logo
Man ‘struck with bottle and choked until he passed out in nightclub attack', court hears

Man ‘struck with bottle and choked until he passed out in nightclub attack', court hears

Sunday Worlda day ago
Carlos Macedo (21) choked the man while Leonard Macedo (23) hit him with the bottle in a Dublin city centre club, it is alleged
Two men have been accused of a nightclub attack on another man who was struck in the face with a bottle and choked until he passed out.
Carlos Macedo (21) choked the man while Leonard Macedo (23) hit him with the bottle in a Dublin city centre club, it is alleged.
They were both granted conditional bail and their cases were adjourned at Dublin District Court.
The accused, with an address at O'Connell Street, Dublin, are charged with assault causing harm.
The court heard the incident was alleged to have happened at Dicey's Garden Club on Harcourt Street on June 29.
Objecting to bail for Carlos Macedo, a garda sergeant said he believed the accused was a flight risk as he had only been in Ireland for three days before the alleged assault.
Outlining the prosecution's case, he said Carlos Macedo was seen on CCTV striking the alleged victim, throwing a glass bottle and choking him, causing him to pass out. The man required hospitalisation, the court heard.
The DPP consented to the case being dealt with in the district court but Judge Peter White said there appeared to be a serious injury and refused jurisdiction.
They must stay away from Dicey's club and the alleged victim
Applying for bail, defence solicitor Donal Quigley said Carlos Macedo would say what happened in the club was a situation that 'came upon him and his father', who was also in hospital after the incident.
Gardaí objected to Leonard Macedo's bail on the same grounds. He was alleged to have struck the same man a number of times with a glass bottle, causing a cut to his face. There was 'no choking' alleged in his case and the judge postponed a decision on jurisdiction.
Judge White granted bail to both accused on condition they do not apply for any new travel documents after surrendering their passports.
They must stay at a city centre hostel, sign on daily at a garda station and stay away from Dicey's club and the alleged victim.
The judge granted free legal aid after hearing Carlos Macedo was not working, but hoped to get a delivery driver job. Leonard Macedo was working as a waiter.
Leonard and Carlos Macedo. Photo: irishphotodesk.ie
News in 90 Seconds - Monday July 14th
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Neighbours couldn't recognise pensioner due to blood and facial injuries, court hears
Neighbours couldn't recognise pensioner due to blood and facial injuries, court hears

Sunday World

time10 hours ago

  • Sunday World

Neighbours couldn't recognise pensioner due to blood and facial injuries, court hears

