Chief Justice Rush highlights ways judicial system is working to improve the lives of Hoosiers
Delivering her 11th State of the Judiciary speech to the Indiana legislature Wednesday, Indiana Supreme Court Chief Justice Loretta Rush highlighted programs, people and legislation that the courts have used to innovate the judicial system in the state.
'Our work is not done in isolation but in partnership with you, our legislative colleagues, the executive branch, legal professionals and the people we serve.' said Rush. 'We are active in our shared mission to promote justice, safety and stability for all Hoosiers while steadfastly anchored within our constitutional authority.'
During the 30-minute speech in the Indiana House, Rush mentioned creating and updating child support guidelines, helping create 4,600 adopted families, supporting elderly volunteer advocates, almost tripling the number of problem-solving courts in the past decade, and enhancing access to justice through technology like AI.
'I often get asked, 'What's the most important case you've heard?'' Rush said, noting trial judges in the audience are familiar with that question. 'Here is the answer: It is the case before me right now because I guarantee you, for the people involved in that case, it is the most important matter to them.'
Every seat on the floor was taken; extra seating even had to be brought in during this joint session of the General Assembly. The balcony, which was filled to the brim, seated a record number of judges. The attendees also included Gov. Mike Braun, Lt. Gov. Micah Beckwith and guests of the chief justice, whom she would honor during her speech.
Beckwith was visibly impressed by the content of her remarks.
'I thought the chief justice did a great job; it makes me even more proud to be a Hoosier. Very rarely do you think the State of the Judiciary matters, but it's super important,' he said.
Making her way from her Supreme Court chambers, through the hall of the capitol building to the House, Rush waved, shook hands and hugged members of the General Assembly as she walked down the aisle to the podium. After Beckwith introduced Rush, the chamber erupted into applause.
'I am honored to be with you all today, fulfilling my constitutional duty to report to you on the condition of Indiana's courts,' she said. 'Hoosier courts remain sound, steady and strong.'
Much like last year's State of the Judiciary, Rush focused on the work of individual judges and the results of newly instituted programs. She began with a light-hearted joke about the 'Night Court' held during the 2024 legislative session, when Republican leaders worked as court bailiffs for the evening.
'I want to dispel the rumors that your leadership — Speaker (Todd) Huston and President Pro Tem (Rodric) Bray — have applied to be our full-time court bailiffs,' she said as the audience laughed.
Rush then got into the meat of her speech as she spoke to the court's role in helping children and families, highlighting the judiciary's work in revising child support guidelines.
'You tasked us with creating, updating and enforcing them. And we have,' Rush said. 'Court-ordered child support last year resulted in over $770 million in payments for children,' she said, receiving boisterous applause.
Rush also spoke about the work of the trial courts around the state in their struggle to find safe homes for adoptive children. She highlighted the work of Morgan County Judge Dakota Van Leeuwen, who enlisted the help of her community to get 500 Squishmallow stuffed animals to give to adopted children that go through her court.
'Each adopted child leaves her court with a cuddly reminder of how much they are loved,' said Rush as Leeuwen showed off a green and a pink Squishmallow to the audience.
In addition to discussing court programs for Hoosier children, Rush spoke about work being done for the elderly through the Volunteer Advocates for Seniors and Incapacitated Adults (VASIA) program. As part of this initiative, volunteers have advocated for over 800 elder Hoosiers.
'Many elders suffer from abuse, neglect or isolation, and some just have no one in their corner,' Rush said.
She followed that by thanking a longtime Johnson County resident, Linda Kruger, who not only volunteered to assist in the VASIA program but was last year's Volunteer Guardian of the Year.
Rush selected as chief justice for a third five-year term
'Her work and that of more than 260 other court volunteers, embodies the highest ideals of compassion and justice,' said Rush.
The speech then turned to the innovative problem-solving courts. These courts are an alternative form of judicial action that Rush has praised in two consecutive State of the Judiciary speeches.
