logo
NOPE opposes more prison sites; task force reacts

NOPE opposes more prison sites; task force reacts

Yahoo11-06-2025
SIOUX FALLS, S.D. (KELO) — Neighbors Opposing Prison Expansion, or NOPE, opposed a site for a new men's prison in Lincoln County between Harrisburg and Canton, a site that's no longer under consideration. The group is now sharing support for construction at existing facilities.
'Right now we're just looking at taking away information from the discussions of the task force, the studies that have been conducted. And we're just really pushing for any current facilities to be looked at, to be remodeled, updated and made ready. So really, we're not in favor of them building or duplicating any services in Worthing,' said Maddie Voegeli, vice president of NOPE.
SF police searching for parolee wanted for a shooting
She has similar concerns with Mitchell.
'It would just be too costly,' Voegeli said. 'And there are other ways that we can spend the $600 million that would be much better options for those incarcerated and their families.'
Existing DOC facilities as well as the Mitchell and Worthing area sites remain under consideration. Task force members Erin Healy and Greg Jamison are sharing how they feel about possible sites following their latest meeting last week.
'I would say there was more discussion surrounding Mitchell because a lot of Mitchell leadership was there,' Healy said. 'Less on Worthing. But Worthing, of course, is always going to be a point of interest because it is a strong site. It was the, I believe, the number three site location on our consultants' list.'
'The Worthing site probably has a better opportunity of success,' Jamison said. 'Mitchell's just too far away from Sioux Falls and all the employees who work here, who are then going to be required to kind of move there or commute, there is a problem.'
'I've always been hesitant to choose Mitchell,' Healy said. 'I believe that they might not have all of the workforce development necessary in order to host a penitentiary.'
The task force has already unanimously voiced support for replacing the state penitentiary. The state legislature will eventually hear about the group's recommendations, whichever direction they go.
'The state still has an obligation to create a prison system and manage it in the best interest of its people,' Jamison said.
Project Prison Reset's task force has endorsed a plan that includes fifteen to seventeen hundred beds with a maximum cost of 600 million dollars. Both Healy and Jamison, however, question if that price cap is realistic.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Judge Dismisses Donald Trump's Lawsuit Against Bob Woodward, Simon & Schuster And Paramount Global
Judge Dismisses Donald Trump's Lawsuit Against Bob Woodward, Simon & Schuster And Paramount Global

Yahoo

time15 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Judge Dismisses Donald Trump's Lawsuit Against Bob Woodward, Simon & Schuster And Paramount Global

A federal judge tossed out Donald Trump's lawsuit against Bob Woodward, Simon & Schuster and Paramount Global over the legendary investigative journalist's use of his recordings of interviews with the president for an audiobook. In his 2023 lawsuit, Trump had claimed that he had a copyright and contract interest in the audio recordings, interviews which were initially used in Woodward's book Rage, a bombshell that was published in 2020. The audiobook, The Trump Tapes, was released in 2022. More from Deadline Donald Trump Files Suit Against Rupert Murdoch, Dow Jones Over Wall Street Journal's Jeffrey Epstein Story Adam Schiff Talks Of Donald Trump's "Climate Of Fear" In 'Late Show' Guest Appearance; Senate Democrats Raise Questions Of CBS Cancellation - Update Late-Night TV Is On The Precipice After CBS Axes Stephen Colbert; Insiders Lament "End Of An Era" U.S. District Judge Paul Gardephe ruled, among other things, that Trump's legal claim does not 'plausibly allege' that he was the joint author of The Trump Tapes or has a copyright interest in them. Trump had claimed that even though he played no role in coming up with the questions, he had a copyright interest in the responses, the judge noted. The judge wrote that 'The Supreme Court has instructed, under the Copyright Act, 'the author is the party who actually creates the work, that is, the person who translates an idea into a fixed, tangible expression entitled to copyright protection.'' Trump had cited a Feb. 28, 2023 copyright registration he obtained, where he was designated as the joint author with Woodward. But the judge wrote that 'while copyright registration may constitute prema facie evidence of ownership, where there are conflicting and adverse copyright registrations, the Copyright Office does not resolve the competing claims, and courts are called upon to make 'an independent determination of copyright ownership.' Woodward and Simon & Schuster had a copyright registration from Feb. 23, 2023. The judge will allow Trump to amend his complaint, with a deadline of Aug. 18. But he wrote that he found it 'unlikely' that Trump would be able to plead a 'plausible' copyright interest in The Trump Tapes. Paramount Global sold Simon & Schuster to KKR in 2023, but the company remained a defendant in the case. Trump went on to sue Paramount Global shortly before the 2024 election, over the way that CBS News' 60 Minutes edited an interview with Kamala Harris. Paramount Global reached a $16 million settlement with Trump earlier this month, even though its attorneys had previously called the president's lawsuit without merit. The company is seeking Trump administration approval of its merger with Skydance. Best of Deadline Streamer Subscription Prices And Tiers – Everything To Know As Costs Rise And Ads Abound (Hello, Peacock) - Update 'Stick' Release Guide: When Do New Episodes Come Out? 'Stick' Soundtrack: All The Songs You'll Hear In The Apple TV+ Golf Series

