US tariffs 'discouraging': Thunder Bay Chamber of Commerce president
The country imposed a 25 per cent tariff on Canadian, and Mexican, goods on Tuesday. Canada retaliated with tariffs, and other measures, of its own.
"Canada and the provinces have been pushing very hard to try to find a solution and that would work for the US administration," said Charla Robinson, president of the city's chamber. "Unfortunately, it seems that all that effort hasn't really resulted in what we were hoping for."
"That is discouraging, but pleased to see the strength of both the prime minister and the premiers coming out and continuing to stand together, and saying, 'OK, this is where we're at. We're going to push back and we're going to do what we need to do to protect Canadians and the Canadian economy from this unjustified trade war.'"
Canada's retaliatory measures include a 25 per cent tariff of its own on U.S. imports. Ontario Premier Doug Ford also announced the LCBO would pull all American products from its shelves.
The move took the LCBO website offline on Tuesday, with a message reading "service unavailable."
"Our site is temporarily unavailable while we remove U.S. products in response to U.S. tariffs on Canadian goods. Our in-store customer service remains unaffected. Thank you for your patience and understanding."
Ford also announced that Ontario will rip-up its deal with Elon Musk's Starlink satellite Internet provider, and American companies will be barred from provincial procurement contracts.
Robinson said the United States doesn't understand how connected the two countries are.
"This is all the doing of the US government," she said. "They have made this choice to attack their friend and neighbour."
"They clearly don't quite understand just how integrated we are, and that it will be felt on the U.S. side as well as on the Canadian side," Robinson said. "This isn't just going to punish Canadians, this is going to punish Americans and they're going to feel it hard."
"The president needs to understand that."
United States President Donald Trump had initially planned to impose the tariffs about a month ago. However, he delayed the move at the last minute.
Robinson said the month-long delay was beneficial to Canadian business.
"The extra time definitely, from what I'm hearing, has allowed businesses to get a better understanding of potential impacts, potential opportunities to address those impacts," she said. "It's also allowed Canadian and local companies to take a look at their product lines to see where are the things that they're importing from the U.S. potentially going to be impacted, and what might they be able to do to find different suppliers that are not from the U.S."
Fort Frances Mayor Andrew Halikas said he's concerned about the impact the trade war could have on the town, which is located along the Minnesota border.
"There's a great deal of uncertainty, in fact, over what the tariffs are really are going to do," he said. "But one thing we know for sure, we get a lot of fruits and vegetables from the Americans, and so the cost of food is going to go up."
"And like everywhere else, I think, in the province of Ontario, we suffer from homelessness. We have people here who are down on their luck, and any kind of increase in the cost of food and the necessities of life are going to harm people."
Fort Frances agricultural and forestry businesses will also be hit, Halikas said, as they send exports across the border.
And then there's the impact on tourism, Halikas said.
"We're a gateway to northwestern Ontario," he said. "Around Fort Frances we have a lot of beautiful pristine lakes and forests, so we are a tourist destination."
"We're worried that our tourism is going to take an impact," Halikas said. "Our tourist camps are going to be more expensive to operate, so they're going to have to put their prices up and we don't know what effect that will have on our American friends coming up."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Canada News.Net
5 minutes ago
- Canada News.Net
Trump's tariff, trade deals come under fire from experts at home, abroad
Trump has not only signed an executive order to further modify tariff rates for 69 trading partners, but also announced a few high-profile trade deals that critics dismissed as "exaggerated, wrong, and false." NEW YORK, Aug. 3 (Xinhua) -- U.S. President Donald Trump's new round of massive tariff measures and his approach to recent trade negotiations have drawn strong criticism from experts both at home and abroad. Trump has not only signed an executive order to further modify tariff rates for 69 trading partners, but also announced a few high-profile trade deals that critics dismissed as "exaggerated, wrong, and false." "Whatever progress that's ultimately achieved as part of these new trade deals and duty rates will come at the steep price of significant U.S. tariff increases and the erosion of trust with America's key partners," said Jake Colvin, head of the National Foreign Trade Council. "Institutionalizing the highest U.S. duties since the Great Depression, coupled with ongoing uncertainty, is a recipe for making American businesses less competitive globally and consumers worse off while harming relationships with close geopolitical allies and trading partners," Colvin was quoted in a recent Wall Street Journal report. "As of today, U.S. tariff rates are at levels not seen in a century, which will result in hundreds of billions of dollars in new taxes paid mainly by American companies and consumers," said Scott Lincicome, vice president of general economics and trade at the Cato Institute. Trade policy remains uncertain and the U.S. tariff system has gone from simple and transparent to an impenetrable labyrinth of new requirements that will prove particularly costly for smaller American businesses that can't afford either pricey lawyers and accountants or high tariff bills and fines for noncompliance, The Washington Post reported Friday, quoting Lincicome. Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Analytics, said that the effective U.S. tariff rate, which started this year at just over 2 percent, looks to settle somewhere between 15 percent and 20 percent. "The economic damage from the tariffs is mounting... The damage will soon be obvious as inflation ramps up and businesses conclude that the higher tariffs are here to stay," said Zandi in The Washington Post piece. "While economists don't agree on much, they nearly universally agree that broad-based tariffs, such as those being implemented, are a bad idea," said Zandi. "Uncertainty is coming down with more trade deals, but tariffs may settle higher than expected, posing risks to our forecasts," said a Friday research note by Claudio Irigoyen and Antonio Gabriel, global economists with Bank of America Global Research. The higher-than-expected tariffs pose upside risks to inflation forecasts and downside risks to growth forecasts, according to the research note. "It's a very high tariff wall," said Deborah Elms, head of trade policy of the Hinrich Foundation. "The cost is going to be significantly higher for American companies and American consumers who will respond surely by buying less," Elms was quoted as saying in a Friday Bloomberg report. "While we haven't returned entirely to a 'law of the jungle' system, we have taken several huge strides back in that direction," said Stephen Olson, visiting senior fellow at the ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute and a former U.S. trade negotiator, in a Friday CNBC report. "We've seen numerous changes in the U.S. tariff regime to date, and there could always be more. Companies will be wary of investing and setting plans while uncertainty remains," said Jonathan Kearns, chief economist with Australian investment management firm Challenger Ltd. Kearns, a former high-ranking official with Reserve Bank of Australia, expected greater pass-through to the U.S. consumer in the months ahead, according to the Bloomberg report.
