Australia co-ordinating on recognition of Palestine
Canada, the UK and France have announced plans to recognise the state of Palestine at a United Nations meeting in September, amid a humanitarian crisis in Gaza.
Although the federal government has said statehood is a matter of "when, not if", it has been hesitant to set a timeline, with the prime minister previously saying any UN resolution would need to guarantee the designated terror group Hamas played no role in the future nation.
Now, Foreign Minister Penny Wong has revealed Australia is working with other countries on recognition to ensure its concerns are met.
"We understand the urgency, we also understand the importance of having impact, we are obviously discussing and co-ordinating these issues with many countries," she told Nine's Today show on Tuesday.
"Everybody understands that there is a risk that there will be no Palestine left to recognise unless the international community work together towards two states.
"We want to ensure work with others to ensure that Hamas has no role in a future Palestinian state, and we do have a unique opportunity at this time with the international community to isolate Hamas."
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese spoke with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas on Tuesday morning, when he reiterated Australia's commitment to a two-state solution in the Middle East that would allow Palestine and Israel to co-exist.
He also stressed the need for the immediate delivery of aid to Gaza, a permanent ceasefire and the release of all hostages.
Mr Abbas thanked Australia for its economic and humanitarian support for Gaza and agreed to meet on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly meeting starting on September 9.
More than 140 of the 193 UN member states already recognise the state of Palestine, including European Union member states Spain and Ireland.
The Australian development comes after significant pro-Palestine protests in capital cities over the weekend, including a 90,000-strong march on the Sydney Harbour Bridge on Sunday.
Australia on Monday also committed another $20 million to humanitarian aid for Gaza, as UN sources found more than two million people in the enclave were facing high levels of food insecurity.
Mr Albanese has also requested a call with his Israeli counterpart, Benjamin Netanyahu.
The crisis in Gaza began after Hamas attacked Israel on October 7, 2023, killing 1200 people and taking about 250 more hostage.
Israel's retaliatory response has since killed more than 60,000 people, according to Gaza's health authorities.
Israel has denied the population is facing, or succumbing to, starvation despite international human rights groups branding its offensive a genocide.
Overnight, Gaza's health ministry said the number of people who have died from hunger since the war began has risen to 180, including 93 children.
The Australian government has taken issue with the Israeli position.
"We believe it is a breach of international law to stop food being delivered, which is the decision Israel made in March," Senator Wong told ABC Radio.
Pro-Palestine Australians have called on the government to impose sanctions on Israel similar to those placed on Myanmar and Russia.
Senator Wong noted that Australia had sanctioned individuals for human rights abuses against Palestinians.
The government would not speculate on sanctions "for the obvious reason they have more effect if they are not flagged".
The coalition has reiterated its support for a two-state solution, but Liberal MP Julian Leeser said recognition can only come "at the end of a process".
"It's wrong that we're putting recognition on the table at this point because it removes pressure on Hamas, and I think it sends a bad signal to other areas of conflict," he told ABC Radio.
"It's very important that we do nothing that encourages Hamas in its activities."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
a minute ago
- ABC News
UN urges Australia to halt deportation of man to Nauru while complaint investigated
The United Nations has urged Australia to halt plans to deport a man to Nauru while it investigates the human rights implications of his case. Australia is seeking to deport three people released under the NZYQ decision to the tiny Pacific nation in exchange for an undisclosed payment but their removal has been stalled since February due to court challenges. The men, one of whom has a prior murder conviction, were among a group of hundreds released into the community following the High Court's dramatic 2023 ruling that their indefinite detention was unlawful. The United Nations' Human Rights Committee wrote to the Australian government last week requesting the deportation of one of the trio be halted while they consider his complaint to the body, which was submitted days earlier. It cannot compel the government to follow its direction, which it issued as an interim measure while the matter is under investigation. "The principle is simple; if your visa is cancelled, you have to leave Australia," Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said in a statement. "That's a pretty consistent principle, applied in every functioning immigration system around the world." But the Human Rights Law Centre, which is representing the man, argues the government has an international legal responsibility not to deport people to places where they might be killed or suffer inhumane treatment. Their complaint to the United Nations on behalf of their client argued that sending him to Nauru breached this obligation because he would not be able to access adequate medical treatment, would be separated from his family, could face violence or discrimination