A paramedic also today described Mr Niland as "crying blood" with multiple traumatic injuries to his face and skull. Pensioner Tom Niland was so badly beaten during an alleged home invasion that his neighbours did not recognise him walking along the middle of the road covered in blood, wearing odd shoes and with his eyes swollen shut, a Central Criminal Court trial has heard. Mr Niland's neighbours Anna Calpin and her daughter Fiona said they only realised it was Mr Niland when he spoke to say that he had been "robbed" by three men. A paramedic also today described Mr Niland as "crying blood" with multiple traumatic injuries to his face and skull. A surgeon from Sligo University Hospital told the trial that Mr Niland had suffered "serious and life threatening injuries" that required him to be put on life support. Mr McGillicuddy said it is the State's case that John Irving (31) of Shanwar, Foxford, Co Mayo broke into Mr Niland's house along with Francis Harman (58) of Nephin Court, Killala Road, Ballina, Co Mayo and John Clarke (37) of Carrowkelly, Ballina on January 18, 2022. It is alleged Mr Irving assaulted Mr Niland, leaving him with injuries that caused his death more than 20 months later, on September 30, 2023. John Irving arriving at Sligo Courthouse. Mr Irving faces four charges in total. It is alleged that he unlawfully killed Mr Niland at Mr Niland's home at Doonflynn, Skreen, Co Sligo. He is accused of entering Mr Niland's home as a trespasser and causing him serious harm. He is further alleged to have intentionally or recklessly caused serious harm to Mr Niland and to have falsely imprisoned him. Mr Irving has pleaded not guilty to all four charges. Anna Calpin told prosecuting counsel Tony McGillicuddy SC that she was walking around outside her home opposite Mr Niland's house with her daughter Fiona when they noticed cars slowing down on the road. They went to see what was happening and saw a man on the road. She said: "As we approached he was standing in the middle of the road with his hands out in front of him, he couldn't see anything and we didn't know who it was. "When we got closer to him, the first thing we heard was, I was robbed, and then we realised it was Tom." The witness recalled a lot of blood and said Mr Niland's face was "totally distorted," and his eyes were swollen and shut. He had a runner on one foot and a shoe on the other but neither were laced up. Tom Niland News in 90 Seconds - Monday July 14th She recalled Mr Niland telling her that his doorbell rang and when he opened the door, three men wearing masks appeared and pushed him into his hallway. He said they took his wallet which contained eight or nine hundred Euros. Ms Calpin brought Mr Niland into her home and called an ambulance and gardai. Fiona Calpin said Mr Niland was "unrecognisable" until he spoke. Anna Calpin's husband and Fiona's father, David Calpin, said he was in his workshop when Fiona came in and said that Mr Niland had been "robbed and assaulted". Mr Calpin went inside where he saw his neighbour. He said: "He was so badly beaten that his eyes wouldn't even open, he was covered in blood on his face and clothes. He was basically unrecognisable." Mr Calpin went across to Mr Niland's house where he saw blood "running down the glass of the front door", on the driveway and the road. A pair of tights or nylons lay on the driveway. He realised it was a crime scene so he left to wait for gardai, he said. George Williams of the ambulance service in Sligo told Mr McGillicuddy that he went into the Calpin home and saw Mr Niland with a towel wrapped around his head. Mr Niland told him that he had answered his front door and was attacked by three people. When Mr Williams removed the towel, he saw multiple injuries and trauma around Mr Niland's face, head and skull. He said Mr Niland's eyes were "completely swollen shut and he had the appearance as if he was crying blood." Mr Niland complained of pain in his face, on his head, tongue and the right side of his chest. Given Mr Niland's age and the level of trauma, Mr Williams believed the injuries were potentially life threatening so he decided to immediately remove him to an ambulance. Dr Martin Caldwell told Mr McGillicuddy that he was the emergency surgeon on duty at Sligo University Hospital when Mr Niland arrived. He said Mr Niland had suffered "serious and life threatening injuries" and told him that he had been beaten and kicked at his home. He noted Mr Niland had significant swelling to his face and head and bruising to the right side of the body. Scans revealed bleeding to the brain, a fracture to the floor of the orb of the right eye and multiple broken ribs on the right side. Despite the brain injury, doctors decided it was not necessary to send him to the Beaumont Hospital in Dublin for surgery. Between January 20 and January 26, Mr Niland made progress and was able to sit on a chair. However, his condition deteriorated at that point and he became more drowsy. He required a ventilator to help him breathe and doctors decided to place him on life support in the Intensive Care Unit. By early March, he had made no progress, Dr Caldwell said, and a consultant neurologist took over his care. John Scott told Mr McGillicuddy that he was part of a group of kayakers who were heading out on Lough Easkey in Sligo four days after the alleged assault on Mr Niland. As he was placing a kayak into the water, he said he noticed something unusually square under a couple of inches of water by the side of the lake. When he took it from the water he realised it was a wallet. He phoned a friend who is a garda and told him that the name Tom Niland was on the ID inside the wallet. He said he didn't know the significance of it at the time, but about one hour later, Gda Elaine McAndrew arrived at Lough Easkey and took possession of the wallet. Mr Scott showed her where he had made the discovery. The trial continues before Ms Justice Eileen Creedon and a jury of eight women and four men.

Dublin machine gun raid teen waiting for DPP trial decision
Dublin machine gun raid teen waiting for DPP trial decision

