logo
Morehouse College announces new president

Morehouse College announces new president

Yahoo13-05-2025
The search is over. Morehouse College has selected its 13th president.
[DOWNLOAD: Free WSB-TV News app for alerts as news breaks]
The Morehouse College Board of Trustees has named renowned public health leader and alumnus Dr. F. DuBois Bowman to the position.
This comes after a national search for the school's leader.
Bowman graduated from Morehouse in 1992.
'Returning to Morehouse as its 13th president is the honor of a lifetime,' said Bowman. 'This institution shaped who I am—instilling a commitment to excellence, justice, and impact. I am excited to partner with faculty, staff, students, alumni, and supporters to build on our legacy and write the next chapter of Morehouse's transformative story.'
TRENDING STORIES:
Elderly Johns Creek woman tricked out of $47,000 while doing crossword puzzle
12-year-old nearly kidnapped from Cobb County bus stop, police say
Water shooting into the air after massive main break in DeKalb County
He currently serves as dean of the University of Michigan School of Public Health.
'Dr. Bowman's record of visionary leadership, his deep commitment to academic excellence, and his lifelong dedication to Morehouse make him the ideal choice to lead the College into its next era,' said Willie Woods '85, chairman of the Morehouse College Board of Trustees. 'He brings an extraordinary blend of intellectual rigor, strategic thinking, and values-driven leadership.'
School officials said his appointment follows a historic milestone for the college, which recently named both Research College & University (RCU) and Opportunity College & University (OCU) in the 2025 Carnegie Classifications.
Current Morehouse College President Dr. David A. Thomas announced his retirement last year. He will conclude his tenure in June.
Bowman will take over as president on July 15.
[SIGN UP: WSB-TV Daily Headlines Newsletter]
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why Community Is The New Currency Of Culture
Why Community Is The New Currency Of Culture

Forbes

time8 hours ago

  • Forbes

Why Community Is The New Currency Of Culture

Influence used to be a spotlight. Today, it's a circle. And the ones shaping culture aren't chasing attention, they're creating belonging. In a world filled with polished perfection and viral content, we're seeing a new kind of resonance emerge. The kind that doesn't just capture interest, but builds trust. The kind that isn't manufactured, but lived. People aren't moved by marketing. They're moved by meaning. And here's the truth: what feels organic is often designed with intention. The Trust Shift: From Top-Down to Ground-Up Authenticity isn't a trend, it's a transformation. We've stopped measuring success in reach, and started measuring it in connection. In how people feel seen, respected, and invited in. Today's cultural movements aren't being dictated from the top. They're being co-created from the ground up. From block parties to boardrooms, from community centers to classrooms, the voices shaping tomorrow are the ones rooted in purpose, not performance. It's not about who stands out. It's about who stands with. Ralph Lauren's Oak Bluffs: Legacy in Motion A powerful example of this shift: Ralph Lauren's Oak Bluffs Collection. Rather than constructing a campaign around a single persona, the brand centered a place called Oak Bluffs, a historic refuge on Martha's Vineyard where Black families and HBCU alumni have gathered for generations to rest, reconnect, and rise. Designed by Morehouse and Spelman graduates, the collection is rich with symbolism and intention. Through archival photographs, personal stories, and a moving film directed by Cole Brown, the brand honored a legacy that lives in every stitch. Partnerships with The Cottagers, Inc. and support for the United Negro College Fund made it clear that this wasn't just a campaign, it was a collaboration. A living tribute to a community that has always been the culture. As Ralph Lauren said, 'We celebrate not just Oak Bluffs as a place, but the spirit of community it represents and one that resonates with anyone who has ever sought a home away from home.' The impact didn't come from a spotlight. It came from a shared story. Shared values. Shared voice. Movements Start with Family, Not Fame Community is not a tactic, it's a truth. It's legacy passed down, and leadership lifted up. Whether it's a fashion line, a storytelling platform, or a neighborhood mural, the most powerful movements today are those rooted in real people and shared purpose. The most thoughtful brands aren't asking, 'Who can we showcase?' They're asking, 'Who are we building with?' Even better: 'How can we co-create something The Future of Culture Is Felt, Not Just Seen This is the shift: from impression to impact. From moments to movements. From reach to resonance. We don't need a louder voice; we need deeper listening. The future isn't about being followed. It's about being felt. It's not about visibility. It's about intentional presence. Let's pass the mic. Let's amplify the stories already in motion. Let's design with purpose, and lead with legacy. Because when we build with community, we don't just trend. We transform. Yes, that instinct is spot on. You don't need to directly knock celebrity the contrast speak for itself. When you highlight community, legacy, and intentionality, readers will naturally feel the shift away from traditional celebrity-driven influence without you having to call it out. That way, you're not against influencers or celebrities. You're simply for something deeper, more lasting, more inclusive. It keeps the tone aspirational, not adversarial.

