European Parliament votes to lower protections on wolves
Nearly two-thirds of the European Parliament meeting in Strasbourg, France voted to change wolves' status from 'strictly protected' to 'protected' in a vote of 371 to 162, with 37 abstentions.
Centrist and right-wing groups celebrated the vote.
'Farmers can now breathe a sigh of relief," said Herbert Dorfmann, a spokesperson for the European People's Party, a coalition of center-right groups in the EU. Right-wing Dutch politician Sander Smit said on Twitter: 'This is fantastic news."
Environmental groups criticized the decision as politically motivated rather than scientifically grounded.
'This is a sad day for biodiversity and wild animals,' said Léa Badoz at the Eurogroup for Animals. Joanna Swabe, a spokesperson for Humane World for Animals, called for individual governments to increase national protection for wolves.
Politician Jutta Paulus from the parliament's Greens party said the campaign to reduce the wolves' protection 'borrows from the Donald Trump playbook' and 'ignores scientific evidence and attacks legislation which has been proven to work for decades for no clear gain other than the scoring of cheap populistic points."
Tuesday's vote was the final real hurdle before the measure becomes EU law. The change to the central Habitats Directive law will now likely be passed swiftly by the European Council and enter into force across the 27 member states.
Once deemed necessary to combat threats to the apex predator, restrictions on hunting wolves have over the past few years lost public support as many EU environmental rules and regulations have come under pressure in recent years. Populist and extreme-right parties have criticized the measures as being thought up by urban elites with little knowledge of rural life.
Farmers in many member states have been increasingly angered by attacks on livestock by packs of wolves that have thrived in woods and fields close to agricultural land.
The political movement to ease rules on killing wolves was given top-level support by EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen. An ardent fan of horses, von der Leyen had a pony Dolly that was killed by a wolf three years ago.
Last year, more than 50 European nations from Turkey to Iceland voted to change the biodiversity treaty known as the Bern Convention to curtail protections for wolves.
Experts and environmental groups estimate there could be up to 19,000 wolves across Europe, with large populations thought to roam in Bulgaria, Greece, Italy, Poland, Romania and Spain. After nearly being wiped out in the 20th century, their numbers are estimated to have grown by at least 25% over the last decade.
Programs around the world to protect wolves have been shown to benefit local ecosystems. Yellowstone National Park in the United States said reintroducing wolves in 1995 had led to a better regulated food chain that helped drive a bump in forest cover and animal populations. Yet American states like Wyoming and Montana have passed similar bills allowing for more killing of wolves, driven as in Europe by politics mixing agitated farmers and safety concerns.
'Wolves are vital to healthy ecosystems, but today's vote treats them as a political problem, not an ecological asset', said Ilaria Di Silvestre, Director of Policy and Advocacy for Europe at International Fund for Animal Welfare. 'The EU was once proud to lead on nature protection. Now we are seeing vital species like the wolf sacrificed for short-term political interests that will benefit no one.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
12 minutes ago
- The Hill
Most Americans think Trump megabill will benefit wealthy people: Survey
Nearly two-thirds of Americans think the 'big, beautiful bill' will do more to help wealthy people, according to a new AP-NORC poll. That includes 48 percent of Republicans, 60 percent of independents, and 83 percent of Democrats, according to the poll, which was released on Friday. The bill extends many of the tax cuts passed by Republicans in 2017 during President Trump's first term, alongside significant reductions to welfare services. Democrats have assailed the law as a historic transfer of wealth to the rich from the poor. Sixty-one percent of Americans also said the law would do more to hurt low-income people. However, the two parties were divided on the question of low-income Americans. Less than a third of Republicans said the bill would do more to harm low-income people, compared to 90 percent of Democrats. Democrats are hoping to use the bill's cuts to Medicaid, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), and other government support programs as key messaging during the upcoming 2026 midterms. The bill's effects on low-income Americans, however, could take several years to show. The bill's deepest funding cuts to Medicaid, which could result in millions losing their insurance in the next 10 years, will not kick in until 2028, although work requirements could begin by the end of 2026. Changes to SNAP will also not go into effect until 2028. The bill has also garnered criticism for its long-term additions to the national debt, estimated to be in the trillions. Many economists have expressed concerns about its cost at a time when government spending was already thought to be unsustainable in the long run. In the poll released Friday, approval of Trump's handling of government spending was down to 38 percent, compared to 46 percent from an AP-NORC poll in March. About two-thirds of Americans think the government is spending too much, with Republicans and Democrats in agreement, according to the poll. The poll surveyed 1,437 adults between July 10 and July 14, with a margin of error of 3.6 percentage points.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Thousands rally in Georgia capital to reinforce demands for new parliamentary elections
Thousands of demonstrators took to the streets of the Georgian capital on Saturday to reinforce their demand for new parliamentary elections. Last year's decision by the ruling Georgian Dream party to halt Georgia's bid to join the European Union continues to spark protests across the country.


New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
New Jersey pols lambast Trump admin plan to use military base to house migrant detainees
The Trump administration is planning to use a New Jersey military base to house immigrant detainees in a move that is drawing ire from Democratic Garden State lawmakers. Portions of Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst in Burlington County will be used as 'temporary soft-sided holding facilities,' the Department of Defense told Fox News. 3 Afghan migrants at the facilities of McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst in 2021. Getty Images Advertisement Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth said that the housing of illegal aliens 'will not negatively affect military training, operations readiness, or other military requirements, according to a letter addressed to Democratic Representative Herb Conway. The decision was blasted by national lawmakers from New Jersey who issued a joint statement excoriating the Trump administration for its alleged loose use of military resources. 'This is an inappropriate use of our national defense system and militarizes a radical immigration policy that has resulted in the inhumane treatment of undocumented immigrants and unlawful deportation of U.S. citizens, including children, across the country,' the joint statement read. Advertisement 3 Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth announced the plans on Tuesday. AP 'Using our country's military to detain and hold undocumented immigrants jeopardizes military preparedness and paves the way for ICE immigration raids in every New Jersey community,' the statement said. 'We have the greatest military in the world and using it as a domestic political tool is unacceptable and shameful.' The statement was signed by Reps. Conway, LaMonica McIver, Donald Norcross, Rob Menendez, Frank Pallone, Bonnie Watson Coleman, Josh Gottheimer and Nellie Pou as well as Senators Cory Booker and Andy Kim — all of whom are Democrats. Advertisement 3 New Jersey Democrats, including Sen. Cory Booker, called out the Trump administration for using military resources for 'political' purposes. AP Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth also announced that parts of Indiana's Camp Atterbury will be converted into migrant facilities. It is unclear when the two sites will be up and running, Fox News reported citing the Defense Department. Uproar over migrant housing in the Garden State hit a crescendo earlier this year when raucous protests at Newark's Delaney Hall resulted in federal charges against Rep. LaMonica McIver. Advertisement The rep pleaded not guilty to federal charges of assault and impeding and interfering with law enforcement last month. Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst spans 42,000 acres, is home to 45,000 military and civilian personnel, and is one of the only bases in the country to be operated by the US Air Force, Army, and Navy. The base was previously used to house thousands of Afghan refugees following the US withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021.