DHS memo offers new guidance on terminating status of international students
The change in guidance comes after ICE abruptly terminated the status of thousands of international students from the Student and Exchange Visitor Information System, or SEVIS — a database that tracks the minute-to-minute status of international students attending schools and participating in job training in the United States.
Last week, after nearly 100 lawsuits were filed challenging the terminations, the federal government informed federal judges through a statement that it would reactivate the SEVIS records for thousands of students it had terminated from the system in recent weeks. Some universities, including the University of Texas at Austin, indicated that some students have had their visas reactivated in the SEVIS database.
ICE restoring international students' visa registrations
The filing from the federal government said, in part, 'ICE is developing a policy that will provide a framework for SEVIS record terminations. Until such a policy is issued, the SEVIS records for plaintiff(s) in this case (and other similarly situated plaintiffs) will remain Active or shall be re-activated if not currently active and ICE will not modify the record solely based on the NCIC finding that resulted in the recent SEVIS record termination.'
'That lasted about 24 hours over the weekend. We got updates saying that ICE was deleting the sentence about 'we will not revoke or terminate SEVIS terminations for the same reasons',' according to Denver-based immigration attorney Brian Green. 'It makes it sound like they're going to re-terminate some of those people again for the same reasons… It's a changing landscape basically every day.'
The Department of Homeland Security did not respond to KXAN's questions about the new guidance or the SEVIS terminations.
The new guidance, dated April 26, appears to expand the reasons why a student's legal status can be terminated in SEVIS. The policy states that the Student Exchange and Visitor Program, or SEVP, can terminate a student's record in SEVIS if the state department revokes their visa.
'It's not clear at this point if this is the new policy that they promised, because it hasn't been broadcast to the schools. So, we are still kind of trying to figure out what exactly that means, and there are some concerns about the new claims that the government is making in that document,' Maryland-based immigration attorney Anna Stepanova said.
KXAN confirmed that at least 104 international students based in Texas had visas revoked or had their immigration status marked as terminated in SEVIS in recent weeks. Our reporting partner, the Texas Tribune, reports the number is at least 252 statewide. KXAN has reached out to universities across the state to independently verify those numbers.
Green is currently representing more than 30 students across the country who were deleted from SEVIS, including six people based in Texas.
Immigration statuses revoked for dozens of international students at Texas universities
According to Green, all the individuals deleted from the system appear to have had some interaction with law enforcement during their time in the U.S., which was recorded in the National Crime Information Center database.
The offenses, according to Green and other immigration attorneys, range from traffic citations to more serious crimes like driving under the influence. In some cases, immigration attorneys say charges were never filed or were dropped.
Stepanova said none of the cases she is aware of meet the current law's criteria for a status violation.
'The law is very specific. It has to be a conviction for a crime of violence for which a term of imprisonment should be one year or more,' Stepanova said.
Green said his clients got notice in early April that they had been terminated from the system. Along with a message saying, 'Individual identified in criminal records check and/or has a visa revoked.'
His lawsuit, filed on behalf of 23 international students, argues that the termination was 'unlawful,' violated the students' Fifth Amendment rights to due process and put them at risk of 'abrupt detention' without prior notice.
Court records indicate that the six Texas-based international students represented in the lawsuit had recently graduated and were completing their Optional Practical Training, or OPT, which allows eligible international students on F-1 visas to temporarily work in the United States in a field related to their studies.
DHS Secretary for Public Affairs Tricia McLaughlin said in a press release that it would 'consider aliens' antisemitic activity on social media and the physical harassment of Jewish individuals as grounds for denying immigration benefit requests.'
'There is no room in the United States for the rest of the world's terrorist sympathizers, and we are under no obligation to admit them or let them stay here,' DHS Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs Tricia McLaughlin said.
'They're reinstating 4,700 people in the SEVIS system. Maybe those people will be terminated again in a week or two. There's a lot of stress on a lot of students right now,' Green said. 'Foreign students are really upset and worried about what is going to happen to them.'
