Longtime Interior staffer tapped to lead OSMRE
A career staffer who worked at the departments of the Interior and Energy has been tapped to lead the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement.
Interior Secretary Doug Burgum in a June 5 memo announced that Thomas Shope will now lead OSMRE in an acting capacity, an agency tasked with cleaning up aging and toxic coal mines and safeguarding miners.
Shope has had a lengthy federal career, most recently working as a regional director at OSMRE and overseeing active coal mining operations and reclamation in Appalachia.
Advertisement
According to his online biography, Shope previously served as the principal deputy assistant secretary at the DOE's Office of Fossil Energy, where he oversaw the nation's Strategic Petroleum Reserve, the National Energy Technology Laboratory and various carbon sequestration efforts.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Republicans face a ferocious ad campaign surrounding Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill'
A ferocious advertising campaign is underway with passage of President Donald Trump's landmark policy bill hanging in the balance, as political groups and business interests spent at least $35 million just this month to try to sway key members of Congress and their constituents. Republican Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina was facing the pressure from both sides before he announced Sunday that he wouldn't seek reelection in 2026. Americans for Prosperity, an arm of the conservative megadonor Charles Koch's political network, spent nearly $2 million this month in key media markets such as Charlotte and Raleigh-Durham. 'Trump's tax cuts put money back in my pocket, and they're helping young families save for their first homes,' says a woman featured in one of the ads from AFP. 'Congress needs to save our tax cuts and protect prosperity.' At the same time, the Democratic-aligned group Unrig Our Economy spent nearly $1 million hammering Tillis over Medicaid cuts in the bill. 'Sen. Thom Tillis could vote to take away our health care and give tax breaks to billionaires,' an ad from the group warns. Other Republicans in swing districts face the same dynamic heading into a midterm campaign in which they will need to reach at least some voters who don't back Trump without angering the president or his core supporters. In Tillis' case, he announced he wouldn't seek reelection hours after Trump called for him to face a primary challenge because he didn't support a procedural vote on the 'big, beautiful bill.' 'We so often hear of members concerned about their general reelection efforts, but that is all for naught if you can't get through a primary,' said John Thomas, a Republican strategist and ad maker. 'To add even more pressure, the GOP base is extremely supportive of President Trump, much more than their individual federal representative. Break rank with Trump and there is a price to pay.' Nebraska Rep. Don Bacon, a Republican from a battleground district who last week announced plans to retire, commented Friday on the advertising blitz surrounding the legislation. 'I think the other guys, look, they put $500,000 on me this week saying 'Don Bacon's cutting Medicaid,'' he told CNN's Manu Raju. 'There's a lot of goodness here, but we gotta talk about it and show the voters.' In June alone, according to data from the ad-tracking firm AdImpact, a sprawling collection of large PACs and interest groups spent more than $35 million on dozens of ads about the bill, which contains a range of Trump administration policy priorities on taxes, spending and immigration. Republicans account for about half of that spending, while Democrats account for about a quarter and independent and business PACs for another quarter. Hundreds of thousands of dollars more have been spent on ads not explicitly mentioning the sweeping legislation but referencing looming policy changes and parochial interests, backed by other business and lobbying groups. Late Saturday night, after intense negotiations, the sweeping bill narrowly cleared a major procedural hurdle in the Senate by a 51-49 vote, backed by several key swing votes — among those buffeted by ad campaigns — in the spotlight, such as Maine Sen. Susan Collins, Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski and Missouri Sen. Josh Hawley. Major challenges for the giant tax and spending bill remain, however, as it still faces amendments and a final vote in the Senate. The House will have to vote to accept a significantly changed piece of legislation from the Senate after only narrowly approving its own version of the bill weeks ago. A group aligned with Trump's political network, 'Securing American Greatness,' has spent more than $7.7 million on ads in June, leading all advertisers with a broad campaign, much of it aimed at shoring up support among House members. 'Mariannette Miller-Meeks just voted for President Trump's working family tax cuts that mean higher wages and lower taxes for working families,' says an ad from the group targeting the key battleground representative from Iowa who won her last reelection by 798 votes. At the same time, the pro-Trump group is hammering congressional Democrats in competitive districts for their opposition to the bill, raising the prospect of higher taxes if an extension of 2017 tax cuts, included in the legislation, fails to pass. 'It's Washington's game, taxing us to bankroll their liberal waste,' says an ad from the group targeting California Democratic Rep. Josh Harder, reelected in 2024 by a margin of about 9,000 votes. 'Tell Josh Harder we can't afford his tax hikes.' With the key procedural hurdle cleared on Saturday, Republican Sen. Kevin Cramer underscored the political challenges would get easier once the bill was passed. 'Well, it doesn't get easier,' the North Dakota senator said. 'I just think, at some point, you just have to take what you know — all the data, all the analysis, all the discussion, all the hearings — and apply them to a vote. Pass the bill. And the sooner we do that, the sooner all the good things will kick in, and that will alleviate, I think, people's concerns.'
