Kentucky MAGA: Trump advisers launch 'super PAC' to defeat Thomas Massie; Congressman denounced US strikes on Iran nuclear sites
Two key advisers to
Donald Trump
have launched a "super PAC" (political action committee) to unseat Rep. Thomas Massie, a Kentucky Republican who
criticized
the US President over the strikes on nuclear facilities in Iran, and previously,
opposed
the MAGA leader's "big, beautiful bill."
The organization, named "Kentucky MAGA," will be run by Trump's senior political advisers, Chris LaCivita and Tony Fabrizio.
"The PAC would spend 'whatever it takes' to defeat Massie (in the May 2026 primary)," LaCivita
told
Axios, which was the first to report that the super PAC is being formed.
Another Trump aide told the website that plans for taking on Massie were in the works before the Congressman decided to call the attack on Iran "unconstitutional."
Trump lashes out at Massie for remarks on '
Operation Midnight Hammer
'
Earlier, Trump called his fellow Republican Massie a "loser" and demanded that MAGA "drop" the Kentucky representative after the latter denounced Operation Midnight Hammer - the US air strikes in Iran - as "unconstitutional."
"MAGA should drop this pathetic LOSER, Tom Massie, like the plague! The good news is that we will have a wonderful American Patriot running against him in the Republican Primary, and I'll be out in Kentucky campaigning really hard.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Free P2,000 GCash eGift
UnionBank Credit Card
Apply Now
Undo
MAGA is not about lazy, grandstanding, nonproductive politicians, of which Thomas Massie is definitely one," the US President wrote on his Truth Social platform.
'Actually, MAGA doesn't want him, doesn't know him, and doesn't respect him. He is a negative force who almost always Votes 'NO,' no matter how good something may be. He's a simple minded 'grandstander' who thinks it's good politics for Iran to have the highest level Nuclear weapon, while at the same time yelling 'DEATH TO AMERICA' at every chance they get," he added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
12 minutes ago
- Mint
What the rise of Mamdani in New York means for America's Democratic Party
Zohran Mamdani's completely unanticipated yet comprehensively decisive win in the New York City primary election for selecting the Democratic Party's mayoral candidate has sent tremors, even shockwaves, through the party establishment. For those of us who have been observing the party, it has exposed again the deep corruption at its top levels. At the same time, this otherwise small election—after all, it is merely a party primary in a single city—has provoked the expected tropes of cultural warfare and identity politics in the US, but at a national scale: xenophobia, Islamophobia and red-baiting in particular. Let us focus on the corruption in the Democratic party, which for the last two decades has been trying to suppress popular (and democratic) aspirations by pushing candidates for US president who are aligned with the party establishment and its centrist positions; status quo candidates rather than insurgents, disruptors or originals. It began with the first attempt to get Hillary Clinton at the top of the ticket in 2008. Despite the best efforts of the party establishment (controlled by Bill and Hillary Clinton cronies), including well-documented 'dirty tricks,' an unknown upstart called Barack Obama, a first term Senator and African-American to boot, swept the party and later the nation with his charm and intelligence. Progressives everywhere marvelled at the magic of democracy. Also read: Ajit Ranade: What Mamdani's rise in New York tells us about welfarism versus populism Eight Obama years later, the party establishment again backed Hillary Clinton. Veteran Joe Biden, vice-president for eight patient years, was simply pushed aside. He did not even run. But there was a big problem in the form of another unknown upstart. Senator Bernie Sanders from Vermont not only talked like the socialist he was (scandalously in favour of genuine redistribution of income), but began drawing huge crowds and winning state primaries. He was eventually put down (but not before winning 46% of the party's delegates) by a combination of alleged favouritism by the Democratic National Committee and an orchestrated media bias. Sanders' views were supposedly too 'extreme' for mainstream America, which allegedly made him 'unelectable.' As the world knows, the 2016 election was won by Donald Trump, who was considered a joke and utterly 'unelectable' by the same people who had argued that Sanders couldn't win. As far as I can tell, this time there was no jubilation among progressives over the magic of democracy. The Democratic fiasco of the 2024 election developed slowly and inexorably, like A Chronicle of a Death Foretold. Joe Biden, who had ''honourably' stepped aside for Hillary Clinton in 2016, now refused to step aside, despite being visibly unfit, both physically and mentally. His inner circle and party elders protected him till they no longer could. His vice-president, Kamala Harris was anointed without a primary, without hearing from ordinary party members. Harris, who had four years earlier failed miserably in her attempt to secure