Learning Support Funding Welcomed But Something's Got To Give For ECE
'If you're an ECE provider struggling to stay viable, you're asking 'what will help me keep the doors open? The lack of investment today confirms providers' worst fears - that the Government does not have confidence to invest in ECE because of the broken funding system,' said Simon Laube, Early Childhood Council CEO.
ECC, who've campaigned for a comprehensive funding review over many years, takes the funding allocated to an ECE funding review in Budget 2025 as a big win for the entire sector, but says an announcement with the details can't come soon enough.
'After Budget 2024 we were told there would be real cost relief through the ECE Regulatory Review, but any changes are still unclear and 14-18 months away,' said Early Childhood Council CEO Simon Laube.
Further evidence of the broken funding system was revealed today, with the government having to find $334.5 million to fund higher than expected early childhood payments to providers this year, likely caused by the costly Pay Parity policies combined with questionable population projections. One ECC member alone had a $60,000 shortfall this year due to Pay Parity's teacher salary progression requirements, which give all teachers 4% salary increments, unfunded by government - shortfalls of that size are enough to sink a vulnerable business or community group.
This year's ECE cost adjustment of 0.5% is a record low. Over the last six years, successive government's lowballing adds up to a massive 12.7% shortfall against inflation over the period.
'The Government is allowing these cost pressures to mount up - ECE funding in 2026 will be 12.7% less valuable than it was to providers in 2020, that's the equivalent of a massive funding cut in today's dollars,' said Simon Laube.
ECC celebrates the Learning Support investment in the Budget, as it has the potential to make a massive difference for learners who need additional support. Supporting these learners shows that New Zealanders truly care for all children, and it's about time. In ECE, additional funds for the Early Intervention Service and an expansion of that service into Year 1 of school will massively help address the well-known problems with children's transition out of ECE into school, when the Early Intervention Service used to get cut off. Now it won't get cut off and children who need additional support can experience a more seamless education.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
a day ago
- Scoop
Move To One Regulator A Major Turning Point In ECE Reform
The proposal to make the Education Review Office the sole Early Childhood Education regulator is a massive change that should deliver much sought after clarity for the ECE sector, says the Early Childhood Council. 'Recommendation two in the Ministry for Regulation review related to addressing the duplication of regulatory assessment, and inconsistencies between ERO's reviews of ECE providers and the Ministry of Education's interventions through their licensing regime. When these reforms take effect from next year, providers will deal with one regulator, thoroughly addressing the regulation-duplication issue once and for all,' said Simon Laube, ECC CEO. The ECE regulatory review report was completed in December 2024, but the outcomes of that review are still being put into effect. Legislation was introduced into Parliament this week which will clarify the purpose of regulation in ECE, and Ministry of Education consultation recently closed on changes to the licensing criteria. 'We look forward to a day where the ECE regulations have clear standards that can be measured and tested objectively, and where providers can have confidence about what to expect from the regulator with no more disproportionate sanctions being taken.' 'Today's regulator announcement is a massive change and a significant aspect of a much wider series of ECE regulatory reforms. Today it's clear that this truly is reform, I think the level of system change is on a scale comparable to the restructure of the District Health Board model in the health system. There's still a long way to go with the ECE Regulatory reforms, but this change will become a major turning point in that overall journey. Do it once and do it properly. We know the direction better now, but the success still depends on its delivery,' said Simon Laube.
Scoop
a day ago
- Scoop
Have Your Say On The Education And Training (Early Childhood Education Reform) Amendment Bill
The Acting Chairperson of the Education and Workforce Committee is calling for public submissions on the Education and Training (Early Childhood Education Reform) Amendment Bill. The bill aims to improve the effectiveness of the early childhood education (ECE) regulatory system for children and parents, and to reduce the regulatory burden for service providers. The bill seeks to amend the Education and Training Act 2020 to: clarify the purpose, objectives, and guiding principles of regulating ECE services establish a new statutory role, the Director of Regulation, with responsibilities for performing key regulatory functions in the ECE system clarify responsibilities relating to the prescribing of licensing criteria. The bill would partly implement the Government's decisions resulting from the Regulatory Review of Early Childhood Education. Tell the Education and Workforce Committee what you think Make a submission on the bill by 2.00pm on Monday, 1 September 2025. For more details about the bill:
NZ Herald
2 days ago
- NZ Herald
Government's secret pay equity overhaul bypassed public scrutiny
It halted existing claims and raised the threshold for proving work had been historically undervalued to support a claim. Claims then had to start again under the new threshold. The bill halted existing claims and raised the threshold for proving undervalued work. Photo / Jason Dorday It was revealed in the Budget that the savings from tightening the regime amounted to about $12.8 billion over the next four years. The documents, released to RNZ under the Official Information Act, revealed ministerial meetings, including one involving the Prime Minister, were carefully managed, with instructions to withhold their proactive diary release under confidentiality provisions. One email from Workplace Relations and Safety Minister Brooke van Velden's office instructed officials to manually remove digital access to cabinet papers, warning that leaving the default settings in place 'will give access to ministers but also SPSs [senior private secretaries] and some ministerial advisers. So you might want to remove that and we can add individual named ministers instead'. Workplace Relations and Safety Minister Brooke van Velden's office kept details of pay equity changes under tight wraps. Photo / Mark Mitchell Another memo described how hard copies were hand-delivered to ministers' offices to avoid creating digital trails. 'If you really need a soft copy, I can email it through,' wrote an official from the office of van Velden. 'For context, I swear I'm not being weirdly difficult – this was the method of distribution that has been advised.' The strategy was internally referred to as 'Project Ten'. A comprehensive communications pack was prepared in advance, to be released only after the bill had been introduced and passed. 'We recommend that any announcements or statements about the proposed amendments must be made after the introduction of the bill,' one paper said. 'This is because there is a risk of a large increase in the number of claims being raised if information about the proposed changes is made public beforehand.' That advice was followed. The legislation stopped 33 active claims overnight, some of which had been under way for years, and implemented a stricter legal test for future ones. The documents make clear that fiscal concerns were central to the push – a key driver was to significantly reduce costs to the Crown. Officials stressed the need for the law to be passed in time for Budget 2025, reinforcing the cost-cutting motive. But, they acknowledged the truncated timeline meant there was no opportunity for public submissions on the bill, a process later criticised as 'particularly unusual and draconian'. Officials also conceded limited testing and analysis of the policy proposals because of the short timeframe, and raised concerns about unintended consequences arising once the bill has been passed. Despite the rushed process, the internal discussions reveal the Government was aware of the contentious nature of the changes. Officials noted the proposed transitional arrangements, which 'retrospectively remove and alter people's rights', were 'most likely to be contentious' and 'may engage the Human Rights Act and Bill of Rights Act'. It proceeded anyway. – RNZ
