US envoy meets with the families of Israeli hostages in Tel Aviv
Witkoff was greeted with some applause and pleas for assistance from hundreds of protesters gathered in Tel Aviv, before going into a closed meeting with the families. Videos shared online showed Witkoff arriving to meet the Hostages and Missing Families Forum, as families chanted "Bring them home!" and "We need your help."
The meeting came one day after Witkoff visited a US-backed aid station in Gaza to inspect efforts to get food into the devastated Palestinian territory.
Of the 251 hostages taken during the Hamas attack, 49 are still being held in Gaza, including 27 the Israeli military says are dead.
After the meeting, the Forum released a statement saying Witkoff had given them a personal commitment that he and US President Donald Trump would work to return the remaining hostages.
'Horrifying acts'
Hamas has attempted to maintain pressure on the families, on Friday releasing a video of one of the hostages − 24-year-old Evyatar David − for the second time in two days, showing him looking emaciated in a tunnel. The video called for a ceasefire and warned that time was running out for the hostages. David's family said their son was the victim of a "vile" propaganda campaign and accused Hamas of deliberately starving their son.
"The deliberate starvation of our son as part of a propaganda campaign is one of the most horrifying acts the world has seen. He is being starved purely to serve Hamas's propaganda," the family said. French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot on Saturday also denounced the video, and one released a day earlier by another Palestinian Islamist group, as "despicable." "They must be freed, without conditions," he posted on X. "Hamas must be disarmed and excluded from ruling Gaza."
Help us improve Le Monde in English
Dear reader,
We'd love to hear your thoughts on Le Monde in English! Take this quick survey to help us improve it for you.
Take the survey
The United States, along with Egypt and Qatar, had been mediating ceasefire talks between Hamas and Israel that would allow the hostages to be released and humanitarian aid to flow more freely. But talks broke down last month and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government is under increasing domestic pressure to come up with another way to secure the missing hostages, alive and dead. He is also facing international calls to open Gaza's borders to more food aid, after UN and humanitarian agencies warned that more than two million Palestinian civilians are facing starvation.
'Without rest'
But Israel's top general warned that there would be no respite in fighting if the hostages were not released. "I estimate that in the coming days we will know whether we can reach an agreement for the release of our hostages," armed forces chief of staff Lieutenant General Eyal Zamir said in a statement. "If not, the combat will continue without rest." Zamir denied that there was widespread starvation in Gaza. "The current campaign of false accusations of intentional starvation is a deliberate, timed and deceitful attempt to accuse the IDF (Israeli military), a moral army, of war crimes," he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LeMonde
2 hours ago
- LeMonde
UN talks aim to seal deal on plastic pollution crisis
The 184 countries gathering to forge a landmark treaty on combating plastic pollution were told on Tuesday, August 5, they must find a way to tackle a global crisis wrecking ecosystems and trashing the oceans. States should seize the chance to shape history, the man chairing the talks said as 10 days of negotiations kicked off at the United Nations in Geneva. "We are facing a global crisis," Ecuadoran diplomat Luis Vayas Valdivieso told the more than 1,800 negotiators as they prepared to thrash out their differences in the search for common ground. "Plastic pollution is damaging ecosystems, polluting our oceans and rivers, threatening biodiversity, harming human health, and unfairly impacting the most vulnerable," he said. "The urgency is real, the evidence is clear – and the responsibility is on us." Plastic pollution is so ubiquitous that microplastics have been found on the highest mountain peaks, in the deepest ocean trench and scattered throughout almost every part of the human body. But after five rounds of talks, three years of negotiations hit the wall in Busan, South Korea, in December when oil-producing states blocked a consensus. Pathway to deal Key figures steering this revived attempt insist a deal is within reach this time around. "There's been extensive diplomacy from Busan till now," the UN Environment Programme's Executive Director Inger Andersen told Agence France-Presse (AFP). "Most countries, actually, that I have spoken with have said: 'We're coming to Geneva to strike the deal.' Will it be easy? No. Will it be straightforward? No. Is there a pathway for a deal? Absolutely." More than 400 million tons of plastic are produced globally each year, half of which is for single-use items. While 15 percent of plastic waste is collected for recycling, only nine percent is actually recycled. Nearly half, or 46 percent, ends up in landfills, while 17 percent is incinerated and 22 percent is mismanaged and becomes litter. In 2022, countries agreed they would find a way to address the crisis by the end of 2024. However, the supposedly final negotiations on a legally binding instrument on plastic pollution, including in the seas, flopped in Busan. One group of countries sought an ambitious deal to limit production and phase out harmful chemicals. But a clutch of mostly oil-producing nations rejected production limits and wanted to focus on treating waste. Production cap gap A cap on plastic production is one of the thorniest issues being debated in Geneva. Katrin Schneeberger, the director of Switzerland's environment ministry, told the opening press conference: "This is no call for a production cap. Clarifying this in informal meetings was an important message to producing countries." New Le Monde's app Get the most out of your experience: download the app to enjoy Le Monde in English anywhere, anytime Download More than 600 non-governmental organizations are in Geneva, and this time have access to the discussion group meetings. "We have to stop making so much plastic," Greenpeace's delegation chief Graham Forbes told AFP. The group and its allies want a treaty "that cuts plastic production, eliminates toxic chemicals and provides the financing that's going to be required to transition to a fossil fuel, plastic-free future," he said. "The fossil fuel industry is here in force," he noted, adding: "We cannot let a few countries determine humanity's future when it comes to plastic pollution." Panama's delegate Juan Monterrey Gomez – a fellow proponent of an ambitious treaty – voiced optimism that a treaty could be struck on August 14. "The beginning is better than Busan," he said of the start of talks. No country wanting to be held responsible for sinking the negotiations "is probably the biggest trigger we can push," he told AFP.