Sunday World

time12 hours ago

  • Sunday World

Dublin machine gun raid teen waiting for DPP trial decision

The boy, alogside his co-accused who skipped court last month, are both aged 17. A youth accused of being armed with a machine gun during a violent burglary in Dublin was remanded on continuing bail today pending directions from the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP). A warrant is still out for the arrest of his teenage co-accused, who skipped court last month. The pair, both aged 17, were initially denied bail on June 14 but were released because, at that time, the Oberstown Detention Campus in Dublin had no room to accommodate the two youths, despite a judge's decision. One of the boys skipped court two days later while his co-accused was ordered to obey conditions and was remanded until today at the Dublin Children's Court. Judge Toale noted that gardaí needed more time to get a decision from the DPP on the case and ordered the teenager, who was supported in court by family members, to come back on a date in September. Court stock image. News in 90 Seconds - Monday July 14th A bail hearing last month was told that a 60-year-old man was "savagely" beaten in front of his terrified family when machine gun-armed intruders forced entry into their home in Shankill, Co Dublin, on June 11. They are accused of aggravated burglary and unlawful possession of a Czech-made 9mm Skorpian machine pistol. The boys, from north Dublin, cannot be named because they are minors. The teenager, who has yet to enter a plea, must obey a 10 pm – 6 am curfew at his home, stay contactable by phone, remain out of the Shankill area, and not contact witnesses. He has had to surrender his passport within 48 hours and is not permitted to apply for alternative travel documents. Two adults are also before the courts on connected charges. At their bail hearings last month, Garda witnesses stated the four acted in joint enterprise. It was alleged that the two masked teens, wearing puffer jackets, travelled to the house on an e-bike, while two men arrived by car. The teenager who was back in court yesterday/today was said to have had a black face cover and approached the house. It was claimed that he removed the gun from the front of his trousers and "pointed" it at the family through the window. The boys allegedly "forced" their way through the front door while a man came through a rear entrance and "savagely" beat one of the occupants. The second boy allegedly used boxer shorts as a balaclava and left with the gun on an e-bike. A civilian witness was said to have observed him discarding it before he allegedly drove onto the M50, where he crashed between Junction 12 and 13 and was arrested.

Mother (54) should never have been convicted of sexually assaulting her children, court rules
Mother (54) should never have been convicted of sexually assaulting her children, court rules

Irish Times

time12 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Mother (54) should never have been convicted of sexually assaulting her children, court rules

A mother (54) should never have been convicted of sexually assaulting her three disabled children as she was subjected to an 'extreme' imbalance of power when she made inculpatory statements to a psychologist and polygrapher, the Court of Appeal has ruled. Allowing her an appeal against her conviction, Mr Justice Brian O'Moore said on Monday the only evidence against the woman were 'inculpatory statements which she made in truly extraordinary circumstances'. He noted the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) was not opposing the appeal, and a retrial will not be sought. The appellant had pleaded not guilty but was convicted by a jury, following a retrial in July 2024, of four counts of sexual assault against three of her sons - between January 1st, 2005, and March 25th, 2015. She was also convicted of one count of child neglect between August 3rd, 2008, and March 25th, 2015. She was sentenced by Judge Catherine Staines to eight years, with the final two years suspended, but had remained on bail pending her appeal. READ MORE 'One of the most heinous crimes is sexual abuse by a mother of her own children,' said Mr Justice O'Moore, adding the woman should never have been convicted. . He said to add to the unusual nature of the case, the statements were made not to gardaí but to a psychologist and a polygrapher retained by Tusla . 'The manner in which [they] conducted certain parts of the final two days of interviews did not meet the standards one would expect, to put it mildly,' said Mr Justice O'Moore. He said the woman was assessed and interviewed over five days in August 2015, before she made inculpatory statements on the final day. In July 2021, she was tried before the Circuit Court, where the judge ruled admissions made ought to be excluded as they were not voluntary. The trial judge directed the jury to return a verdict of not guilty. The DPP appealed this, with the Court of Appeal ruling the admissions ought not to be excluded. This decision was upheld by the Supreme Court, with a retrial then taking place. During the retrial, the psychologist accepted that statements made by the polygrapher could have been interpreted as inducements. The psychologist also accepted there was a risk the appellant may have made admissions to him on the basis she believed this was what he wanted. The trial judge said she had serious concerns about the voluntariness of the admissions, but she ultimately ruled she was bound by the decision of the Supreme Court and that the admissions made by the woman were admissible. Mr Justice O'Moore said neither the Court of Appeal nor the Supreme Court had available to it the revealing evidence of the psychologist given in the second trial. 'As these admissions constituted the only evidence against her, it follows that she should have been acquitted of all charges against her,' he said , ruling the court would allow the appeal.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store