logo
AI overviews for attorneys: Winning the new search game

AI overviews for attorneys: Winning the new search game

Miami Herald7 hours ago
AI overviews for attorneys: Winning the new search game
Imagine you are someone injured and in the hospital after a car crash. You grab your phone and search for "what to do after a car accident." However, you don't see the 10 or so site links that would typically show up on your screen. Instead, you see an AI-generated answer at the top of the search results, laying out a response to your query, along with links to the sources behind that answer.
This scenario is no longer hypothetical. It's Google's AI Overviews. And it's here.
In this article, Consultwebs discuss this new digital marketing platform as well as strategies that attorneys can use to optimize their online presence for AI Overviews, including providing content and using other methods that align with E-E-A-T - Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness - the core framework Google uses to evaluate content quality.
The Changing Legal Search Landscape
By this point, you're likely familiar with AI-generated answers to searches. The importance of organic search or paid search cannot be downplayed. However, these AI-generated results are changing how people search for legal help online.
On the one hand, the shift in how potential law firm clients seek information presents a threat. But it also presents an opportunity. The threat lies in the possibility of law firms seeing lower click-through rates and traffic from informational AI results. The opportunity lies in the potential for law firms to increase their online visibility.
Proprietary Consultwebs data shows higher conversion rates from AI sources; the higher rate is likely due to the higher level of intent behind the user's query. So, while the quantity of site traffic may decrease, the quality of that traffic will likely increase and lead to a higher number of leads for law firms.
What Are AI Overviews?
AI Overviews are Google's AI-generated answers that appear above traditional organic results. They directly answer user questions by combining content from multiple sources from across the web.
AI Overviews appear when people ask legal questions like "How long do I have to file a personal injury claim in Texas?" or "What happens at a first DUI court appearance?" Instead of requiring users to click on links and search for answers on those websites, the overview provides direct answers.
Google marks the summaries with an "AI Overview" label. They occupy the coveted "position zero" spot, which is the first thing users see before they see any other search results.
The overview typically includes the following elements:
Direct answer to the queryKey contextual information relevant to the legal questionOccasionally, related questions that help visitors expand searchList of sources for the summary, which can include law firm websites
So, if a potential client searches for a response to a legal question and sees your law firm as a source in AI Overviews, it will help to establish your law firm's credibility and authority.
How AI-Enhanced Search Affects Client Research Behavior
Potential law firm clients can now get answers to their legal questions without having to visit law firm websites. For instance, when someone searches "statute of limitations car accident Florida," they will see the answer is "four years" in AI Overviews. Note: This result is also a great example of how AI can get things wrong, as Florida changed the statute of limitations to two years from the injury date in March 2023. This shift in search results could move a potential client's initial research away from websites and into Google's environment.
Why AI Overviews Matter for Your Law Practice
To get a better understanding of how Google's AI Overviews could affect your law firm's marketing campaign, consider the following three areas.
Competitive Advantage
Online visibility leads to citations and strengthens your position in AI-generated results. Lawyers can gain an edge when they optimize for AI Overviews, unlike competitors who focus only on traditional SEO. Firms that adapt can establish themselves as authoritative sources before market saturation.
Google's AI does not necessarily feature websites based on historical domain authority or ranking position. Instead, it prioritizes content that answers certain legal questions, regardless of the firm's size or history.
So, in this environment, even well-established law firms with strong traditional search rankings could be vulnerable. Larger firms that delay adapting their content strategy risk being overshadowed by smaller, more agile competitors who know how to quickly restructure their online presence to match how AI systems evaluate information.
Practice Area-Related Benefits
In several different practice areas, the ability to optimize for AI Overviews will give a law firm a competitive edge. Consider the following.
Personal injury: Capturing potential clients at the moment of need - you can reach prospective clients during a critical decision-making moment, or right after an accident occurs. At that moment, by addressing urgent questions such as, "Should I accept the insurance settlement offer?" you can establish credibility when people are most receptive to hiring legal representation.Criminal defense: Providing value during crisis moments - again, with AI Overviews, you can reach potential clients in this practice area when they face high-stress, time-sensitive situations. You can demonstrate your knowledge and experience on topics like "What happens at arraignment?" or "What are the penalties for a first DUI offense?" By taking advantage of AI Overviews, you will position your criminal defense firm as a trusted guide and establish authority at a time when potential clients need reassurance.Estate planning: Demonstrating knowledge of complex topics - in AI Overviews, you can simplify legal concepts that potential clients may find overwhelming and showcase your ability to make complex matters accessible. You can provide clarity and show your approachability, which are key qualities in this practice area, by providing answers to questions such as "What are the differences between a will and a living trust?" or "How can you avoid probate?"
