Pentagon pressuring Japan and Australia over China
Beijing views Taiwan as part of its territory according to the One-China principle, and insists on eventual reunification. While the US officially acknowledges Chinese sovereignty over the self-governing island, it continues to supply Taipei with weapons.
US Under Secretary of Defense Elbridge Colby has for months been pushing Japanese and Australian military officials to prepare for a potential conflict, the outlet wrote, citing anonymous sources.
'Concrete operational planning and exercises that have direct application to a Taiwan contingency are moving forward with Japan and Australia,' the FT cited one of its sources as saying. 'But this request caught Tokyo and Canberra by surprise because the US itself does not give a blank check guarantee to Taiwan.'
According to Colby, the Defense Department is focused on US President Donald Trump's agenda of 'restoring deterrence and achieving peace through strength.' However, 'some among [Washington's] allies might not welcome frank conversations,' Colby wrote on X on Saturday.
Australian Defense Industry Minister Pat Conroy refused to 'engage in hypotheticals' when asked to comment on reports of US pressure over China. Canberra has 'the sole power to commit Australia to war or to allow our territory to be used for a conflict,' he told ABC on Sunday.
Tensions in the Taiwan Strait have risen since Taiwan elected pro-independence President Lai Ching-te last year. Trump has reengaged China in a trade war since taking office, although the escalation has somewhat subsided after Washington and Beijing settled a rare-earths deal last month.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
4 hours ago
- Russia Today
EU will pay for Patriot deliveries to Ukraine
US President Donald Trump has said he will send additional Patriot air defense missiles to Ukraine, adding that the deliveries will be paid for by the EU. The announcement came days after the Pentagon reversed its decision to halt some military aid. 'We will send them Patriots, which they desperately need, because [Russian President Vladimir] Putin really surprised a lot of people. He talks nice and then bombs everybody in the evening. But there's a little bit of a problem there. I don't like it,' Trump told reporters at Joint Base Andrews outside of Washington on Sunday evening. The US president did not clarify whether he was speaking only about ammunition for the Patriots or also the air defense systems. He noted that he has not yet agreed on the number, adding that Ukraine 'would have some because they do need protection.' 'But the European Union is paying for them. We are not paying anything for them… This will be a business for us,' Trump said. He made the remarks following media reports that he was considering a new military aid package, which would potentially include both defensive and offensive missiles. Trump previously said he had approved shipments of defensive weapons, without providing further details. Trump has recently ramped up his criticism of Putin, who he has blamed for the lack of a breakthrough in US-mediated negotiations between Moscow and Kiev. He also said he is 'unhappy' with the Russian president, remarking that he is 'very nice all the time, but it turns out to be meaningless' with regard to achieving a ceasefire. Russia continues to conduct strikes on Ukraine, saying it only attacks military-related targets and never has also said the strikes are retaliation for Ukraine's attacks on Russian territory which often target civilians, residential buildings, and critical infrastructure.
Russia Today
4 hours ago
- Russia Today
US-Japan relations undergoing era-defining crisis
Relations between the US and Japan, America's key ally in the Asia-Pacific region, are experiencing one of the worst crises in decades, with potentially far-reaching ramifications, the Financial Times reported on Monday. Aside from deep economic ties, Japan hosts dozens of US military bases, which account for much of Washington's presence in the vicinity of its key rival, China. The newspaper cited several unnamed senior officials on both sides of the Pacific as warning of a 'fundamental fragility,' highlighted by US President Donald Trump's treatment of Japan with regard to tariffs earlier this month. The media outlet's sources reportedly predicted that an 'era-defining reset is now inevitable.' The publication quoted Christopher Johnstone, a former White House official who currently works for The Asia Group consultancy, as suggesting that the 'challenges go deeper than any single figure in the administration.' He claimed that there is a growing impression among Japan's leadership that 'for the Trump team, nothing is sacred and everything is transactional.' Rahm Emanuel, who served as US ambassador to Japan under President Joe Biden, told the FT that the ongoing rift over trade could also have implications for the Asia-Pacific region's security architecture. The media outlet noted that President Trump's latest remarks concerning Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba were far chillier than statements he made just a few months earlier. The FT pointed out that, in issuing blanket trade terms without differentiating between Japan and countries generally considered to be lesser partners for Washington, Trump essentially snubbed a major ally. According to the report, while the US president had expected the Japanese prime minister to 'be a relatively easy partner' in trade talks, Ishiba had sought a total tariff exemption – a mutual misjudgment that has supposedly left both dissatisfied. In a series of posts on his Truth Social platform last Monday, the US president announced the imposition of new 25% tariffs on Japan, along with several other nations. Trump claimed that economic ties with Tokyo had 'been, unfortunately, far from Reciprocal.'
