'Cruelty over care': Transgender care advocates blast Supreme Court
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Supreme Court will hear case about bans on gender-affirming care for minors
A case involving a law in Tennessee that restricts puberty blockers and hormone therapy for transgender minors will be heard by the Supreme Court.
Scripps News
Organizations and advocates for transgender youth blasted the U.S. Supreme Court's decision on June 18 that upheld Tennessee's ban on gender-affirming care for minors.
Advocates said the high court's decision was a major blow to transgender rights and medical organizations that have endorsed gender-affirming care for minors.
The decision came about five years after the court ruled that transgender, gay and lesbian people are protected by a landmark civil rights law barring sex discrimination in the workplace.
In the Tennessee case, the high court said that preventing minors from using puberty blockers and hormone therapy does not violate the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment.
The Tennessee House Republican Caucus cheered the ruling as a "proud day for the Volunteer state and for all those who believe in protecting the innocence and well-being of America's children."
The Tennessee Equality Project, an advocacy group that fights anti-LGBTQ legislation, said in a statement that the organization was "profoundly disappointed" by the high court's decision. The decision further erodes the rights of transgender children, their families and doctors, the group said.
"Gender-affirming care is proven to save lives," the group's statement said. "Major medical associations, including the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Medical Association, support gender-affirming medical and psychological care because it saves lives and improves mental well-being."
Kimberly Inez McGuire, executive director of Unite for Reproductive & Gender Equity, said the Supreme Court chose "cruelty over care."
"This decision upholds a dangerous and deeply unjust law that strips families of their rights, criminalizes love and support and puts the lives of young people at risk," McGuire said in a statement.
The decision means transgender adolescents who live in states that restrict gender-affirming care could have difficulty accessing such care, said Lindsey Dawson, associate director for HIV policy and director for LGBTQ health policy at KFF, a health policy nonprofit.
Dawson said 25 states have gender-affirming care bans in effect, though only Arizona and New Hampshire ban gender-reassignment surgery. Some transgender youth who live in states restricting care such as puberty blockers or hormone therapy might choose visit states without such bans. However, that option wouldn't be an option for transgender youth and their families who lack the financial means to travel for care.
"If you are minor who needs access to this medically necessary care, you simply can't get it if you live in one of these states," Dawson said.
More details: Supreme Court to weigh key transgender care case: What's at stake for minors
Trump administration targets transgender care
The decision comes as President Donald Trump's administration has targeted other aspects of transgender care.
After taking office, Trump signed an executive order stating the U.S. would not "fund, sponsor, promote, assist, or support" gender-affirming care.
In April, the federal agency that oversees Medicare and Medicaid told states not to use Medicaid funding to pay for gender-affirming care for minors.
Dr. Mehmet Oz, administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, said the federal agency will stop paying for gender reassignment operations or hormone treatments for those under 18.
A 2023 study in the medical journal JAMA Network Open found gender-affirming surgeries were most popular with young adults.
More than 25,000 people ages 19 to 30 received these procedures from 2016 through 2019. Fewer than 8% of patients − a total of 3,678 − were 12- to 18-year-olds.