Local Market Domination
AI Overviews have transformed how Google handles location-based legal searches, including in the following areas.
Geographic targeting - When people search with local intent (for example, "child custody laws in Phoenix" or "slip and fall statute of limitations California"), Google will prioritize region-specific content in its AI summaries. So, if a law firm thoroughly addresses jurisdiction-specific questions, it can result in a visibility advantage.
Building local authority through content - Your firm's prominence in local AI Overviews depends on your geographic content. By creating resources that address your state's laws, local court procedures, and other regulations, you can position your firm as a local authority.
Near-me search optimization - This approach is particularly powerful for capturing "near me" searches and location-based legal questions that potential clients use in urgent situations. Firms that develop content covering all of their service areas will consistently outperform competitors in local AI Overview citations.
So, your local SEO takeaways should be:
Create jurisdiction-specific content addressing local laws and procedures.Optimize for location-specific legal questions that are common in your practice areas.Incorporate local citations and references to regional legal resources.Develop content for all geographic areas your firm serves.
By implementing these strategies, you should be able to effectively drive higher-quality leads from potential clients seeking legal help.
E-E-A-T and AI Overviews: The Critical Connection
E-E-A-T stands for Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness. Google uses this core framework to evaluate content quality. For legal websites, Google applies heightened scrutiny because legal advice falls under "Your Money or Your Life" (YMYL) topics - information that could affect a person's well-being or financial security. Google's quality raters assess whether legal content demonstrates genuine expertise, comes from authoritative sources, and presents trustworthy information that won't harm users if followed.
E-E-A-T matters more than ever with AI-generated results. When generating summaries, Google's AI systems prioritize content from sources with strong E-E-A-T signals to minimize the risk of spreading inaccurate legal information.
E-E-A-T Signals You Can Send With Your Website
Unlike traditional search rankings, where hundreds of factors determine position, AI Overviews appear to give heavy weight to E-E-A-T signals when selecting which law firms' content to feature. That means demonstrating clear expertise and authority is no longer just about ranking. Instead, it is about whether your content gets featured in the prominent AI summaries at all.
The following are E-E-A-T signals that your law firm can send with your site.
Expertise Signals
Accurate and precise legal terminologyJurisdiction-specific information and lawsClear explanations that simplify complex concepts without oversimplificationContent addressing potential exceptions and edge casesPractice area focus and depthContextual examples that demonstrate applied knowledge
Authoritativeness Markers
Firm history and established reputationAttorney credentials and bar admissions - displayed clearlySpeaking engagements and published worksRecognition from legal peers and organizationsAttorney bio pages with verifiable credentialsTransparent firm information and historyProper legal schema markup implementationConsistent NAP (Name, Address, Phone) information across the web
Trust Indicators
Clear presentation of attorney credentials near relevant contentRegular content updates reflecting current lawsAppropriate disclaimers addressing limitations of general informationSecure website protocols (HTTPS)Clear privacy policies and terms of serviceTransparent client communication channelsAbsence of misleading claims or guaranteesSpecific, detailed client reviews, not just generic praise
Citation and Reference Quality
Citations to relevant statutes and case lawReferences to official legal resourcesInternal links to deeper explanationsExternal links to court websites and government resourcesBar association and legal directory citationsProperly attributed quotes from authoritative sourcesConsistent citation formatting
Practical E-E-A-T Enhancements for Law Firms
In general, your law firm's E-E-A-T Priority Checklist should be:
Associate appropriate attorneys with specific content pieces.Include credentials directly alongside legal information.Regularly update content to reflect current laws.Cite authoritative legal sources.Build comprehensive internal linking between related topics.
Specifically, your law firm can take the following steps to align with E-E-A-T:
Strategic Credential Placement
Display attorney credentials throughout your website, not just on bio pages.Include credentials with content (for example, "Written by Sarah Johnson, Board-Certified Family Law Specialist").Link attorney names to detailed profiles containing full credentials and experience.Highlight specializations adjacent to relevant practice area content.
