
This is Your Last Day to Claim a Piece of Apple's $96 Million Siri Settlement: Here's How
Viva Tung/CNET
As useful as they -- sometimes -- can be, virtual assistants can often be just as annoying, especially if you've ever called one up by mistake. If you're an Apple user who's had that sort of issue with Siri in the last decade, I've got a settlement you should know about.
Apple customers may be eligible for a payout from a $96 million class-action settlement if the Siri virtual assistant was accidentally activated during a private conversation. However, if you want your payout for this privacy invasion, you'll need to make sure you sign up soon. The deadline to file a claim now less than a week away, and after that you'll be out of luck.
Apple agreed to the settlement after being sued for allegedly allowing Siri to listen in on private conversations without consent. Now, a claims website is live, and if you meet the criteria, you could get a piece of the payout. Whether you're a longtime iPhone user or just want to see if you're eligible, here's everything you need to know before the window closes.
The settlement period covers a full decade and given the ubiquity of Apple products, there's a good chance you'll be eligible for a piece of the payout. If you meet the eligibility standards, you can claim a payment for up to five Siri-enabled devices, with a cap on how much you can receive per device. We'll get into the specific amount a little bit later.
The impact of this settlement has the potential to be wide-ranging, given the reach of Apple's product ecosystem. According to a Business of Apps report from November, citing company and market research data, there were roughly 155 million active iPhones in the US as of 2024, a number that's been steadily increasing since the product's debut. Similarly, active Apple TV streaming boxes in the US have also been increasing year to year, with more than 32 million active in the US as of 2023.
To find out if you're eligible for this settlement, read on. For more, find out what's up with the recent delay of T-Mobile data breach settlement checks.
Who sued Apple and why?
This class-action lawsuit, Lopez et al v. Apple Inc., was first brought against Apple in 2019, with plaintiffs alleging that they were routinely recorded by their Apple devices after unintentionally activating the Siri virtual assistant, violating their privacy in the process. They further alleged that these recordings were then sold to advertisers and used to target them with ads online.
Specific incidents mentioned in the suit include plaintiffs seeing ads online for brands like Air Jordan and Olive Garden after Apple device users discussed them out loud. In some instances, plaintiffs claimed that their devices began listening to them without them having said anything at all. At least one plaintiff involved in the case was a minor when it was first filed.
Though it agreed to the settlement, Apple hasn't admitted any wrongdoing.
"Siri has been engineered to protect user privacy from the beginning," Apple said in a statement sent to CNET. "Siri data has never been used to build marketing profiles and it has never been sold to anyone for any purpose. Apple settled this case to avoid additional litigation so we can move forward from concerns about third-party grading that we already addressed in 2019. We use Siri data to improve Siri and we are constantly developing technologies to make Siri even more private."
Who is eligible for this class-action settlement?
The eligibility requirements for this settlement are fairly broad, as it's open to anyone who owned a Siri-enabled Apple device between Sept. 17, 2014, and Dec. 31, 2024. In order to opt in, you'll have to swear under oath that at some point during that period, you accidentally activated Siri on each device you want to get a payment for, and that these activations occurred during a conversation meant to be private.
Siri-enabled devices include iPhones, iPads, Apple Watches, MacBooks, iMacs, Apple TV streaming boxes, HomePod speakers and iPod Touches.
How can I opt in to this Apple settlement?
As of Thursday, May 8, a website has been launched where Apple customers can claim a portion of the settlement, if they believe they qualify. If you're looking to submit a claim, you have until July 2, 2025, to do so.
It's not clear at this time when payments will be disbursed to approved claimants but it will surely be sometime after Aug. 1, 2025, when a final approval hearing is scheduled.
How much can I get from the class-action settlement?
Payments per device are to be capped at $20, although depending on how many people opt in to the settlement, claimants could receive less than that. Each individual can only claim payments for up to five devices, meaning the maximum possible payment you could receive from the settlement is $100.
