logo
Anchorage leaders move to change 'site access' rules they say hamper new housing development

Anchorage leaders move to change 'site access' rules they say hamper new housing development

Yahoo29-05-2025
May 29—The Anchorage mayor's office and members of the Assembly are pushing for a package of changes to zoning rules that they say are impeding development and stalling new housing construction the city desperately needs.
"Anchorage needs to build more housing, but some of our tools are broken. To build the future we want, first we need to fix our tools," Mayor Suzanne LaFrance said in a statement released alongside two influential members of the Assembly, a signal the administration is aligned with legislators on the measure.
The ordinance from the administration, Assembly Vice Chair Anna Brawley and member Daniel Volland is 51 pages of technical adjustments to a set of policies loosely labeled "site access." Those are the rules scattered throughout Title 21, the building code, that cover requirements for various access routes people use to get into their homes and other buildings.
"The proposal is complex but could be summarized as a simplification of standards for driveways, parking areas, and building frontages, with an emphasis on flexibility while providing for better physical definitions of private property and the street," according to a staff report from the municipality's Planning Department.
The proposed reforms, which are up for public testimony in June, came out of a monthslong working group that brought together developers, planners, community advocates, elected officials and others to address building rules that were hindering new projects.
"I would characterize this one less as 'unlocking a bunch of new housing.' This is fixing something that isn't working in the code now," Brawley said in an interview.
Over the last several years, elected officials from all different political backgrounds have been trying to change planning and zoning rules in ways that make it easier to build new residential units. But not all those adjustments have worked. Brawley said there are big sections of the building code that are so technical, cumbersome, and hard to understand that simply parsing it has become a delay for builders.
"If the code is too complicated to read, then it's not working," Brawley said.
The new proposal simplifies code around site access development. It also grants more administrative discretion for the many instances where projects, especially in-fill development and new multifamily structures, involve nuances and variables that are hard to completely square with written regulations.
"What problem were we trying to solve here?" asked Daniel Mckenna-Foster from the city's Long-Range Planning Division during a February meeting hosted by the Federation of Community Councils. "It's really about the interaction between private properties and the street...and how people get from one to the other."
Many of the requirements addressed in the new ordinance have been on pause since the Assembly passed a moratorium on implementing them several months ago. That pause is set to expire this November. The working group proposal, which was endorsed by the Planning and Zoning Commission in March before it went along to the Assembly, would replace the previous site access rules.
"It is more expensive and challenging than ever to build housing in Anchorage," said Tyler Robinson, Vice President of Cook Inlet Housing Authority, in a statement released after the working group made it's recommendations. "The changes to code introduced by the Site Access ordinance fundamentally broke our ability to provide more housing to the community — from single-family homes to large apartment buildings."
LaFrance has made housing a policy priority for her administration, emphasizing that the municipality and Assembly need a multi-prong approach to add 10,000 new housing units in the coming decade. The administration, along with allies on the Assembly who are pushing for better development strategies, say one piece of that is promptly scrapping policies that aren't working.
"This is fixing problems we already know about, this isn't new policy," Brawley said of the new proposal. "I think it's both the product and the process we wanted to highlight."
The Assembly will hear public testimony on the ordinance at its June 10 meeting.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Joint subcommittee studying even-year elections meets for first time
Joint subcommittee studying even-year elections meets for first time

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Joint subcommittee studying even-year elections meets for first time

RICHMOND — A joint legislative subcommittee is studying what it would mean to move all of Virginia's elections to even years. The subcommittee met at the General Assembly building Tuesday for the first of four discussions this summer and fall. It's largely by historical fluke that Virginia has an election every year, according to legislative services senior attorney Brooks Braun. In 1868, Virginia, then under U.S. military control, enacted a new constitution that abolished slavery, provided for universal male suffrage and established a uniform November date for general elections. But arguments over provisions that would disenfranchise former Confederates delayed the ratification election, planned for later that year. Then-President Ulysses Grant ordered an election in 1869. The constitution — excluding the Confederate disenfranchisement clauses — was ratified by referendum, and Virginia also elected its first Reconstruction-era governor and legislature. The commonwealth has held odd-year elections ever since. Arguments in favor of election consolidation to even years cite reduced costs and that voter turnout for state and local elections would be drastically improved. 'If turnout is your only consideration, or your major consideration, you stuff everything into a presidential year,' said political analyst Bob Holsworth during Tuesday's presentations. You can think of Virginia as having four separate electorates, presenters said. The first group votes in presidential elections, over the past 15 years, consistently accounts for 70 to 75% of the population. The second group, voting in presidential midterm elections, has seen improved turnout since 2014 and includes between 40 and 60% of the population. The third group votes in Virginia's gubernatorial and House of Delegates elections every four years the year after the presidential election and is made up of around 40 to 55% of the population. The last group, voting in midterm gubernatorial elections, which includes House of Delegates and state Senate elections, has the worst voter turnout, with between 29 and 42% of the vote. Consolidating elections does result in better turnout, but it also means that local candidates must compete with federal or state candidates for attention and dollars. In Hampton Roads, following a 2021 law that meant local elections that historically held in May were moved to November, local candidates said it was hard to be heard over the noise of the presidential race, if voters knew there was a back half of the ballot at all. 2024 is first time some Hampton Roads elections are in November. Is it helping or hurting? 'I have 17 incorporated towns (in my district) on the Eastern Shore, so you're talking about 200 to 500 people, you're talking about posters, just meeting your neighbor and asking them to vote,' Del. Rob Bloxom, R-Mappsville, said. 'They should be talking about the potholes, the tree trimming, the ditch maintenance, not national issues, not immigration, not pro-life. They'll never vote on any of that.' Changing Virginia's elections to occur solely in even years would not be a simple process, Braun, the legislative services attorney, said. Virginia's constitution does not mandate odd year elections for state office, but it does specify term lengths and when they start. To get on an even-year schedule, the governor, for example would need to serve either a three or five-year term. The constitution would need to be amended to allow for one-time shortened or lengthened terms for the governor, lieutenant governor, attorney general, House of Delegates members, state senators and other constitutional officers like sheriffs and commonwealth's attorneys. To make the change, a constitutional amendment would have to be proposed by the subcommittee in the next legislative session and then subsequently pass the lengthy ratification process. Braun modeled a timeline in which the first election for statewide offices and the entire legislature would be serving a regular term would be in 2034. That's assuming that the governor's term was temporarily reduced to three years instead of five. After 12 election cycles, in 2041, the city clerk of court position would finally be back to its regularly-scheduled eight-year term and consolidation would be complete. The joint subcommittee will meet again this Thursday to discuss how campaign finance would be affected. Kate Seltzer, (757)713-7881 Solve the daily Crossword