Rush celebrated the Military Veteran Problem Solving Courts in this year's address, including a personal story of Mark McDaniel, a recent graduate of Tippecanoe's Veterans Treatment Court.
'Mark is working full time, was just named employee of the month at a large Lafayette manufacturing plant, has his own home, is reconnected with his family, and has been sober for the last three years,' Rush said.
When recognized by Rush, he held up and then draped the handmade 'quilt of valor' that he was wrapped in upon graduation from the program over the balcony. Lawmakers, judges and guests gave a loud and long-lasting standing ovation. Mark choked back tears as he held the quilt made by community members that commemorated his achievement.
Rush then talked about the drastic changes in technology that have impacted the court system. From data sharing applications that changed the way law enforcement verify the legality of carrying a gun to improved public transparency with MyCase software and, most recently, AI innovations in court recording. Rush said the court's technology has made their jobs more efficient.
'Where it used to take weeks or months to get that record, it now takes only minutes,' Rush said, referring to transcribing a trial.
She concluded her remarks by honoring the newest members of Indiana government, including the governor and lieutenant governor, leaving them with words of advice for the future.
'Though we are separate branches with separate responsibilities, we are a team because we have all been called to public service to build a stronger state for all Hoosiers,' Rush concluded as the standing ovation began.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hamilton Spectator
19 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Mark Carney, Palestinian Authority aligned on conditions for statehood, but ‘it won't happen overnight,' PA diplomat says
OTTAWA — Canada has no specific demands for the Palestinian Authority to meet in order to recognize the State of Palestine at September's UN General Assembly, the PA's most recent top official in Ottawa says, but reforms to achieve statehood are 'not going to happen overnight.' Echoing Prime Minister Mark Carney's remarks Wednesday , Mona Abuamara, the PA's Ambassador to Italy and formerly the chief representative in Canada for the last four years, told the Star in an interview that the conditions laid out by Ottawa to recognize a Palestinian state are in fact the goals of the Palestinian Authority that were communicated to Canada and other nations. Mona Abuamara, the Palestinian Authority's ambassador to Italy and formerly the chief representative in Canada for the last four years. 'It's not that it's asked of us and pushed on us,' Abuamara told the Star Thursday. 'Those are things that we want to have, because we want to build a state that's independent and viable, democratic, and we want to be able to have our people choose their leadership.' 'It wasn't preconditioned recognition. It was mutual agreement on the things that we're on the same page.' In making those comments, Abuamara shed further light on the process leading up to Canada's decision this week to recognize a Palestinian state, but she also laid bare the challenges ahead to actually achieve a viable Palestinian state in the face of Israeli and Hamas resistance. Speaking to reporters Wednesday, Carney expressed little doubt Ottawa would follow through in September, saying Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas repeatedly committed to elections in 2026, the exclusion of Hamas and the demilitarization of a future Palestinian state. But Abuamara, who said the Canadians don't expect any results by September, acknowledged following through on those reforms will be an uphill climb, and will require a massive international effort. 'It's not going to happen overnight,' Abuamara said. 'We have Gaza that has been levelled to the ground, and we have a Jerusalem that's occupied. So those things we will need to have been resolved by the international community, so we would be able to have an election in Palestine.' In announcing Canada's plan to recognize a Palestinian state, Carney on Wednesday spoke of how prospects of a negotiated two-state solution have increasingly dimmed amid Israeli settlement expansion and settler violence in the West Bank, the Hamas attacks on Israel and Israel's ensuing invasion of Gaza. Since the Oct. 7, 2023 attacks by Hamas, which killed more than 1,200 people and captured more than 250 hostages, Israel's military response has killed more than 60,000 Palestinians, according to health officials in Gaza. On top of those conditions, the Palestinian Authority, the main alternative leadership to Hamas, has been rife with allegations of corruption and deep mistrust among Palestinians, dampening its international reputation. But amid little progress on a ceasefire and escalating outrage over the mounting death toll, the mass starvation and humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza, several nations are attempting to revive momentum for a two-state solution. That's what compelled France and Saudi Arabia to hold a joint UN conference on the topic, and what later led Paris, the U.K., Ottawa and others to announce plans to recognize a Palestinian state led by the PA. The current Israeli government, however, rejects a two-state solution. Declaring 'Israel will not bow to the distorted campaign of international pressure against it,' Iddo Moed, Israel's ambassador to Canada, said Wednesday there is no reason to trust the Palestinian Authority and argued the move will harden Hamas during ceasefire and hostage negotiations, a view shared by the United States. 