and there is no guarantee the Nauruan government would not deport him back to Iraq, where he faces the risk of persecution. "This insidious plan affects more than just three people. It shows the Albanese government believes that some people in this country deserve fewer rights than others, and deserve repeated, lifelong punishment," associate legal director Josephine Langbien said. "These deportations would set a dangerous new baseline for how all migrants and refugees can be treated. We must demand better from our political leaders." In February, the government announced it had struck a deal with Nauru, which offered to grant visas to members of the NZYQ cohort in exchange for payment. The group — many of whom were convicted of violent offences but have served their sentences — were previously being kept indefinitely in Australian immigration detention because they had failed character tests but also had no reasonable prospects of deportation. That was until the high court's landmark decision in the case of one man, identified only as "NZYQ", triggered the cohort's release into the community. The judgement sent the government scrambling to find an alternative solution, which included attempts to monitor the cohort using ankle bracelets and curfews. But that too had to be reworked when the High Court ruled the cohort could not be treated punitively. Announcing the deal with Nauru, Mr Burke said he expected that more than the three men would eventually be deported after the initial legal challenges were cleared. It is the first test of the new laws that the government passed last year to strengthen its powers to send people without a visa to a third country for resettlement. In the interim, the government has promised the High Court that the man would not be removed from Australia until his case was resolved. Court documents show he was convicted of a crime and sentenced to a total of five years' jail before being released on parole and taken into immigration detention. His lawyers argue the ruling about his visa was not made lawfully. It is unclear when the High Court will make a judgement in the case. "The Albanese government claims to respect international law and urges other countries to do the same," Ms Langbien said. "It must demonstrate that respect by following this direction from the UN Human Rights Committee and halting these deportations."
ABC News
31 minutes ago
- ABC News
Netanyahu meets with security officials amid reports Israel's considering full takeover of Gaza
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has met with senior security officials to finalise a new strategy for the 22-month war in Gaza, his office said on Tuesday, with Israeli media reporting he is leaning towards a complete military takeover of the Strip. Despite intense international pressure for a ceasefire to ease hunger and appalling conditions in the besieged Palestinian enclave, efforts to mediate a truce between Israel and Palestinian militant group Hamas have collapsed. Eight more people died of starvation or malnutrition in the past 24 hours, Gaza's health ministry said, while another 79 died in the latest Israeli firing. Israel disputes these figures but does not release its own to counter them. The prime minister's office said in a statement that Mr Netanyahu had held a "limited security discussion" lasting about three hours during which military Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir "presented the options for continuing the campaign in Gaza". An Israeli official had earlier told Reuters that Defence Minister Israel Katz and Strategic Affairs Minister Ron Dermer, a confidant of Netanyahu, would also attend the meeting to decide on a strategy to take to a Cabinet meeting expected to take place on Thursday. Israel's Channel 12, citing an official from Mr Netanyahu's office, had said the prime minister was leaning towards taking control of the entire territory. Such a move would reverse a 2005 decision to withdraw from Gaza, while retaining control over its borders, a move right-wing parties blame for Hamas gaining power there. It was unclear, however, whether Mr Netanyahu was foreseeing a prolonged occupation or a short-term operation aimed at dismantling Hamas and freeing Israeli hostages. The prime minister's office declined to comment on the Channel 12 report. "It is still necessary to complete the defeat of the enemy in Gaza, release our hostages and ensure that Gaza never again constitutes a threat to Israel," Mr Netanyahu told new recruits at a military base. "We are not giving up on any of these missions." On Saturday, Hamas released a video of Evyatar David, one of 50 hostages still held in Gaza, appearing emaciated in what seemed to be an underground tunnel. The images shocked Israelis and sparked international condemnation. Throughout the war, there has been sustained international pressure on Hamas to release the remaining hostages, of whom Israeli officials estimate 20 are still alive. Most hostages have been released during ceasefires following diplomatic negotiations. Israel broke the last ceasefire. A Palestinian official told news agency Reuters the suggestion of a full takeover of Gaza may be a tactic to pressure Hamas into concessions, while the Palestinian Foreign Ministry urged foreign nations to take heed of the reports. "The ministry urges countries and the international community to treat these leaks with utmost seriousness and to intervene urgently to prevent their implementation, whether these leaks are meant to exert pressure, test international reactions, or are genuine and serious," the offical said. Israel's coalition government, the most right-wing and religiously conservative in its history, includes