the Democratic nomination for president, failed at the hustings, as many of us watching expected she would. What is the meaning of Mamdani for this party of the status quo run by a highly educated liberal elite, beholden to Wall Street and out of touch with the working class, whose preferred candidate for New York City's mayor was Andrew Cuomo, someone accused of serial sexual abuse, and whose incumbent mayor Eric Adams is currently charged with bribery and fraud? Danger. And the party's immediate reaction was alarm. Mamdani's own state's two Democratic Senators refused to endorse him. Major party donors and politicians (including Cuomo and Adams, who plan to run as independents) seem to be ganging up to beat him. Also read: How Zohran Mamdani beat Andrew Cuomo Why this reaction? Let us count the reasons. Mamdani is 33 years old ('too young'). He is Muslim and so also his wife and father ('wrong religion'). He is of Indian origin, but Ugandan by birth and became an American citizen only in 2018 ('no neat identity box to check'). He is vociferously pro-Palestinian (therefore 'anti-semitic'). He is a socialist (like Bernie Sanders), a critic of capitalism and in favour of state action to redistribute welfare in favour of the working class ('wrong ideology'). For an ageing party, most of whose elected representatives sit in safe districts, Mamdani is an existential threat. Mamdani is seen by many as toxic to the Democratic brand. His ideas may fly in New York City (because he is a smart campaigner), they say, but will never play in Peoria. They also say that his ideology (socialism) is anathema to Americans and, more importantly, Wall Street. Everyone seems to agree that his social identity (Muslim immigrant) is a double whammy. Mamdani does have some unrealistic ideas such as freezing rents in the city and selling affordable food through state-owned grocery stores. These Soviet style policies are so outdated that it is hard to find any city or country that practises them. 'Defunding' the police—whatever that may mean—is also a non-starter in any society. The same goes for 'globalizing the Intifada'. For these reasons, Mamdani's success has been received with undisguised glee by Republicans. Could there be an easier way to caricature their rival party? Republican National Committee chair Michael Whatley said that Mamdani 'is the face of the new Democratic Party." Trump first said that Mamdani was in the US 'illegally" and later labelled him a 'communist." These are the usual attacks on leftist ideology and minority identity. Also read: Welfare schemes have reshaped the retail prices that matter to people The question for Democrats should not be about what Republicans think of Mamdani, nor whether his politics will play outside New York City. It should be about introspection, grassroots democracy and how to make fresh new faces emerge and voices be heard (without throttling them). This used to be a party of the working class. Can it be one again? Can they learn from Mamdani instead of being afraid of him? The author is a professor of geography, environment and urban studies and director of global studies at Temple University.
Time of India
14 minutes ago
- Time of India
SC rejects PIL against political parties using national tricolour in their flags
The Supreme Court on Monday refused to examine a PIL seeking action against political parties for allegedly using flags with the tricolour along with party symbols. A bench comprising Chief Justice B R Gavai and Justices K Vinod Chandran and N V Anjaria declined to hear the petition filed by one Sanjay Bhimashankar Thobde, who appeared in person. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Data Science Healthcare Digital Marketing others healthcare Data Science Finance Data Analytics Cybersecurity Product Management MBA Public Policy Leadership Others Design Thinking Artificial Intelligence Project Management PGDM CXO Technology Management Degree Skills you'll gain: Data Analysis & Interpretation Programming Proficiency Problem-Solving Skills Machine Learning & Artificial Intelligence Duration: 24 Months Vellore Institute of Technology VIT MSc in Data Science Starts on Aug 14, 2024 Get Details Skills you'll gain: Strategic Data-Analysis, including Data Mining & Preparation Predictive Modeling & Advanced Clustering Techniques Machine Learning Concepts & Regression Analysis Cutting-edge applications of AI, like NLP & Generative AI Duration: 8 Months IIM Kozhikode Professional Certificate in Data Science and Artificial Intelligence Starts on Jun 26, 2024 Get Details The plea said certain political parties have been using flag designs closely resembling the national tricolour in their political campaigns, often replacing the Ashoka Chakra with party symbols. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 15 Most Beautiful Female Athletes in the World Click Here It also specifically named Congress, the Nationalist Congress Party (Sharad Pawar faction), and the Nationalist Congress Party. The plea said this amounted to a violation of the Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act , 1971. Live Events "Since when are they doing it? Some parties have been doing it since independence," the bench said and rejected the plea.