Here's the case for lower rates from the Fed's 2 dissenting voices
Here's the case for lower rates from the Fed's 2 dissenting voices

Business Insider

time4 days ago

  • Business Insider

Here's the case for lower rates from the Fed's 2 dissenting voices

The Fed's dissenters are laying out their case for cutting interest rates. This week, Jerome Powell and the central bank opted to keep rates unchanged, but there was a rare double dissent from two Fed officials. It was the first time two governors had dissented in 30 years. Powell, for his part, has continued to insist that the Fed is still "a ways away from seeing where things settle down," regarding President Donald Trump's tariffs and the impact on inflation. Yet, two members of the Federal Open Market Committee disagreed, and on Friday, they each released statements unpacking their views. Governor Christopher Waller and Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman have both previously advocated for cutting interest rates, and reiterated their views at this week's meeting. Both expressed concern regarding the US labor market, and newly released data may back up their claims. The nonfarm payroll report on Friday showed that the US economy added 73,000 jobs in July, fewer than expected. May and June also saw figures revised lower by a combined 258,000, pointing to a weakening labor market. Here's why the two Fed governors say the Fed need to cut rate. Waller's argument Widely considered a likely candidate to replace Powell as chairman of the Fed, Waller has been an outspoken critic of the decision not to cut interest rates this year. In his dissenting opinion, he reiterated the argument that reducing it by 25 basis points made sense. Waller laid out three primary reasons: 1) Tariffs are "one-off increases in the price level" and lead to only temporary increases in inflation. 2) Multiple data points make the case that monetary policy should be less restrictive. These included real Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth, the unemployment rate, and total inflation. 3) While the labor market has appeared "fine on the surface," Waller said that "other data suggest that the downside risks to the labor market have increased." "The data imply the policy rate should be around neutral, which the median FOMC participant estimates is 3 percent, and not where we are—1.25 to 1.50 percentage points above 3 percent," Waller said in his statement. Bowman's argument Bowman also argued that the Fed should reduce interest rates by 25 basis points. In her argument, she primarily focused on the strength and resilience of the US economy. "With economic growth slowing this year and signs of a less dynamic labor market, I saw it as appropriate to begin gradually moving our moderately restrictive policy stance toward a neutral setting," she said. Bowman added that she believes such action would serve as an effective hedge against less-than-optimal economic conditions and potential problems in the labor market. She noted that while the unemployment rate has remained low through June and total payroll employment displayed modest increases, the labor market had become "less dynamic" and showed "increasing signs of fragility." Bowman also highlighted concerns regarding the Fed's employment mandate, speculating that if conditions do not show improvement soon, firms may be forced to lay off workers, a trend that has already taken shape. "As I recognize that economic conditions are shifting," she added, "I believe that beginning to move our policy rate at a gradual pace toward its neutral level will help maintain the labor market near full employment."

Weak Jobs Report Raises Chances of a September Interest Rate Cut
Weak Jobs Report Raises Chances of a September Interest Rate Cut

New York Times

time4 days ago

  • New York Times

Weak Jobs Report Raises Chances of a September Interest Rate Cut

The strength of the labor market has been one of the main reasons that Federal Reserve policymakers have felt comfortable waiting to cut interest rates in recent months. The surprisingly weak jobs report on Friday is likely to change that equation. Jerome H. Powell, the Fed chair, described the labor market as 'solid' as recently as Wednesday, pointing to the low unemployment rate and solid job gains to justify the central bank's decision to hold interest rates steady for the fifth consecutive meeting. But the data on Friday called that assessment into question. The unemployment rate ticked up only slightly, to 4.2 percent. But large downward revisions to job growth in May and June suggested that the labor market has not been as strong in recent months as policymakers believed. Fed officials have said repeatedly that their decision on whether and when to resume lowering interest rates would depend on data on both employment and inflation. On Wednesday, Mr. Powell reiterated that the Fed was prepared to act quickly if the labor market showed signs of weakening. 'Downside risks to the labor market are certainly apparent,' he said. Not all Fed officials were prepared to wait. Two Fed governors, Christopher J. Waller and Michelle W. Bowman, dissented from the Fed's decision this week, saying they preferred to lower rates a quarter-point. In statements released Friday, both governors cited concerns about the labor market as reasons for their dissents. 'Private-sector payroll growth is near stall speed, and other data suggest that the downside risks to the labor market have increased,' Mr. Waller wrote. He added that, with inflation still tame, 'we should not wait until the labor market deteriorates before we cut the policy rate.' President Trump also seized on the report to continue browbeating the Fed and Mr. Powell to cut. Using the nickname Mr. Trump has given Mr. Powell, the president said 'Too Little, Too Late. Jerome 'Too Late' Powell is a disaster. DROP THE RATE!'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store