Rollout of eVisas ‘could drag 200,000 people into Windrush-style scandal'
There are fears that some in this group will face a serious risk of being left undocumented as the Home Office converts immigration records from paper to digital.
The news has emerged at a time when the Home Office says it is taking back control of its immigration system.
Many of those affected are older people and some are not digitally literate. Many came from countries across Africa and Asia in the 1970s and 80s and were granted indefinite leave to remain by the Home Office with an ink stamp or vignette (sticker) in their passports, or a piece of paper confirming their status. This physical proof of right to remain is known as a legacy document.
However, the Home Office is now encouraging everyone eligible to create an online eVisa account to replace their legacy document. Officials say the system is working well for millions of people, but many users have reported technical problems including with linking their passport to their eVisa.
But the organisation the3million, which campaigns for the rights of EU citizens in the UK and has monitored the government's eVisa rollout closely, believes the Home Office is unable to track this large group of people down so cannot urge them to obtain eVisas.
It is possible some may have died or left the UK. They did not feature on the Home Office's previous immigration database – CID (Case Information Database) – nor on Atlas, CID's replacement.
The best estimate of the number involved is 200,000, which comes from a Home Office internal assessment (pdf) in April 2022.
The Guardian repeatedly asked the Home Office if it has records relating to those 200,000 people and if it knows how many are still alive and residing in the UK, but received no response.
Naga Kandiah of MTC Solicitors has been working with some older people with legacy documents who are only now realising they need to go online and obtain eVisas.
'Individuals who were previously granted indefinite leave to remain or other long-term statuses via ink-stamped endorsements are increasingly being left behind,' he said.
'Despite holding lawful status, many are now at serious risk of being treated as undocumented, simply because their physical documents are not recognised or integrated into the Home Office's new digital eVisa platform.
'This vulnerable group often includes elderly, marginalised or digitally excluded individuals, many of whom have lived in the UK for 30 to 40 years or more.
'Without access to digital records or UK Visas and Immigration accounts, these individuals are effectively invisible within the current system, despite their lawful and settled status.
Sign up to Headlines UK
Get the day's headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morning
after newsletter promotion
'As a result, many are being denied access to essential services and entitlements, including pensions, universal credit, NHS treatment and housing, simply because they cannot prove their status under the digital framework.'
Even when older people with ink stamps or vignettes in their passports do try to engage with eVisas, many are reporting problems with the system.
The Guardian reported on the case of Kathleen Harper last year, an American actor with an ink stamp in her passport granting her indefinite leave to remain. She struggled to access her eVisa and abandoned her attempt.
But recently she was asked to provide proof of her identity and tried again to obtain an eVisa. Despite the Home Office putting experienced technical advisers on the case, they still hit walls, repeatedly getting a message on screen saying: 'Cannot start yet.'
Harper said: 'It has taken at least eight phone calls and several hours of my time to get my passport connected to my eVisa. Is this a sane way of going about things?'
Home Office sources said they had apologised to Harper for the confusion concerning her case and that her eVisa issue had now been resolved.
Monique Hawkins of the3million said: 'We believe the transition to eVisas could cause potential problems for people with legacy documents – there's an urgent need for an independent review of the entire eVisa system and its rushed rollout.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
18 minutes ago
- The Independent
Even over the Fourth of July weekend, ICE officials didn't stop their raids in LA: ‘Troubling reminder of federal overreach'
Immigration and Customs Enforcement detained several people in the Los Angeles area on Independence Day. The agency has detained more than 1,600 people in the region in recent months, according to the Los Angeles Times. Among those arrested on the Fourth of July were two car wash workers who had been employed there for decades and a beloved food vendor who runs a birria stand, the outlet reports. A man whose father was detained, who asked to remain anonymous, told NBC 4 LA that he was unsure what prompted the raids. 'He's not a criminal,' he said. 'He wasn't doing anything he wasn't supposed to. He came in to work on the Fourth of July.' West Hollywood officials were also critical. 'On a day meant to honor the ideals of liberty, democracy, and freedom from oppression, we instead confront a deeply troubling reminder of federal overreach. Independence Day should be a time for reflection and reverence, not fear and persecution,'' they said in a statement on the city website. Anti-ICE protests also continued on the holiday. The Los Angeles Police Department arrested five people in connection with downtown demonstrations, the Los Angeles Times reports. Fans of the Los Angeles Galaxy soccer team walked out of the stadium on Friday in protest against the owners' lack of public support for immigrants. Fans also held up a banner that read: 'Fight Ignorance, Not Immigrants.' Earlier in the week, ICE raided three Los Angeles-area Home Depots and arrested a total of 37 people, KTLA reports. President Donald Trump also signed his sweeping spending and tax bill into law on Independence Day while attending a picnic for military families. That bill will provide ICE with roughly $45 billion over the next four years to spend on detaining undocumented immigrants. This comes as part of Trump's promise to carry out the 'largest deportation program in American history.' The new funds make ICE the 'single largest federal law enforcement agency in the history of the nation,' Aaron Reichlin-Melnick of the American Immigration Council told Democracy Now!. 'We're talking nearly 20 years' worth of detention funding to be spent only in a four-year period, and an increase to ICE's enforcement budget beyond anything we've ever seen before, allowing the agency to expand mass deportations over the next four years to every community nationwide,' he said. Trump has also praised a new ICE detention center in Florida, dubbed 'Alligator Alcatraz.' The president visited the site on Tuesday, saying it will soon house 'some of the most menacing migrants, some of the most vicious people on the planet.'
