logo
A Where's Wally tattoo, Hitler moustache and Palestine flag sticker recorded as hate incidents by police

A Where's Wally tattoo, Hitler moustache and Palestine flag sticker recorded as hate incidents by police

Independent22-03-2025

A disagreement in the workplace over a colleague discussing a genital Where's Wally tattoo and someone sticking an 'Adolf Hitler moustache' on their face featured in more than 6,500 non-crime hate incidents (NCHIs) recorded by 28 police forces in Britain last year.
Forces also recorded a neighbour parking too close to a car as well as a report of two white females singing a song with 'Africa' in a lyrics while a black woman walked past.
NCHIs should only be recorded by police forces where no criminal offence has been committed but the person reporting it believes the incident is motivated by hostility or prejudice because of race, religion, sexual orientation, disability or transgender identity.
Personal data can only be logged if there is a serious risk of significant harm or it could lead to a criminal offence.
They are recorded for officers to gather intelligence on hate incidents in communities - but critics say they are an intrusion of freedom of speech.
Under Home Office's guidance, police officers and staff should take a 'common sense' approach, and not log trivial, malicious or irrational reports.
But Freedom of Information Act requests by The Independent show that while many NCHIs clearly meet the threshold for recording, several appear to be questionable.
Bedfordshire Police recorded 'fuss' in a work place when a colleague described a Where's Wally tattoo on his genitals as part of an incident logged that also included the worker calling a cap the complainant was wearing a durag, which they said 'came across as quiet racist/stereotypical'.
Cumbria Police recorded an NCHI were two white women sang a song with Africa in the lyrics whilst walking past a black female in a store, which the complainant perceived to be a hate incident due to race.
The same force logged a man stating on public forums words to the effect of 'European Union citizens, steal your jobs without putting money in and take money out without contributing to society'.
And its officers also recorded a NCHI after it was reported a person made a sticker to look like an Adolf Hitler moustache, and then stuck it to their face.
Staffordshire Police recorded a Palestine flag sticker being stuck on a shop shelf calling for a boycott of Israeli produce.
North Wales Police logged a neighbour parking closely to the complainant's son, and also a pentagram symbol spray painted on a lawn which was believed to be linked to religious hatred and antisocial behaviour.
The force also recorded an incident where a person had objected to a disabled person riding a mobility scooter on a pavement.
Humberside Police recorded a 'smirking' learner vehicle blocking a guide dog's owner's right of way on a pavement. The force also logged an incident where a male pupil called a person 'Rishi'.
Another NCHI recorded by the force read: 'Female sends an email to family members and copies in police email. The email is nothing to do with police and is a long rant aimed at family members and refers to them as "pure evil Nazis".'
Dorset Police recorded an incident summarised as 'brown sauce over car', and two other NCHIs were linked to youth pride events.
Dyfed-Powys Police logged an incident over a person targeted with radio static noise while playing outside in a dispute that started 'when they fell out over a chicken'.
The Home Office's code of practice on non-crime hate incidents was updated in 2023 to raise the threshold for when personal data can be recorded on a NCHI in response to concerns over freedom of speech.
It appeared to reflect a fall in NCHIs recorded by the 29 police forces that responded to the FOI request. A total of 6,684 NCHIs were logged last year in the 12 months ending on 31 October last year - although two forces provided the data on calendar years.
That figure was down from 7,036 the year before, and 8,389 in 2020/21.
Police Scotland recorded the most NCHIs, 1,173, followed by South Yorkshire, 513, and Nottinghamshire, 465.
In November, the College of Policing chair Lord Herbert of South Downs suggested the need for a 'rebalancing' over the public's response to the incidents, saying police should be able to focus on their job rather than deal with 'mere disputes' that damage public confidence.
And last September, watchdog His Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire and Rescue Services found that police were recording and attending too many NCHIs, and not consistently applying national guidance.
Critics include Hampshire Police and Crime commissioner Donna Jones, who said NCHIs should be scrapped in their current form. She said police should not be responding to an incident that was not a crime.
The Tory politician told The Independent: ' The police exist to investigate crime and protect the public. The fact that more than 6,000 'non-crime' incidents were recorded in 2024, including reports about stick-on moustaches, tattoos, and song lyrics shows just how flawed the guidance is.
'This issue stems from poorly worded legislation and unclear guidance issued to police forces, which has left officers in an invidious position of taking time away from tackling serious crimes like burglary, shop theft, street robbery, and sexual assault.
'Hate crimes are impactful and some can be very serious. When these actual crimes are committed, the police must act and take appropriate action. Victims of hate crimes deserve the right support. Policing should focus on criminal offences, with clearer laws to prevent unnecessary interventions.
'But the clue is in the title, if it's not a crime, police shouldn't be involved; they simply don't have enough time. Officers don't have the resources to monitor playground disputes or pub conversations. This legislation needs an urgent overhaul so police can focus on delivering justice for victims and making communities safer.'
A National Police Chiefs' Council, which is currently reviewing the use and effectiveness of NCHIs, said forces faced an 'operational complexity' in balancing freedom of speech and protecting communities and individuals from hate crime.
A spokesperson told The Independent: 'There is a high bar for prosecuting the offence of stirring up racial hatred, which is substantially different from the grounds for recording and investigating an allegation.
'There are many complaints across offence types that pass the test for recording and investigation but do not reach the threshold for prosecution once investigations are complete. We recognise there are strongly held and competing views on hate crime and the criminal justice response to it.'
A West Yorkshire Police spokesperson said: 'Police need to apply their judgement in establishing whether there is hostility towards a protected characteristic group. If, having applied their judgement and taking account of the full context, no hostility is found, the incident must not be recorded as an hate incident.'
The Home Office said home secretary Yvette Cooper had made clear the 'consistent and common-sense approach' required when dealing with NCHIs.
A spokesperson added: 'The home secretary has also made clear that she believes all police forces should be focused on the central priorities of the government's Safer Streets Mission, including rebuilding neighbourhood policing, reducing anti-social behaviour, and making progress towards the unprecedented ambition to halve knife crime and violence against women and girls within a decade.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Palestine Action documentary brought forward due to ban
Palestine Action documentary brought forward due to ban

