This is not the answer to the threats Britain faces
Battles for territory and for political power beyond Ukraine result in death and despair for millions. Climate change, deepening inequality, poverty, famine and the displacement of populations generate humanitarian agendas that a country such as ours should respond to. They also constitute threats to us. We should not dispense with foreign aid to bolster a narrow perception of what we need to defend against. But what about cost?
As Dan Sabbagh asks (Spending constrains Labour's defence review – but no harm in gradualism, 2 June), even if we accept the need to strengthen the readiness of our conventional forces, why do we need to spend more on nuclear weapons?
The existing nuclear deterrent is dreadful in and of itself. Even if we are uncertain about the US's resolve, the UK and France could unleash mass destruction with what they have now. Surely we cannot see a scenario when we would need to, or choose to, deploy nuclear weapons on the battlefield?
We should redirect the funding for more nuclear weapons in the defence review to overseas aid. It's not enough, but it does signal that we are not being diverted in our commitment to those in the most dire need across the world by the agenda of Vladimir Putin and his coterie in Moscow. Neil SmallLeeds
Traditionally, we have seen our armed forces as being necessary to protect Britain's territorial integrity and safeguard our way of life and independence. As Dan Sabbagh points out, our territorial integrity is not under threat. As for our way of life and independence, there is no threat to this from Vladimir Putin: he does not appear to have any interest in the way we conduct our internal affairs, and even if he did, there is not much leverage he could apply. The same cannot be said for the American administration, which can exercise enormous leverage over our government and has distinct ideas about how it would like to influence our internal affairs, made painfully clear by JD Vance in his Munich speech earlier this year.
Part of this leverage resides in the nature of the dependence of British armed forces on American equipment and support. Under the defence review, this degree of dependence will remain – we will be renewing our nuclear deterrent (missiles provided by the US) and probably buying more equipment from the US. Should we not be looking at decoupling ourselves from the US rather than exposing ourselves to pressure from a potentially malevolent government? Richard HendersonBristol
One must presume that our 'battle-ready' prime minister did not read your exemplary interview with Neta Crawford last week (How the US became the biggest military emitter and stopped everyone finding out, 30 May), outlining her analysis of the true costs to the biosphere of an escalation in military spending. Or does not care.
The economics aside, the political choices before Keir Starmer and all global leaders in this Anthropocene twilight of 'ecological collapse' ('Half the tree of life': ecologists' horror as nature reserves are emptied of insects, 3 June) are exquisitely stark. Either they devote their full energies to the climate emergency and so genuinely lead in attempting to heal an international system's self-destructive path to planetary annihilation. Or they reprise the last cold-war, nuclear-tipped, military confrontation of the 1980s and so, this time, seal it. Which is it to be? Dr Mark Levene New Radnor, Powys
The prime minister proposes to increase conventional defence spending and bring back a form of national service to 'make Britain safer'. But documents in the House of Commons library state that we will be spending £118bn between 2023 and 2033 on our nuclear deterrent. If nuclear weapons aren't keeping us safe, what is the point of them? Why not spend this huge sum on social care, housing and other similar projects that would benefit the whole community. Most people would then be happy to let the prime minister have his soldiers, while life improves for everyone else. Peter Loschi Oldham, Greater Manchester
Zoe Williams' description of sexual violence in war was a hard read, but a timely reminder, given the bullish talk flowing from the strategic defence review, that war is always an atrocity in one form or another (The story of war is one of kidnapping, slavery and rape. And what we talk about is strategy and territory, 2 June). The second world war ended with the atrocities of atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. I support strengthening our defences to keep Britain safe from attack, but if nuclear weapons are part of that, let us remember that they are a deterrent, not an opportunity.Anne ConstantineGreat Gransden, Cambridgeshire
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
20 minutes ago
- Reuters
Ukraine's top commander says troops standing firm outside key city
July 18 (Reuters) - Ukraine's top military commander, Oleksandr Syrskyi, said on Friday his forces were standing firm in defending a key city on the eastern front of the three-year war. President Volodymyr Zelenskiy praised Ukraine's forces in their defence of Pokrovsk, a logistics hub in eastern Donetsk region that has weathered months of Russian attempts to capture it in their troops' slow advance westward. Syrskyi said he had presented a report to the president describing the challenges facing Ukrainian troops along the 1,000-km (620-mile) front. "Most attention was focused on the Pokrovsk and Novopavlivka sectors, where our soldiers are courageously containing intense pressure and destroying the Russian aggressor," Syrskyi wrote on the Telegram messaging app. "The enemy is continuing to deploy its tactic of small infantry groups, but has proved powerless on its attempts to seize Pokrovsk. Today, they tried to break through with sabotage groups but were exposed and destroyed by Ukrainian defenders." Zelenskiy, in his account of the commander's report, singled out for praise those defending Pokrovsk, particularly from sabotage groups "trying to advance and enter Ukrainian cities and villages. No such Russian group will have a chance of survival." Syrskyi issued his report at the end of a week of upheaval in the government, now focused on boosting domestic arms production. Zelenskiy appointed a new Prime Minister, Yulia Svyrydenko, and put her predecessor, Denys Shmyhal, at the head of the Defence Ministry. The outgoing Defence Minister, Rustem Umerov, was named chairman of the National Security and Defence Council and told to "intensify" peace talks with Russia. Russia's military has been advancing through Donetsk region, with the Russian Defence Ministry announcing almost daily the capture of villages on the approaches to Pokrovsk. The capture of one such village, Popiv Yar, was announced on Thursday. Ukraine has reported some successes in pushing back Russian troops from the area in recent months. Pokrovsk is a road and rail hub used to supply other frontline towns. Most of Pokrovsk's pre-war population of 60,000 has been evacuated. Ukraine's only mine that produces coking coal - used in its once vast steel industry -- lies idle outside the city. In Kyiv, Ukrainian air defence units repelled Russian drones on Friday evening. Fragments from one intercepted drone fell on a dwelling in an eastern suburb, but no injuries were reported.
