Nepra rejects govt plea to apply revised SoT to KE
Nepra's decision was revealed in a determination issued on Tuesday, which outlines a revised average uniform SoT of Rs 31.59/kWh for both power Distribution Companies (Discos) and K-Electric for the fiscal year 2025–26. This rate marks a reduction from the earlier Rs 32.73/kWh (excluding duties and taxes), reflecting an average decrease of Rs 1.14/kWh after factoring in a budgeted Tariff Differential Subsidy (TDS) of Rs 250 billion for FY 2025–26.
In its formal request (Motion for Leave), the Power Division argued that under government policy, a uniform consumer-end tariff should be maintained across K-Electric and state-owned Discos— even post-privatisation— through a mix of direct and indirect subsidies. To achieve this, the KE tariff should be modified to align with Nepra's approved national uniform tariff structure, incorporating the proposed targeted and cross subsidies.
DISCOs and KE: Nepra approves revised average uniform SoT
The Power Division also referenced legal provisions— Section 7, 31(4), and 31(7) of the NEPRA Act and Rule 17 of the relevant rules— supporting its appeal for revised consumer-end tariff recommendations for K-Electric, to be effective from July 1, 2025. The motion included a request to update the SoT via an amendment to SRO No. 575(1)/ 2019.
During the hearing, K-Electric's Director of Finance Ayaz Jaffer urged Nepra to use KE's most recent tariff (determined on May 27, 2025) instead of the older Jan–Mar 2023 rates to establish the uniform tariff. However, Naveed Qaiser of the Power Planning and Monitoring Company (PPMC) opposed the suggestion, pointing out that the federal government has already filed a review petition against the newer KE tariff determination. Therefore, he argued, the Jan–Mar 2023 tariff should be treated as the valid benchmark.
The Authority said it understands that it determines revenue requirement/ tariff for Discos for each year. Ultimately, Nepra decided not to accommodate the Power Division's request. In its official determination, the regulator stated that despite the federal government's plea to use the Jan–Mar 2023 KE tariff as the basis for a uniform SoT, it opted to apply the rates from KE's latest approved tariff for FY 2023–24, as issued on May 27, 2025.
Nepra announced a reduction in the uniform average tariff from Rs 35.50/kWh to Rs 34/kWh, indicating an overall decrease of Rs 1.50 per unit.
The revised SoT for consumers will be as follows: (i) up to 50 units– lifeline (Rs 3.95/kWh;(ii) 51-100 units- lifeline Rs 7.74/kWh;(iii) 0-100 (protected) Rs 10.51/kWh;(iv) 101-200 (protected)Rs 13.01 /kWh; (v) 01-100(non-protected) Rs 22.44/kWh; (vi) 101-200(non-protected) Rs 28.91/kWh;(vii) 201-300(non-protected Rs 33.10/ kWh; and (viii) 300 & ToU (non-protected) Rs 41.78/kWh. Average uniform domestic tariff will be Rs 27.20/kWh with reduction of Rs 1.13/Kwh from 28.33/kWh.
New commercial tariff has been fixed at Rs 45.43 per unit with a reduction of Rs 1.15/Kwh, general services, Rs 43.17/kWh, industrial Rs 33.48/kWh, Bulk Rs 41.76/kWh, agricultural Rs 30.75/kWh, others Rs 32.68/kWh.
According to Nepra, total number of electricity consumers is 37,994,210 who are projected to consume 103,558/MkWh. The average tariff has been reduced to Rs 31.59/kWh for FY 2025-26 from Rs 32.73/kWh through re-basing.
Power Division explained that capacity charges have been reduced by Rs.186 billion, despite additional impact of Rs.50 billion capacity charges of Jamshoro Coal Plant, as compared to the reference capacity charges for the FY 2024-25. This reduction is mainly on account of termination/ re-negotiations of IPP contracts and change in exchange rate assumption.
The Authority also observed that the petitioner in its Motion and also during the hearing submitted that inter-disco tariff rationalisation is not aimed at raising any revenues for the federal government as it is within the determined consolidated revenue requirement of all the Discos for the FY 2025-26; rather the federal government would be providing a subsidy of Rs.249 billion to different consumer categories during the period.