The National

time3 hours ago

  • The National

Palestine Action documentary brought forward due to ban

The online release of To Kill a War Machine was brought forward to this week after it emerged that the Home Office is going to proscribe Palestine Action after activists from the group broke into RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire and spray-painted two military planes red. Days after the incident, the Home Secretary, Yvette Cooper, said the 'disgraceful attack' was 'the latest in a long history of unacceptable criminal damage committed by Palestine Action'. A draft of a proscription order against Palestine Action will be presented to parliament on Monday. READ MORE: Met police drops second terror charge against Kneecap The ban under terror laws would make it a criminal offence to belong to or support the group and would be punishable by up to 14 years in prison. The film's directors have been scrambling to take legal advice and fear they will end up being in breach of counter-terror laws if they continue distributing their documentary, according to the Guardian. Showings of the film have been lined up across Britain in the coming days and weeks but plans to ban the group have cast doubt over whether the screenings can go ahead. To Kill a War Machine was made available to watch online on Tuesday and has been downloaded by people from all over the world. However, its London-based directors, Hannan Majid and Richard York, are concerned that Britain could end up being the only place in the world where people would not be able to see the film. 'We've operated around the world and have a lot of experience of regimes telling us what we can and can't do,' Majid told the Guardian. 'We've had authorities in Bangladesh telling us we shouldn't even be editing footage of garment workers and activists advocating for their rights, and we've been followed by the police in Cambodia, but we have never encountered anything like this in Britain.' Majid has been working with York since 2006 through their production company, Rainbow Collective, which focuses on documentaries about human rights issues and have collaborated with organisations including Amnesty International. To Kill a War Machine took six months of work and was made independently by the filmmakers from Palestine Action. The documentary uses real-time bodycam and phone footage that the group had put into the public domain. In the film, activists are seen smashing and occupying weapons factories across the UK while explaining their motivation for their actions, which they view as legitimate in the face of alleged war crimes in Gaza. (Image: @IMDmilo) There are also interviews with two activists from Palestine Action, Sohail Sultan and Joe Irving, both of whom were acquitted of charges of causing criminal damage. However, the move by the UK Government to proscribe Palestine Action means there are now questions looming over whether the documentary and events, including a London premiere on July 18, can be continued after the group is banned. 'We set out to make this film in a completely legitimate and legal manner, as we have done with other films. It's been certified by the British Board of Film Classification (BBFC) and it is good to go but now we are being advised that the curtailing of Palestine Action could have a major knock-on effect for us as it could become not only illegal for others to voice support for them but also for us, as film-makers, to distribute this film,' said York. Majid added: 'People are still excited and there has been a tremendous outpouring of support on social media. 'Hopefully we can still go ahead with much of our plans, but we have had to rush things forward and do the digital release this week rather than waiting for September and try to build on the awards we have already picked up. 'That all changed on Monday night and there has been a spike as soon as we put it online.' The filmmakers are having discussions with distributors in the UK and the US about the potential risks of showing the film. 'On the basis of some of our legal advice, we may not even be able to distribute it in other countries and territories if the film is seen as being somehow in support of a group which is proscribed. We are still hoping to be able to show it in cinemas within the law,' said York. They are also considering whether they will have to withdraw submissions for a range of international film festivals.