The Independent
32 minutes ago
- The Independent
UK sanctions Russian spies trying to ‘destabilise Europe'
The UK has sanctioned a string of Russian spies and hackers, accusing them of carrying out a campaign to 'destabilise Europe'. Those sanctioned include a unit that targeted the daughter of Sergei Skripal years before Russian agents attempted to murder him in Salisbury with the nerve agent Novichok. Others are accused of belonging to units that have carried out cyber attacks in the UK, France, Germany and the US – while also facilitating strikes on civilian targets in Ukraine. Foreign Secretary David Lammy said: ' GRU spies are running a campaign to destabilise Europe, undermine Ukraine's sovereignty and threaten the safety of British citizens. 'The Kremlin should be in no doubt: we see what they are trying to do in the shadows and we won't tolerate it. That's why we're taking decisive action with sanctions against Russian spies.' In total, 18 officers of the GRU, Russia's military intelligence unit, have been sanctioned, along with three men linked to Moscow's efforts to spread disinformation in West Africa. They include five men said to have been involved in a cyber attack on Yulia Skripal in 2013, in which the GRU's Unit 26165 targeted her emails with malware known as X-Agent. Development of X-Agent is said to have been overseen by Lieutenant-Colonel Sergey Morgachev, and involved Aleksey Lukashev, Ivan Yermakov, Sergey Vasyuk and Artem Malyshev, who have all been sanctioned. Lukashev and Yermakov are said to have carried out the attack on Ms Skirpal's emails, five years before members of a separate GRU unit poisoned her and her father with Novichok. The Foreign Office accused Unit 26165, which is already sanctioned, of attempting to disrupt investigations into the attempted murder of the Skripals along with another already-sanctioned GRU outfit, Unit 74455. On Friday, the UK added GRU Unit 29155 to the sanctions list, accusing it of carrying out the poisoning and saying the incident 'underscores how GRU Units integrate cyber operations into hybrid activity with the aim of furthering the Kremlin's objectives'. Also sanctioned are Aleksey Morenets and Yevgeney Serebriakov, accused of carrying out 'close access operations' against the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons in The Hague, Netherlands. As well as carrying out cyber attacks in Western Europe, Unit 26165 is said to have conducted operations in Ukraine, including carrying out reconnaissance that facilitated the 2022 attack on the Mariupol Theatre that killed hundreds of civilians, including children. Several of the men sanctioned on Friday are already wanted by the FBI in the United States. They include Colonel Aleksandr Osadchuk, said to be the commanding officer of Unit 74455. He and others have been charged with a series of offences in connection with Russian attempts to interfere in the 2016 US election. Other men sanctioned by the UK on Friday, including Morenets and Serebriakov, are accused of targeting anti-doping organisations and other sporting bodies around the 2016 Olympic Games in Rio De Janeiro. Meanwhile, the UK joined the EU in lowering the price cap on Russian oil as Ukraine's allies sought to increase pressure on Moscow to engage in peace talks. The cap, which is currently 60 US dollars per barrel, will fall to 47.60 dollars from September 2 in a move Chancellor Rachel Reeves said was aimed at 'exploiting' President Vladimir Putin's 'biggest vulnerability'. Energy revenues account for around 30% of the Russian state's income, making them a key source of funding for the Kremlin's war in Ukraine. Ms Reeves, who is attending a meeting of G20 finance ministers in South Africa, said: 'The UK and its EU allies are turning the screw on the Kremlin's war chest by stemming the most valuable funding stream of its illegal war in Ukraine even further.' Mr Lammy added the UK would not 'stand by' while Mr Putin 'continues to stall on serious peace talks'.
