logo
Witness in murder of journalist Gauri Lankesh complains of receiving threat call ahead of court appearance

Witness in murder of journalist Gauri Lankesh complains of receiving threat call ahead of court appearance

Indian Express02-06-2025

A panchnama witness involved in the identification of a house in the Belagavi region of Karnataka that was allegedly used to finalise the conspiracy to kill the journalist Gauri Lankesh has complained of receiving a threat ahead of his visit to a special court in Bengaluru to testify in the trial of 17 persons arrested for the September 5, 2017, murder of the journalist.
The witness who ran a business in Belagavi had rented the house, which had been used by members of a right-wing crime syndicate involved in the murder of Gauri Lankesh. He was made a panchnama witness when three accused persons in the case – Sharad (Kalaskar), Ganesh (Miskin), and Amit (Baddi) – identified the house.
The 55-year-old witness, who was summoned to the witness box last week, complained to the state public prosecutor (SPP) of receiving a threatening phone call ahead of his visit, and based on the complaint, the SPP filed a memo in the special court during the trial on May 28.
'Learned Spl. P.P. has filed a memo along with a requisition of CW (court witness)… Copy of the requisition is served on learned counsel for the accused,' the court noted.
'Despite the threats, the witness stuck to his statement in court,' a prosecution source said.
During the trial, the witness said that he had rented a house in Belagavi, and police officials brought two suspects in the murder case – Ganesh (Miskin) and Amit (Baddi) – to the house in August 2018. In September 2018, they brought a third accused identified as Sharad (Kalaskar). A fourth accused was also brought, but the witness claimed to have forgotten his name.
In the court, the witness identified Amit (Baddi), Shrikant (Pangarkar), and Sharad (Kalaskar) among the accused persons who were brought to the house where the alleged conspiracy occurred, but said he could not identify the fourth person due to the passage of time.
During the trial of the murder case last week, one of the prosecution witnesses turned hostile. The witness had earlier given a detailed statement to a magistrate about his participation in multiple training camps for the use of guns and explosives conducted by a Hindutva syndicate, which is implicated in the murder of Gauri Lankesh.
The 37-year-old prosecution witness, who is involved in grassroots politics in the Belagavi region of Karnataka, was declared hostile by the state special public prosecutor on Wednesday after he denied all the statements he had earlier made before a magistrate in September 2018 under Section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973.
The witness who had identified several persons arrested for the murder of Gauri Lankesh as participants in the training camps also rejected the Test Identification Parade he had participated in at the Bengaluru prison in November 2018 and claimed that he had identified the accused persons under police duress.
During a cross-examination in the court after being declared hostile by the prosecution, the witness denied the charge that he was deviating from his earlier statements due to pressure from the accused persons – most of whom were granted bail last year.
Gauri Lankesh died after four bullets were fired at her by a man now identified by the SIT as Parashuram Waghmore, a former activist of the right-wing Sri Rama Sene outfit.
A forensic analysis of the four empty cartridges and the four bullets fired to kill Lankesh showed that the markings on the bullets and cartridges were the same as markings found on bullets and cartridges seized from the site of the killing of Kannada scholar and researcher M M Kalburgi in the northern Karnataka town of Dharwad on August 30, 2015.
Findings from the comparison of ballistic evidence from the Lankesh and Kalburgi cases also revealed that the 7.65 mm country-made gun used in the two murders in Karnataka had also been used in the shooting of the Leftist thinker Govind Pansare, 81, in Maharashtra's Kolhapur on February 16, 2015.
The ballistic evidence indicated that one of the two guns used in the Pansare murder was used to kill the rationalist Narendra Dabholkar, 69, in Pune on August 20, 2013.
The Karnataka Special Investigation Team (SIT) has named 17 people from right-wing fringe outfits for the conspiracy and murder of Gauri Lankesh. The accused have been charged with murder and involvement in an organised crime activity under the Karnataka Control of Organized Crimes Act, (KCOCA) 2000.
'The members of this organisation targeted persons whom they identified to be inimical to their belief and ideology. The members strictly followed the guidelines and principles mentioned in 'Kshatra Dharma Sadhana', a book published by Sanatan Sanstha,' the SIT said after it filed a 9,235-page chargesheet on November 23, 2018.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Unable' to attend court, complainant withdraws defamation cases against Nawab Malik
‘Unable' to attend court, complainant withdraws defamation cases against Nawab Malik

Indian Express

time7 hours ago

  • Indian Express

‘Unable' to attend court, complainant withdraws defamation cases against Nawab Malik