far-right politicians who advocate the annexation of both Gaza and the West Bank and encourage Palestinians to leave their homeland. Nearly two years of fighting in Gaza has strained the military, which has a small standing army and has had to repeatedly mobilise reservists. It has throughout the war pushed back against the idea of Israel fully occupying Gaza. In a sign of differences between some members of Israel's ruling coalition and the military, far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir on X challenged military head Mr Zamir to state he would comply with government directives even if a decision was made to take all of Gaza. The statement from Mr Netanyahu's office said the Israeli Defence Forces were "prepared to implement any decision that will be made by the Political-Security Cabinet". The war was triggered when Hamas-led militants attacked Israel on October 7, 2023, killing around 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and capturing 251 hostages. Israel's military response has devastated the tiny, crowded enclave, killing more than 61,000 people — mostly civilians — according to Palestinian health authorities. Israel's campaign has forced nearly all of Gaza's more than two million people from their homes and caused what a global hunger monitor called last week an unfolding famine. Some 188 Palestinians, including 94 children, have died from hunger since the war began, according to Gaza authorities. An Israeli security official, in a briefing to reporters, acknowledged there may be hunger in some parts of Gaza but rejected reports of famine or starvation. On Tuesday, Israeli tanks pushed into central Gaza but it was not clear if the move was part of a larger ground offensive. Reuters
The Advertiser
an hour ago
- The Advertiser
Final push for global plastics treaty begins in Geneva
Representatives from more than 160 countries have begun a final attempt to create a legally binding international treaty to combat plastic pollution. The UN talks in Geneva aim to secure a deal that regulates plastic production, design and waste management. According to estimates from the UN Environment Programme (UNEP), around 500 million tonnes of plastic were produced globally in 2024, nearly 400 million of which ended up as waste. Without an agreement, UNEP warns that waste volume could triple by 2060. "Every hour counts," said the chairman of the conference, Ecuadorian Ambassador Luis Vayas Valdivieso. "We are setting the foundations for a global tool that could change the future of environmental history," he added. The negotiations are scheduled to run until August 14. The UN Environment Assembly agreed in March 2022 to negotiate a treaty to combat plastic pollution. No agreement was reached at the last round of negotiations held in South Korea in late 2024. The treaty is to cover the production, design and disposal of plastic. Less plastic is to be produced, products are to be reused and recycled as many times as possible, and what remains is to be disposed of in an environmentally friendly manner. How this is to be achieved is controversial. "It's time for courage, not compromise,' says Florian Titze from WWF. "An agreement based on the lowest common denominator will not solve the plastic crisis." The WWF environmental foundation notes that "plastic waste destroys habitats, endangers animals and humans and poisons ecosystems." According to estimates by the UNEP, people around the world used 500 million tonnes of plastic last year, almost twice as much as 25 years previously. According to UNEP, 400 million tonnes of this is likely to quickly end up as waste. Our World in Data says a quarter of the plastic waste in rivers and oceans comes from plastic bags and bottles. China, the country with the largest plastic production, has already planned national production restrictions. Most plastics are made from oil, which is why the oil states in particular are preventing an ambitious treaty, including Iran, Saudi Arabia, the Gulf states and Russia. They only want to talk about waste and recycling. The US government under Donald Trump is currently abolishing regulations of all kinds. "This has not exactly simplified the situation in the negotiations, conference sources said. Representatives from more than 160 countries have begun a final attempt to create a legally binding international treaty to combat plastic pollution. The UN talks in Geneva aim to secure a deal that regulates plastic production, design and waste management. According to estimates from the UN Environment Programme (UNEP), around 500 million tonnes of plastic were produced globally in 2024, nearly 400 million of which ended up as waste. Without an agreement, UNEP warns that waste volume could triple by 2060. "Every hour counts," said the chairman of the conference, Ecuadorian Ambassador Luis Vayas Valdivieso. "We are setting the foundations for a global tool that could change the future of environmental history," he added. The negotiations are scheduled to run until August 14. The UN Environment Assembly agreed in March 2022 to negotiate a treaty to combat plastic pollution. No agreement was reached at the last round of negotiations held in South Korea in late 2024. The treaty is to cover the production, design and disposal of plastic. Less plastic is to be produced, products are to be reused and recycled as many times as possible, and what remains is to be disposed of in an environmentally friendly manner. How this is to be achieved is controversial. "It's time for courage, not compromise,' says Florian Titze from WWF. "An agreement based on the lowest common denominator will not solve the plastic crisis." The WWF environmental foundation notes that "plastic waste destroys