logo
Kansas Reflector staff rakes in recognition with 16 awards in statewide journalism contest

Kansas Reflector staff rakes in recognition with 16 awards in statewide journalism contest

Yahoo10-04-2025
Tecumseh South Elementary Students wheel the "moon tree" across a field before planting it May 28, 2024. The field is adjacent to the school, which is just east of Topeka in Shawnee County. This photo was part of an entry that won third place for best story/picture combination in the 2025 Kansas Press Association awards. (Sherman Smith/Kansas Reflector)
The width and breadth of Kansas Reflector journalism was recognized in the annual Kansas Press Association contest results announced Wednesday.
From business reporting to commentary to overall recognition, a swath of Reflector reporters, editors and contributors shared the 16 awards in the Division VII category. The task of writing these award summaries has fallen to me over the years, and you might think that the excitement fades, but it hasn't yet. Being part of this staff and effort to bring free, nonprofit journalism to the Sunflower State remains a spectacular privilege.
Editor in chief Sherman Smith was named Kansas journalist of the year, his third time winning that award since founding the Reflector in the summer of 2020. He also won first place in the series category for coverage of the Marion County Record newspaper raid anniversary. He shared that award with independent journalist Marisa Kabas.
Former Reflector and Missouri Independent reporter Allison Kite and Stateline's Kevin Hardy won first place for local business story.
Finally among the first place finishers, opinion contributors Eric Thomas and Mark McCormick were both recognized for column writing. I'm delighted to see Eric and Mark recognized for their determined, consistent and ever-readable pieces. I finished third in the category, which translates to a Reflector sweep of the top three finishers.
'I have the best job in the world because I get to work with all my favorite journalists in a tireless quest to speak truth to power and lift Kansans' voices,' Smith told me Wednesday evening.
I couldn't agree more.
Further staff members were honored with an array of second-place finishes. Reporter Anna Kaminski received the distinction for her entry in the military story category, while former reporter Rachel Mipro placed for an environmental story. Mipro departed in July, and Kaminski arrived in August. Working with both has been a joy.
Now we come to an eternally tricky piece of any awards story. That would be the writer covering his or her own awards. I placed second for journalist of the year for the second time in a row. In this case, however, I'm right behind Smith. I'm sure I'll never hear the end of it. I also finished second in editorial writing.
Other Kansas Press Association awards for Kansas Reflector staff included:
New Journalist Award: Third place, Anna Kaminski
Investigative Story: Third place, Sherman Smith
Education Story: Third place, ''Unapologetically loud': How student journalists fought a Kansas district over spyware and won,' Sherman Smith
Column Writing: Third place, Clay Wirestone
Column Writing: Third place, Max McCoy
Best Story/Picture Combination: Third place, 'Kansas elementary school students plant exclusive sweetgum that traversed the moon,' Sherman Smith
Military Story: Third Place, 'Bill protecting Kansans veterans from 'claim sharks' vaporized after flat tax failed,' Sherman Smith
Each year I repeat some variant on the journalistic truism that no one does these jobs for awards. The most important recognition I receive comes from our readers, both in person and through email. But only the must curmudgeonly of codgers would refuse such distinction when offered.
On behalf of Reflector staff, thanks to the KPA, and we hope to keep serving you all.
Clay Wirestone is Kansas Reflector opinion editor. Through its opinion section, Kansas Reflector works to amplify the voices of people who are affected by public policies or excluded from public debate. Find information, including how to submit your own commentary, here.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Will Frank White recall get delayed? What county legislators and lawsuits say
Will Frank White recall get delayed? What county legislators and lawsuits say

