Bill to create pension ‘megafunds' and tidy up ‘micro' retirement savings pots
Many people build up several small pensions that can be hard to keep track of as they switch jobs. The Bill will bring together micro pension pots worth £1,000 or less into one pension scheme.
For people approaching retirement, the Bill will require schemes to offer clear default options for turning savings into a retirement income.
There will also be new rules creating multi-employer defined contribution (DC) scheme megafunds of at least £25 billion, using economies of scale to invest in a wider range of assets.
The Government said defined benefit (DB) pension schemes will also have increased flexibility to 'safely' release a surplus worth collectively £160 billion, to support employers' investment plans and benefit scheme members.
Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall said: 'The Bill is about securing better value for savers' pensions and driving long-term investment in British businesses to boost economic growth in our country.'
Chancellor Rachel Reeves described the legislation as 'a game changer'.
Pensions minister Torsten Bell said: 'Pension saving is a long game, but getting this right is urgent so that millions can look forward to a higher income in retirement.'
Sir Steve Webb, a former Liberal Democrat pensions minister who is now a partner at LCP (Lane Clark & Peacock), said: 'Whilst there are many worthy measures in the Bill, the biggest omission is action to get more money flowing into pensions.'
He continued: 'This issue is unfortunately on the back burner. Measures such as consolidating tiny pension pots are helpful tidying up measures, but do nothing to tackle the fundamental problem that millions of us simply do not have enough money set aside for our retirement.
'With every passing year that this issue goes unaddressed, time is running out for people already well through their working life to have the chance for a decent retirement.'
Patrick Heath-Lay, chief executive of People's Partnership, provider of the People's Pension, said: 'The Bill contains many measures that will require providers to deliver better outcomes for savers and improve the workplace pension system.
'We are encouraged by the introduction of default consolidator schemes, which will be the most effective way to solve the dormant small pots problem.'
Andy Briggs, CEO of Phoenix Group, said: 'The Bill sets a clear direction for the future of pensions with the emphasis on building scale and ensuring savers receive value for money.'
Ian Cornelius, CEO of Nest, said: 'We believe that large, well-governed schemes can drive great outcomes for their members by using their scale and expertise to diversify where money is invested, and gain access to attractive investment opportunities not available to smaller investors at low cost.'
Nausicaa Delfas, chief executive of the Pensions Regulator, said: 'Making sure all schemes are focused on delivering value for money, helping to stop small, and often forgotten pension pots forming, and guiding savers towards the right retirement products for them, will mean savers benefit from a system fit for the future.'
Michelle Ostermann, chief executive of the Pension Protection Fund, said: 'We will support the Government and policymakers as the Bill progresses.'
Rocio Concha, director of policy and advocacy at Which?, said: 'Pensions have become far too complex and fragmented, so it's good to see the Government taking steps to simplify them and ensure schemes provide value for money.
'Which? has campaigned for years for the consolidation of small pots, so we are delighted that this Bill is seeking to do just that – a move that will provide greater value for savers and support them to keep track of their pensions.'
Yvonne Braun, director of policy, long-term savings, at the Association of British Insurers, said: 'This wide-ranging Bill is set to usher in the most large-scale pension reforms since auto-enrolment. The details will be crucial and we will scrutinise the Bill to ensure it puts the interests of savers first.
'We also urgently need to tackle the level of pension contributions which are too low to create an adequate retirement income for many. We urge government to set out the details of its adequacy review as soon as possible.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
13 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Major survey reveals 'standout' view on 'Scottish visa'
The latest Understanding Business survey, conducted by 56° North and Diffley Partnership, found 70% of companies are supportive of a Scottish visa to allow some migrants to come to work in Scotland, as long as they live in the country and maintain a Scottish tax code. A slightly smaller number, 68%, believe migration is vital for filling critical skills shortages in Scotland and that the Scottish Government should have power to control the migration of workers. However, respondents to the survey were conscious of the impact of migration on the local workforce, and the need for joined-up thinking on devolution of migration and UK-wide immigration policy. Scottish businesses groups, notably those representing the hospitality and tourism sectors, have regularly voiced concern over skills shortages since Brexit, which ended the free movement of people between the UK and countries within the European Union. There have been calls by the [[Scottish Government]] in recent years for the introduction of a Scottish immigration visa system to help attract workers to Scotland, but they have been resisted by the UK Government, which controls immigration policy. However, it appears the issue is not going away. The latest Understanding Business survey suggests Scottish employers are interested in a more flexible, regionally responsive immigration policy, particularly in light of workforce shortages and general economic pressures. The proposed visa would be designed to meet the needs of the Scottish labour market and population requirements which can differ from those in other parts of the UK. Only 17% of respondents said they opposed the idea of a Scottish visa, while the remaining 14% were neutral or unsure. The survey authors said the relatively low level of opposition suggests there is broad recognition among employers of the economic and demographic benefits of such a scheme. The proposed Scottish visa would allow migrants to work and pay tax in Scotland, while being required to live in the country. This would reflect immigration models used in countries such as Canada and Australia. The support shown towards a Scottish visa came as businesses indicated a degree of confidence about the economic outlook. A plurality of expect turnover (47%) and profitability (44%) to increase over the next 12 months, record highs for the survey series, followed closely by those that think their turnover or profitability will remain the same in the next year, at 41% and 39%. Around half (48%) believe general economic conditions are worse than a year ago, and 41% expect that conditions will continue to deteriorate over the next year. But a growing proportion expressed the view that the general economy is better now than a year ago (30%) or will improve over the