Ex-Illinois House speaker Michael Madigan — the longest-serving legislative leader in US history — sentenced in corruption case
U.S. District Judge John Robert Blakey sentenced the 83-year-old in U.S. District Court in Chicago.
Nicknamed the 'Velvet Hammer' for his quiet but hard-nosed style, Madigan was convicted in February on 10 of 23 counts in a remarkable corruption trial that lasted four months.
3 Michael Madigan was sentenced to 7 1/2 years in prison Friday after he was convicted of trading legislation for the enrichment of his friends and allies.
AP
The case churned through 60 witnesses and mountains of documents, photographs and taped conversations.
Federal prosecutors sought a 12 1/2-year prison term.
Madigan's attorneys wanted five years' probation, saying he is a good man who tried to do right by taxpayers and needs to be home to care for his ailing wife, Shirley, who submitted a videotaped statement to the court requesting her husband be able to come home.
But Blakey noted that federal sentencing guidelines allowed for a term of 105 years based on findings in evidence — notably that Madigan committed perjury when he took the stand in his own defense.
Blakey was particularly piqued over what he called 'a nauseating display of perjury and evasion.'
'You lied. You did not have to. You had a right to sit there and exercise your right to silence,' Blakey said.
'But you took the stand and you took the law into your own hands.'
3 Madigan was convicted on 10 of 23 counts for a corruption trial that lasted 4 months.
AP
During a legislative career spanning half a century, Madigan served nearly four decades as speaker, the longest on record for a U.S. legislator.
Combined with more than 20 years as chairperson of the Illinois Democratic Party, he set much of the state's political agenda while handpicking candidates for political office.
More often than not, he also controlled political mapmaking, drawing lines to favor his party.
Meanwhile, prosecutors said, the Chicago Democrat built a private legal career that allowed him to amass a net worth of $40 million.
Madigan was convicted on 10 counts of bribery, conspiracy, wire fraud and other charges for ensuring approval of legislation favorable to utility giant ComEd in exchange for kickbacks and jobs and contracts for loyalists, including a Chicago alderman seeking a paid job on a state board after retiring from government.
The jury deadlocked on six counts, including an overarching racketeering conspiracy charge, and acquitted him on seven others.
Madigan spoke briefly before sentencing, asking to avoid prison so he could care for his wife and spend his final years with his family.
'I'm truly sorry for putting the people of the state of Illinois through this,' Madigan said.
'I tried to do my best to serve the people of the state of Illinois. I am not perfect.'
During a three-and-a-half-hour hearing, Blakey noted the numerous letters sent to the court supporting Madigan.
The judge said Madigan was a good family man and a kind man, helping his neighbors without pause.
But he said, 'Being great is hard. Being honest is not. It's hard to commit crimes. It actually takes effort.'
Assistant U.S. Attorney Sarah Streicker hammered home the fact that Madigan has not taken responsibility for the crimes or shown any remorse.
3 Federal prosecutors wanted him sentenced for 12 1/2 years.
AP
Streicker noted that Madigan, having served as speaker through seven governors, 'had every opportunity to set the standard for honest government.'
Instead, she said, 'he fit right into the mold of yet another corrupt leader in Illinois.'
Defense lawyers had called the government's recommended sentence 'draconian' and, given Madigan's age, a life sentence.
'He did not seek to be greedy. He lived a very frugal life …,' Madigan attorney Dan Collins said.
'The rhetoric wants to make Mike responsible for the long history of corruption in Illinois. He is not, Judge. He is one man.'
They asked Blakey to consider the totality of Madigan's life and work and the need to care for his wife in requesting a sentence of five years' probation, with one year of home confinement, a requirement to perform community service and a 'reasonable fine.'
In a video submitted to the court, Shirley Madigan said she needed her husband to come home.
'I really don't exist without him,' she said.
'I wish I could say that I do, but I don't know what I would do without Michael. I would probably have to find someplace to live and I'd probably have to find care.'
Tried alongside Madigan was his former legislative colleague and longtime confidant, Michael McClain.
The jury couldn't reach a decision on any of the six counts against McClain.