France 24
2 hours ago
- France 24
Medvedev vs Trump: Russia's ex-president becomes Putin's provocateur-in-chief
Russia 's ex-president Dmitri Medvedev found his way back into the headlines when his belligerent social media exchange with US President Donald Trump led to the repositioning on August 1 of two US nuclear submarines to what Trump called 'appropriate regions'. Medvedev has recently become an ultra-nationalist provocateur on social media, especially since Russia began its large-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. It's a major metamorphosis for a politician who during his time as president, from 2008 to 2012, embodied the liberal face of Russia. Accustomed to outrageous statements 'Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences,' Trump posted on his Truth Social platform after announcing his decision to re-deploy two submarines. Medvedev had taken exception to Trump imposing a new 10-day deadline for Russia to end its war in Ukraine, and posted that Trump was "playing the ultimatum game with Russia… Each new ultimatum is a threat and a step towards war." On X, the former Russian president raised the prospect of a third World War if Trump persisted in trying to force Russian President Vladimir Putin to engage in peace negotiations with Ukraine. On Telegram, Medvedev referred to "Dead Hand' – the Soviet Union's system for launching a nuclear strike. Trump seems to have decided that he had had enough. But given Medvedev's long history of sabre rattling, Trump's reaction of 'taking the bait' instead of ignoring the posts is a bit puzzling, says Stephen Hall, a specialist in Russian politics at the University of Bath. Medvedev is a 'loose cannon ... trying to make himself relevant,' says Jenny Mathers, a specialist in Russian security issues at Aberystwyth University in the UK. If you want to know what Putin is thinking and above all 'what he wants to the world to hear', it's not Medvedev you should be listening to, but rather Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, Mathers says. Medvedev has made a habit of making outrageous statements in recent years, following his term as president and then as prime minister from 2012 to 2020. Medvedev has 1.7 million subscribers on Telegram, where he his posts tend to be aggressively nationalistic. He describes Ursula von der Leyen, the German President of the European Commission, as a 'crazy old lady'. France is accused of being nostalgic for the Vichy regime, while the Baltic states are simply described as 'wretched'. These insults are from recent posts seen by more than three million Telegram users. Why so much animosity? Medvedev boasts that 'hatred is the most important weapon' in the battle against what he calls European 'Russophobia'. He has always embodied a more extreme version of the image that Putin wanted to project to the world, Mathers says. 'So when Putin was being slightly liberal, Medvedev was quite a bit more so,' she says. The two faces of Dmitri Medvedev When Medvedev was designated to take over as Russian president in 2008, Putin had decided it was time for a rapprochement with the US and then president Barack Obama. 'His presidency was about wanting to reach out to the US, wanting to strike deals and have good relations,' Mathers says. Kremlin strategists successfully portrayed Medvedev as embodying a more modern Russia in tune with the West, someone who 'knew how to use Twitter and an iPad', Hall says. In Putin's eyes, Medvedev also had another advantage: he did not belong to the circle of ' siloviki ', agents of the Russian police and intelligence services. 'He's a lawyer by training, so he probably is a moderniser by the standards of Russia, or at least of the current Russian regime,' Hall says. 01:46 Putin's return as Russian president in 2012 marked the beginning of a more authoritarian and imperialist turn for Russia. Since then, Medvedev has discarded any semblance of moderation. 'He now says things that are much more extreme than what Putin says," Mathers says. For Hall, his nationalistic stance is partly a question of 'political survival". Medvedev's career has followed a downward trajectory since 2012. After his term as president, he was named Putin's prime minister, only to end up as deputy chairman of Russia's Security Council. Though he has been sidelined, he at least has 'an official position that allows him to speak out on matters of national security', says Mathers. Given his current job, his responsibilities are limited, says Hall. 'As deputy of the Security Council he is possibly very good at pushing paper around and setting up meetings' and having tea with officials like Nikolai Patrushev and Sergei Shoigu, the two secretaries-general of the Security Council. 'But other than that, he doesn't play a huge role." To provoke is to win? By being strident, Medvedev hopes to prove that he is still someone who counts in politics and that he can be useful. 'I think at the moment Medvedev is taking the Zhirinovsky role,' says Hall, referring to late ultra-nationalist politician Vladimir Zhirinovsky, whoseextremist and provocative declarations served as a way for the Kremlin to gauge what viewpoints might be accepted by the public. On the international stage, the Kremlin can let its new provocateur-in-chief Medvedev act without too much risk. After all, he doesn't hold a very important position, says Mathers. So if one of his statements goes too far, 'Putin can either ignore what he says' or indicate that it does not reflect the official position of Russia. The Kremlin can also hope that Medvedev's bellicose outbursts will prompt the West or a Western country to limit its support for Ukraine – better safe than sorry. Moscow knows that Western democracies cannot afford to completely ignore Medvedev's threats, even if 99 percent of the time, talk of nuclear Armageddon is just bluster, notes Hall. Western governments cannot totally rule out the possibility that Russia will "actually use nuclear weapons", he says. Has Medvedev managed to permanently antagonise Trump? That remains to be seen. The US president has for some time stepped up his rhetoric and threatened more concrete action against Russia. But Trump could hardly attack Putin directly, says Hall, because in order to end the war in Ukraine, 'he needs Putin to negotiate". In this respect, Medvedev appeared to be an ideal target for Trump's anger. He has the advantage of being a former president, notes Hall – and so has the stature to be an interlocutor in diplomatic exchanges with Trump via social media.