'President Abbas's latest vision for the future sharply contrasts with the Palestinian Authority's long-standing record; thus, it is hard to see his new-found 'commitments' as more than a thinly veiled strategy to maintain the status quo with the sympathy and support of the international community,' Moed said. 'Canada and its allies should not be under an illusion otherwise.' Thomas Juneau, a University of Ottawa professor who specialized in the Middle East, said that without a change in government in Israel, it's unlikely the conditions for a two-state solution will be met. 'Everybody is careful in talking about that, because ... Canada and other countries don't want to be seen as directly intervening in Israeli affairs,' Juneau said. 'But everybody knows that this current government, given its makeup, is not interested in a two state solution.' Likewise, purging Hamas, which rules Gaza, out of Palestinian society is also a tall order, said Louise Blais, a former Canadian representative to the UN. 'Hamas is an idea, as well,' Blais said. 'And it's going to live on in the people.'


The Hill
20 hours ago
- The Hill
These key US allies are set to recognize Palestinian state
About three-quarters of countries in the United Nations (UN) recognize the Palestinian state, which holds a 'Permanent Observer State' status within the intergovernmental body — allowing it to be part of the proceedings, but unable to vote on resolutions. Three more countries — close U.S. allies — have joined the tally in the last week. Last week, France said that it would recognize Palestinian statehood, with President Emmanuel Macron stating the move is part of a commitment to a 'just and lasting peace' in the Middle East. France became the first nation within the Group of Seven (G7) to do so. The announcement came shortly after negotiations over a ceasefire between Israel and Palestinian militant group Hamas broke down, with the Jewish State and the U.S. pulling their negotiators from Qatar. President Trump's Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff pinned the blame on Hamas and argued that the officials will consider 'alternative options to bring the hostages home and try to create a more stable environment for the people of Gaza.' Israel's ambassador to the U.N., Danny Danon, said last week that 'neither international conferences disconnected from reality nor unilateral statements at the UN will lead to peace.' Then this week, as the international outrage over the humanitarian crisis in the Gaza Strip has continued, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said the United Kingdom was ready to recognize Palestine's statehood if Israel does not manage to take action of ending the war with Hamas, a conflict that has been ongoing since the Palestinian militant group's terrorist attack on the Jewish State on Oct. 7, 2023. Starmer set the deadline for the UN's General Assembly in September, calling for an uptick in aid being delivered into the war-torn enclave and for Hamas to release the remaining hostages. 'I've always said that we will recognize a Palestinian state as a contribution to a proper peace process at the moment of maximum impact for the two-state solution, with that solution now under threat, this is the moment to act,' Starmer said. Canada became the third close U.S. ally this week to announce it would recognize the Palestinian state. Canada's Prime Minister Mark Carney said Ottawa would provide recognition of the state in September at the UN's General Assembly, a decision that would entail the Palestinian Authority 'holding general elections in 2026 in which Hamas can play no part, and to demilitarize the Palestinian state.' Trump said on Truth Social that Canada's decision would make it hard for the U.S. to reach a trade agreement with Ottawa. On Monday, the president said that the U.S. would set up 'food centers' in Gaza as food distribution in the enclave has come under intense scrutiny and deaths of Gazans from starvation. Trump also acknowledged that there is starvation among the roughly 2.1 million population in Gaza, sharing a different view from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who said that no one is starving in the enclave. The White House said on Thursday that Witkoff and U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee would be in Gaza on Friday to 'inspect the current distribution sites and secure a plan to deliver more food and meet with local Gazans to hear first-hand about this dire situation on the ground.'


