maurice. The Jewish Levitas family had moved to London during the Great Depression, and Maurice joined the Irish unit in the International Brigades – which recruited young people around the world to serve in the armed forces of the Spanish government. The Irish initially joined the British battalion, and some later transferred to the American Abraham Lincoln battalion. About one in three of these US volunteers were Jewish. Writing home to his mother, one volunteer wrote: 'In Spain there are thousands of mothers like yourself who never had a fair shake in life. They got together and elected a government that really gave meaning to their life. But a bunch of bullies decided to crush this wonderful thing.' This letter summarised the motives behind the international struggle against Franco's fascists. Both the American and British battalions suffered heavy casualties at the Battle of Jarama in 1937. Frank Ryan, the Irish unit's commander, was wounded and travelled home to convalesce. But, as others did, he went back to Spain, knowing that the war could not be won. Following Franco's victory in 1939 – military assistance from Hitler and Mussolini proved to be crucial – Ryan remained a prisoner when almost all of the British and American prisoners were repatriated. Condemned to death, Ryan had a stroke of luck when a New York Times correspondent mentioned him in two reports. In prison with fellow 'Internationals', American comrades remembered him as an 'inspiring figure' with a 'commanding personality'. Lou Ornitz, moved from prison to prison, and lucky to be alive as so many others had been executed, remembered Ryan's courage. 'One night he was taken out and as we said good-bye he told us to sing Kevin Barry, and we did as he was led away. He came back a few hours later and I thought he was a ghost.' Ireland's brigadistas were not welcomed home as heroes, and a few, such as Michael O'Riordan, were interned in the Curragh. Following the invasion of the Soviet Union in 1941, O'Riordan and Neil Goold made a controversial – to IRA ears – argument about the war: Irish republicans should join the British forces to defeat Hitler-led fascism. O'Riordan opposed any reliance by the IRA on Germany, and followed Ryan in taking issue with those who believed in all circumstances that 'England's difficulty is Ireland's opportunity'. Some of his former comrades in Spain joined the Allied armed forces. Maurice Levitas enlisted in the Royal Army Medical Corps and served in Burma (Myanmar) and India. Michael Lehane, a Kerry republican, who returned to fight in Spain twice, could not wear a British uniform, and instead joined the Norwegian Merchant Marine. He perished when his ship was sunk by a U-boat in the North Atlantic. When he went home to Cork, O'Riordan and other former IRA internees set up a new branch of the Labour Party named after Liam Mellows. Within weeks they infuriated the local party. When a Labour councillor made anti-Semitic remarks, O'Riordan organised a public meeting on the 'Jewish question' and dispelled anti-Semitic prejudices so effectively that Jewish people in the audience felt they had no need to speak. One of them, the lawyer Gerald Goldberg, later donated £5 to the Mellows branch, which led to O'Riordan being accused of attempting 'to subvert the party with Jewish money'. In February 1944, O'Riordan and another Cork comrade were expelled ahead of four others in Dublin as part of Labour's crackdown on left-wing entryists. Standing as a socialist he narrowly missed a seat in the 1945 local elections, and came third in a by-election the following year. Goldberg became the first Jewish lord mayor of Cork in June 1977 – the same month post-Franco Spain held its first general election since 1936.