The Uniform Tariff so determined by the Authority includes impact of PYA of Rs.58.68 billion, to be passed on in a period of twelve months from the date of notification of the decision.
It was further stated that there is no anomaly in the current industrial tariff structure as the total cost of B4— inclusive of both fixed and variable charges—is actually lower than B3, which is again lower than B2. This reflects the benefit of losses for consumers connected at high tension (HT) lines, as opposed to industrial consumers on low tension (LT) lines.
It was explained that ToU (Time-of-Use) pricing plays a critical role in maintaining power system stability and economic efficiency. Peak hours are strategically designated to curb demand during periods of high system stress when marginal generation costs are at their highest. However, lowering the peak rate would necessitate an upward adjustment of the off-peak rate to meet the system's annual revenue requirement. This could disproportionately burden smaller industrial consumers and potentially reduce overall electricity sales, thereby exacerbating the revenue shortfall and contributing to further upward pressure on tariffs.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
2 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Bridging the financial gap: insights from Karandaaz Financial Inclusion Survey (K-FIS)—I
While health and education have traditionally dominated the human development and public policy agenda globally, financial inclusion has increasingly emerged as a critical development goal over the past decade and a half. The rationale is straightforward: by integrating the underbanked, underserved, and financially excluded populations into the formal financial system, economies can become more resilient and inclusive. Access to financial services – such as bank accounts, credit, savings, and insurance – empowers individuals and simultaneously expands the formal economy, enhancing government capacity to raise revenue and deliver essential public goods and services. In Pakistan, financial inclusion remains low when measured as the percentage of working-age individuals (15+) who own a bank account. According to the Karandaaz Financial Inclusion Survey (K-FIS) 2024, only 35 percent of Pakistani adults are financially included. Although this marks a 3.5-fold increase since the World Bank's inaugural Findex Survey in 2011, when the figure stood at 10 percent, Pakistan still trails its regional peers. As of 2021, financial inclusion stood at 77.5 percent in India, 54 percent in Nepal, 89.3 percent in Sri Lanka, and 52.8 percent in Bangladesh. The South Asian average was 67.9 percent. Digging deeper into the 2024 K-FIS findings reveals significant disparities within Pakistani society. One of the most glaring is the gender gap. Only 14 percent of women are financially included, compared to 56 percent of men. While limited financial literacy plays a role (as confirmed by the data), deeper structural factors also contribute. Women's limited agency in household decision-making is a critical issue: only 11 percent of women report having a say in financial matters, whether it's saving, purchasing assets like livestock, or deciding on household consumption. Digital literacy is another barrier, with men scoring 65 versus women's 48 on self-reported ability to use mobile phones, send texts, and navigate social media platforms. The survey underscores that financial exclusion for women is not just a matter of access, but also of societal norms and intra-household dynamics. Ali Akbar Ghanghro (Senior Manager Research & Insights, Karandaaz Pakistan) Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
3 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Deceptive marketing practices: CAT upholds CCP findings against marketers of PREMA Milk
ISLAMABAD: The Competition Appellate Tribunal (CAT) has upheld the findings of the Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP) against M/s At-Tahur (Pvt) Limited, the processors and marketers of PREMA Milk, for engaging in deceptive marketing practices in violation of Section 10 of the Competition Act, 2010. The case originated from a complaint filed by the Pakistan Dairy Association (PDA), alleging the PREMA disseminated misleading claims on social media after the Supreme Court's 2016 judgment on milk quality. PREMA's marketing campaign implied that all other dairy products, except PREMA's, were unfit for human consumption—an assertion found to lack reasonable basis and capable of harming competitors' business interests. Following an inquiry, the CCP concluded that the company had violated Section 10(1), read with Section 10(2)(a), (b), and (c) of the Act. It imposed a penalty of PKR 35 million and directed the PREMA to issue a public clarification about its misleading claims. While upholding CCP's findings, the CAT observed that the penalty amount is excessive and reduced the fine from Rs 35 million to Rs 5 million. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