Former Greens candidate horrifically injured during arrest at pro-Palestine protest hits out at NSW Premier from her hospital bed
Former Greens candidate horrifically injured during arrest at pro-Palestine protest hits out at NSW Premier from her hospital bed

Daily Mail​

time4 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Former Greens candidate horrifically injured during arrest at pro-Palestine protest hits out at NSW Premier from her hospital bed

A former Greens candidate, who was left with a serious eye injury after being arrested by police at a pro-Palestine rally has unleashed at NSW Premier Chris Minns. Hannah Thomas has undergone surgery following the injury suffered during the protest in Sydney's south-west, outside Lakemba business, SEC Plating, which the Greens have accused of supplying materials used by the Israeli military. Ms Thomas, who challenged Prime Minister Anthony Albanese in the seat of Grayndler at the last election, is at risk of losing vision in her right eye, following the clash with police. She has since issued with a court attendance notice by police and charged with hinder/resist police and refuse/fail to comply with direction to disperse. She is expected to appear in Bankstown Local Court on August 12. 'I just wanted to say thanks so much for the overwhelming support I've received... I've been lucky to be looked after so well by the staff at the hospital,' she said from her hospital bed on Sunday. 'I don't want to go into too much detail about the traumatic events on Friday, but, I'm 5'1' and I weigh 45kg. I was engaged in a peaceful protest and the actions of NSW Police have left me potentially without vision in my right eye permanently. 'This is because of Chris Minns and (police minister) Yasmin Catley and their draconian anti-protest laws. 'The anti-protest laws aren't just a threat to people protesting for Palestine, but for any person who wants a safer world for all of us.' Police issued a move-on direction to the group of around 50 protestors at about 5.35am on Friday to disrupt the alleged unauthorised protest. The NSW Greens claimed Lakemba business was involved in the supply chain to make Israeli fighter jets. Ms Thomas allegedly refused to comply with the order and sustained facial injuries when she was arrested before being taken to Bankstown Hospital for treatment. A photo of Ms Thomas on Saturday showed the severity of her injuries, with her entire right eye closed, swollen and bloody, while she sat in the back of an ambulance. The right side of her face was also covered in blood while her eye was black. NSW Greens MP Sue Higginson wrote to NSW Police Commissioner Karen Webb and Police Minister Yasmin Catley to complain about the actions of the officers at the rally. 'I am writing to you to express my deep concern that no critical incident has been declared following the (alleged) assault by NSW Police against a community member at a public assembly in Belmore,' Ms Higginson wrote. 'As you know, a critical incident is an incident involving a NSW police officer that results in the death or serious injury of a person. 'Having witnessed the grievous injuries (allegedly) caused by the police to Hannah Thomas, spoken to on ground witnesses who witnessed what occurred and with the knowledge that Hannah has experienced serious injuries and hospitalisation, I am calling for a critical incident to be declared urgently.' Four others were arrested and charged during the protest, including a 24-year-old man who was allegedly found in possession of a stolen police body-worn camera. Police said the camera was stolen by an unknown protester during a scuffle and was tracked to the 24-year-old's location. It is not clear exactly what caused Ms Thomas' injuries but doctors are reportedly fearing she may not regain sight in her right eye. The Greens meanwhile have said they have spoken with lawyers to potentially represent Ms Thomas and the other protesters who were arrested during the incident. Ms Thomas has attended anti-Israel protests in the past, having called on Australia to impose sanctions on Israel, whose government she accused of genocide. She was among dozens of demonstrators who descended on Albanese's electorate office to demand action after Greta Thunberg's 'Freedom Flotilla' was seized by Israeli defence forces earlier this month. A spokesperson for NSW Police previously told Daily Mail Australia: '[Ms Thomas] sustained facial injuries while being arrested for allegedly failing to comply with a police direction and the arrest was discontinued and (she) was taken to Bankstown hospital for treatment.'

