BRICS+ Series: SPIEF 2025 Showcases Russia's Multipolar Vision
Russia's President Vladimir Putin gives a speech at the plenary session during the Saint Petersburg International Economic Forum (SPIEF) in Saint Petersburg on June 20, 2025. The 28th edition of Saint Petersburg International Economic Forum (SPIEF) takes place at the ExpoForum Convention and Exhibition Centre in Saint Petersburg on June 18-21, 2025.
The 2025 St. Petersburg International Economic Forum (SPIEF), now in its 28th year, opens at a time of deep geopolitical flux and economic recalibration. With the theme Shared Values as a Foundation for Growth in a Multipolar World, this year's forum underscores Russia's evolving global posture, moving decisively away from Western-centric models of engagement and toward a new architecture of international cooperation defined by strategic partnerships, economic sovereignty, and multipolar governance.
Historically, SPIEF was conceived as a bridge between Russia and the West, a high-level platform for promoting trade, attracting foreign investment, and integrating into global markets. However, since the 2014 Ukraine crisis and more acutely after the 2022 conflict escalation, Russia has reoriented its external strategy. The forum has transformed from a forum of Western corporate courtship to one of alternative economic diplomacy, positioning itself as a cornerstone in the reconfiguration of global economic power.
2025 SPIEF
This year's SPIEF, coordinated by the Roscongress Foundation under presidential patronage, drew tens of thousands of delegates from over 140 countries. Among them were not only government representatives, entrepreneurs, and investors but also institutions committed to restructuring the international trade and financial systems. Key themes that dominated the forum included the expanded role of BRICS, development of new trade corridors, restructuring of energy markets, and increased cooperation with the Global South, particularly in Latin America, Africa, Southeast Asia, and the Middle East.
One of the most anticipated aspects of the forum was the ongoing evolution of BRICS. Following its expansion at the 2024 Kazan Summit, the group has now introduced a flexible partner country format. This allows countries such as Belarus, Nigeria, Kazakhstan, Thailand, Cuba, and Uzbekistan to actively engage with BRICS' platforms without needing full membership. This strategic move reflects Moscow's attempt to create a broader coalition of like-minded states seeking to de-dollarise trade, foster technological self-sufficiency, and share a vision of multipolar cooperation free from Western ideological constraints.
As Moscow deepens these ties, SPIEF 2025 is becoming a space to facilitate new forms of South-South cooperation. Leaders and delegations from Latin America, ASEAN, and Africa have taken part in panels ranging from agricultural supply chain restructuring to joint development of digital platforms and artificial intelligence infrastructure. This is not mere rhetoric. Countries such as Brazil, Cuba, Indonesia, and the UAE are already engaged in concrete trade, energy, and investment initiatives with Russia, many of which were formalised or advanced at SPIEF.
Strategic Realignment
Amidst this realignment, Russia is also repositioning its energy strategy. The decoupling from European markets has prompted Moscow to look East and South, forging long-term contracts with buyers in Asia, Africa, and Latin America. This reorientation is not just a matter of necessity—it is a foundational element of a broader doctrine of energy sovereignty. SPIEF discussions have focused heavily on supply diversification, infrastructure financing, and national energy security frameworks, with an eye toward insulating Russia's energy exports from Western sanctions and environmental conditions. Parallel conversations about the global energy transition are also taking place, particularly on the sidelines, where experts and state officials debate how to reconcile decarbonisation ambitions with the realities of industrial development in the Global South.
Russia's traditional sphere of influence
Meanwhile, SPIEF is also being used as a vehicle to reinforce Russia's influence in its traditional sphere of interest, the post-Soviet space. Business forums with Belarus, Kazakhstan, Armenia, and other members of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) and the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) remain central to Russia's strategy of regional leadership. These economic ties often function as proxies for deeper political influence, particularly in moments when diplomatic relations fluctuate. Even Moldova, whose Western aspirations have grown is included in proposed economic talks, indicating that Moscow continues to leverage trade and investment as tools for geopolitical alignment.