He was convicted, though, in a separate trial over the ComEd conspiracy last year.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
21 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Mayors, doctor groups sue over Trump's efforts to restrict Obamacare enrollment
WASHINGTON (AP) — New Trump administration rules that give millions of people a shorter timeframe to sign up for the Affordable Care Act's health care coverage are facing a legal challenge from Democratic mayors around the country. The rules, rolled out last month, reverse a Biden-era effort to expand access to the Affordable Care Act's health insurance, commonly called 'Obamacare' or the ACA. The previous Democratic administration expanded the enrollment window for the coverage, which led to record enrollment. The Department of Health and Human Services rolled out a series of new restrictions for Obamacare late last month, just as Congress was weighing a major bill that will decrease enrollment in the health care program that Republican President Donald Trump has scorned for years. As many as 2 million people — nearly 10% — are expected to lose coverage from the health department's new rules. The mayors of Baltimore, Chicago and Columbus, Ohio sued the federal health department on Tuesday over the rules, saying they will result in more uninsured residents and overburden city services. 'Cloaked in the pretense of government efficiency and fraud prevention, the 2025 Rule creates numerous barriers to affordable insurance coverage, negating the purpose of the ACA to extend affordable health coverage to all Americans, and instead increasing the population of underinsured and uninsured Americans,' the filing alleges. Two liberal advocacy groups — Doctors for America and Main Street Alliance — joined in on the complaint. The federal health department announced a series of changes late last month to the ACA. It will shorten the enrollment period for the federal marketplace by a month, limiting it to Nov. 1 to Dec. 15 in 2026. Income verification checks will become more stringent and a $5 fee will be tacked on for some people who automatically re-enroll in a free plan. Insurers will also be able to deny coverage to people who have not paid their premiums on past plans. The rules also bar roughly 100,000 immigrants who were brought to the U.S. as children from signing up for the coverage. HHS said in a statement that the polices 'are temporary measures to immediately tamp down on improper enrollments and the improper flow of federal funds.' The mayors — all Democrats — argue that the polices were introduced without an adequate public comment period on the policies. 'This unlawful rule will force families off their health insurance and raise costs on millions of Americans. This does nothing to help people and instead harms Americans' health and safety across our country,' said Skye Perryman, the president of Democracy Forward, which is representing the coalition of plaintiffs in the lawsuit. The lawsuit does not challenge the Trump administration's restriction on immigrants signing up for the coverage. The Biden administration saw gains in Obamacare enrollment as a major success of the Democratic president's term, noting that a record 24 million people signed up for the coverage, thanks to generous tax breaks offered through the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act. But the program has been a target of Trump, who has said it is riddled with problems that make the coverage unaffordable for many without large subsidies. Enrollment in the program dipped during his first term in office.
San Francisco Chronicle
25 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Senate GOP removes tax on solar and wind energy but dismantles climate law passed by Democrats
WASHINGTON (AP) — The sprawling Republican budget bill approved by the Senate Tuesday removes a proposed tax on solar and wind energy projects but quickly phases out tax credits for wind, solar and other renewable energy. The Senate approved the bill 51-50 as President Donald Trump and GOP lawmakers move to dismantle the 2022 climate law passed by Democrats under former President Joe Biden. Vice President JD Vance broke a tie after three Republican senators voted no. The bill now moves to the House for final legislative approval. The excise tax on solar and wind generation projects was added to the Senate bill over the weekend, prompting bipartisan pushback from lawmakers as well as clean energy developers and advocates. The final bill removes the tax but mostly sticks with legislative language released late Friday night and would end incentives for clean energy sooner than a draft version unveiled two weeks ago. Some warn of spike in utility bills Democrats and environmental groups said the GOP plan would crush growth in the wind and solar industry and lead to a spike in Americans' utility bills. The measure jeopardizes hundreds of renewable energy projects slated to boost the nation's electric grid, they said. 'Despite limited improvements, this legislation undermines the very foundation of America's manufacturing comeback and global energy leadership,' said Abigail Ross Hopper, president and CEO of the Solar Energy Industries Association. If the bill becomes law, 'families will face higher electric bills, factories will shut down, Americans will lose their jobs, and our electric grid will grow weaker,'' she said. The American Petroleum Institute, the top lobbying group for the oil and gas industry, applauded the bill's passage. 