Forbes
21 hours ago
- Forbes
World Court Opinion: Protection From Climate Change Is A Human Right
At the request of the United Nations General Assembly, the International Court of Justice reviewed the liability of countries for their contribution to climate change and what actions countries must take to prevent climate change. After over two years of proceedings, the ICJ released its Advisory Opinion relating to the Obligations of States in respect of Climate Change, stating that international law establishes a human right to a clean, health, and sustainable environment, including protections from the impacts of climate change. While the opinion is non-binding, it will shape the future debate over climate change policy and lead to a wave of new litigation. The ICJ was established in 1945 through the UN Charter to handle legal disputes between nations. Known as the World Court, it is an outlet for countries to settle civil disputes through a neutral court. In March, 2023, The UN General Assembly asked the ICJ to issue an advisory opinion on the legal obligations of countries in preventing climate change. The opinion, while non-binding, is an indicator of how the Court may interpret future climate related litigation and guide future legislative development. Following written and oral statements by countries and interested parties, the Court issued its opinion, and a shorter summary of the opinion, on July 23. The UNGA posed two questions to the ICJ:The Court looked at the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, the Kyoto Treaty, and the Paris Agreement to determine legal obligations established by those documents. Disagreeing with arguments made by large countries, including the United States, that the obligations were procedural, the Court found that the goals and actions to reduce GHG emissions are legally binding. The Court also found that high GHG emitting countries could be legally liable for the adverse impacts of climate change. However, the Court's opinion looked beyond documents that directly address climate change, and connected environmental concerns with human rights. They are not the first. In April 2024, the European Court of Human Rights issued a ruling that stated protection from the effects of climate change is a human right under European law. In Verein KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz v. Switzerland, the plaintiffs argued that enforcement of the Paris Agreement could be made through the European Convention on Human Rights. Specifically, they pointed to Articles 2 (Right to life), 6, (Right to a fair trial), and 8 (Right to respect for private and family life). The ECtHR agreed. The ICJ came to the same conclusion, connecting customary international human rights laws and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights to the right to a health environment. The Court stated, that it "considers that the protection of the environment is a precondition for the enjoyment of human right… that the adverse effects of climate change, including, inter alia, the impact on the health and livelihoods of individuals through events such as sea level rise, drought, desertification and natural disasters, may significantly impair the enjoyment of certain human rights… "The Court considers that the adverse effects of climate change may impair the effective enjoyment of human rights… that a clean, healthy and sustainable environment is a precondition for the enjoyment of many human rights, such as the right to life, the right to health and the right to an adequate standard of living, including access to water, food and housing." Notably, the Court rejected arguments made by large countries that claimed the Paris Agreement, UNFCCC, and Kyoto Treaty were the exclusive documents relating to climate change. By incorporating the UDHR, countries that are not party to the Paris Agreement may still face liability. The linkage between climate change and human rights opens new avenues of legal consequences for high GHG emissions. Climate activists will bring legal challenges against countries for failing to act to reduce GHG emissions, including the continued use of fossil fuels and failure to make companies report GHG emissions through sustainability reporting. Applying it to the business sector, climate activists will bring new legal challenges against oil companies for human rights violations. It could also lead to new criminal penalties, including the developing crime of ecocide that treats environmental actions in a similar fashion as genocide. The International Court of Justice opinion, while non-binding, was a significant win for climate change activists. However, its application and reach is still unknown. Do not expect large countries to simply accept the opinion. Look for developments at the UN and at COP30 to undermine the opinion or change international law to render it moot.