On the broader stage, the forum has witnessed notable diplomatic gestures. Indonesia's decision to deepen bilateral cooperation, and the UAE's growing $10 billion trade relationship with Russia, signal a shift in global power balances. Thailand's potential free trade agreement under BRICS, and Brazil's increasing alignment with multipolar economic values, all point to a future where Russia is more deeply embedded in a web of global partnerships that bypass traditional Western frameworks.
SPIEF 2025, is far more than a trade expo. It is a demonstration of intent—a statement that Russia, despite sanctions, isolation, and war, is not retreating from the global stage but rather repositioning itself to lead in a world where power is distributed, values are plural, and alliances are diverse. It is an affirmation that the age of unipolar dominance is over, and that a new, more contested, and more balanced global order is beginning to take shape with Russia at its centre.
Written by:
*Dr Iqbal Survé
Past chairman of the BRICS Business Council and co-chairman of the BRICS Media Forum and the BRNN
*Chloe Maluleke
Associate at BRICS+ Consulting Group
Russian & Middle Eastern Specialist
**The Views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of Independent Media or IOL.
** MORE ARTICLES ON OUR WEBSITE https://bricscg.com/
** Follow @brics_daily on X/Twitter & @brics_daily on Instagram for daily BRICS+ updates
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
7 hours ago
- The Citizen
SA not ready for fallout if Israel-Iran ceasefire fails, warns UJ professor
As the ceasefire between Iran and Israel holds, the world watches with bated breath to see what will happen next between the two regional powers. To gain insight into the situation, Caxton Local Media spoke to Dr Suzy Graham, professor in the Department of Politics and International Relations at the University of Johannesburg. Discussing the ceasefire, Graham explained that although it is still early days, the truce holds real potential, though it remains inherently fragile. 'Its longevity hinges on disciplined diplomacy, credible inspections, and political will from all actors. If any of these break down, especially due to hardliners or indirect aggression via proxies, the truce could unravel quickly,' she said. For now, however, the signs are cautiously optimistic. A ceasefire on edge: What's holding it together? Graham believes the ceasefire was primarily driven by a rapid cycle of escalation and daring diplomacy aimed at avoiding further catastrophic conflict. Although the ceasefire appears to be working, she warned that initial breaches from either side could lead to its deterioration. She described the thought of a third world war as unthinkable. 'Despite social media speculation, the probability of a full-scale World War III remains low, but not zero,' Graham said. South Africa's position: Legal, vocal, and diplomatic Speaking about South Africa's stance on the Israel-Iran conflict and how it aligns with the country's broader foreign policy, Graham said South Africa will almost always call for dialogue in any conflict situation. 'The South African government has been vocal in strongly condemning the recent military strikes on Iran, describing the attacks as violations of international law. It has urged all parties, Iran, Israel, and the USA, to engage in UN-led dialogue, emphasising diplomacy, restraint, and nuclear inspection,' she explained. Regarding the potential impact on South Africa if the conflict reignites and becomes a wider regional crisis, Graham said the country would likely continue championing international law, human rights, and nuclear non-proliferation. She noted that South Africa could strengthen its moral leadership among Global South and Muslim-majority countries. 'At the same time, the country could face intense backlash from Israel and Western allies, particularly the USA, Germany, and the UK, especially if Pretoria doubles down on its International Court of Justice genocide case or calls for sanctions. 'South Africa could see reduced goodwill from Western investors or governments, especially if tensions rise over its international legal campaigns or alignment with Iran.' 'In the immediate term, South Africa would likely call for a ceasefire, condemn aggression, and activate international and legal channels. In the short term, it might push for UN and BRICS statements and engage the African Union and Global South partners. 'In the mid-term, it would need to manage economic fallout, reinforce public diplomacy, and maintain BRICS plus solidarity. In the longer term, South Africa could use the crisis to push for UN Security Council reform, nuclear disarmament, and multipolar global governance.' Graham emphasised that if South Africa is drawn into the conflict, its role would be principled, vocal, and legalistic, not military. 'It may be drawn in politically, but not militarily,' she said. 'The country's focus would remain on shaping the normative global order, not engaging in hard power projection.' What escalation could mean for South Africa Although South Africa would not be militarily involved, Graham said a wider Middle East conflict would hit its economy hard, particularly through rising fuel prices, increased trade costs, and inflation. 