
EUAN MCCOLM: Thirty years ago I had my first clash with a member of the 'lanyard class'. Sadly, it was only a taste of things to come
Thirty years ago, while working as a reporter for a newspaper in the North-East of England, I was compelled by my employers to attend a 'stress management' course. Over two days inside a stuffy meeting room at St James' Park, I would be taught techniques to make me happier and more efficient.
The course leader decided to begin proceedings with a general knowledge quiz. This, he said, would place us in a real-life stress situation.
The quiz was not in the slightest bit stressful. The aftermath, on the other hand…
I came top in the quiz, by some distance. I'm not saying my fellow stress managers were idiots but I'm hardly the fizziest drink in the fridge and I didn't get a question wrong.
Having marked myself out, by knowing the name of the capital of Brazil, as having airs and graces, I was treated with suspicion by the others.
Over the following two days, we sat in that airless room listening to a man with the most punchable face I'd ever seen suggest a variety of ways in which we might reduce our stress levels.
What he did was this: every night, as he drove home, he'd pass a service station a mile from his house. At this point, he would tell himself that he was no longer in 'the work world'. If this wasn't enough, he might light some candles and have a long soak in the tub.
Reader, I am what you might call a smart-a*** and so I took great pleasure in irritating this charlatan, who was being paid handsomely so that my bosses could tick a box that said they were doing the right thing by their staff.
When he asked whether, if I was in a plane and the engines died, I'd parachute to safety, I played it deadpan.
'Dunno,' I said.
'But if you don't, you'll die,' he said.
'I get that,' I replied. 'It's just I don't know whether, in the moment, I'd be able to jump.'
'But the plane's going to crash,' he continued, his exasperation mounting.
'Yeah, I know,' I said. 'And I hope I'd be able to do it but, you know, how can I say I would?'
I was annoying everyone in the room by this point. A woman from advertising sales snapped that she'd jump and the course leader told us all this was evidence that, under terrible pressure, the human mind can find reserves of strength.
I went for lunch alone on the first day and then let the afternoon drift past in a hoppy haze.
On the second day, the stress management expert managed his stress by ignoring me.
When I returned to my desk after two days of sessions, my news editor demanded to know what stories I had for the coming Sunday's paper. Well, none, I said. I've been on a stress management course.
Under pressure to catch up, I felt more stressed than before.
It isn't healthy to hold grudges but, three decades on, my contempt for the man who ran that course has only intensified.
He was at the vanguard of the trend for employers to bring in consultants and workshoppers. Rather than creating genuinely comfortable working conditions and paying decent wages, companies could run a series of expensive – and pointless – courses and declare themselves committed to the Government's 'Investors in People' scheme.
The contemporary equivalent of those consultants are the activists who, over recent years, have been let loose across the public and private sectors to conduct courses on equality and inclusion.
Just as my bosses didn't give a hoot about my stress levels 30 years ago, today's employers don't care about the damage these consultants cause.
This lanyard-class is perfectly personified by Isla Bumba, equality officer at NHS Fife.
In evidence last week during the tribunal of Sandie Peggie – suing the health board and trans-identifying doctor Beth Upton for sexual harassment and discrimination after she was suspended for complaining about the presence of a biological male in a female-only space – Ms Bumba exposed the vacuity of these box-tickers, employed to ensure their employers comply with whichever target or objective is currently in vogue.
In the case of Ms Bumba – a £60k-a-year equality officer with seemingly no understanding of the Equality Act – this meant giving advice that not only left Sandie Peggie victim of a shocking witch-hunt but also left her employers, funded by the Scottish taxpayer, open to costly legal action, such as the tribunal now taking place.
But the hapless equality officer cannot be a scapegoat for her employers. The chief executive of NHS Fife, Carol Potter, and the board –chaired by Pat Kilpatrick –must all go.
And they must go as publicly as possible.
This is not only necessary for the good governance of NHS Fife, it is essential if the grip of gender ideologues on public bodies is to be loosened.
Carol Potter, Isla Bumba, Pat Kilpatrick and every member of the NHS Fife board must become examples of what happens when those in authority ignore their responsibilities to both employees and the law.
Right now, lurking in offices across Scotland, there are overconfident and under- qualified men and women who hold in their hands – and seem indecently eager to exercise – the power to destroy careers.
These people, with their courses and their talk of 'best practice', are a danger.
Fortunately, there already exist robust equality laws which, among other things, protect the sex-based rights of women.
There should be no need in any organisation with a functioning legal department
to employ someone to ensure compliance with the law, especially when that individual doesn't have the faintest idea what they're talking about.
