Mining operator fired for vulgar language during safety meeting
Image: File
Vulgar language used by a mining operator during a "Brother's Keeper' safety meeting towards a female colleague had cost him dearly when he was fired, and that ruling was now endorsed by the Johannesburg Labour Court.
Siyabonga Buthelezi turned to the court in a bid to get his job back, as he said being fired was too harsh under the circumstances. Buthelezi had told the female employee during the meeting that she was talking 'f…s…'. This took place in front of a number of other employees from other departments and sub-contractors.
Buthelezi worked for AEL Mining Services at the time and was an operator in the bagging department. The workplace safety awareness training was presented by a safety practitioner, only identified as Ms Z Mmboneni.
A PowerPoint presentation was displayed, and Mmboneni explained it, after which questions were invited from attendees about the issues raised in the presentation. However, some employees from the bagging department began raising questions concerning plant issues, which were not related to the presentation.
Mmboneni responded by saying the meeting was not the right forum to address those issues and asked them to curtail these questions. The meeting turned volatile, and some workers left. Buthelezi raised the need for a separate gathering room so that they could discuss these issues. Mmboneni suggested that the issues should be discussed during a plant meeting.
According to Mmboneni, Buthelezi started raising his voice, and she reiterated it was not the forum to discuss issues not pertaining to the safety meeting. It was at that point that Buthelezi said what she was saying was 'f…s...' while looking directly at her. She said a shop steward then rebuked Buthelezi and told him to apologise to her, which he did not do.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Mmboneni said she believed that if the shop steward had not intervened, he would have continued to insult her. She recalled someone else who tried to stop him using vulgar language but could not identify the person.
According to her, there was a reaction from the meeting when Buthelezi uttered the objectionable words. She testified that she had felt embarrassed by being threatened and insulted in front of employees and contractors at the meeting.
The bagging shed manager, who was an attendee at the meeting, gave a similar version of the events to that given by Mmboneni. Buthelezi denied being angry or raising his voice, but he agreed that Mmboneni was not responding to the questions raised.
He wanted to say the showers at the plant where they were working were 'f…dirty' but decided not to finish what he was going to say because he realised he might have been perceived as rude when he used the swear word 'f…'. He disputed that anyone had tried to close his mouth or that the shop steward had apologised on his behalf.
Following an internal hearing, Buthelezi was fired for using vulgar language. His dismissal was confirmed during arbitration proceedings. It was not disputed that on either version, Buthelezi's use of vulgar language was unacceptable.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
2 days ago
- IOL News
KZN Cogta MEC warns Msunduzi Municipality against hindering corruption probe
COOPERATIVE Governance and Traditional Affairs MEC Thulasizwe Buthelezi has taken the Msunduzi Municipality to task over its efforts to stall an investigation into allegations of corruption within the municipality. Buthelezi wrote to the municipality, warning it to comply with the investigation or face consequences. The Mercury has seen a letter the MEC sent to Mayor Mzimkhulu Thebolla, in which he warns the city to comply. In a public statement issued on Tuesday regarding the matter, the MEC stated he had issued similar directives for Section 106 investigations in KwaDukuza and Nongoma. He said while the other municipalities were progressing with those investigations, Msunduzi appeared to be defying the instruction. In his letter, the MEC warns Msunduzi against its attempts to block the investigation, stating that the law gives him the mandatory powers to act when requested by the minister of the same portfolio. He added that such action is mandatory, not discretionary.
TimesLIVE
3 days ago
- TimesLIVE
Co-operate with forensic investigation or face the music, Cogta MEC tells Msunduzi municipality
KwaZulu-Natal co-operative governance and traditional affairs MEC Thulasizwe Buthelezi has warned Msunduzi municipality to co-operate with his investigation into their finances or face the consequences. Buthelezi launched forensic investigations into Msunduzi, Nongoma and KwaDukuza municipalities in March after allegations of fraud and corruption and in the wake of the auditor-general's findings. 'While investigations at KwaDukuza and Nongoma are at an advanced stage, the Msunduzi municipality has refused to co-operate with the investigation,' Buthelezi said on Tuesday. He has written to the Msunduzi municipality, placing it on terms to co-operate or face the consequences of non-co-operation with a statutory investigation. 'We are resolute in our commitment to enforcing good governance and accountability in all KZN municipalities and will not hesitate to act without fear or favour in the interest of residents and ratepayers.' Buthelezi said his action is mandated by the Municipal Systems Act, which stipulates an MEC is obliged to conduct an investigation after maladministration, fraud and corruption allegations. Auditor-general Tsakani Maluleke found R6bn in unauthorised, irregular, fruitless and wasteful expenditure in several municipalities. Buthelezi said the investigations will specifically address allegations of abuse of municipal assets, elevated levels of political instability, political interference in procurement processes, deficiencies in consequence management, contraventions of supply chain management regulations, irregularities in recruitment procedures, maladministration, fraud and corruption. Nongoma municipality in northern KwaZulu-Natal is plagued by allegations of corruption which resulted in the recent arrest of mayor Mshangane Ndabandaba, his deputy Sabelo Nkosi and speaker Babongile Sithole. All are out on R5,000 bail. In KwaDukuza, mayor Ali Ngidi was accused of using the mayoral back-up van to take his children to school. Despite several interventions including placing it under administration several years ago, Msunduzi continues to fall short of financial protocols. The municipality told TimesLIVE it would comment later.
IOL News
3 days ago
- IOL News
Former DAC deputy director-general fights dismissal linked to whistle-blower case
The Labour Court has confirmed the dismissal of a former Department of Arts and Culture deputy director-general who tried to reveal the identity of a whistle-blower. Image: File A former deputy director-general at the Department of Sport, Arts and Culture (DAC), who was fired after she tried to reveal the identity of a whistle-blower within the National Arts Council (NAC), turned to the Johannesburg Labour Court to get her job back. Kelebogile Sethibelo was dismissed in her absence in July 2019 after she failed to attend the disciplinary inquiry against her. Her dismissal followed two allegations of misconduct against her related to attempts to reveal the identity of a whistle-blower and insubordination. Aggrieved with the dismissal, she referred a dispute to the bargaining council. Following unsuccessful attempts at conciliation, the matter came before an arbitrator, who ruled her dismissal to be fair. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad Loading Unhappy with this finding, Sethibelo now turned to the Labour Court. In an investigation conducted by law firm Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr Inc. at the time, it had emerged that Sethibelo had instructed the CEO of the NAC to investigate and reveal the identity of the person within the NAC who had leaked information about alleged corruption and misadministration within the department to the media. The arbitrator found that Sethibelo's actions breached the Protective Disclosures Act and the DAC's whistleblowing policy, rendering her dismissal substantially fair. The applicant challenged the findings of the arbitrator on the procedural and substantive fairness of her dismissal. She contended that the arbitrator failed to apply his mind to the evidence before him, including that she was deprived of a fair opportunity to state her case at the internal disciplinary hearing. The Labour Court had to assess whether Sethibelo's email to the NAC's CEO amounted to an instruction to uncover the identity of the whistle-blower. Her defence that she was merely overseeing the NAC's operations was rejected as the email went beyond routine oversight and targeted the whistle-blower's identity. Her contention that the whistle-blower was not a member of the DAC was also rejected as the NAC's staff fell under the DAC's oversight and thus protected by its whistle-blower policy. The fact remains that the applicant sought to have the identity of the whistle-blower revealed, rather than have the nature of the allegations investigated, the court stated.