KXAN's Digital Data Reporter Christopher Adams contributed to this report.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
2 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
Bob Kustra: Donald Trump's ethnic cleansing is proof of man's inhumanity to man
One of the great mysteries of my family life is what possessed two teenage sisters at the turn of the 20th century to leave home in Rzeszow, Poland, and head for a new life in America. I'm sure the poverty of the peasantry under the Austro-Hungarian Habsburg Empire had much to do with it, but still mind-boggling to think they left parents and family they would never see again. One of those young women was my grandmother who lost my immigrant grandfather at a young age, and as a single mom, she cleaned offices in a bank building in downtown St. Louis. It reminds me of migrants today taking the first line of employment, usually jobs most Americans would not accept. On our southern border, they trace their roots to Central and South American nations where they fled the poverty, violence and environmental damage that urged them to head north. The United States is hardly blameless for the lines of migrants seeking work and other opportunities in America. Thanks to its production and overuse of fossil fuels, the U.S. is a major contributor to greenhouse gases responsible for climate change that has thrown many Central Americans off their land. And too often in America's Cold War efforts to oppose any democratic movement left of center, it supported ruthless dictators who kept the poor in their place. Trump's bogus claim that he is ridding America of rapists and murderers simply doesn't square with the facts. The overwhelming majority of Latino immigrants who entered the U.S. without legal permission have been working here for years and have committed no crimes. The Cato Institute reported that 65% of people detained by ICE had no prior convictions, and more than 93% had no violent convictions. Many of those are traffic, immigration or nonviolent vice offenses. Worse yet, those who have crossed the border illegally over the years have no path to citizenship, which would have been resolved in the bipartisan bill, the U.S. Citizenship Act of 2021, that was before Congress last year. But Trump wanted to run on the issue in the 2024 campaign, so he instructed his Republican minions in Congress to kill it. Perfect fodder for his MAGA crowd all jazzed about border security. A now-viral video shows a Latino man, Narciso Barranco, with no criminal record and working as a landscaper thrown to the ground and punched in the head and neck by federal agents in California. That man raised three sons who became Marines. Working mothers have been separated from their children under murky and vague Immigration and Customs Enforcement procedures. Isidro Pérez, a 75-year-old Cuban man living in America for almost 60 years, recently died in ICE custody. The price Trump forces innocent migrants to pay for their hard work and support of family over the years is detention and possible deportation. Masked ICE agents — with no uniforms to prove they are official — handcuff and sometimes shackle migrants. With no warrants or papers, they are thrown into overcrowded and squalid detention centers with little medical care. Ushering in nothing short of a police state intent on ethnic cleansing, Trump's proposed 2026 budget authorizes funding for detention complexes greater than the budget for the federal prison system and detention complex capacity that will allow the government to detain at least 116,000 at once. The latest detention center Trump showed off recently, dubbed Alligator Alcatraz, is in the heart of the Florida Everglades. Tent-like structures baking in the Everglades heat and humanity surrounded by alligators and pythons may test the Eighth Amendment's prohibition against 'cruel and unusual punishment' when migrants die of heat exposure. Trump at its opening joked: 'We're going to teach them how to run away from an alligator if they escape prison.' Robert Burns, Scotland's national poet, lived in a different time, but he coined a phrase still descriptive of humanity's worst impulses. His famous poem 'Man Was Made to Mourn' contains a line that underscores the barbarity of the American president and his Republican Party sycophants. 'Man's inhumanity to man makes countless thousands mourn!' As pundits have claimed, cruelty is the point of Trump's presidency. His is a master class on cruelty. He serves an inhumane plate of vengeance to his MAGA base daily. Polls show Trump's win was overwhelmingly about his promise to rid America of migrant criminals and gang members. Yet, his voters have already registered their objections in communities where ICE grabbed their cooks, landscapers and nannies with no criminal records and threw them into inhumane detention centers. I hold out hope that Americans will continue to take to the streets with their fierce objections to the barbarous tactics of ICE agents and the brutal overreach of Trump's border security policies. Then we show up for 2026 midterms to take the first step in changing the makeup of a Republican-majority Congress that ratifies man's inhumanity to man.