Yahoo

time3 days ago

  • Yahoo

Will Frank White recall get delayed? What county legislators and lawsuits say

As the future of a planned recall election for County Executive Frank White Jr. heads to the courts, the Jackson County Legislature may be changing its tune to support pushing the vote to a later date. Legislators had initially set the election date for Aug. 26. But in the face of multiple legal challenges and concerns from local election boards, they introduced an ordinance Monday supporting a Nov. 4 election to recall White, a Democrat and former Royals Hall of Famer who has served as county executive since 2016. The ordinance suggests that Nov. 4 — when a county election is already scheduled — would be the next most appropriate date if a 'lawful election date' could not be found within 60 days of when voters submitted the petition prompting a recall vote, which is the timeline outlined in the county's charter. Supporters of the recall effort submitted signatures to the Kansas City and Jackson County election boards, which certified 43,011 valid signatures on June 30, breaking the required signature threshold by 109 names. Along with vocal organizers in Eastern Jackson County, many of the signatures were collected over the course of two years by a dark money political action group. White's opponents have cited disagreement with his handling of Jackson County's property tax assessments in recent years, as well as the 2024 tax question that would have funded a new Royals stadium in the Crossroads. White's chief of staff Caleb Clifford said that he and White are concerned that the legislature introduced an ordinance around a Nov. 4 election while the older ordinance supporting an earlier date still stands. 'Moving forward with setting an election date without first rescinding the prior ordinance and ensuring full legal compliance could result in two unlawful, unbudgeted elections, costing taxpayers millions and requiring the County to once again draw from out dwindling emergency reserves,' Clifford said. The scheduled Nov. 4 election is already set to include a ballot measure about amending the Jackson County Charter to make the role of county assessor an elected position starting in November 2028. Currently, Jackson County is the only county in Missouri where the county assessor is appointed rather than elected. Third District At-Large Legislator Megan Smith (formerly Marshall) sponsored the ordinance supporting a Nov. 4 recall, which was assigned Monday to the legislature's Intergovernmental Affairs Committee. Smith was the only legislator to abstain from a July 18 vote overriding White's veto of an earlier ordinance recommending an August 26 special election. The Jackson County and Kansas City election boards have been advocating for a Nov. 4 date for multiple weeks, arguing that state and federal law afforded them a longer timeline to administer an election. During the July 18 vote, Smith echoed their concerns, noting that an August election date may disenfranchise voters overseas who will not receive ballots in time or voters who need to vote early or by absentee ballot. Forcing an election in violation of state law could open the door for other lawsuits or election results to be invalidated in the future, Smith said. 'I don't know if [the legislature] will get something done before the courts do,' said Tammy Brown, Republican Director of the Jackson County Election Board. 'We'll be happy either way whenever they get settled.' The legislature and election boards have been involved in conflicting lawsuits, both of which ask the Jackson County court system to issue guidance on when a recall election should take place. A lawsuit filed July 9 by four Jackson County residents, including former chairs of both the Democratic and Republican parties of Jackson County – Phil LeVota and Mark Anthony Jones, respectively – asked the court to mandate an Aug. 26 election regardless of any action from either White or the legislature. The next day, the Jackson County and Kansas City election boards filed their own lawsuit, arguing that the proposed Aug. 26 date could not be legally enforced. 'We have certain federal and state laws we have to follow,' Brown said. 'We understand that they wanted a very speedy, quick election, but all of our elections start 10 weeks out, so we had to follow the law and that's what we've done. That's why we had to file the lawsuit.' As of Tuesday, both lawsuits have been consolidated into one case. Jackson County judge Mary Wayne Seaton will hear the combined lawsuit on Aug. 1. Meanwhile, some Jackson County residents and organizations are calling for White to resign before a special election proceeds. The Urban Council, a coalition of civil rights organizations in the Kansas City area affiliated with the Urban Summit, joined LeVota and Sixth District Legislator Sean Smith last week in demanding that White step down. White has said that he would support a Nov. 4 election, while LeVota has called for a special election in September or October if the courts ruled against an Aug. 26 date. Both White and LeVota have said that running the recall question during a special election outside of Nov. 4 would cost taxpayers about $2 million. If Smith's ordinance supporting a Nov. 4 election passes, White would have 10 days to veto it, at which point the legislature could overturn a veto with a supermajority of six votes — as occurred with the previous ordinance supporting an August 26 recall election. However, the final decision on the timing of a recall election for now rests on a judge's decision. 'It's up to the courts at this point,' Brown said. 'We'll have to see what happens.' Solve the daily Crossword

Alberta's United Conservatives call in lawyers in Progressive Conservative name fight
Alberta's United Conservatives call in lawyers in Progressive Conservative name fight

Hamilton Spectator

time4 days ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Alberta's United Conservatives call in lawyers in Progressive Conservative name fight