Canada News.Net
6 minutes ago
- Canada News.Net
Cutting Russia ties has cost EU 1 trillion Moscow
The blocs economy is weakening due to reduced cooperation with Russia, Deputy Foreign Minister Aleksandr Grushko has said The EU's decision to reduce energy and trade cooperation with Moscow over the Ukraine conflict has cost the bloc more than €1 trillion ($1.15 trillion), Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Aleksandr Grushko has said. In an interview with Izvestia on Monday, Grushko said the figure is based on various expert estimates of the economic consequences of the EU's decision to impose unprecedented sanctions on Russia, adding that it accounts for lost profits from energy and trade cooperation. According to Grushko, trade between the EU and Russia dropped from €417 billion ($482 billion) in 2013 to €60 billion ($69 billion) in 2023 and is now "approaching zero." He added that Europe's economy has subsequently taken a hit and is losing competitiveness. "Natural gas in Europe is four to five times more expensive than in the US, and electricity is two to three times higher," he said. "That is the price Europe has to pay for ending all economic contacts with Russia." In June, Russian President Vladimir Putin said that refusing Russian gas supplies had cost EU countries around €200 billion ($231 billion). In late 2024, Russian officials also estimated that total EU losses tied to sanctions against Russia had reached $1.5 trillion. Meanwhile, Moscow has said it has acquired a "certain immunity" to Western sanctions. Grushko's comments come after the EU agreed a trade deal with the US, which commits the bloc to purchasing large volumes of American energy - which Moscow says will come at a much steeper cost than that provided by Russia - and imposes 15% tariffs on key EU exports. Numerous EU politicians have described the agreement as lopsided and damaging to the bloc's interests. Commenting on the US-EU deal, Putin claimed that the EU had essentially lost its political sovereignty, and that this directly leads to losing economic independence. The EU began imposing sanctions on Russia in 2014, following the start of the Ukraine crisis, and expanded them drastically in 2022. Measures have targeted banking, energy exports, and other industries. Moscow considers the sanctions illegal, saying they violate international trade rules and harm global economic stability.
Canada News.Net
7 minutes ago
- Canada News.Net
EU lost 1 trillion by cutting Russia ties Moscow
The blocs economy is weakening due to reduced cooperation with Russia, Deputy Foreign Minister Aleksandr Grushko has said The EU has suffered losses exceeding €1 trillion ($1.15 trillion) since drastically reducing energy and trade cooperation with Moscow over the Ukraine conflict, Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Aleksandr Grushko has said. In an interview with Izvestia on Monday, Grushko said the figure is based on various expert estimates of the economic consequences of the EU's decision to impose unprecedented sanctions on Russia, adding that it accounts for lost profits from energy and trade cooperation. According to Grushko, trade between the EU and Russia dropped from €417 billion ($482 billion) in 2013 to €60 billion ($69 billion) in 2023 and is now "approaching zero." He added that Europe's economy has subsequently taken a hit and is losing competitiveness. "Natural gas in Europe is four to five times more expensive than in the US, and electricity is two to three times higher," he said. "That is the price Europe has to pay for ending all economic contacts with Russia." In June, Russian President Vladimir Putin said that EU countries had lost around €200 billion ($231 billion) by refusing Russian gas supplies. In late 2024, Russian officials also estimated that total EU losses tied to sanctions against Russia had reached $1.5 trillion. Meanwhile, Moscow has said it has acquired a "certain immunity" to Western sanctions. Grushko's comments come after the EU agreed a trade deal with the US, which commits the bloc to purchasing large volumes of American energy - which Moscow says will come at a much steeper cost than that provided by Russia - and imposes 15% tariffs on key EU exports. Numerous EU politicians have described the agreement as lopsided and damaging to the bloc's interests. Commenting on the US-EU deal, Putin claimed that the EU had essentially lost its political sovereignty, and that this directly leads to losing economic independence. The EU began imposing sanctions on Russia in 2014, following the start of the Ukraine crisis, and expanded them drastically in 2022. Measures have targeted banking, energy exports, and other industries. Moscow considers the sanctions illegal, saying they violate international trade rules and harm global economic stability.