The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
Democrats might be ‘overthinking' strategy to recapture voters
Democrats are rethinking ways to recapture voters they've lost to President Trump in recent election cycles, and they may have been offered an important lesson in the New York mayoral primary. In various post-mortems and focus groups done on the heels of their devastating 2024 election loss, Democrats have thoroughly examined exit polls and voter demographics in search of the gaps in their party's appeal. But Democratic strategist Chuck Rocha, who served as a senior adviser on Sen. Bernie Sanders's (I-Vt.) presidential campaign in 2020, said Democrats are 'overthinking' the solution by analyzing the voters who flipped sides or skipped voting during the last election. 'It's more simple than that,' Rocha said. 'Just concentrate on people who are frustrated as hell and get both of them.' Rocha pointed to the New York mayoral race as proof. He says progressive upstart-turned-party nominee Zohran Mamdani (D) was able to capture voters — including those who did not vote a few months ago in the presidential election — by talking about affordability and other tangible economic issues that appealed to them. Rocha said voters 'want anything that's different' from the status quo when it comes to the cost of living. 'It shows how desperate people are,' he said. While many Democrats disagree with Mamdani's politics, they say the campaign he ran shows the unwavering preeminence of economic issues. And Trump taught the same lesson in 2024, political observers say, by telling voters what they wanted to hear on the economy and his message on 'draining the swamp.' 'Donald Trump and Zohran Mamdani just showed, in very different elections, that economic issues are still king — and that you can appeal to a wide, bipartisan swath of voters by saying you'll bring down the cost of living,' said Democratic strategist Christy Setzer. 'Working-class voters have been drifting away from the Democratic Party on so-called 'cultural' issues for a long time, but they're still very gettable through a clear message and from a compelling messenger.' According to exit polls, Democrats in 2024 lost significant ground with middle-class voters, a cornerstone of their traditional base, down 10 percentage points from 2020. At the same time, there is a decreasing sense of strong party leadership and little optimism about the party's future, respective CNN/SSRS and AP/NORC polling out in May revealed. But Mamdani, a self-proclaimed democratic socialist, took aim at the Democratic establishment, calling for draining the swamp to make room for change. It was an echo of Trump's messaging in his 2024 campaign. 'Donald Trump was successful because … he wasn't afraid to be against and call out people in his own party and other parties,' said Susan Del Percio, a longtime New York-based Republican strategist who does not support Trump. 'Mamdani was the exact same. He was calling out everybody, and then that's when you get to act with no fear.' Mamandi strayed from the Democratic establishment with a clear message of affordability and came out on top in a crowded and competitive primary. Former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, Mamdani's only serious competition, ran on a message of protecting New York City from Trump. But the New York City electorate is drastically different from the rest of the country, political observers say, noting someone like Mamdani may not appeal to moderates and centrists. 'Being a self-proclaimed democratic socialist … doesn't play in swing districts. It plays in New York City primaries,' Del Percio said. 'The Democratic candidates have to look more like Elissa Slotkin talking about the cost of living than they do Mamdani talking about the cost of living.' Realizing they need to do more to appeal to the middle class, Democrats across the country have begun to put forward plans and back legislation to regain lost ground. Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.) recently came out with her 'Economic War Plan,' the goals of which, she has said, are to reconnect the Democratic Party with the middle class. At the same time, Gov. Gavin Newsom (D-Calif.) signed a bill this week overhauling California's environmental protection laws to accelerate much-needed housing construction in the state. In the name of bringing down the cost of living, Newsom's move goes against a history of California Democrats unconditionally defending the state's environmental protection laws. But the New York race gave some Democrats an injection of hope that their party was starting to turn things around after the crushing loss last year. 'We have proof now, and the proof is the NYC mayor's race,' Rocha said. Mamdani won 'the same precincts in New York City where Donald Trump overperformed in the general election,' he explained. Democratic strategist Jamal Simmons said while not every voter is gettable, 'a lot of them are,' and he said some of the people who supported Trump are Democrats who simply found Trump's message more compelling than the Democratic ticket in the 2024 race. 'Voters are not captive to any political party,' Simmons added. 'They have agency. They get to make their own choices, and if politicians aren't speaking to them, they'll look elsewhere.'