Russia Today
7 hours ago
- Russia Today
Ukraine's summer of losing ground: Here's how Russia is cracking the front line
Over the past month, Russia's summer campaign has maintained the methodical pace set in May and June – deliberate, grinding, but steadily effective. In total, Russian forces have seized roughly 500 square kilometers of territory – three times more than during the same period last year. While the advances may appear modest on the map, they reflect a consistent application of pressure along multiple axes and a broader shift in battlefield momentum. Active fighting has unfolded across four key sectors, stretching from the northern borderlands near Sumy to the southern reaches of the Zaporozhye front. Each offers a distinct tactical picture, yet together they form a coherent narrative of Russia's evolving strategy. Below, we examine the month's developments, front by front – from north to south. Russian forces continue to push forward along the Sumy axis, working to establish a buffer zone on the Ukrainian side of the border with Russia's Kursk Region – directly across from last year's staging area near Sudzha. Faced with a potential threat to the regional capital of Sumy, Ukrainian command was forced to redeploy units from other sectors and pull reserves into the area. In late June, the Ukrainian army launched a series of counterattacks near Alekseevka and Kondratovka, aiming to squeeze the Russian bridgehead from the flanks or potentially sever it altogether. Meanwhile, the Ukrainian army has retained a presence in Tetkino – the only settlement on Russian territory, in Kursk Region, where Ukrainian forces still hold positions. As of early July, Ukraine's counteroffensives appear to have ground to a halt. Russian troops succeeded in dislodging the Ukrainian troops from one of their two remaining footholds in Tetkino. The coming weeks will determine whether the Russian advance into Ukrainian territory will continue – or if the focus will shift to consolidating gains and expanding the border buffer zone. Last autumn, Russian forces secured a foothold on the western bank of the Oskol River north of Kupiansk, while simultaneously advancing toward the river from the south. By late June and early July, reports surfaced suggesting that Russian units had captured Moskovka – a key stronghold along the strategic Kupiansk-Volchansk railway. Encircling Kupiansk effectively would require cutting off two major arteries: The main supply route running west through Blagodatovka, and another road leading south through Osinovо. What's the situation now? Despite earlier claims, there is still no confirmed Russian presence in Moskovka, suggesting the village remains contested or under Ukrainian control. Overall, the Kupiansk axis is viewed as a secondary theater. Operations in this area appear designed primarily to pin down Ukrainian forces, preventing them from reinforcing more critical sectors of the front. After a successful push in May, Russian advances in the Konstantinovka sector have slowed somewhat. Russian forces are now pressing up against the city's primary defensive lines, advancing along the Stepanovka, Aleksandro-Kalinovo, and Plescheyevka axes. What's unfolding follows a now-familiar Russian approach to urban warfare. First, the city is flanked and key lines of communication are brought under fire control. Then begins the grinding phase: Sustained artillery bombardment wears down the defending garrison as Russian troops close in from three directions. Over time, this pressure begins to erode the city's defenses. At that point, Ukrainian forces face two choices – either retreat in an orderly fashion, as seen in Kurakhovo, or, if ordered to hold at all costs, risk a defensive collapse with potentially serious consequences for adjacent sectors, as happened in Avdeevka and Ugledar. Meanwhile Russian forces are currently focused on wearing down the Ukrainian garrison. The main roads into Konstantinovka are under Russian fire control, and pressure on the flanks is steadily increasing. On the northern approach from Chasov Yar, however, progress remains limited due to difficult terrain – an issue we addressed in a previous report. The situation around Pokrovsk mirrors that of Konstantinovka – and together, these battles may mark some of the most consequential developments of the summer campaign. On the eastern outskirts of Pokrovsk, Russian forces have advanced up to 8km toward Rodinskoe, bringing two of the three main supply routes into Pokrovsk and neighboring Mirnograd under fire control. Further south, between Pokrovsk and Velikaya Novoselka, Russian troops achieved their most significant gains this month – pushing up to 15km across a 30-kilometer-wide front. Their advance reached the administrative boundary of the Donetsk People's Republic (DPR), with the village of Komar – an important Ukrainian defensive position – reportedly cleared and brought under Russian control. On July 7, the Russian Defense Ministry announced the capture of Dachnoye, a village located on the DPR's border and the first settlement in Ukraine's Dnepropetrovsk Region to fall under Russian control. As part of Ukraine's fortified defense line, securing Dachnoye marks both a tactical and symbolic milestone for the Russian advance. After nearly a year and a half of relative calm, the southern front near the Dnepr River has erupted with renewed activity. Russian forces are now advancing along three axes in the region. Notably, they have captured Kamenskoye – a strategically significant settlement on the riverbank. On July 11, Russian Defense Minister Andrey Belousov visited the forward command post of the Dnepr Group of Forces, signaling high-level attention to the area. In the coming weeks, it should become clearer whether this uptick in operations is intended to stretch Ukrainian reserves and apply pressure – or if it marks the opening phase of a broader Russian offensive in the south.