Time of India
22 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump's Golden Dome looks for alternatives to Musk's SpaceX
The Trump administration is expanding its search for partners to build the Golden Dome missile defense system, courting Project Kuiper and big defense contractors as tensions with Elon Musk threaten SpaceX 's dominance in the program, according to three sources familiar with the matter. The shift marks a strategic pivot away from reliance on Musk's SpaceX, whose Starlink and Starshield satellite networks have become central to U.S. military communications. It comes amid a deteriorating relationship between Trump and Musk , which culminated in a public falling-out on June 5. Even before the spat, officials at the Pentagon and White House had begun exploring alternatives to SpaceX, wary of over-reliance on a single partner for huge portions of the ambitious, $175 billion space-based defense shield, two of the sources said. Musk and SpaceX did not respond to requests for comment. After Reuters reported initially that SpaceX was a frontrunner to build parts of Golden Dome, Musk said on X that the company had "not tried to bid for any contract in this regard. Our strong preference would be to stay focused on taking humanity to Mars." Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category others Finance Data Science Digital Marketing MBA Technology Project Management Product Management Management Data Analytics Others healthcare Cybersecurity CXO MCA PGDM Operations Management Design Thinking Data Science Leadership Public Policy Degree Skills you'll gain: Duration: 16 Weeks Indian School of Business CERT - ISB Cybersecurity for Leaders Program India Starts on undefined Get Details Due to its size, track record of launching more than 9,000 of its own Starlink satellites, and experience in government procurement, SpaceX still has the inside track to assist with major portions of the Golden Dome, especially launch contracts, sources say. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Victoria Principal Is Almost 75, See Her Now Reportingly Undo Project Kuiper, which has launched just 78 of a planned constellation of 3,000 low-earth orbit satellites, has been approached by the Pentagon to join the effort, signaling the administration's openness to integrating commercial tech firms into national defense infrastructure and going beyond traditional defense players. Jeff Bezos, Amazon's executive chairman, told Reuters in January that Kuiper would be "primarily commercial," but acknowledged "there will be defense uses for these [low-earth orbit] constellations, no doubt." Live Events A spokesperson for Project Kuiper declined to comment for this story. The Pentagon declined to comment. The White House did not respond to requests for comment. Golden Dome's ambitions mirror those of Israel's Iron Dome - a homeland missile defense shield - but a larger, more complex layered defense system requires a vast network of orbiting satellites covering more territory. In the search for more vendors for the satellite layers of Golden Dome, "Kuiper is a big one," a U.S. official said. While SpaceX remains a frontrunner due to its unmatched launch capabilities, its share of the program could shrink, two of the people said. Officials have reached out to new entrants like rocket companies Stoke Space and Rocket Lab are gaining traction and will be able to bid on individual launches as the program matures, according to the U.S. official. Later in the development of Golden Dome "each individual launch is going to get bid, and we have to actually give bids to other people," besides SpaceX, the official said. Need for satellite There is an urgent need for more satellite production. Last year Congress gave Space Force a $13 billion mandate - up from $900 million - to buy satellite-based communication services in what was widely seen as one of many efforts to stimulate private sector satellite production. Amazon's Project Kuiper, a $10 billion initiative led by former Starlink managers dismissed by Musk for slow progress, Reuters has reported, has lagged behind SpaceX in deployment. But its potential defense applications - such as communications that could aid missile tracking - have drawn renewed interest as the administration prepares to allocate the first $25 billion tranche of funding authorized under Trump's sweeping tax and spending bill. Traditional defense giants Northrop Grumman, Lockheed Martin, and L3Harris are also in talks to support Golden Dome. L3Harris CFO Kenneth Bedingfield told Reuters in an interview the company has seen a surge in interest in its missile warning and tracking technologies, which are expected to play a key role in the system. Northrop, meanwhile, is pursuing several efforts including a space-based interceptor, a component that would enable missile strikes from orbit, Robert Flemming, the head of the company's space business, told Reuters in an interview. "Lockheed Martin is ready to support Golden Dome for America as a proven mission partner," Robert Lightfoot, president of Lockheed Martin Space, said in a statement. Golden Dome's initial outreach this spring invited smaller, newer Silicon Valley firms seen as nimbler, more sophisticated and potentially less expensive alternatives to the big defense firms to the table - but that was before the Musk-Trump feud upended that calculus. Several with close ties to Trump aside from SpaceX, including Palantir and Anduril - were considered early frontrunners to win big pieces of the $175 billion project. But the Musk-Trump feud has reshaped the competitive landscape. Musk recently launched the "America Party," a tech-centric, centrist political movement aimed at defeating Republicans who backed Trump's tax-and-spend agenda. Rapid timeframe Trump launched the Golden Dome initiative just a week into his second term, pushing for rapid deployment. Space Force General Michael Guetlein, confirmed by the Senate on July 17, is set to lead the program with sweeping authority. Under a previously unreported directive from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Guetlein has 30 days from confirmation to build a team, 60 days to deliver an initial system design, and 120 days to present a full implementation plan, including satellite and ground station details, two people briefed on the memo said. The inclusion of commercial platforms like Kuiper raises security concerns. Its satellites would need to be hardened against cyberattacks and electronic warfare, a challenge that has plagued even SpaceX's Starlink network. In May 2024, Elon Musk said SpaceX was spending "significant resources combating Russian jamming efforts. This is a tough problem." Beyond the technical and political challenges, Golden Dome could reshape global security dynamics. A fully operational space-based missile shield may prompt adversaries to develop new offensive capabilities or accelerate the militarization of space.