Authority-Building Case Results and Testimonials
Create practice area-specific case result pages with coordinated challenges and outcomes.Organize testimonials to highlight key legal expertise rather than general praise.Include verification elements, such as client initials or case types, when possible.Feature testimonials that mention particular attorney skills (for example, "Attorney Miller's deep knowledge of estate tax law saved our family thousands.").
Comprehensive Content Development
Organize information with clear hierarchical headings.Include FAQ sections anticipating related questions.Develop topic clusters with main pages linking to detailed subtopic pages.Address jurisdictional variations relevant to your practice areas.
Practical Strategies: Optimizing Your Digital Presence for AI Overviews
To get a better understanding of what it means to optimize your law firm's digital presence for Google's AI Overviews, let's examine three specific areas.
Content Structure and Format
The structure and format of your law firm's online content can affect your ability to take advantage of the marketing opportunities that AI Overviews provides. Your content should feature the following.
Question-focused headings that mirror natural client queries - Google's AI Overviews prioritize content that directly addresses the questions potential clients ask. Consider using question-based formats that match real search inquiries instead of traditional practice area headings. Content with natural language questions that mimic what clients would type into a search will increase the likelihood of being selected as a source for AI Overviews. A couple of examples are:
Instead of "Car Accident Representation," use "What Should I Do Immediately After a Car Accident in [State]?"Instead of "Child Custody Services," use "How Is Child Custody Determined in [State] Divorce Cases?"
Clear, concise paragraphs with definitive answers - Position definitive answers at the beginning of your content, followed by supporting information. Google's AI looks for content that provides clear answers without unnecessary preamble. For instance, in the example below, notice how the content provides a direct answer in the first sentence, followed by context and nuance.
Query - How long do I have to file a personal injury claim in Texas?Content - In Texas, you generally have two years from the date of injury to file a personal injury lawsuit. This time limit, known as the statute of limitations, is established by Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code § 16.003. Missing this deadline typically means losing your right to seek compensation through the court system.
Bulleted lists and organized information for easy AI parsing - Organize key information in formats that are easy for AI systems to identify and extract. Bulleted lists and clear organizational patterns help Google's AI understand your content's structure. In the example below, the content has a structured format, which makes it easier for Google's AI to identify and extract information when generating overviews.
Topic - Types of Compensatory Damages Available in Personal Injury CasesContent - The following are types of compensatory damages available in personal injury cases:
Medical expenses (past and future)
Lost wages and diminished earning capacity
Property damage and repair costs
Pain and suffering
Emotional distress
Loss of enjoyment of life
Loss of consortium
FAQ sections that directly address common legal questions - Include dedicated FAQ sections that address related questions potential clients might have. By using FAQs, you provide Google's AI with clear, pre-formatted answers to common follow-up questions. The following are examples of FAQ sections in the area of personal injury law that create valuable, self-contained content units that Google's AI can easily identify when generating overviews for related searches:
Should I talk to the other driver's insurance company?
No, you should avoid giving statements to the other driver's insurance company without legal representation. Insurance adjusters may use your statements to minimize your claim's value.
What if the accident was partially my fault?
[State] follows a comparative negligence rule, which means you may still recover damages even if you were partially at fault, though your compensation may be reduced by your percentage of fault.
How much is my car accident claim worth?
The value depends on several factors, including the severity of injuries, medical expenses, lost income, property damage, and impact on quality of life. An experienced attorney can provide a more accurate assessment based on your circumstances."
Technical Optimization
From a technical standpoint, optimizing your law firm's digital presence for AI Overviews involves the following:
Schema markup for attorneys and legal content - Schema markup provides explicit signals to search engines about your content's meaning and helps Google's AI to better understand and categorize your legal knowledge for inclusion in AI Overviews. You should focus on:
Attorney Schema - Tells Google who you are, your credentials, education, certifications, and practice areas.Legal Service Schema - Identifies your firm's services, practice areas, and service locations.FAQ Schema - Structures your frequently asked questions so Google can easily extract them for AI Overviews.How-To Schema - Useful for procedural content like "How to file for divorce" or "Steps after a car accident."Local Business Schema - Enhances your local visibility with accurate name, address, and phone information