Telegraph
25 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Twenty years on from 7/7, we have learned nothing
As our thoughts turn to the terror attacks which rocked London 20 years ago tomorrow, the Russian Federation is – according to the Dutch government – now responsible for thousands of chemical weapon attacks in Ukraine. The war in Ukraine is now heartbreakingly similar to the trench warfare of WW1. The casualty rate is similar and now the Russians are trying to break the stalemate with gas as the Germans did at the second battle of Ypres in April 1915. As then, the lack of respirators initially was decisive: but the delivery of protective equipment to the frontline in WW1 nullified this dreadful weapon, as it should in Ukraine once British masks arrive in the coming weeks. Twenty years ago, at the time of 7/7, I was commanding the UK's Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear (CBRN) defence force and we were on operations in Iraq. We were dealing with a potential Al Qaeda biological weapon attack against British troops in southern Iraq. Though much about that episode is still confidential, the basic detail is in my memoir Chemical Warrior. That situation ultimately turned out to be a false alarm, but it brought conventional operations to a halt for 48 hours as my team and I dealt with the threat. This is when I began to think that if you had no morals or scruples you would use chemical weapons all the time. In his brilliant autobiography Nine Lives, Aimen Dean, a jihadist turned MI6 agent working within Al Qaeda, details how the terror organisation was planning to use and develop chemical and biological weapons. This is undoubtedly still an aspiration of ISIS and other jihadist groups. What has vexed me for some time is the thought that had 7/7 been a CBRN attack, God only knows what the death toll might have been. I saw at close hand the vile Assad regime killing thousands of Syrian civilians with the deadly nerve agent Sarin, but also with much more readily available chlorine. When I was fighting with the Peshmerga against ISIS, in 2015-17, the terrorists frequently fired mortars at us full of mustard agent aka mustard gas. ISIS also tried to obtain highly enriched uranium to make an improvised nuclear device which could have devastated whole towns and villages. The successors of the 7/7 jihadists have tried and, so far, failed to devastate the hated West with some form of CBRN attack. Long may this continue, but we must not drop our guard. It is not just the terrorists who view this type of attack as the gold standard, but also tyrants and rogue states. The dictator of North Korea had his stepbrother assassinated with the nerve agent VX, and my hometown of Salisbury was attacked by Russian hitmen on the orders of Putin himself, with Novichok, the deadliest chemical man has ever produced. There was enough Novichok used in the attack to kill half the population of Salsibury. Nonetheless there are countermeasures for every threat. It is the one that is ignored or put in the too difficult bracket that will cause us serious harm. The routine use of readily available toxic industrial chemicals like chlorine in Syria, and of 'non lethal' CS gas in Ukraine, has drawn very little comment from the international community. Tyrants like Putin may become emboldened to use more toxic and lethal substances or pathogens against us. The awful events of 7/7 showed us long ago that it's a dangerous world, full of people who wish us harm, and it is much more dangerous today. But for too long we have allowed evil to flourish without action or even protest. Worse, we have failed to strengthen our defences: we have used creative accounting to pretend spending was adequate, rather than actually finding more money for the armed services, the intelligence agencies, the special forces and all the others who guard us while we sleep. Going forward we need to remember that stark lesson we should have learned 20 years ago. It won't matter how good (or not) our other public services or our welfare system may be if our defences are inadequate.
Telegraph
25 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Can Britain survive four more years of Labour?