Japan Faces 40-Year Debt Sale as Fiscal Fears Linger After Vote
Japan Faces 40-Year Debt Sale as Fiscal Fears Linger After Vote

Bloomberg

timea day ago

  • Bloomberg

Japan Faces 40-Year Debt Sale as Fiscal Fears Linger After Vote

Japan's 40-year government bond auction on Wednesday will be the first test of investor appetite for super-long debt following a historic election defeat for Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba. Investors remain concerned over the outlook of bonds in one of the most indebted developed nations amid expectations of higher government spending as Ishiba tries to placate disaffected voters. Widening asset swap spreads are already pointing to worries over Japan's fiscal trajectory.

Walczyk wants commission on government efficiency for New York
Walczyk wants commission on government efficiency for New York

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Walczyk wants commission on government efficiency for New York

Jul. 21—One north country lawmaker wants to remake the Trump administration's "Department of Government Efficiency" in New York — and he's pitching it as a way to address state's projected $750 million budget shortfall. State Sen. Mark C. Walczyk, R-Sackets Harbor, sponsors a bill in the state legislature to create the "New York state commission on government efficiency." It's been around since February, and in just seven paragraphs of core language, lays out a new state commission that would be focused on identifying 'unnecessary and wasteful spending' in the state's books, and offering recommendations on spending items to be eliminated. It would consist of eight members: two each appointed by the Senate majority and minority leaders, and two each from the Assembly speaker and minority leader. Members would serve a term of two years and wouldn't be paid. The commission would be tasked with generating a report within a year and would continue to generate annual reports from there on. Those reports will deliver their report to the Governor, the Senate President Pro Tempore and the Assembly Speaker. Walczyk argues that the state's $750 million budget gap, generated by changes made to the federal rules regarding Medicaid and how states can fund their subsidized health insurance programs, is actually of a symptom of waste, fraud and abuse within the state's quarter-billion-dollar-plus budget. "Instead of scrambling to fill the $750 million hole, the real question is why are we in this situation at all?" he said. "New York's financial woes stem not from the decisions of the federal Congress and President Trump, but from a bloated budget and corrupt process completely out of line with the needs of real New Yorkers." Walczyk said his plan would save the state billions and would serve as a check on the budget he says was rammed through late with little transparency. "By scrutinizing the state's spending plan and showing people where their tax dollars are going, we can close the funding gap overnight," he said. Walczyk pointed to one program as an example of waste, the state's multi-billion-dollar Empire State Film Tax Credit, which is much-maligned by spending hawks. A tax credit for film and TV productions conducted in New York, Gov. Kathleen C. Hochul called for $800 million for the program this fiscal year, and over $7.7 billion in tax deductions have gone out over 11 years. The state contends the program nets about $1.70 for local and state government tax coffers per $1 in tax incentives from the state, and the heavily downstate-focused TV and producers groups say there's been a definite bump in the number of projects happening in the state. With those productions come jobs, investments, and long-term commitments to supporting a local economy. The Motion Picture Association projects $1.3 million per day in local spending can come with a major TV or movie production. Walczyk pointed to other analysis, paid for by the state with an outside contractor, that the tax film credit generated just 15 cents in taxable revenue per dollar spent. Adding in indirect jobs, which assumes that jobs outside of the production itself will be created because of the presence film projects, the analysis found 31 cents generated per dollar. Walczyk also pointed to other projects maligned by fiscal conservatives this year, like the $1 billion injection into the state's energy research arm to achieve climate goals and a $2 billion rebate check plan. "I know it's easy and politically expedient for them to point the finger at Washington, but come on; look in the mirror. Time for New York COGE," he said. Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store