While the technical implementation might require developer assistance, understanding the schema types helps you prioritize information on your website.
Page speed and mobile optimization importance - Google's AI prioritizes content from sites that deliver excellent user experiences, with page speed and mobile optimization being important factors. Sites that load quickly and function well on mobile devices are more likely to retain users and encourage them to stay on the site. Key optimization areas include the following:
Image Optimization - Compress images, use modern formats like WebP, and specify dimensions.Mobile Responsiveness - Ensure all content is easily readable on mobile devices without horizontal scrolling.Page Speed - Minimize unnecessary scripts, optimize CSS delivery, and leverage browser caching.Core Web Vitals - Focus on improving Largest Contentful Paint, First Input Delay, and Cumulative Layout Shift metrics. These technical factors create a foundation for authority that complements your content quality.
Site structure and internal linking strategies - A logical site structure with strategic internal linking helps Google's AI understand the relationships between your content pieces, establishing topical authority that increases your chances of being featured in AI Overviews.
The following are effective approaches that your law firm can take:
Topic Cluster Structure - Organize content around central practice area pages with supporting subtopic pages.Contextual Internal Linking - Link related content naturally within text to establish content relationships.Breadcrumb Navigation - Help users and search engines understand your site's hierarchical structure.Consistent URL Structure - Create logical URLs that reflect your content organization.
Content Development Strategy
To optimize your content for AI-generated search results, you should focus on these items.
Identify high-opportunity legal queries in your practice area - Strategic content development starts with identifying the specific questions that potential clients ask and which trigger AI Overviews. Focus on queries with high search volume and look for existing content that may lack depth or authority. Research methods for identifying high-value queries include the following:
Use Google's "People Also Ask" sections to identify related questions.Analyze competitor content that currently appears in AI Overviews.Review your consultation notes for frequently asked initial questions.Use keyword research tools to find question-based searches with significant volume.
Examples of high-opportunity query types, by practice area, include:
Personal Injury
"How much is my [specific injury] claim worth?"
"Who pays medical bills after a car accident in [State]?"
"What if the accident was partially my fault in [State]?"
Family Law
"How is child support calculated in [State]?"
"How long does divorce take in [State]?"
"Can I modify a custody agreement without going to court?"
Create comprehensive content clusters around primary topics - Develop interconnected content ecosystems that establish authoritative coverage of key legal topics. The depth will signal to Google's AI that your firm has expertise worthy of citation in AI Overviews. Here is an example of an optimized car accident content cluster structure:
Primary Topic Page: "Car Accidents in [State]"
Overview of state laws governing auto accidentsStatistics on accident frequency and common causesGeneral process for pursuing compensation
Supporting Subtopic Pages:
"[State] Car Accident Statute of Limitations"Detailed explanation of time limitsExceptions that may extend or toll the statuteCase examples illustrating deadline applications"Determining Fault in [State] Car Accidents"Evidence types used to prove liabilityHow comparative negligence affects recoveryThird-party liability scenariosSpecialized Pages for Specific Scenarios:Uber/Lyft accident claimsUninsured motorist scenariosMulti-vehicle accidentsCommercial vehicle collisions
Update frequency and freshness factors - Google's AI prioritizes current, accurate legal information. Establish a review process to ensure your content reflects the latest laws, precedents, and procedures. Examples of content update triggers are:
Legislative changes affecting the practice areaNew case lawProcedural changes in local courtsUpdated statistics or dataNew industry best practices
To be proactive in addressing these triggers, you should follow a content audit schedule that incorporates:
Quarterly Reviews - Check all high-traffic pages for accuracy.Semi-Annual Deep Audits - Review practice area content.Annual Overhauls - Make major updates to primary practice area pages with case studies, statistics, and procedural information.
Measuring Success: Tracking Your AI Overview Performance
To determine if your optimization efforts are working, focus on these performance indicators, or key metrics to monitor:
Visibility - Track which queries feature your content in AI Overviews by monitoring position improvements and using specialized tools like ZipTie.dev or SEMrush.Traffic Patterns - Compare organic traffic before and after optimization.Conversion Rates - Focus on what matters most - consultation requests and client inquiries.
Your measurement approach should cover the following:
Use Google Search Console to analyze impression and CTR changes for key queries.Implement monthly content audits, identifying "winners" (content frequently appearing in AI Overviews) and "underperformers."Apply successful patterns from high-performing content to other areas of practice.
This story was produced by Consultwebs and reviewed and distributed by Stacker.
© Stacker Media, LLC.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