next year (35%), up seven and 10 percentage points respectively. Well over half of Scottish businesses said they were more concerned about tax (56%) and inflation (55%) than they were three months ago, although these proportions witnessed small declines of three and four percentage points respectively. Meanwhile, there were encouraging findings for government ministers who are often accused of being out of touch with business. More businesses agreed that the Scottish and UK Governments are concerned with the needs of Scottish business and taking action to address them. Agreement that the UK Government is concerned with the needs of Scottish business is 'notably lower' compared with the perception of the Scottish Government on this front, at two in five (40%) compared to over half (53%). However, both have risen considerably since the last survey wave, up seven and five percentage points. A smaller gap was apparent when considering if both governments are taking action to address Scottish business concerns. Mark Diffley, founder and director at Diffley Partnership said: 'The standout data point this quarter is the significant business support for the introduction of a Scottish visa for workers, backed by seven in 10 business, up to 75% of those with an opinion either way on the issues. 'Combined with other positive views about the impact of migration on the labour force and the economy, this should give political parties food for thought ahead of next year's election. 'Meanwhile, although the business community in Scotland is still rather more pessimistic than optimistic, the gap between the two has closed which gives some hope about the possibility of a more positive outlook ahead after a long, tough period for businesses.' John Penman, managing partner at 56° North said: 'Our last survey showed Reform, which is the most vocal party in terms of restricting immigration, were gaining support among business in Scotland, however these results show that many businesses are in favour of bringing skilled migrants into the Scottish workforce. 'Reform's continued strong showing in the polls may well mean this becomes a recurring theme in the run up to next year's Scottish election as parties seek to position themselves as best for economic growth.' Understanding Business surveyed more than 500 Scottish businesses across a range of sectors, including hospitality, agriculture, construction, and manufacturing.
The Herald Scotland
14 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Why the case for a 'Scottish visa' just got stronger
But how long can the current state of affairs continue? Starmer has so far resisted calls from the Scottish Government to introduce a "Scottish visa" to help the country deal with the labour shortages it faces, but the issue is simply not going away. Indeed, it seems to be very much uppermost in the minds of many Scottish business owners. As exclusively revealed by The Herald today, 70% of businesses in Scotland support the introduction a tailored 'Scottish visa', according to the latest Understanding Business Survey, conducted by 56° and Diffley Partnership. Such a scheme which would allow migrants to come to work in Scotland, as long as they live and maintain a tax code in the country, and presumably ease the pressure on the many companies which have struggled with skills shortages since the end of freedom of movement. But this would not be unrestrained immigration. Asked what their most important considerations would be if a Scottish visa were introduced, the top two responses from businesses surveyed both related to protecting Scottish workers, with 37% each saying 'maintaining a balance between migrant workers and upskilling local talent' and 'protecting job opportunities for Scottish workers and preventing wage suppression' were important. Business also wanted to ensure that any visa scheme would be easy to navigate for both employers and workers, selected as a top consideration by 35%. Clearly, immigration remains a hot political topic, and with feelings continuing to run high on the topic Starmer's reluctance to implement any big policy changes is perhaps understandable. Especially given that Labour's stance on Brexit was writ large in its election manifesto last year. But for a Government that has made economic growth its central mission, and has now presided over a second consecutive month of GDP decline, it must surely be looking to all the levers it has at its disposal to stem the tide. A Scottish visa, targeted at sectors and companies suffering the most acute skills shortages, would be a step in the right direction.
Powys County Times
2 hours ago
- Powys County Times
Water industry review unlikely to spark required change, claims Feargal Sharkey
Water campaigner Feargal Sharkey says he believes a landmark review into the water industry will not produce changes the public and customers desperately need. The Independent Water Commission, led by former Bank of England deputy governor Sir Jon Cunliffe, will outline recommendations to turn around the floundering sector in its final report on Monday, with claims it will lead to the abolition of embattled water regulator Ofwat. But former Undertones frontman Sharkey, who has become a leading campaigner for water companies to clean up their act, said he fears the highly anticipated report will be a 'flat pancake'. He told the PA news agency: 'We were promised that the report will bring us champagne – but it will just be a saucer of milk.' Sharkey, who has given evidence to MPs on the need for reform and has spoken at numerous public and trade union meetings, said he does not believe 'much will happen' as a result of the report's findings. 'Sir Jon's job is to make the current system better, but so many things have not been considered in his review, such as the ownership of the water companies. 'I also don't think you can talk about abolishing Ofwat without considering the future of the Environment Agency – and taking a long, hard look at the Environment Department (Defra), as well as the lack of action from government ministers for many years. They are just as culpable.' Sharkey said governments have had the power to punish water companies over sewage pollution, or the 'scandal' of paying huge bonuses to bosses, but had chosen not to use them for years. He believes the public and customers have been treated with 'contempt' by water companies for years despite outrage over sewage pollution of rivers and waterways. He added the fact that the review had been held was a victory for the many small community groups across the country set up to tackle the crisis. The review was commissioned by the UK and Welsh governments as part of their response to systemic industry failures, which include rising bills, record sewage spills and debt-ridden company finances, although ministers have ruled out nationalising companies. A Government spokesperson pointed out that unfair bonuses have been banned for senior executives at six water companies under new measures which came into force last month. The Government said at the time that transformative change across the water sector was needed to clean up rivers, lakes and seas, and modernise the sector for decades to come.