habitats, endangers animals and humans and poisons ecosystems." According to estimates by the UNEP, people around the world used 500 million tonnes of plastic last year, almost twice as much as 25 years previously. According to UNEP, 400 million tonnes of this is likely to quickly end up as waste. Our World in Data says a quarter of the plastic waste in rivers and oceans comes from plastic bags and bottles. China, the country with the largest plastic production, has already planned national production restrictions. Most plastics are made from oil, which is why the oil states in particular are preventing an ambitious treaty, including Iran, Saudi Arabia, the Gulf states and Russia. They only want to talk about waste and recycling. The US government under Donald Trump is currently abolishing regulations of all kinds. "This has not exactly simplified the situation in the negotiations, conference sources said. Representatives from more than 160 countries have begun a final attempt to create a legally binding international treaty to combat plastic pollution. The UN talks in Geneva aim to secure a deal that regulates plastic production, design and waste management. According to estimates from the UN Environment Programme (UNEP), around 500 million tonnes of plastic were produced globally in 2024, nearly 400 million of which ended up as waste. Without an agreement, UNEP warns that waste volume could triple by 2060. "Every hour counts," said the chairman of the conference, Ecuadorian Ambassador Luis Vayas Valdivieso. "We are setting the foundations for a global tool that could change the future of environmental history," he added. The negotiations are scheduled to run until August 14. The UN Environment Assembly agreed in March 2022 to negotiate a treaty to combat plastic pollution. No agreement was reached at the last round of negotiations held in South Korea in late 2024. The treaty is to cover the production, design and disposal of plastic. Less plastic is to be produced, products are to be reused and recycled as many times as possible, and what remains is to be disposed of in an environmentally friendly manner. How this is to be achieved is controversial. "It's time for courage, not compromise,' says Florian Titze from WWF. "An agreement based on the lowest common denominator will not solve the plastic crisis." The WWF environmental foundation notes that "plastic waste destroys habitats, endangers animals and humans and poisons ecosystems." According to estimates by the UNEP, people around the world used 500 million tonnes of plastic last year, almost twice as much as 25 years previously. According to UNEP, 400 million tonnes of this is likely to quickly end up as waste. Our World in Data says a quarter of the plastic waste in rivers and oceans comes from plastic bags and bottles. China, the country with the largest plastic production, has already planned national production restrictions. Most plastics are made from oil, which is why the oil states in particular are preventing an ambitious treaty, including Iran, Saudi Arabia, the Gulf states and Russia. They only want to talk about waste and recycling. The US government under Donald Trump is currently abolishing regulations of all kinds. "This has not exactly simplified the situation in the negotiations, conference sources said. Representatives from more than 160 countries have begun a final attempt to create a legally binding international treaty to combat plastic pollution. The UN talks in Geneva aim to secure a deal that regulates plastic production, design and waste management. According to estimates from the UN Environment Programme (UNEP), around 500 million tonnes of plastic were produced globally in 2024, nearly 400 million of which ended up as waste. Without an agreement, UNEP warns that waste volume could triple by 2060. "Every hour counts," said the chairman of the conference, Ecuadorian Ambassador Luis Vayas Valdivieso. "We are setting the foundations for a global tool that could change the future of environmental history," he added. The negotiations are scheduled to run until August 14. The UN Environment Assembly agreed in March 2022 to negotiate a treaty to combat plastic pollution. No agreement was reached at the last round of negotiations held in South Korea in late 2024. The treaty is to cover the production, design and disposal of plastic. Less plastic is to be produced, products are to be reused and recycled as many times as possible, and what remains is to be disposed of in an environmentally friendly manner. How this is to be achieved is controversial. "It's time for courage, not compromise,' says Florian Titze from WWF. "An agreement based on the lowest common denominator will not solve the plastic crisis." The WWF environmental foundation notes that "plastic waste destroys habitats, endangers animals and humans and poisons ecosystems." According to estimates by the UNEP, people around the world used 500 million tonnes of plastic last year, almost twice as much as 25 years previously. According to UNEP, 400 million tonnes of this is likely to quickly end up as waste. Our World in Data says a quarter of the plastic waste in rivers and oceans comes from plastic bags and bottles. China, the country with the largest plastic production, has already planned national production restrictions. Most plastics are made from oil, which is why the oil states in particular are preventing an ambitious treaty, including Iran, Saudi Arabia, the Gulf states and Russia. They only want to talk about waste and recycling. The US government under Donald Trump is currently abolishing regulations of all kinds. "This has not exactly simplified the situation in the negotiations, conference sources said.