Boston Globe
5 hours ago
- Boston Globe
The Supreme Court stripped judges of a powerful tool to fight Trump's autocracy. Congress must give it back.
But now they can't. Based on the Supreme Court's reading of a 1789 law, lower courts can now only take such action on specific cases before them, meaning that even clear-cut violations of the law could continue against those without the wherewithal to go to court. Advertisement Congress can and must correct this mistake. Lawmakers should pass legislation that protects judges' ability to provide robust equitable remedies when people's rights are threatened by legally or constitutionally dubious administration actions. Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up Now, it's true that there have been problems with universal injunctions, and judges have sometimes misused them. But the court's ruling took a sledgehammer to a system that should have been fixed by Congress with a scalpel. And in the case of Trump, the ruling opens the door for him to strip birthright citizenship from American-born babies, continue whisking migrants to countries foreign to them with little notice and without due process, and engage in other actions that threaten people's rights and freedoms. Advertisement The court's 6-3 ideologically split opinion, authored by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, was based on the majority's interpretation of the Judiciary Act of 1789. The justices considered if the statute authorizes broad preliminary injunctions like that issued by Boston-based US District Court Justice Brian Murphy, which paused Trump's executive order to deny birthright citizenship to children born to some migrants. 'The answer is no,' Barrett wrote for the majority. Instead, the court held, challengers of the policy who have standing to bring suit can only obtain such preliminary relief for themselves. '[P]rohibiting enforcement of the Executive Order against the child of an individual pregnant plaintiff will give that plaintiff complete relief: Her child will not be denied citizenship,' Barrett wrote. 'And extending the injunction to cover everyone similarly situated would not render her relief any more complete.' This is untenable, and will only lead to a cruel game of judicial whack-a-mole that fails to provide adequate protection to those most imperiled by these policies. The onus should not fall on those who are targeted by these policies to fend for themselves. It should fall on the administration to show that it is acting in a lawful way. The court did just the opposite, holding that it is the administration that will likely suffer irreparable harm if courts dare to exercise their authority as a check on the executive. The overuse of universal injunctions has been an issue of increasing bipartisan concern, particularly since the Obama administration. In the last two decades, both the number of executive orders issued and the number of temporary injections blocking them have steadily ballooned. But the number of executive orders Trump has issued in his second term is without historical precedent, even exceeding Franklin Delano Roosevelt, who issued a flurry of edicts in an effort to implement his New Deal agenda. Advertisement And many of Trump's orders are based on strained legal or constitutional arguments, such as the administration's claim that the 14th Amendment's birthright citizenship protection only extended to children of enslaved people, that the Alien Enemies Act allows migrants to be deported without due process, or that the Immigration and Nationality Act allows the government to send migrants to countries where they've never been and to which they have no connection. Judges must have the ability to decide when relief extending beyond named plaintiffs is warranted. Should there be limits on that power? Yes, and Congress can include them in its bill. It can also underscore that states can still seek statewide relief from policies they can demonstrate harm all of their residents, and ease the process for class actions to be formed at the earliest stages of litigation to give relief to groups of people who demonstrate a need for protection. Judges handling the flurry of Trump-related litigation need more tools, not fewer. It's lawmakers' duty to give those tools to them. The Supreme Court must also swiftly take up and decide the constitutional and legal questions presented by Trump's orders. The justices could have rejected the Trump administration's erroneously limited reading of the 14th Amendment's birthright citizenship protections, but opted instead to leave that question for another day. But given the risks of the order, there is no time like the present. And in the meantime, federal judges must do all they can to help challengers who will be harmed by Trump's policies. The Supreme Court did not tie judges' hands completely when it comes to equitable relief. Quick certification of class actions and swiftly granting relief to states that demonstrate the peril to their residents are among the arrows still in judges' quivers. They must use them. Advertisement We are not as bound or doomed by history as the Supreme Court's justices believe. The public needs to demand that members of the legislative and judiciary branches stand up and reclaim their powers to check a president who believes he is above the law and the Constitution. Editorials represent the views of the Boston Globe Editorial Board. Follow us