Wyndham Clark wanted Oakmont ban to stay private, happy to have path forward after U.S. Open locker room incident
Wyndham Clark wanted Oakmont ban to stay private, happy to have path forward after U.S. Open locker room incident

Yahoo

time15 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Wyndham Clark wanted Oakmont ban to stay private, happy to have path forward after U.S. Open locker room incident

Wyndham Clark opened up again about the U.S. Open locker room incident on Sunday, something that's dragged along throughout the golf world even now as the British Open wrapped up a month later. Clark was suspended from Oakmont Country Club outside of Pittsburgh last week after he smashed a locker during the major championship there last month. He missed the cut at the U.S. Open after climbing to 8-over at the midway point, and that led to an outburst in the locker room. Clark apologized for the incident the next week, and called it a 'mistake in a moment of rage.' But this week, Oakmont suspended Clark from the course until he meets certain requirements, like paying for damage, making a charitable contribution and attending 'counseling and/or anger management sessions.' That was laid out to Clark and course members in a letter from club president John Lynch. 'Obviously I feel terrible with what happened. I'm doing anything I can to try to remedy the situation,' Clark said after his final round at the British Open on Sunday. 'We're trying to keep it private between Oakmont, myself and the USGA. I'm just happy we have a pathway moving forward, and like you said, I'm hoping we can get past this and move on and hope there's no ill-will towards me and Oakmont.' As for why that letter was made public, though, Clark didn't seem too pleased. 'We were hoping it was going to be private,' he said. 'I'll just leave it at that.' The locker room incident was the second such outburst Clark has made this summer. He launched his driver into a sponsor wall behind a tee box at Quail Hollow Club during the PGA Championship after a bad shot. That left a big hole in the sign and actually broke his driver. Thankfully, nobody was behind him at the time. He apologized for that incident, too. Clark said he's had temper issues in the past, but he's trying to learn from the latest two outbursts. He also said it was a 'no-brainer' to pay for the damages he caused at Oakmont. 'I've been pretty open about my mental shift and change to get better, and I did that in '23 and '24, and then having a tough year and all the expectations and just frustration all coming together, and I did two stupid things,' he said. 'But one thing that it did do is wake me up and get me back into the person I know I am and the person I want to be. 'I hope those things don't reflect because I don't think they reflect on who I am, and going forward that stuff is not going to happen again.' Clark finished T4 at the British Open on Sunday with his final-round 65. That was his best finish at a major championship since he won the U.S. Open in Los Angeles in 2023. Clark now has two top-10 finishes on Tour this season. He entered Royal Portrush at No. 28 in the Official World Golf Rankings. Though Clark is currently banned from Oakmont, it won't be much of an issue for him for a while. The course isn't set to host the U.S. Open again until 2033, which is the final year that Clark can play in the tournament under his 10-year exemption he received for his win. 'That's up to them,' he said when asked if he'll get to play there again. 'I really don't know. I would hope so … I did something awful, and I'm really sorry for it. Hopefully they have it in their heart to forgive me, and maybe in the future I'll be able to play there.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store