39-year-old pays $460 in rent for a luxury condo in Chiang Mai, Thailand–take a look inside
39-year-old pays $460 in rent for a luxury condo in Chiang Mai, Thailand–take a look inside

CNBC

timean hour ago

  • CNBC

39-year-old pays $460 in rent for a luxury condo in Chiang Mai, Thailand–take a look inside

When Shao Chun Chen was laid off from his dream job at Google in early 2024, he was forced to take a break and rethink how he wanted his life to look like. Suddenly, he was no longer obligated to stay in his home country of Singapore, where he had built his entire career. "When the layoff happened, I was [reflecting], you know, feeling sorry for myself," the 39-year-old told CNBC Make It. "Then I asked myself: 'Hey, let's flip it around. How can this be a positive thing?" "I wanted to try something different, and I've always enjoyed Thailand," said Chen. He was familiar with the country as his wife was native to Thailand and they had visited it previously. He was drawn to the diverse environments that it offered, from bustling cities to serene beaches and mountains. In addition, he liked how the Asian country had visas and policies that were transparent and friendly to foreigners. Ultimately, Chen said that his layoff allowed him to get out of his comfort zone and experiment with building out his dream life, and as part of this lifestyle re-design, he and his wife moved to Chiang Mai in November 2024. Today, the two reside in a 600-square-foot one-bedroom luxury condo which costs 15,000 Thai baht (about USD $460) a month. The condo came fully furnished, and he pays about $20 a month for utilities, and about $15 a month on WiFi. Chen said he is currently paying for his unit on a month-by-month basis, so his rent would be cheaper if he commits to a longer lease. Previously, his 500-square-foot condo in Singapore cost about $2,500 a month — more than five times the amount he is paying currently in Thailand. His current condo offers amenities such as a gym, a small pilates studio, a co-working space, multiple swimming pools and a water slide. Since getting laid off from his corporate job, Chen works for himself by creating educational content on YouTube and from his coaching business, through which he says he can charge $500 an hour, depending on the client. He has also made money by teaching as an adjunct lecturer at the National University of Singapore, which required him to supercommute between Singapore and Thailand once a week. However, he is now taking a break from this gig, he said. Additionally, Chen has built a seven-figure portfolio over the course of about a decade, according to documents viewed by CNBC Make It, which has afforded him financial independence. Chen noted that life in Thailand is much slower and "zero stress", unlike how mentally taxing it was in Singapore, he said. This has allowed him to cut down on expenses. "When I was in Singapore ... [my job] paid very well, but the lifestyle was very hectic. I was working like 12 to 14 hours a day," he said. Due to the high level of stress he experienced, Chen would cope by spending money on things like therapy, spa visits and drinking on weekends. "The funny thing is that now that I'm here, these things are way more affordable, but I don't even desire [them]," he said. "My head space is completely different." Today, on top of using the gym in his condo, Chen said he occasionally pays for massages, which cost about $15 an hour. "I find that I actually save more money, even though I don't work as much," said Chen. Though he is very happy living in Thailand, he would consider moving back to Singapore if the right opportunity opened up, he said. For now, he is living presently and enjoying the life that Thailand has to offer. "The previous version of myself ... I valued everything on efficiency and ROI," said Chen. "But then here, people don't think that way. They may not have as much as a safety net ... but they seem to enjoy their day to day, and they actually have time to sit down and enjoy their coffee and have time to read a book." "These are some of the simple pleasures that I now am able to afford, which doesn't actually cost a lot," he said.