EDMONTON - Alberta's governing United Conservative Party has brought in its lawyers to challenge a rogue splinter group in a fight over resurrecting the province's legacy Progressive Conservative party brand. The UCP has sent a cease and desist letter to two former United Conservative caucus members who are now seeking to challenge Premier Danielle Smith's government by forming a new party using the old Progressive Conservative name. UCP executive director Dustin van Vugt, in a statement Wednesday, said the cease and desist letter was sent to protect the Progressive Conservative Association of Alberta copyright and trademarks that belong to the UCP. 'The PC Alberta name, logo and goodwill were being used by people with no right to it,' he wrote. Van Vugt said neither of the ex-UCP caucus members were part of PC Alberta. 'Their attempt to usurp the goodwill associated with our legacy party in order to confuse voters and avoid the hard work of building a political movement is particularly insulting to the thousands of former PC Party members and supporters who are now contributing members of the UCP,' he wrote. The Progressive Conservatives ran Alberta's government for four decades before collapsing and merging with the Wildrose Party into the new United Conservatives in 2017. The UCP has been Alberta's governing party since 2019. Peter Guthrie, a former cabinet minister in Smith's government, along with former UCP backbencher Scott Sinclair, made headlines earlier this month announcing their plans to resurrect the PC name for a party that would challenge the UCP. Guthrie said Wednesday the letter shows the UCP is worried, and trying to intimidate those who want to move the province's political sphere back to 'normality.' 'They're fearful of us getting off the ground here and offering options to Albertans,' he said in an interview. Guthrie said they're still gathering signatures to register, but now they're also working to join and rebrand the centrist Alberta Party. 'We can get to that official party status now without having to get caught up in all the legal games that the UCP is trying to play here,' he said. Guthrie and Sinclair, both voted out of caucus earlier this year for challenging UCP policies, have said that Smith's government has lost its way, is catering to a narrow band of extremists and separatists, and that centrist conservatives need a place to park their vote. The would-be PCs have told supporters the Alberta Party will take on new board members and begin taking steps to change the name to reflect a progressive conservative alternative in the province. 'It may be that we have to tweak it a bit, but you can't own 'progressive' and you can't own 'conservative,'' said Guthrie. He added the Alberta Party is looking for a new direction, and the partnership makes sense. 'The Alberta Party has that infrastructure in place, and we've come out of the gates — we've had this incredible amount of interest. We started with a very small team, and we've had thousands of people trying to contact us,' he said. The collaboration means it's likely they'll need to hold a leadership contest, Guthrie said, since the Alberta Party already has a leader. Lindsay Amantea took on the role on an interim basis last year. The Alberta Party did not immediately respond to a request for comment. This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 23, 2025. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

Concerns over class sizes, layoffs loom over back-to-school
Concerns over class sizes, layoffs loom over back-to-school

Axios

time5 days ago

  • Axios

Concerns over class sizes, layoffs loom over back-to-school

As Indiana schools prepare to welcome students in the coming weeks, teachers are bracing for larger class sizes thanks to uncertainty with education funding. The big picture: The Trump administration is withholding more than $5 billion in funding for K-12 programs pending a reevaluation "given the change in administration," according to the Department of Education. That comes on top of cuts to state property taxes that fund local governments, including school districts. Driving the news: Warren Township Schools start Thursday, with many following suit next week. What they're saying:"We've heard quite a bit of talk about potential reductions in force," Jennifer Smith-Margraf, president of the Indiana State Teachers Association, told Axios. Smith-Margraf said she's not aware of any layoffs, but knows some districts are choosing not to fill open positions as they wait to see what final openings and budget numbers look like. "It's been a good 15 years since we've really heard talk at this level about positions," she said. "Folks are really wondering about class size and caseloads and what that means for services for students." Why it matters: Research shows that even small reductions in class size can lead to gains in student achievement. Yes, and: Indiana just got back disappointing standardized test scores showing that students made little progress in English and language arts. Between the lines: Smith-Margraf says that teachers will also feel the squeeze of large classes in other ways. Providing extra classroom supplies is one of the first things that cash-strapped schools will cut, meaning teachers are often doing it themselves. "As families have to prioritize other things over school supplies … food, health care, making sure they have a roof over their head … educators have been digging deeper and deeper into their pockets to make up that gap," she said. Threat level: A smaller workforce could also mean larger ratios of students to school counselors, social workers and other positions. Flashback: Class size used to be something that teachers could negotiate in collective bargaining agreements, but that law changed in 2011. ISTA has unsuccessfully fought to win that right back in recent years. What we're watching: More than 20 governors have filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration for withholding the educational funding. The governors said the funding freeze has "caused chaos" in their states' educational systems.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store