logo
Australia delivers Abrams tanks to Ukraine for war with Russia

Australia delivers Abrams tanks to Ukraine for war with Russia

Yahoo19-07-2025
SYDNEY (Reuters) -Australia's government said on Saturday it had delivered M1A1 Abrams tanks to Ukraine as part of a A$245 million ($160 million) package to help the country defend itself against Russia in their ongoing war.
Australia, one of the largest non-NATO contributors to Ukraine, has been supplying aid, ammunition and defence equipment since Moscow invaded its neighbour in February 2022.
Ukraine has taken possession of most of the 49 tanks given by Australia, and the rest will be delivered in coming months, said Defence Minister Richard Marles.
'The M1A1 Abrams tanks will make a significant contribution to Ukraine's ongoing fight against Russia's illegal and immoral invasion," Marles said in a statement.
The tanks formed part of the A$1.5 billion ($980 million) that Canberra has provided Ukraine in the conflict, the government said.
Australia has also banned exports of alumina and aluminium ores, including bauxite, to Russia, and has sanctioned about 1,000 Russian individuals and entities.
Australia's centre-left Labor government this year labelled Russia as the aggressor in the conflict and called for the war to be resolved on Kyiv's terms.
($1 = 1.5366 Australian dollars)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump says Witkoff will travel to Russia, affirms plans for new sanctions
Trump says Witkoff will travel to Russia, affirms plans for new sanctions

CNN

time39 minutes ago

  • CNN

Trump says Witkoff will travel to Russia, affirms plans for new sanctions

President Donald Trump said his foreign envoy Steve Witkoff will travel to Russia in the coming days as the president calls for an end to the conflict in Ukraine. Trump revealed Witkoff's previously unknown travel plans during an event at the White House Thursday afternoon, where he also said he planned to apply new sanctions on Moscow and described Russia's continued assaults on Kyiv as 'disgusting.' 'He's going to Russia, believe it or not,' Trump said when questioned about Witkoff's current trip to the Middle East, where he is meeting with officials to discuss Israel's war in Gaza. Additional details on Witkoff's upcoming travel were not immediately available. Witkoff's last known visit to Russia was in April, when he met President Vladimir Putin in the Kremlin. Those talks did not yield an immediate breakthrough in bringing the Ukraine war to an end. And since then, Trump's frustration toward Putin has increased as prospects for peace grow dim. Trump vented that anger Thursday when questioned about Moscow's latest barrage of missiles and drones aimed toward Ukraine. 'I think it's disgusting what they're doing. I think it's disgusting,' he said. And while he affirmed that he planned to apply new sanctions on Russia — which he'd previously threatened if Moscow didn't agree to a peace deal by next week — he also downplayed the effect they might have on the course of the war or Putin's mindset. 'Yeah, we're going to put sanctions,' he said. 'I don't know that sanctions bother him. You know, they know about sanctions. I know better than anybody about sanctions and tariffs and everything else. I don't know if that has any effect, but we're going to do it.'

Russia Is Committed to Supporting Syria's Rebuilding, Putin Says
Russia Is Committed to Supporting Syria's Rebuilding, Putin Says

Bloomberg

time39 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Russia Is Committed to Supporting Syria's Rebuilding, Putin Says

Vladimir Putin said Russia was committed to supporting Syria's reconstruction during a meeting with that country's foreign minister in Moscow on Thursday, as both nations seek a way forward after the ouster of President Bashar al-Assad, a crucial ally of the Russian president. The encounter between Putin and Asaad Al-Shaibani marked the beginning of a new era of political and military understanding between Damascus and Moscow, the Syrian foreign ministry said in a statement cited by state-run news agency Sana.

Matching Occupational Exoskeletons With The Right Work Task
Matching Occupational Exoskeletons With The Right Work Task

Forbes

time39 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Matching Occupational Exoskeletons With The Right Work Task

Regardless of whether one thinks of industrial exoskeletons as personal protective equipment (PPE), an engineering solution, or something in between, these wearable devices are still an ergonomic solution that needs to be applied to the correct problem. In the decade that this technology has started to see an ever-growing adoption at work sites, the responsibility of matching the exoskeleton with a job task continues to fall on the end user or buyer. This is a persistent hurdle towards mass adoption, with several solutions on the horizon. How it started: Like any new technology, exoskeleton startups had no choice but to sell their products directly. This meant that if a company wanted to select and compare devices, it had to discover each one and establish unique communication channels. This process can be slow and laborious, and the lessons learned by one buyer are often not shared with others. One exception that exists in the public domain is 'The implementation of cobotics and exoskeletal devices for the Australia red meat processing industry,' a 91-page report published by AMPC comparing 19 industrial exoskeletons. Ten years later, the landscape has gone through some dramatic changes. Multiple standards bodies have looked into classifying and evaluating occupational exoskeletons. Fraunhofer IPA, a leading German research institute, has created a series of parcours to evaluate occupational exoskeletons as product families grouping results by task. Another change is the emergence of distributors, which could either be dedicated to one supplier or carry multiple products from different developers. As a quick note, choosing the correct exoskeleton solution (or deciding if a wearable is even the correct solution) for a repetitive work task is just one piece of the puzzle for a successful implementation. Still, it is often the first step in the process, and an error there will cascade down through pilots and long-term adoption efforts (and will most certainly negatively impact any return business). Even with all these changes, the majority of occupational exoskeletons are still sold directly by their producers, with some alternative acquisition and comparison pathways emerging: First, several dedicated consulting companies have sprouted in North America and Europe, which can provide support in choosing the right exoskeleton system for a fee. Second, some distributors carry devices from multiple developers, and their sales team is becoming more experienced with the strengths of each one. Third, some companies go beyond the role of a distributor and have become closer to an integrator that goes on a journey with the end user and buyers, helping them through the entire process of selection, comparison, and setting up a pilot. Last but not least, in the age of AI and digital tools, there have been multiple systems proposed that can collect data from repetitive work tasks, and some are designed specifically for wearables. The challenge with this digital solution is data collection, which can range from cell phone videos to motion tracking or even full EMG studies, but that is not all, because in addition to data collection, data interpretation with these systems is not trivial and requires effort before it can be condensed and summarized into a digestible report. How could things shape up in the future? There are a few likely scenarios on how the complexity of selecting an occupational exoskeleton could be reduced while creating a more positive and streamlined experience for decision makers and buyers. The car dealership route - developers of occupational exoskeletons could continue to consolidate so that each one has a full portfolio. This would be similar to shopping for a car, where car company A would offer sedans through trucks and everything in between, and the dealership next to it would offer the same range of vehicle classes from a different maker. An alternative to that would be an increase in multi-vendor distributors that already carry competing brands. Some examples of this happening right now would be Stanley Handling and FoxInnovation in Europe, The Exoskeleton Store and ExxoVantage in the Americas and Oceania. With this model, buyers have to visit fewer places and can also leverage the experience of the multi-vendor distributors to assist with selection. The final version could be an investment and improvement in digital tools. This could include online comparison tools, such as those found on car or camera equipment websites, or something more custom that can collect and interpret data from job sites and compare it against the known capabilities of different types and brands of industrial exoskeletons. All this work will lead to the formation of a marketplace, allowing buyers and end users to compare and evaluate industrial wearable solutions against data or prior knowledge. This would simplify the buying process considerably and lower the entry barrier for professionals and companies interested in becoming early adopters of wearable devices that provide direct physical support for their jobs.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store