
Bill to ban young kittens and puppies being imported into UK passed by MPs
The MP for Winchester's Animal Welfare (Import of Dogs, Cats and Ferrets) Bill was supported by the Government, and will now proceed to the House of Lords on its passage to becoming law.
Dr Chambers said: 'As a vet, I've seen the devastating consequences of puppy smuggling. It's unimaginably cruel to separate puppies and kittens from their mothers at a very young age, and then bring them across borders in substandard conditions where they're then sold for maximum profit by unscrupulous traders who prioritise profit over welfare.'
He added: 'Careful consideration has been given to setting these limits, balancing the need to disrupt illegal trade with minimising impact on genuine pet owners. To underpin this, only an owner, not an authorised person, will be permitted to sign and declare that the movement of a dog or cat is non-commercial.
'Crucially, the Bill places a duty on the Government to use these regulation-making powers to first deliver three key measures – a ban on the import of puppies and kittens under six months old, a ban on the import of heavily pregnant dogs and cats that are more than 42 days pregnant, and a ban on the import of dogs and cats who've been mutilated.'
He criticised the influence of social media on the increased demand for dogs with docked ears, and a party colleague hit out at the platforms' role in publishing animal abuse.
He said: 'One reason that there is such an interest in dogs with cropped ears is that a lot of influencers on Instagram and other social media platforms pose with these dogs or show they have these new dogs with cropped ears. Many people aren't aware that this is a mutilation.
'They think it's how the dogs' ears normally look, and it drives a demand for dogs that look like this.'
Labour MP Peter Lamb (Crawley) directly named Meta, which owns Facebook, as a company that publishes content featuring animal abuse.
He said: 'There are far too many groups online which are dedicated to animal abuse. Constituents of mine have been involved in attempts to try and shut these groups down over the years.
'They'll also often find that instead of finding support on the part of social media companies, to try and address these problems, instead it is they who are reported and face their own accounts being shut down by those perpetrators.'
He added: 'We cannot rest on our laurels and Meta must be made to answer for the fact that they are not acting to bring an end to animal abuse on their networks, and that they are profiting actively from the advertising which appears on that network, and advertisers must be aware that part of what they are paying for, when they pay to advertise on Facebook, is maintenance of animal abuse networks.'
Environment minister Emma Hardy said: 'These measures represent a crucial step forward in our collective efforts to tackle the pet smuggling trade.'
Ms Hardy added: 'We want to see fewer low-welfare operations supply pets to the GB market and fundamentally less animals to suffer because of this.'
She continued: 'As set out in the Government's manifesto, we are committed to ending puppy smuggling and delivering a better future for our animals and I am pleased to say that this Bill does just that.
'It's key measures deliver crucial recommendations put forward by the Efra (Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) select committee and tackle multiple concerns that have been raised by stakeholders regarding loopholes in our current pet travel rules.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Powys County Times
2 hours ago
- Powys County Times
Ministers ‘pushed ahead too fast' on welfare reform, says Phillipson
Ministers 'pushed ahead too fast' and 'didn't listen enough' on welfare reform, the Education Secretary has said. Bridget Phillipson also said that future spending decisions had been made 'harder', when asked about the prospect of the two-child benefit cap being scrapped. Ms Phillipson told the BBC's Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg programme that she was 'not going to pretend that it hasn't been a tough or a challenging week' after ministers were forced to scrap their plans for the personal independence payment (Pip) in the face of a backbench revolt. 'I'd be the first to acknowledge that, both in the pace and the nature of what we set out, we didn't get it right, but we do need to reform the system we've got,' she said. Asked about the Prime Minister's authority, the Education Secretary said: 'What the Prime Minister has said, and what I also believe, is that what we set out, we pushed ahead too fast, we didn't listen enough to people, including, I would say, including to lots of people who had concerns about the nature of that change.' Ministers have warned MPs that there will be financial consequences to the decision not to reform Pip as planned. Labour backbenchers have also been pushing for the Government to scrap the two-child benefit cap. When asked if there was now less chance of the cap being scrapped given the costs that come with Tuesday's decision, Ms Phillipson told the BBC that ministers were 'looking at every lever and we'll continue to look at every lever to lift children out of poverty'. Pushed on whether the likelihood of the cap going was now slimmer, Ms Phillipson said: 'The decisions that have been taken in the last week do make decisions, future decisions harder. 'But all of that said, we will look at this collectively in terms of all of the ways that we can lift children out of poverty.' Meanwhile, shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride had written to the budget watchdog asking whether a new updated fiscal forecast was in the works after Labour's U-turns on welfare and winter fuel. I've written to the @OBR_UK seeking urgent clarity on the multi-billion pound hole created by Labour's unfunded spending commitments. When governments lose control of the finances and transparency is sidelined, confidence in our economy is put at risk. Parliament and the public… — Mel Stride (@MelJStride) July 6, 2025 In his letter to the Office for Budget Responsibility, Sir Mel said: 'The public, Parliament and markets deserve clarity and transparency about the impact of recent events on the nation's finances and the Government's fiscal strategy.' The Conservatives will try to change the Government's welfare Bill to tighten up access to Pip and universal credit by laying a series of amendments this week.


Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Civil servants have discovered their most pointless money-waster yet
If you go down to the website today, you're sure of a small surprise. Trying to identify it is a bit like trying to solve one of those old-fashioned childhood puzzles where you had to find the differences between two similar pictures. Look hard, then harder. Still can't see it? Well, the logo, once chastely black and white, has blossomed into colour. The background is now a limpid sky-blue, and instead of lurking shyly at the foot of the lettering, the full stop has turned an ethereal shade of Cambridge blue and hovers halfway up the type. This cost of this momentous change – part of a 'brand refresh' of the site undertaken by the communications agency M&C Saatchi – is reported to be more than £500,000. And if that seems a bit steep for a spot of colouring-in with blue crayons, it comes with a hefty explanatory dossier, written in that curious argot used by officials hoping to deflect comparisons between their latest brilliant wheeze and the Emperor's New Clothes. The functions that the cerulean blob is intended to undertake are as multifarious as they are baffling. 'The dot can take on different roles – guiding users through content, journeys and experiences across channels', the guidance explains, adding 'it should always serve a clear purpose'. If only the same could be said of the dossier, which suggests that the dot should act as 'the bridge between government and the UK', and 'a guiding hand for life'. If the dot is starting to sound like the changeling child of Isambard Kingdom Brunel and the Hand of the King from Game of Thrones, there is more to come. The dossier also suggests that the dot could depict a coin being saved into a piggy bank, or a text bubble in a guide on how to vote. But there is a stern warning for larky civil servants thinking of busting out into a full-scale homage to the dotty artist, Yayoi Kusama. They are not to 'use the dot in a decorative way or distort or skew the dot'. All this may evoke an episode of the Radio 4 comedy, The Consultants, in which Chesney fixes the leaky 'e' that has developed in the alphabet. The annals of consultant-led branding are littered with tragi-comic disasters, from Consignia to Abrdn (the meme-haunted rebrand of Aberdeen Asset Management). But the satire isn't quite as hilarious when it is hard-pressed taxpayers who have coughed up for the 'journey', or wild goose chase, on which the blue dot is to lead us. If only the corridors of power were populated by classicists rather than PPE graduates, someone might have twigged that Aristophanes of Byzantium, the grammarian, editor of Homer and head librarian of the library of Alexandria, could have delivered a similar dot for free. A couple of millennia ago, the great scholar devised a system of placing a dot, or punctus, at various heights in a text to denote rhetorical divisions in speech. Were he currently working in Whitehall, he would instantly recognise the fabulously pricey new dot, hovering at the midpoint of the surrounding type, as his very own stigma mese – a dot placed midway up the surrounding type – waiting patiently since 200BC to guide the public on a journey through the promised land of channels.


Sky News
2 hours ago
- Sky News
Another tantrum from the Labour backbenches is inevitable
In common with many parents across the country, here's a conversation that I have with my young daughter on a semi-regular basis (bear with me, this will take on some political relevance eventually). Me: "So it's 15 minutes until your bedtime, you can either have a little bit of TV or do a jigsaw, not both." Daughter: "Ummmm, I want to watch TV." Me: "That's fine, but it's bed after that, you can't do a jigsaw as well." Fast-forward 15 minutes. Me: "Right, TV off now please, bedtime." (Pause) Daughter: "I want to do a jigsaw." Now replace me with the government, the TV and jigsaw options with axing welfare cuts and scrapping the two-child cap, and my daughter with rebellious backbenchers. 6:36 That is the tension currently present between Downing Street and Labour MPs. And my initial ultimatum is the messaging being pumped out from the government this weekend. In essence: you've had your welfare U-turn, so there's no money left for the two-child cap to go as well. As an aside - and before my inbox fills with angry emails lambasting me for using such a crude metaphor for policies that fundamentally alter the lives of some of the most vulnerable in society - yes, I hear you, and that's part of my point. 9:11 For many in Labour, this approach feels like the lives of their constituents are being used in a childish game of horse-trading. So what can be done? Well, the government could change the rules. Altering the fiscal rules is - and will likely remain - an extremely unlikely solution. But as it happens, one of Labour's proverbial grandparents has just popped round with a different suggestion. 5:31 A wealth tax, Lord Neil Kinnock says, is the necessary outcome of the economic restrictions the party has placed on itself. Ever the Labour storyteller, Lord Kinnock believes this would allow the government to craft a more compelling narrative about whose side this administration is on. That could be valuable, given one of the big gripes from many backbench critics is that they still don't really understand what this prime minister stands for - and by extension, what all these "difficult decisions" are in aid of. The downside is whether it will actually raise much money. 16:02 The super-rich may have lots of assets to take a slice from, but they also have expensive lawyers ready to find novel ways to keep their client's cash away from the prying eyes of the state. Or, of course, they could just leave - as many are doing already. In the short term, the future is a bit easier to predict. If Downing Street is indeed now saying there is no money to scrap the two-child cap (after heavy briefing in the opposite direction just weeks ago), an almighty tantrum from the backbenches is inevitable. And as every parent knows, the more you give in, the harder it becomes to hold the line.