Proceedings against Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) leader Nawab Malik were closed after BJP's Mohit Bharatiya withdrew the two defamation cases filed against him. The withdrawal follows a plea filed by Malik before the magistrate court seeking to dispose of the case as Bharatiya had not appeared in court during the last 15 hearings to record his statement. Bharatiya filed an affidavit before the court stating that he was voluntarily withdrawing the plea. 'That since this Hon'ble Court is desirous of keeping the said case on day-to-day basis, I am desirous to withdraw the case filed against the accused in the above-referenced matter as, I will be unable to attend this Hon'ble Court on daily basis,' the affidavit said. The cases pertained to remarks allegedly made by Malik during an investigation by the Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) into the 2021 raid on a cruise ship off the Mumbai coast. Bharatiya had alleged that Malik had 'purposefully and intentionally defamed' him and his brother-in-law, following which he filed two defamation complaints under Section 500 of the Indian Penal Code. The court summoned Malik after one of the complaints, filed on October 26, 2021. The matter was listed for recording of evidence, where Bharatiya was expected to depose as the complainant. However, according to a plea filed by Malik's lawyer Gaurav Bhawnani, Bharatiya failed to appear for as many as 15 consecutive hearings. On each of the hearings, an adjournment was sought due to non-availability of the complainant, the plea said. Under section 256(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code, in case of non-appearance of the complainant, the court can acquit the accused. Malik's plea pointed out that while an advocate can appear on a complainant's behalf, personal presence becomes mandatory at the stage of recording evidence. 'The present proceedings have completely stalled due to the repeated absence of the complainant,' the plea stated, adding that Bharatiya's continued absence demonstrated 'no respect' for the valuable time of the court, the accused, or the advocates involved. Another case filed by Bharatiya against Malik, who was then a minister in the Maha Vikas Agadhi (MVA) government, was also withdrawn in 2022.

Court closes defamation case against Nawab Malik after BJP functionary withdraws 2021 complaint
Court closes defamation case against Nawab Malik after BJP functionary withdraws 2021 complaint

Economic Times

time9 hours ago

  • Economic Times

Court closes defamation case against Nawab Malik after BJP functionary withdraws 2021 complaint

A magistrate court closed defamation proceedings against Nawab Malik after Mohit Kamboj withdrew his complaint, citing his inability to attend daily hearings. Kamboj alleged Malik defamed him and his brother-in-law following an NCB raid in 2021. The court acquitted Malik under IPC section 500 after Kamboj's withdrawal application was approved. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads A magistrate court here on Monday closed defamation proceedings against former Maharashtra minister Nawab Malik after BJP functionary Mohit Kamboj withdrew his complaint."The accused stands acquitted of the offence under IPC section 500 (defamation) and the proceeding is hereby closed," the court had filed the application for withdrawal of the case under section 257 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC).The said provisions allow a complainant to withdraw their complaint at any time before a final order is passed, provided the magistrate is satisfied with the grounds for withdrawal. If permitted, the magistrate will then acquit the accused."Since this court is desirous of keeping the said case on a day-to-day basis, I am desirous to withdraw the case filed against the accused as I will be unable to attend the court on a daily basis," Kamboj stated in his application."I have voluntarily decided to withdraw the case, and no undue pressure or coercion has been exerted upon me in this regard," it a complaint filed in court in 2021, Kamboj alleged that Malik had defamed him and his brother-in-law after the NCB raided a cruise ship in October of that claimed Malik, in a press conference on NCB arresting several persons including actor Shah Rukh Khan's son Aryan Khan, "purposefully and intentionally defamed" him (Kamboj) and his brother-in-law Rishab had sought action against Malik for allegedly committing offences under sections 499 and 500 (defamation) of the Indian Penal Code.

Court closes defamation case against Nawab Malik after BJP functionary withdraws 2021 complaint
Court closes defamation case against Nawab Malik after BJP functionary withdraws 2021 complaint

Time of India

time10 hours ago

  • Time of India

Court closes defamation case against Nawab Malik after BJP functionary withdraws 2021 complaint

A magistrate court here on Monday closed defamation proceedings against former Maharashtra minister Nawab Malik after BJP functionary Mohit Kamboj withdrew his complaint. "The accused stands acquitted of the offence under IPC section 500 (defamation) and the proceeding is hereby closed," the court ruled. Kamboj had filed the application for withdrawal of the case under section 257 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC). by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Easy Living: Small Home with Bath for Seniors Compact 60 sqm Mini House for Seniors – Includes Toilet & Bath (See Inside) | Search Ads Search Now Undo The said provisions allow a complainant to withdraw their complaint at any time before a final order is passed, provided the magistrate is satisfied with the grounds for withdrawal. If permitted, the magistrate will then acquit the accused. "Since this court is desirous of keeping the said case on a day-to-day basis, I am desirous to withdraw the case filed against the accused as I will be unable to attend the court on a daily basis," Kamboj stated in his application. Live Events "I have voluntarily decided to withdraw the case, and no undue pressure or coercion has been exerted upon me in this regard," it added. In a complaint filed in court in 2021, Kamboj alleged that Malik had defamed him and his brother-in-law after the NCB raided a cruise ship in October of that year. He claimed Malik, in a press conference on NCB arresting several persons including actor Shah Rukh Khan's son Aryan Khan, "purposefully and intentionally defamed" him (Kamboj) and his brother-in-law Rishab Sachdev. He had sought action against Malik for allegedly committing offences under sections 499 and 500 (defamation) of the Indian Penal Code.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store