The Hidden Cost of OpenAI's Genius
The Hidden Cost of OpenAI's Genius

Gizmodo

timean hour ago

  • Gizmodo

The Hidden Cost of OpenAI's Genius

OpenAI is the undisputed poster child of the AI revolution, the company that forced the world to pay attention with the launch of ChatGPT. But behind the scenes, a desperate and wildly expensive battle is raging, and the cost of keeping the company's geniuses in-house is becoming astronomical. According to a recent report from The Information, OpenAI revealed to investors that its stock-based compensation for employees surged more than fivefold last year to an astonishing $4.4 billion. That figure isn't just large; it's more than the company's entire revenue for the year, accounting for a staggering 119% of its $3.7 billion in total revenue. This is an unheard-of figure, even for Silicon Valley. For comparison, Google's stock compensation was just 16% of its revenue the year before its IPO. For Facebook, it was 6%. So what's going on? In short, OpenAI is fighting for its life in an unprecedented talent war, and its chief rival, Meta, is on the offensive. Mark Zuckerberg has been personally courting top AI researchers with massive compensation packages, successfully poaching several key minds from OpenAI's core teams. This has reportedly prompted a crisis at OpenAI, forcing it to 'recalibrate compensation' and promise even more rewarding pay packages to prevent a catastrophic brain drain. While stock-based compensation doesn't immediately burn through a company's cash reserves, it creates a major risk by diluting the value of shares held by investors. Every billion dollars in stock handed to employees means the slices of the pie owned by major backers like Microsoft and other venture capital firms get smaller. OpenAI is trying to sell this strategy as a long-term vision. The company projects that this massive expense will fall to 45% of revenue this year, and below 10% by 2030. Furthermore, OpenAI has reportedly discussed a future plan where its employees would collectively own roughly one-third of the restructured company, with Microsoft also owning another third. The goal is to turn employees into deeply invested partners who have a massive incentive to stay and build. But the 'Meta effect' is throwing a wrench in those neat projections. The aggressive poaching and the ensuing pay bumps mean OpenAI's costs are likely to remain sky-high. This high-stakes financial strategy puts OpenAI in a precarious position. The company is already spending billions of dollars a year as it spends heavily on the computing power needed to run its models. Adding billions more in stock compensation puts immense pressure on the company to dramatically increase revenue and find a path to profitability before its investors get spooked. While Microsoft seems locked in for the long haul, other investors may grow weary of having their ownership diluted so heavily. It forces a countdown timer on the company to deliver a massive financial return to justify the cost. OpenAI was founded with a mission to build artificial general intelligence (AGI) that 'benefits all of humanity.' This costly talent war, fueled by capitalist competition, puts immense pressure on that founding ideal. It becomes harder to prioritize safety and ethics when you're burning billions to keep your top minds from joining the competition. Ultimately, OpenAI is betting these billions to ensure it has the best talent to win the race to create the world's first true superintelligence. If they succeed, the financial cost will seem trivial. If they fail, or if a competitor gets there first, they will have spent themselves into a hole for nothing. OpenAI did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The College-Major Gamble
The College-Major Gamble