For more on Apple, see why a majority of users don't care for Apple Intelligence and find out which iOS setting can stop apps from tracking you.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Google's Dual-Box Plan Seeks to Avert DMA Fines
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG) unit Google has rolled out a fresh Option B proposal to tweak its search?results layout, aiming to appease rivals and the European Commission under the EU's Digital Markets Act (DMA), just days before a pivotal Brussels workshop. In March, Brussels accused Google of favoring its own vertical offeringsShopping, Hotels and Flightsin general search results, breaching DMA rules on impartial treatment of third?party services. Last week, Google floated a plan to add a Vertical Search Service (VSS) box at the top of search pages, linking to specialist engines for travel and hospitality. Under the newly disclosed Option B, Google would complement the VSS box with a second supplier box directly beneath it, featuring free, algorithmically organized links to hotels, restaurants, airlines and transport providers. According to documents sent by the Commission, this dual?box arrangement is intended to give competitors visibility while sidestepping characterizations of the feature as a Google?owned service. Google's spokesperson says the company has made hundreds of alterations to comply with the DMA, but warns that the new rules risk worse online products and experiences for Europeans. The DMA empowers Brussels to fine gatekeepers up to 10 percent of global turnover for non-compliance. Google, designated a gatekeeper alongside Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN), Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL), Meta (NASDAQ:META), Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) and ByteDance, faces its first DMA workshop on July 78 in Brussels, where its proposals will be scrutinized by both competitors and regulators. Failure to secure buy-in could trigger a substantial penalty and force more drastic overhauls to Google's core search business. With the July workshop looming, Google's Option B is its latest bid to strike a middle groundbalancing regulatory demands for neutrality with the need to preserve its search-driven ad revenue model. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Bloomberg
33 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
‘Big Beautiful Bill' Raises Threat of Default for Litigation Asset-Backed Securities
Legislation tucked inside President Donald Trump's landmark tax bill could make it difficult for asset-backed securities tied to litigation funding to make timely interest payments, according to a note by Kroll Bond Rating Agency. The Tackling Predatory Litigation Funding Act, which is part of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act currently in the Senate, would impose substantial new taxes on profits from third-party litigation funding, says the June 27 note by authors including Joanne DeSimone and Zara Shirazi.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Nvidia stock just hit an all-time high. So could it still make sense to buy?
This year has been anything but boring so far for Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) shareholders. The Nvidia stock price has soared 66% in under two months to hit an all-time high in today's (3 July) US market session. That means that the chip company's stock now trades 1,572% higher than five years ago. That is the sort of return that would leave many investors laughing all the way to the bank. Looking at it, I wonder whether I am too late to start buying Nvidia stock now – or if it may move even higher in future. Let us begin with the current valuation. Nvidia stock is changing hands for 52 times earnings. That is definitely on the high side in my view of what constitutes value, even for a growth stock. In fact, that valuation alone means I am not willing to buy at the current price. However, while I think it is high, I do not think it is ridiculous. Some growth stocks trade on a three-figure P/E ratio. Tesla is an example – but Nvidia's short- to medium-term business growth prospects look better than Tesla's, in my view. One of the wildcards in all of this is Nvidia's earnings. Over the past five years, the company's basic earnings per share (EPS) have grown a staggering 2,700%. So, in one sense, Nvidia stock is actually cheaper now than it was five years back. Sure, the stock price has jumped 1,572%. But that is markedly lower than the growth in basic earnings per share. I see this as a wildcard because earnings movements are a critical factor in deciding what a fair share price might be. If Nvidia continues to grow EPS sharply – even at a far slower rate than before – its prospective P/E ratio could be far less than 52. Even the current share price could then turn out to be a long-term bargain. But what if recent earnings are a one-off blip due to high expenditure by firms on building AI infrastructure? Should that turn out to be the case – and there is a risk it will – the prospective P/E ratio could be much higher than 52. That may mean that Nvidia stock falls to a price far below its current record-setting level. Valuation is important because overpaying even for a great business can be a costly mistake. I see a lot to like about Nvidia. It is hugely profitable, has unique expertise, and proprietary designs, and is selling high-margin chips to a large installed customer base. I reckon that could mean the share moves even higher and of course I would like to benefit from that. But so I do not get carried away, I also need to feel comfortable with the margin of safety a share price offers me. Tariff disputes and growing competition are both risks to Nvidia's sales, alongside an unclear medium-term outlook for AI chip demand. So, at the current price, I am not willing to buy Nvidia stock. The post Nvidia stock just hit an all-time high. So could it still make sense to buy? appeared first on The Motley Fool UK. More reading 5 Stocks For Trying To Build Wealth After 50 One Top Growth Stock from the Motley Fool C Ruane has no position in any of the shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has recommended Nvidia and Tesla. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Motley Fool UK 2025 Sign in to access your portfolio