One year on from his landslide election victory, Sir Keir Starmer's plans are in disarray. His Chancellor is in tears. His MPs are in open rebellion. But most importantly outside Westminster, his promises to restore growth in the economy have come to nought, despite extremely expensive plans to force a rebound. Here are the charts that show why the optimism of last summer – when Labour's victory supposedly replaced the inept Tories with 'grown-ups' – has withered. Growth Since the shock of the pandemic lockdowns and the boost from reopening the economy, GDP has only grown in fits and starts. In last year's election campaign, the Conservatives made much of the 'gangbusters' growth of the first half of 2024. But that rapidly petered out. The opening months of this year also saw a brief growth spurt which came to an end even more quickly – the economy shrank again in April. Looking through the short-term bumps to compare GDP with its level a year ago, there are few signs of any sustained recovery. The economy is not even 1pc bigger now than it was 12 months ago. The outlook for living standards is not much better. Productivity – which measures the average output created for each hour worked – has been in freefall for the past two years. Last year it dropped by 0.8pc, according to the Office for National Statistics (ONS), double the 0.4pc fall suffered in 2023. Those represent the biggest drops since the financial crisis. Higher productivity over the longer term is the key to sustained higher wages, lower inflation and economic growth, so the outlook is extraordinarily bleak. Inflation Sir Keir came to power after the cost of living crisis pummelled the British public. Living costs are up by more than 25pc since the eve of the pandemic and essentials are up even more. Groceries cost more than 30pc more than they did just over five years ago. Electricity and gas bills are up 57pc and 73pc respectively. Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, and her colleagues thought they had got spectacularly lucky last year, as inflation fell back to the Bank of England's 2pc target in the month before their election victory. But they are receiving little credit for keeping a lid on living costs: 2pc inflation still means prices are rising, not returning to anything like pre-Covid levels. And worse still, inflation only stayed at target fleetingly. Consumer prices are now up by 3.4pc on the year and the Bank of England expects a further acceleration in the months to come. Many of the factors driving inflation higher are caused by the Government, from the VAT raid on private school fees to prices set by regulators such as water bills. The Bank of England fears this will lead to a fresh wage-price spiral driving inflation up further – hence cutting interest rates only very cautiously, sustaining the high borrowing costs facing Britain's indebted households. Unemployment Andrew Bailey, the Bank's Governor, is waiting for more signs the jobs market is weakening. That would ease concerns about a fresh spiral of inflation. But it is also bad news for workers. The Governor has flagged up the signs that the labour market is indeed softening. Unemployment is up at 4.5pc and is set to rise to 5pc, the Bank forecasts. That is a level last seen in lockdown, and threatens to take Britain back to 2015 when the economy was still shaking off the hangover from the financial crisis. There are other signs of workers suffering too. Bailey says the cost of the Chancellor's £25bn raid on employers' National Insurance contributions (NICs) – the biggest chunk of her record-breaking tax-raising Budget last October – appears to be falling largely on workers, in the form of less hiring and lower pay rises. Sure enough the number of job vacancies in the economy is falling firmly below pre-Covid levels. After the post-pandemic hiring frenzy, which pushed vacancies up to 1.3m, the number of posts now available has fallen by more than 40pc. The ONS found 736,000 positions on offer in the three months to May. Business confidence There is a bitter irony in this. A year ago, bosses cheered on the election of Sir Keir and his party. The economic confidence index compiled by the Institute of Directors soared to levels not seen since the rollout of Covid vaccines promised to put an end to the pandemic lockdowns. Yet within months sentiment was in freefall, plumbing depths as low as those seen in the early months of the pandemic and in the crisis after Liz Truss's catastrophic mini-Budget. The cause? Labour's mismanagement of the economy. By hitting companies with a NICs raid, Reeves left businesses feeling betrayed. Labour's manifesto promised not to raise the tax. The Government claimed that its pledge only applied to the minority of NICs paid directly by workers, not to the much bigger chunk paid by their employers. This was news to companies, which had fallen for Reeves's charms prior to election day. Low confidence means less hiring, less investment and less of the vital growth and prosperity which Labour had vowed to restore. Debt The record-breaking, manifesto-bending tax increases which shook the economy so badly were at least supposed to serve a purpose: getting the public finances back on the straight and narrow. Unfortunately, even they were not enough to fund the Government's spending plans. The Chancellor also changed her fiscal rules to justify additional borrowing at the same time. Even if everything went to plan, the Office for Budget Responsibility estimated her plans would add hundreds of billions of pounds to the national debt compared to their forecasts under the Conservatives. By the end of the decade the number-crunchers expect the debt to stand at £3.4 trillion, up from the £3.1 trillion previously estimated for 2028-29. Yet slower growth, about-turns on reforms, stubborn borrowing costs on that mounting debt and fresh promises on military spending all mean Reeves is yet again facing a black hole in the finances. That means more tax rises are anticipated, whether stealthily in the form of frozen tax thresholds or overtly with higher rates - all on top of the record tax burden already weighing down the private sector. More tears are on the way, and not just from the Chancellor.