Euronews
4 hours ago
- Euronews
Why is Slovenia the only EU country to ban arms trade with Israel?
In the absence of a consensus at European level, Slovenia is going it alone. On Thursday, it became the first EU country to ban all arms trade with Israel, including transit and imports. In a press release, the Slovenian government explicitly outlined its concerns about the humanitarian situation in Gaza and denounced the EU's inability to adopt such a measure because of "internal disagreements." The decision is above all symbolic, since the Slovenian government says it has not issued any arms export permits to Israel since October 2023 because of the conflict. This decision is intended to intensify the pressure on the Israeli state to put an end to the war in Gaza. "All measures are on the table, we support, as we have done in the past, the suspension of the accession agreement with Israel, as well as trade sanctions and an arms embargo, sanctions against certain settlers, certain ministers and the Israeli government that supports violence", declared Tanja Fajon, Slovenia's Minister of Foreign Affairs, on 15 July in Brussels. "All measures must be taken as soon as possible, until there is a ceasefire, until the violence has stopped, until we have a resolution between the two countries", she added. Falling sales Other European countries such as Belgium, Italy and the Netherlands have not gone as far as Slovenia, but have reduced arms sales to Israel. Belgium officially banned arms exports to Israel following the 2008-2009 Gaza war. In the Netherlands, the Court of Appeal in The Hague annulled the export of F-35 spare parts to Israel in February 2024. The 2013 Arms Trade Treaty prohibits states from transferring weapons that will be used to commit genocide or crimes against humanity. In 2008, EU countries also undertook to refuse transfers of technology and military equipment that could be used to prolong armed conflicts. "For European states, there is an obligation not only not to export equipment that could be used to commit crimes in Gaza, but also not to export equipment that could be used to maintain the land, air or naval dimensions of the Israeli occupation of the Palestinian territories," Samuel Longuet, a researcher at the Groupe de recherche et d'information sur la paix et la sécurité (GRIP), told Euronews. "So this covers virtually all the military equipment that could be used by the Israeli army." Continued exports Meanwhile, European exports of military equipment to Israel continue. Some countries state that the parts are only assembled in Israel or that they are used as training equipment, and not in Gaza. "The work of several human rights associations in Italy, as well as the Italian investigative press, revealed that the Italian government had just suspended the granting of new export licences, but everything that had been authorised before 7 October 2023 was still going to Israel. In particular parts for training aircraft," explains Longuet. The transfer of dual-use technologies, which can be used for both civilian and military purposes, also poses a problem. In Belgium, the Flemish region allowed a local company to export "screens that ended up in the control cabins of Israeli drones that were used to bomb a humanitarian convoy a few months ago," the researcher said. "The argument put forward by the Flemish government at the time, before 7 October, in March 2023, was that this was a generic technology, a screen that could be found, yes, in a drone control cabin, but also in anything else. And so in this case, it didn't require the company supplying these screens to apply for an export licence, since it wasn't strictly speaking a military technology", he points out. The United States is by far the leading supplier of weapons to Israel. It accounts for two-thirds of Israeli arms imports, with Germany and Italy coming in second and third places. Germany mainly sells frigates and torpedoes, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. "What we export is a little bit of everything in fact. Parts that can be used on Israeli ships, so equipment that will be used in naval systems. We also supply parts for training aircraft," says Longuet. "The UK and Italy, for example, export parts for the Italian M-346 aircraft used to train future Israeli fighter pilots," he explains. At the European level, an arms embargo is unlikely to succeed. It would have to be approved unanimously by the EU Council. However, Longuet says countries such as Germany, Hungary and the Czech Republic, staunch supporters of Israel, would likely block it.