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

The College-Major Gamble

The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here. This is Atlantic Intelligence, a newsletter in which our writers help you wrap your mind around artificial intelligence and a new machine age. Sign up here. When I was in college, the Great Recession was unfolding, and it seemed like I had made a big mistake. With the economy crumbling and job prospects going with it, I had selected as my majors … journalism and sociology. Even the professors joked about our inevitable unemployment. Meanwhile, a close friend had switched majors and started to take computer-science classes—there would obviously be opportunities there. But that conventional wisdom is starting to change. As my colleague Rose Horowitch writes in an article for The Atlantic, entry-level tech jobs are beginning to fade away, in part because of new technology itself: AI is able to do many tasks that previously required a person. 'Artificial intelligence has proved to be even more valuable as a writer of computer code than as a writer of words,' Rose writes. 'This means it is ideally suited to replacing the very type of person who built it. A recent Pew study found that Americans think software engineers will be most affected by generative AI. Many young people aren't waiting to find out whether that's true.' I spoke with Rose about how AI is affecting college students and the job market—and what the future may hold. This interview has been edited and condensed. Damon Beres: What do we actually know about how AI is disrupting the market for comp-sci majors? Rose Horowitch: There are a lot of tech executives coming out and saying that AI is replacing some of their coders, and that they just don't need as many entry-level employees. I spoke with an economics professor at Harvard, David Deming, who said that may be a convenient talking point—nobody wants to say We didn't hit our sales targets, so we have to lay people off. What we can guess is that the technology is actually making senior engineers more productive; therefore they need fewer entry-level employees. It's also one more piece of uncertainty that these tech companies are dealing with—in addition to tariffs and high interest rates—that may lead them to put off hiring. Damon: Tech companies do have a vested interest in promoting AI as such a powerful tool that it could do the work of a person, or multiple people. Microsoft recently laid thousands of people off, as you write in your article, and the company also said that AI writes or helps write 25 percent of their code—that's a helpful narrative for Microsoft, because Microsoft sells AI tools. At the same time, it does feel pretty clear to me that many different industries are dealing with the same issues. I've spoken about generative AI replacing entry-level work with prominent lawyers, journalists, people who work in tech—the worry feels real to me. Rose: I spoke with Molly Kinder, a Brookings Institution fellow who studies how AI affects the economy, and she said that she's worried that the bottom rung of the career ladder across industries is breaking apart. If you're writing a book, you may not need to hire a research assistant if you can use AI. It's obviously not going to be perfectly accurate, and it couldn't write the book for you, but it could make you more productive. Her concern, which I share, is that you still need people to get trained and then ascend at a company. The unemployment rate for young college graduates is already unusually high, and this may lead to more problems down the line that we can't even foresee. These early jobs are like apprenticeships: You're learning skills that you don't get in school. If you skip that, it's cheaper for the company in the short term, but what happens to white-collar work down the line? Damon: How are the schools themselves thinking about this reality—that they have students in their senior year facing a completely different prospect for their future than when they entered school four years ago? Rose: They're responding by figuring out how to produce graduates that are prepared to use AI tools in their work and be competitive applicants. The challenge is that the technology is changing so quickly—you need to teach students about what's relevant professionally while also teaching the fundamental skills, so that they're not just reliant on the machines. Damon: Your article makes this point that students should be focused less on learning a particular skill and more on studying something that's durable for the long term. Do you think students really will shift what they're studying? Will the purpose of higher education itself change somehow? Rose: It's likely that we'll see a decline in students studying computer science, and then, at some point, there will be too few job candidates, salaries will be pushed up, and more students will go in. But the most important thing that students can do—and it's so counterintuitive—is to study things that will give you human skills and soft skills that will help you endure in any industry. Even without AI, jobs are going to change. The challenge is that, in times of crisis, people tend to choose something preprofessional, because it feels safer. That cognitive bias can be unhelpful. Damon: You cover higher education in general. You're probably best known for the story you did about how elite college students can't read books anymore, which feels related to this discussion for obvious reasons. I'm curious to know more about why you were interested in exploring this particular topic. Rose: Higher ed, more than at any time in recent memory, is facing the question of what it is for. People are questioning the value of it much more than they did 10, 20 years ago. And so, these articles all fit into that theme: What is the value of higher ed, of getting an advanced degree? The article about computer-science majors shows that this thing that everyone thought is a sure bet doesn't seem to be. That reinforces why higher education needs to make the case for its value—how it teaches people to be more human, or what it's like to live a productive life in a society. Damon: There are so many crisis points in American higher education right now. AI is one of them. Your article about reading suggested a problem that may have emerged from other digital technologies. Obviously there have been issues stemming from the Trump administration. There was the Claudine Gay scandal. This is all in the past year or two. How do you sum it all up? Rose: Most people are starting to realize that the status quo is not going to work. There's declining trust in education, particularly from Republicans. A substantial portion of the country doesn't think higher ed serves the nation. The fact is that at many universities, academic standards have declined so much. Rigor has declined. Things cannot go on as they once did. What comes next, and who's going to chart that course? The higher-education leaders I speak with, at least, are trying to answer that question themselves so that it doesn't get defined by external forces like the Trump administration. Article originally published at The Atlantic

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store