'This historic legislation will help usher in a new era of energy dominance by unlocking opportunities for investment, opening lease sales and expanding access to oil and natural gas development,'' said Mike Sommers, the group's president and CEO. While Democrats complained that the bill would make it harder to get renewable energy to the electric grid, Republicans said the measure represents historic savings for taxpayers and supports production of traditional energy sources such as oil, natural gas and coal, as well as nuclear power, increasing reliability. In a compromise approved overnight, the bill allows wind and solar projects that begin construction within a year of the law's enactment to get a full tax credit without a deadline for when the projects are 'placed in service,'' or plugged into the grid. Wind and solar projects that begin later must be placed in service by the end of 2027 to get a credit. The bill retains incentives for technologies such as advanced nuclear, geothermal and hydropower through 2032. Changes to the renewable energy language — including removal of the excise tax on wind and solar — were negotiated by a group of Republican senators, including Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski and Iowa Sens. Joni Ernst and Chuck Grassley. Iowa is a top producer of wind power, while Murkowski is a longtime supporter of renewable energy as crucial for achieving energy independence, particularly for isolated rural communities in Alaska. Murkowski, who voted in favor of the final bill, called her decision-making process 'agonizing.' 'I had to look on balance, because the people in my state are the ones that I put first,' she told reporters after Tuesday's vote. 'We do not have a perfect bill by any stretch of the imagination.' GOP bill said to be 'massively destructive' Rhode Island Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, the top Democrat on the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, called the bill a 'massively destructive piece of legislation' that 'increases costs for everyone by walloping the health care system, making families go hungry and sending utility bills through the roof.' The bill 'saddles our children and grandchildren with trillions and trillions of dollars in debt — all to serve giant corporations, fossil fuel polluters and billionaire Republican megadonors who are already among the richest people on the planet,' Whitehouse said. Wyoming Sen. John Barrasso, a Republican and former chairman of the Senate Energy panel, hailed the bill for rescinding many elements of what he called the Biden administration's 'green new scam,' including electric vehicle tax credits that have allowed car owners to lower the purchase price of EVs by $7,500. The bill also blocks a first-ever fee on excess methane emissions from oil and gas production that industry groups fiercely opposed, increases oil and gas leases on public lands and revives coal leasing in Wyoming and other states. 'Today, the Senate moved President Trump's agenda forward,'' said West Virginia Sen. Shelley Moore Capito, a Republican who chairs the Senate environment committee. Clean energy advocates were deeply disappointed by the bill, which they argue undoes much of the 2022 climate law approved by Democrats. 'By eliminating a number of clean energy incentives and slashing others, this bill represents a significant step backward for America's energy future,' said Nathaniel Keohane, president of the Center for Climate and Energy Solutions, a nonprofit that seeks to accelerate the global transition to net-zero greenhouse gas emissions. ___ Associated Press writer Alexa St. John in Detroit contributed to this story.
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Kentucky's senators split as Trump's 'big beautiful bill' advances through chamber
The sweeping national policy and spending bill backed by President Donald Trump is advancing, but just one of Kentucky's two U.S. senators is on board. Sen. Rand Paul was one of three Republicans to oppose the bill, which passed through the Senate on a 51-50 vote on July 1, after Vice President JD Vance cast a tie-breaking vote. Paul was joined in opposition by fellow Republican Sens. Thom Tillis of North Carolina and Susan Collins of Maine, along with every chamber Democrat. Sen. Mitch McConnell, meanwhile, sided with the majority of Republicans and voted in favor. The bill will now be sent back to the House for final approval. In a statement, McConnell said the vote is a "step toward fulfilling" Trump's goals to "secure the border, restore peace through strength and American energy dominance, and give working families and small businesses relief from the Biden economy." But he was critical of some components, saying lawmakers missed a chance to make an "urgent, additive investment" in national defense. "Largely missing this opportunity makes the Congress' work to secure robust topline defense funding even more important, and I will continue to urge my colleagues and the Administration to meet growing and coordinated threats to America's security with the resources they demand," the senator said. McConnell has said his top priority before leaving office at the end of 2026 is working to get a handle on "most dangerous international situation since World War II." Paul, meanwhile, said he'd worked to "stop Congress from adding to our debt" during lengthy negotiations that took place before the vote and had told Vance the bill would have his approval "if it included a 90% reduction in the debt ceiling." "I wasn't looking for favors. I wasn't horse-trading. I was fighting for the American people and against our out-of-control debt," he said in a social media post. "Bottom line: I offered my vote for fiscal sanity. Congress chose to sell out taxpayers instead. Only once the bill is released, we will know what the true price was." That potential price tag has drawn concern from several others in the nation's capital — U.S. Rep. Thomas Massie has called it "a fiscal suicide pact between the White House and Republicans in Congress" — and around the country. The "One Big Beautiful Bill," as it's been deemed by the president, preserves tax cuts passed during Trump's first administration while investing billions in border security and the U.S. military. The 940-page bill is estimated to eventually add $3.3 trillion to the nation's debt, according to the independent Congressional Budget Office, and includes deep cuts to the Medicaid health insurance program. More: As Trump's feud with Massie heats up, state senator weighs entering 2026 primary This story may be updated. Reach Lucas Aulbach at laulbach@ This article originally appeared on Louisville Courier Journal: 'Big beautiful bill' Senate vote divides Rand Paul, Mitch McConnell