'An escalation in the Israel-Iran conflict could seriously disrupt global oil flows, and South Africa, as an energy-importing nation, would feel the effects quickly and deeply. 'The country's inflation rate, currency, fiscal stability, and household livelihoods would all come under pressure.' When asked if South Africa is prepared for possible knock-on effects of war, such as cyberattacks or disruptions in trade, Graham said the country is not fully ready for the complex and interconnected consequences of a major regional war involving Iran and Israel. 'While it has some institutional frameworks and economic policy tools, South Africa lacks a coordinated national resilience strategy, particularly for cyber threats and maritime trade disruptions. 'A greater focus on strategic planning, inter-agency coordination, and public-private resilience building is urgently needed.' Breaking news at your fingertips… Follow Caxton Network News on Facebook and join our WhatsApp channel. Nuus wat saakmaak. Volg Caxton Netwerk-nuus op Facebook en sluit aan by ons WhatsApp-kanaal. Read original story on At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
The South African
9 hours ago
- The South African
Can peace hold? Rwanda and DRC deal to end regional conflict
A peace agreement between Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) was signed in Washington on 27 June 2025. With diplomatic support from allies in the region, the United States and Qatar helped to broker the deal. Secretary of State Marco Rubio hosted the event at the State Department in Washington, DC. Furthermore, the March 23 Movement (M23) rebel group did not sign the accord but remains central to the continued peaceful dialogue in Doha. In addition, within 90 days, both countries agreed to implement a disengagement plan for 2024. The agreement includes a framework for regional economic integration as well as a framework for cooperative security. According to the agreement, Rwanda has ninety days to withdraw its troops from the east of the DRC. As a result, DRC will mandate an operational strategy for the neutralisation of the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR), provided Rwanda removes its defensive measures. The deal makes it easier for the Congolese government and M23 representatives to negotiate in Qatar. Within 30 days, a cooperative security oversight body will proceed to guarantee compliance. Enhancing regional trade in vital minerals like cobalt and lithium is another goal of the agreement. The United States will have access to mineral rights in the DRC, according to President Donald Trump. Rwanda's foreign minister, Olivier Nduhungirehe, described the deal as 'a turning point' for the area. The DRC's foreign minister, Therese Kayikwamba Wagner, stressed the importance of justice and sovereignty. The agreement could allow for billions of dollars in Western investment in the region, according to U.S. officials. Over seven million people are displaced in the east of the DRC, and the agreement included a commitment to protect and advance humanitarian access for those affected. Within a few weeks, heads of state will be concluding a comprehensive economic protocol in Washington. Before the endorsement of the economic framework commences, progress in the Doha negotiations is considered a crucial priority. The peace deal includes procedures for verifying the disarmament of militias and the withdrawal of the army from the region. Trump's Africa advisor, Massad Boulos, affirmed the United States' involvement in facilitating the minerals deal. Regional analysts and experts, including Michelle Gavin of the Council on Foreign Relations, expressed concern that the deal does not adequately address M23's territorial gains. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 11. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news
IOL News
a day ago
- IOL News
BRICS: The key to a new World Order through expansion
At the 2023 BRICS Summit in South Africa, six more countries were accepted as members into BRICS. Image: GCIS THE annual BRICS Summit, to be attended by heads of state, takes place in Brazil's Rio de Janeiro in early July. BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) is expanding at the speed of light. At the 2023 BRICS Summit in South Africa, six more countries were accepted as members into BRICS. They were Ethiopia, Egypt, UAE, Iran, Qatar and Argentina. Argentina pulled out soon afterwards following an electoral victory by a pro-West Libertarian Party led by President Javier Milei in Buenos Aires. Yet as things stand, up to 40 countries are knocking on the door of BRICS. They are led by the great Asian regional powerhouse, Indonesia. I paint a picture of the role of BRICS in global affairs to illustrate its emergence as a power of great significance. The BRICS Summit in Brazil takes place at a time of extraordinary changes in geopolitics, underscored by the rapidly unfolding disintegration of Western hegemony that has held firm since the end of WWII in 1945. The US, the major glue that has led the West as a united front through formations such as Nato, among others, has unleashed tariffs on Europe in a move that has shaken the foundation of the Western alliance. Under President Donald Trump, Washington's main focus is to 'Make America Great Again', or 'America First' foreign policy that has left the globalists reeling. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ The scramble to keep together the crumbling cookie is a spectacle to watch. Just this week at the Nato summit at The Hague, Trump had to be cornered into grudgingly endorsing Nato's Article 5, which refers to the principle of 'an attack on one is an attack on all'. In fact, so desperate was Nato secretary-general Mark Rutte to have Trump not mess up the meeting that he called Trump 'Daddy'. For far too long, Europe has been scavenging on the US. 'The European Union was born to screw the United States,' Trump lashed out in February this year. It is the EU to raise its budget spending on defence to at least 5% of its national budgets, Trumped insists, and the West has had to reluctantly agree for fear of being totally abandoned by Washington. In contrast, the rise of the Global South as a force to be reckoned with is intertwined with the impact in the growing importance of BRICS in geopolitics. Across the entire Majority World, the common message is of solidarity, togetherness, cooperation and mutual pursuit of common goals. For instance, Brazil will hold the BRICS Summit under the theme: 'Strengthening Global South Cooperation for More Inclusive and Sustainable Governance'. As the Global South works hard to strengthen its collective rising power in the 21st century, the Global North is grappling with growing schism between member-states, particularly in the ranks of the EU, where Western Europe continues to subtly treat former Soviet Union Eastern European countries as inferior. Addressing the St Petersburg International Economic Forum (Spief) last week, Russian President Vladimir Putin put it bluntly, saying: 'The dominance of the West is over.' Similarly, the foreign policy of China has consistently been premised on the principles of 'shared future', characterised by cooperation that leaves no one behind, great or small. The concerted mobilisation efforts by BRICS countries, marked by a geographic and ideological sense of solidarity borne from the era of liberation wars against colonialism and imperialism, are an emotional magnetic force that drives BRICS. South Africa, another key component of the strategic geopolitical bloc that is BRICS, will play host to the G20 Leaders' Summit at the end of this year under a similar theme that advocates for greater cooperation across the Majority World, as International Relations scholars refer to the Global South nowadays. South Africa's presidency of the G20 will focus on the theme: 'Solidarity, Equality, Sustainability'. The theme so irked the US that the Trump administration's Secretary of State Marco Rubio boycotted the G20 meeting of foreign ministers in South Africa. There have been unabating fears that the US could boycott the end-of-year meeting in South Africa as bilateral ties ad been frosty for an extended period. However, word in diplomatic circles is that the US has had a change of heart and will see Trump attend the G20 meeting. Relations between intra-BRICS countries continue to grow stronger by the day. India emulated the rest of the Global South when it refused to support the Western economic sanctions against Russia. Instead, India has been reselling Russian oil and gas to Europe under the obvious guise that the products were 'made in India'. The BRICS Bank, also known as the New Development Bank, is quietly positioning itself to counter the lending dominance of the US-led IMF and World Bank. Trade by BRICS countries accounts for 40% of the global trade, according to statistics. Additionally, the combined population of BRICS countries account for nearly 50% of the world's population. There are ample opportunities for BRICS to rapidly morph into the most powerful global body, more powerful than the sectarian G7 and the crumbling UN system that continues to be undermined by US-led Western unilateralism. There are a number of strategically aligned Global South entities that, working together, can achieve a lot more, and faster. For example, at this week's Eurasian Economic Forum held in the capital of Belarus, Minsk, President Putin made some telling remarks when he revealed that 'BRICS is working on a digital investment platform'. Putin explained that such an initiative could also be rolled out across the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU). Putin elaborated: 'We are developing this platform within BRICS, and these ideas could be implemented in the EAEU too.' The pursuit and formation of networks within and across the Majority World, nurturing of cooperative initiatives and unity of purpose are some of the major principles upon which BRICS can serve as a catalyst to the reformation of the Majority World into a true pole of power in international affairs.