The Guardian
32 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Angela Rayner tells Labour to ‘step up' and make case for being in power
Angela Rayner has urged Labour colleagues to 'step up' and make the case for why the party should be in power as the government attempts to draw a line under a tumultuous first year in office and shift towards a more upbeat approach. The deputy prime minister urged Labour MPs to focus on the party's achievements over the last 12 months rather than always thinking about failures, saying they should all be 'message carriers' for what had been done well. But she said there were big challenges ahead, with changes in areas such as infrastructure investment and planning going to take years to bear fruit. 'These things take time to lead in. That's the challenge with politics. Everybody wants something mañana. It's like, gotta have it immediately.' In an interview with the Guardian as MPs prepared to break for the summer recess, Rayner also said she was unafraid of Nigel Farage, that tough action against rebellious Labour MPs was 'justified' and that fixing the 'awful' Send system for children was an urgent priority. She said it was a 'moral mission' for Labour to bring down child poverty, she would feel personally wounded if the government did not hit its 1.5m new homes target and that it was determined to 'break the doom loop' of low economic growth and high taxes suffered for years. However, speaking in her office in the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, Rayner made clear she expected her colleagues, from Keir Starmer down, to do a better job of arguing for what they believed in. 'We all have to step up and make that case. It's the job of all of us in the wider Labour movement,' she said, citing achievements such as falling NHS waiting lists, funding increases for housing and rising wages. 'I often go to Labour fundraisers and joke that the Tories will do 4% of their manifesto, and then go on about that 4% as if they've delivered the whole lot. In our Labour movement, we'll do 96% of it, but we'll go on about the 4% that we never managed to achieve. 'It's a mindset that we have … We're always thinking about what we didn't get, as opposed to all the huge achievements that we're making. Our whole movement is message carriers. And if we're not going to talk about these huge achievements, then who is?' Labour has characterised Reform UK as its main opposition at the next election, even though it has just four MPs. Rayner said they had to be 'held to account' for making 'wild promises' to the public they would not be able to deliver on, calling Farage a 'snake oil salesman'. 'Politics can make a real difference to people's lives, but it takes time to change, to bring about that fundamental change that people are so desperate to see. That's what this Labour government is doing,' she said. 'It's not short-termism on the back of a fag packet, on some billboard. It's actually the fundamental reforms that will get Britain back on track … instead of people feeling at the moment like everything is broken and nothing can be fixed.' Rayner defended the decision to strip the Labour whip from four 'persistent' rebel MPs, even though No 10 had said it would try to improve relations with backbenchers after they forced it into a major U-turn over welfare cuts. 'I think it's justified. If you're constantly organising against your Labour government then that's a whipping issue for the chief whip, and that's as old as time,' she said. But she acknowledged the government had to find ways of giving MPs 'opportunities to air concerns' and be part of the collective decision-making process. Labour MPs are concerned that ministers will approach plans for children's special educational needs and disabilities (Send) in the same way as they did changes to welfare, which were presented as a cost-saving move. But Rayner, who has two children who have been through the Send process, said the system was 'awful' for parents and had to be fixed, adding that she knew the government needed to bring families, schools and MPs with them on the difficult path to change. Her own department has an additional interest because councils, which provide much of the support, were granted two further years until March 2028 to keep Send deficits off their books, giving them a strict deadline. 'Can we do it in the time? We have to, because so many young people are being let down at the moment, because the system is not catching people's needs early on. That system is awful for parents. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion 'I was in the system for a long time … Parents who are trapped in it are constantly, for years, fighting to get their child support that they need. We've got to fix this. Often we're spending huge sums of money and we're still not delivering the outcomes for those young people.' Labour MPs are also desperate for the government to deliver on its pledge to tackle child poverty, with Starmer understood to be keen to lift the two-child benefit cap if affordable, although that has been made harder because of the welfare U-turn. Rayner said it was a 'moral mission' and 'absolutely critical' for a Labour government to bring down child poverty, but despite experts suggesting scrapping the cap would be the most cost-effective way to do so, she said there was 'no single lever' to address problem. She has announced a near doubling of government spending on affordable housing in England, up to £40bn of grants over 10 years, and bringing its target to build 1.5m new homes by 2029 closer. She said she would feel wounded if the target was not hit, even though experts say it will be extremely difficult. 'I would be wounded, even though it is a real stretch target. Everyone says it's really difficult to get there, but I'm determined to,' she said. Just months after Rayner urged Rachel Reeves to consider a series of wealth tax rises, underscoring unease over the chancellor's tight spending plans, she said the country needed to get out of the 'doom loop' of low growth and high taxes it had seen under the Conservatives. While she refused to be drawn on whether it was inevitable that taxes would have to rise this autumn, when asked about her leaked memo to the chancellor, she said the country 'can't continue' as it is. 'I think we will get there. But we can't continue on this doom loop of, you know, low, low growth and high taxes, we have to find a way through this,' she added, highlighting capital investment and trade deals which both supported the economy. 'That's how you grow the economy in the long run, and where people feel better off as a result of it. That's the turnaround that we're doing that the previous government didn't do, and why we've been in this constant doom loop.' Before Donald Trump's second state visit to the UK this autumn, Rayner, who has previously called the US president 'a buffoon' who had 'no place in the White House', said she respected the mandate of elected politicians but was prepared to 'challenge respectfully'. A week after Unite the trade union voted to suspend her membership and rethink its ties with the Labour party over the Birmingham bin strikes, Rayner said that while she was proud of her trade union roots, she answered to working people and her constituents. 'That's my test. Not what a general secretary says.'