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Sen. Bernie Sanders: Trump's budget bill cuts to Medicaid 'is a death sentence' for Americans
The Republican-led Senate is working toward a July 4th deadline to pass President Trump's budget bill, which in part proposes $1T in cuts to Medicaid and is getting zero support across party lines. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) joins 'The Weekend: Primetime' to discuss why he has called the bill a 'horrific' piece of legislation and weighs in on Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC) announcing he will not run for reelection after voting against advancing Trump's bill.
Forbes
44 minutes ago
- Forbes
Parents Of Future College Students Lose Big With Higher Ed Changes
WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 28: The U.S. Capitol on June 28, 2025 in Washington, DC. Senate Republicans ... More overnight released a new version of the "One, Big, Beautiful Bill," as they approach U.S. President Donald Trump's July 4 deadline. (Photo by) Parents trying to help their children pay for college may soon find themselves struggling to navigate the updated Federal student loan rules. The massive overhaul of student loans in the One Big Beautiful Bill sets new caps on Parent PLUS Loans, while also cutting off access to affordable income-driven repayment plans. These changes impacting parents, along with no changes to make college easier to afford for undergraduates, simply puts pressure on parents who are already struggling to help their children pay for college. Under current rules, Parent PLUS borrowers can take out loans up to the full cost of attendance. However, starting July 1, 2026, parents can only borrow up to $20,000 per student per year, with a lifetime cap of $65,000. While there is a three year grace period for parents who've already borrowed a Parent PLUS loan prior to 2026, that doesn't help new parent borrowers next year. That may seem like a sizable amount, but with the average cost of college climbing, many parents (and students) may not be able to close the gap without private student loans. How Families Pay For College Today, many families use a combination of both savings, current income, and student loans to pay for college. Roughly two-thirds of college graduates have student loans, and parents play a big role in this. Parent PLUS Loans make up almost 10% of the total Federal student loan portfolio, and there are over 3.7 million parent PLUS loan borrowers today, according to the most recent data. This issue at hand is that undergraduate students are extremely limited in what they can borrow for college. The current limits range from $5,500 to $7,500 per year for dependent students. These caps have not kept pace with inflation, and have not changed since 2008 - over 15 years ago. Once the student borrows to their limit, parents are usually the ones making up the shortfall. And they have a choice: Parent PLUS Loans or private student loans. And both options have pros and cons - but the Big Beautiful Bill is tilting the scales significantly towards private loans. Parent PLUS Loans Become Worse Than Private Loans For Many There were a few major reasons why families would want to choose Parent PLUS Loans over private student loans: However, the Big Beautiful Bill is eliminating the last two options. Future Parent PLUS Loans will only be able to be repaid via the new Standard Repayment Plan. The will not have access to the new Repayment Assistance Plan (RAP). The result of that change is that future Parent PLUS Loans also cannot access PSLF. PSLF requires borrowers to repay their student loans under specific eligible repayment plans. The current ICR plan is eligible, and the new RAP plan is eligible. Technically, the Standard 10 Year plan is eligible - but that's moot, because a borrower would fully repay their student loan before receiving any loan forgiveness. These changes take away some of the biggest benefits of Parent PLUS Loans. And when you combine the loss of benefits with the high interest rate - 8.94% for 2025-26 and the 4.228% origination fee required for these loans - private loans suddenly look a lot more appealing. The lowest private student loan rates hover around 3.24% APR, and while they don't offer income-driven repayment or loan forgiveness, neither do Parent PLUS Loans in the future. Families that have decent credit could reduce their interest rate by 50% or more by looking at private loans, and be left with effectively the same repayment options. Families Will Be Faced With Tough Choices With federal borrowing limits tightening for parents, and not increasing for students, families will be faced with tough choices. What college do you attend? Can you afford it? Are you credit-worthy enough to get private loans, or will you be stuck with the higher interest and origination fee Parent PLUS Loans that now offer no benefits? For parents of multiple children with limited savings, this is even a tougher conversation. Generally, I think parents should avoid borrowing for their children's college. But the reality is many parents will. Many families still hold the belief that colleges is worth it at any cost, but the truth is that there are limits on the value of a four year degree. Parents should get ahead of the conversation and make sure that their student knows exactly what a parent can afford before the college admissions process starts. Students should be crafting a college list based on schools they know they can attend financially. Final Thoughts While Parent PLUS Loans have historically been left out of income-driven repayment for a variety of reasons, they have also been the most profitable student loans for the government. It's odd they would make it more difficult to borrow, as the revenue from these loans offsets other losses in the student loan portfolio. Regardless, the end result is that parents and families will likely look at private loans more in the next year, since the key benefits of Parent PLUS loans have been eliminated.