Contributing: Maureen Groppe,
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
7 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump withdraws U.S. from 'woke' UNESCO program again
The United States again is withdrawing from the United Nations' UNESCO program, which the Trump administration is now labeling "woke" after previously rejecting it because of alleged anti-Israel bias. The move, which goes into effect at the end of 2026, continues Trump's efforts to pull the U.S. out of international institutions he has long criticized, something he also did in his first term. White House spokesperson Anna Kelly said UNESCO "supports woke, divisive cultural and social causes that are totally out-of-step with the commonsense policies that Americans voted for in November." UNESCO Director-General Audrey Azoulay said in a statement to USA TODAY that Trump's decision to withdraw is 'regrettable' and 'contradicts the fundamental principles of multilateralism.' Azoulay said UNESCO had been anticipating and preparing for a loss of U.S. support and 'is not considering any layoffs.' The U.S. currently contributes about 8% of UNESCO's budget, Azoulay said. Paris-based UNESCO was founded after World War II to promote peace through international cooperation in education, science, and culture. One of UNESCO's core missions is the World Heritage program, which protects historic and cultural sites. It also runs a number of educational programs. Trump also withdrew the U.S. from UNESCO - which stands for U.N. Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization - during his first administration, citing concerns about its approach to Israel. He also withdrew the U.S. from the World Health Organization, the U.N. Human Rights Council, a global climate change accord and the Iran nuclear deal. Joe Biden reversed those decisions after taking office in 2021, returning the U.S. to UNESCO, the WHO and the climate agreement. With Trump now back in the White House, the U.S. is once again pulling out of these global bodies. He has already decided to withdraw the U.S. from the WHO and halt funding to the Palestinian relief agency UNRWA as part of a review of the country's participation in UN agencies, due to be concluded in August. UNESCO has been a focal point of criticism for years. The U.S. stopped funding UNESCO after it voted to include Palestine as a member in 2011. The Reagan administration withdrew from the organization in 1984, but President George W. Bush brought the United States back into the group in 2002. There are 1,248 UNESCO World Heritage sites in 170 countries, including the pyramids in Egypt, Notre-Dame Cathedral in France and the Statue of Liberty in the U.S. Contributing: Reuters; Jim Michaels
Boston Globe
7 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
US says it's leaving UN cultural agency UNESCO again, only 2 years after rejoining
The decision, first reported by the New York Post, will take effect at the end of December 2026. Advertisement This will be the third time that the United States has left UNESCO, which is based in Paris, and the second time during a Trump administration. It last rejoined the agency in 2023, under the Biden administration. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up UNESCO's Director General Audrey Azoulay said she 'deeply' regrets the U.S. decision but insisted that it was expected, and that the agency 'has prepared for it.' She also denied accusations of anti-Israel bias. 'These claims ... contradict the reality of UNESCO's efforts, particularly in the field of Holocaust education and the fight against antisemitism,' she said. The Trump administration in 2017 announced that the U.S. would withdraw from UNESCO, citing anti-Israel bias. That decision took effect a year later. The U.S. and Israel stopped financing UNESCO after it voted to include Palestine as a member state in 2011. Advertisement 'The reasons put forward by the United States of America are the same as seven years ago, even though the situation has changed profoundly, political tensions have receded, and UNESCO today constitutes a rare forum for consensus on concrete and action-oriented multilateralism,' Azoulay added. The decision came as no surprise to UNESCO officials, who had anticipated such a move following the specific review ordered by the Trump administration earlier this year. They also expected that Trump would pull out again since the return of the US in 2023 had been promoted by a political rival, former President Joe Biden. The U.S withdrawal is likely to affect UNESCO because the U.S. provides a notable share of the agency's budget. But the organization should be able to cope. UNESCO has diversified its funding sources in recent years and the US contribution has decreased, representing only 8% of the agency's total budget. Azoulay pledged that UNESCO will carry out its missions despite 'inevitably reduced resources.' The agency is not considering any staff layoffs at this stage. 'UNESCO's purpose is to welcome all the nations of the world, and the United States of America is and always will be welcome,' she said. 'We will continue to work hand in hand with all our American partners in the private sector, academia and non-profit organizations, and will pursue our political dialogue with the U.S. administration and Congress.' The United States previously pulled out of UNESCO under the Reagan administration in 1984 because it viewed the agency as mismanaged, corrupt and used to advance the interests of the Soviet Union. It rejoined in 2003 during George W. Bush's presidency. Advertisement
Washington Post
18 minutes ago
- Washington Post
US says it's leaving UN cultural agency UNESCO again, only 2 years after rejoining
The United States announced Tuesday it will again pull out of the U.N.'s educational, scientific and cultural agency because it believes that its involvement is not in the country's national interest, and that the agency promotes anti-Israel speech. This decision comes only two years after the United States rejoined UNESCO after leaving in 2018, during U.S. President Donald Trump's first administration.