Palestine Action documentary makers fear being criminalised under anti-terror laws
Palestine Action documentary makers fear being criminalised under anti-terror laws

The Guardian

time5 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Palestine Action documentary makers fear being criminalised under anti-terror laws

The makers of an award-winning documentary about Palestine Action say they fear they will be criminalised if they continue distributing the work after the group is banned under anti-terror laws. The online release of To Kill a War Machine was brought forward to this week after it emerged that the Home Office was going to proscribe the protest group, which takes direct action against Israeli arms companies in the UK. The home secretary, Yvette Cooper, announced plans on Monday days after activists broke into RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire and spray-painted two military planes red. A draft of a proscription order against Palestine Action will be presented to parliament on Monday. If passed, the ban would become law, making it illegal to become a member of the group or invite support for it, with penalties of up to 14 years in prison. Since Tuesday, the documentary about their activities has been downloaded by people all over the world, but its directors have been scrambling to take legal advice and fear they will end up being in breach of counter-terror laws if they continue distributing it. Showings of the film have been lined up across Britain in the coming days and weeks – from gatherings in homes through to screenings at cinemas – but there are now doubts about what proscription will mean for this too. Its London-based directors, Hannan Majid and Richard York, said they were concerned that Britain could end up being the only country in the world where people would not be able to see the film. 'We've operated around the world and have a lot of experience of regimes telling us what we can and can't do. We've had authorities in Bangladesh telling us we shouldn't even be editing footage of garment workers and activists advocating for their rights, and we've been followed by the police in Cambodia, but we have never encountered anything like this in Britain,' said Majid. He and York have been working together since 2006 through their production company, Rainbow Collective, on documentaries that focus on human rights and have collaborated with organisations including Amnesty International. To Kill a War Machine was the product of more than six months of work and was made independently of Palestine Action, while using real-time bodycam and phone footage that the group had put into the public domain. Activists are shown smashing and occupying weapons factories in the UK and explaining their motivation for actions they view as legitimate to take in the face of alleged war crimes in Gaza. There are interviews with two activists from Palestine Action, Sohail Sultan and Joe Irving, both of whom were acquitted of charges of causing criminal damage. However, the move to proscribe Palestine Action means there are now question marks over ​the documentary ​a​nd events including a London premiere on 18 July. 'We set out to make this film in a completely legitimate and legal manner, as we have done with other films. It's been certified by the British Board of Film Classification (BBFC) and it is good to go but now we are being advised that the curtailing of Palestine Action could have a major knock-on effect for us as it could become not only illegal for others to voice support for them but also for us, as film-makers, to distribute this film,' said York. 'People are still excited and there has been a tremendous outpouring of support on social media. Hopefully we can still go ahead with much of our plans, but we have had to rush things forward and do the digital release this week rather than waiting for September and try to build on the awards we have already picked up. That all changed on Monday night and there has been a spike as soon as we put it online,' said Majid. The film-makers are having discussions with distributors in the UK and the US but are alive to the risks. 'On the basis of some of our legal advice, we may not even be able to distribute it in other countries and territories if the film is seen as being somehow in support of a group which is proscribed. We are still hoping to be able to show it in cinemas within the law,' said York. They are also considering whether they will have to withdraw submissions for a range of international film festivals. It is part of the Zanzibar international film festival this week.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store