4 hours ago
- Business Recorder
FPCCI seeks withdrawal of Rs77/lit PL on FO
ISLAMABAD: The Federation of Pakistan Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FPCCI) has urged Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif to immediately withdraw the Petroleum Levy (PL) of Rs 77 per litre imposed on Furnace Oil (FO), effective July 1, 2025. The industry body warned that the decision could trigger mass industrial closures, layoffs, and a serious blow to exports. In a formal letter to the Prime Minister, FPCCI highlighted the severe consequences of the newly introduced Petroleum Levy, along with an additional Carbon Levy (CL) of Rs 2.5 per litre under the Finance Bill 2025-26. While acknowledging the government's broader fiscal and sustainability goals, FPCCI stated that the policy 'does not reflect economic ground realities' and poses a direct threat to the survival of Pakistan's industrial and export sectors. PL imposition on furnace oil: OICCI urges authorities to engage with key stakeholders According to FPCCI, the new levy has pushed the price of Furnace Oil beyond Rs 82,000 per metric ton—an over 80% increase. A mid-sized industrial unit consuming 20 metric tons of FO per day now faces an added cost burden of Rs 1.64 million per day or nearly Rs 50 million per month. 'For most industrial users, this is not a cost adjustment—it is a make-or-break moment,' FPCCI warned. Many industrial firms had switched to FO-based captive power generation after gas-based production became economically unviable due to the Grid Transition Levy (GTL), while grid connectivity remained limited, especially in older industrial zones and semi-urban clusters. 'Grid extensions and sanctioned load enhancements typically take 3 to 5 years. These industries cannot switch overnight. Without gas or grid access, furnace oil is their only operational lifeline,' the letter stated. Several major manufacturers and exporters had invested heavily in FO-based engines in recent years, based on policy stability. With FO now costing over Rs 185 per litre, captive generation costs have soared to Rs 48–52 per unit—well above grid rates. 'These firms cannot revert to gas or switch to the grid. Exports worth over $1.5 billion from these firms alone are now at direct risk, with cancelled orders, missed deadlines, and unviable pricing looming,' FPCCI warned. It noted that some companies have already begun shutdown procedures. The letter also stressed that Furnace Oil is an unavoidable by-product of crude refining. If it becomes un-sellable domestically or unprofitable to export, refiners are forced to reduce operations—affecting the supply of petrol, diesel, and jet fuel. 'This has already occurred several times in the past 18 months. Refiners have had to export FO at a loss just to keep plants running,' FPCCI noted, warning of a potential halt in domestic refining operations. FO-based thermal power plants, which are essential for emergency ramp-ups during peak demand and grid instability, will also be affected. With FO becoming unaffordable, power producers may stop stockpiling it—raising the risk of load-shedding and grid instability during summer. Thousands of oil tankers that rely on FO for transport face an existential crisis, with potential spillover into broader fuel logistics and employment sectors. Cement producers, who use FO for kiln operations or emergency power, could see energy costs rise by over Rs 300 million per year for a 2,000 MT/day kiln. Glass manufacturers that run high-temperature furnaces on FO would also be severely affected, as energy constitutes up to 30 percent of their total cost. 'Furnace stoppages destroy molten batches and damage equipment. Temporary shutdowns in this sector are economically ruinous,' FPCCI said, adding that thousands of skilled and semi-skilled workers could lose their jobs. After a comprehensive review by its Energy Advisory Committee, FPCCI concluded that the policy would not generate revenue, as the product it seeks to tax—Furnace Oil—would effectively vanish from the market due to its unviable economics. 'This is not a tax problem. It is an economic survival issue,' FPCCI emphasized. It proposed the following three corrective measures: (i) immediate withdrawal of the Rs 77/litre Petroleum Levy on Furnace Oil; (ii) uniform application of a nominal Carbon Levy of Rs 2.5/litre, aligned with rates on petrol and diesel; and (iii) a phased approach, gradually increasing the levy to Rs 5/litre only after viable alternatives (gas or grid) become available to industrial users. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