For decades, workplaces have been invaded by clipboard-wielding, power-tripping consultants and experts who – in order to justify their salaries – make life unnecessarily difficult for the rest of us.
Once you've clashed with one of these exhausting little tyrants, no number of stress management courses will help you forget.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Times
an hour ago
- Times
Is this a good time to buy shares in National Grid?
T his month's official report into the power cut at Heathrow airport in March made uncomfortable reading for National Grid. The company presents itself as the careful custodian of the high-voltage electricity network across England and Wales — yet the report by the National Energy System Operator gives the impression that it has been asleep on the job. The blaze in a transformer at National Grid's North Hyde substation that triggered the chaos was most likely to have been caused, Neso found, by moisture entering equipment known as a bushing, causing a short circuit and the ignition of oil within it. Moisture had been detected in oil samples in July 2018, indicating an 'imminent fault' that needed fixing — yet National Grid failed to do so for seven years. It deferred basic maintenance at the substation and failed to fix a fire suppression system that was found in 2022 to be 'inoperable'. Some 108 of National Grid's 805 transformers nationally are overdue maintenance, the report found, a proportion that's within the company's own limits but raises obvious questions about what risks may be going unaddressed.


Daily Mail
5 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Lonely Britain: Surge in people living alone to 8.4m fuelled by rise in over-65s
A record number of people are now living alone in the UK with a surge over the past decade driven entirely by a rise in over-65s residing on their own, official figures show. In total there were 8.4 million Britons living alone in 2024 - an increase of 11 per cent from 7.6 million people in 2014 - equivalent to 12.5 per cent of all UK households. More than half were 65 and over with an estimated 4.3 million over-65s living alone last year, up from 3.5 million a decade earlier, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) said. The statistics body said that 'people aged 65 years or over accounted in full for the increase in people living alone' while the number of people aged under 65 years living on their own remained stable. Some 40.9 per cent of women aged 65 and over lived alone compared to 27 per cent of men of the same age. The ONS said this reflects greater life expectancies in women while data also shows that men are more likely to remarry. Experts have raised the alarm over the epidemic of loneliness facing Britons, with the World Health Organisation declaring loneliness to be a pressing global health threat in 2023. The figures also show that the proportion of young adults living with their parents has risen by almost 10 per cent in a decade. Some 3.6 million people aged 20 to 34 years lived with their parents in 2024 compared to 3.3 million in 2014 - with more young adults now living with their parents at older ages. Young men are more likely to be at home with their parents than women, with 33.7 per cent of men aged between 20 and 34 years living in the family home, compared with 22.1 per cent of women. The ONS said more young adults living with their parents at older ages is part of a 'trend of adults reaching milestones later in life' - such as getting married and having children - and may be 'explained by a number of factors including increased housing costs'. Alison Fernandes, a partner at Hall Brown Family Law, said the rise in the number of women aged over 65 living alone indicated how much more confident women are now than their counterparts in previous generations. She said: 'Some of these individuals will have been among the first to capitalise on the opportunities to develop careers on an equal footing with men as a result of sex equality legislation. 'Having worked hard to establish a sense of financial independence, many will be wary of seeing it jeopardised. 'That is because they know a significant proportion of marriages do not sadly last the course. In fact, some of these women may already have been divorced and not wish to experience a repeat.' She added: 'That contrasts greatly with men of a similar age who are far more likely to remarry after a break-up.'


The Independent
5 hours ago
- The Independent
Ready to DIY your dream manicure? Win 1 of 4 £80 gift cards from 14 Day Mani
Looking to give your nails the salon treatment without ever stepping foot in one? 14 Day Mani is the award-winning brand redefining at-home nail care with their gel polish kits. Their innovative, HEMA-free gel polish is not only kind to sensitive skin but also delivers salon quality, chip-free results that last for over two weeks. With a mission to empower beauty lovers to "build it yourself", they offer a cost-effective alternative to pricey salon visits. No appointments, just flawless results at home. Now, here's your chance to experience it for yourself. Enter their latest giveaway for a chance to win a £80 gift card, the perfect amount to help you snap up one of their brilliant At-Home Kits, a few stunning Gel Polish Shades or other goodies from their shop. Whether you're new to DIY nails or a seasoned pro, this is your opportunity to elevate your game with trusted, professional grade tools designed for real life. Prize: 1 £80 14 Day Mani gift card Terms and Conditions - The Independent 18+. UK and residents only. Promotion closes at 23:59 BST on the 31 August 2025. Winner will be drawn at random from all entries received by the closing date. The prize is non-transferable and no cash alternative is available. Standard Comps & Offers rules apply, see here.