logo
Australia has to stop being so dumb or things will get out of control

Australia has to stop being so dumb or things will get out of control

The Advertiser5 days ago

Australia now faces four blindingly obvious national pitfalls which, if not met full on, will cause us to tumble into something resembling what Paul Keating called a banana republic.
Keating's was a good wake-up call which worked at the time, and we need another one. The four pitfalls that need an urgent recalibration are as follows.
Unsustainable international trade; a wobbly defence-security position; public-finance arrangements that fuel massive inequality and intergenerational unfairness; and out-of-control immigration.
Let's outline the festering sores first.
International trade: At present Australia exports about $140 billion of low-grade iron ore; $80 billion in LNG; $40 billion worth of coal, three-quarters of which is poor brown coal used to generate electricity. Very little tax is paid, and foreign shareholders get most of the benefit. And we import $30 billion plus in refined fossil fuel.
Long-term this is disastrous. As the world realises that there is a sun in the sky that delivers energy free, our coal will become worthless.
As the world, ever steel-dependent and energy-aware, realises that low-grade iron ore is not worth the transport costs of importing it, we will have to work out a way to refine it here: use it or lose it.
Importing $30 billion worth of fuel is silly when we have the technology and the roof and ground space to generate all the power needed to drive vehicles without any fuel. This transition should happen as quickly as possible.
Defence-security: Australia has always been on the apron strings of Britain or the US. As Britain withdrew to its own in 1942 after the fall of Singapore, we turned to the US. Now the US is withdrawing to its own. Neither of them gave two hoots about Australia. Give us your bodies and money for our wars is all they wanted.
At present, we are committed to a $350-billion-plus program to develop over more than a decade a handful of nuclear-powered submarines and in the meantime to obtain two or three Virginia-class second-hand ones from the US.
Yes, Virginia, there is a Santa Claus, but only for America. We have already paid the US $500 million with no submarine in sight, or ever likely to be. This is because we were dumb enough to sign up to a deal, AUKUS, which allows the US not to deliver any submarines without any penalty through a get-out clause.
How many lemons do we have to buy from this used-car salesman (Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq) before we realise that we are being dudded and become more self-reliant.
Under AUKUS, the British are supposed to design and jointly build the new AUKUS-class nuclear-powered submarine. But Britain is struggling to maintain and replace its nine Astute and Vanguard class nuclear submarines with the new Dreadnought class. Another new class, AUKUS, is more a pipedream than a pipeline.
$350 billion for eight pieces of metal under the sea. is so dumb. Ukraine drove the whole Russian fleet out of the Black Sea with some homemade drones.
Worse, the US is pressing us to commit to spending 3.5 per cent of GDP on defence and to commit to join in any war with China over Taiwan. We are paying for submarines we do not need with money we do not have to fight enemies that we need not provoke.
This unreliable US president who does not share our values should cause us to rethink the America alliance. What we need is enough weaponry to ensure that a potential invader would get such a bloodied nose as to deter them - a purely defensive posture.
Public finance: Australia's tax system is an inequitable quagmire. People using their labour get taxed around 30 per cent. People with capital earnings pay a lot less or next to nothing.
Treasurer Jim Chalmers to his credit has convened a productivity summit. He cited the book Abundance by US journalists Ezra Klein and Derek Thompson which described how notionally progressive environmental and social-cause regulation was clogging the provision of affordable housing.
Yes, progressives should be concerned that over-regulation can stifle the very ends that want. But the Abundance was more than that. It also argued that we could have abundance (of cheap or free energy) if over-regulation of the construction of renewables and sabotage by the fossil industry were removed.
They argued that the broad masses could also have abundance if the ultra-wealthy paid more tax.
Chalmers has also flagged tax reform. It is a good start. We do not want capitalists salivating at the thought of deregulation and ignoring tax reform. We have been there before and there has been no abundance or trickle down for those below.
Immigration: Australia should drastically reduce its immigration program. The level of immigration has nothing to do with race because Australia has a non-racial immigration program, so whatever way you change the numbers - up or down - race has nothing to do with it.
READ MORE:
It is about economics, the environment, and quality of life. In the 2023-24 financial year, Australia's net overseas migration was 446,000 people. This is the main reason we have a housing crisis; congestion; and an infrastructure crisis generally.
Our universities are less places to educate and train our people than factories to sell overseas students tickets to permanent residency - headed by CEOs on million-dollar salaries.
In summary, Australia has to stop being so dumb and stop giving so much away - untaxed resources; money to the US and British military-industrial complex; tax breaks and avoidance schemes for the uber-wealthy; an out-of-control migrant intake; and allowing the fossil industries to expand and profit as if there is no climate crisis or a cheaper and better renewable alternative.
Australia now faces four blindingly obvious national pitfalls which, if not met full on, will cause us to tumble into something resembling what Paul Keating called a banana republic.
Keating's was a good wake-up call which worked at the time, and we need another one. The four pitfalls that need an urgent recalibration are as follows.
Unsustainable international trade; a wobbly defence-security position; public-finance arrangements that fuel massive inequality and intergenerational unfairness; and out-of-control immigration.
Let's outline the festering sores first.
International trade: At present Australia exports about $140 billion of low-grade iron ore; $80 billion in LNG; $40 billion worth of coal, three-quarters of which is poor brown coal used to generate electricity. Very little tax is paid, and foreign shareholders get most of the benefit. And we import $30 billion plus in refined fossil fuel.
Long-term this is disastrous. As the world realises that there is a sun in the sky that delivers energy free, our coal will become worthless.
As the world, ever steel-dependent and energy-aware, realises that low-grade iron ore is not worth the transport costs of importing it, we will have to work out a way to refine it here: use it or lose it.
Importing $30 billion worth of fuel is silly when we have the technology and the roof and ground space to generate all the power needed to drive vehicles without any fuel. This transition should happen as quickly as possible.
Defence-security: Australia has always been on the apron strings of Britain or the US. As Britain withdrew to its own in 1942 after the fall of Singapore, we turned to the US. Now the US is withdrawing to its own. Neither of them gave two hoots about Australia. Give us your bodies and money for our wars is all they wanted.
At present, we are committed to a $350-billion-plus program to develop over more than a decade a handful of nuclear-powered submarines and in the meantime to obtain two or three Virginia-class second-hand ones from the US.
Yes, Virginia, there is a Santa Claus, but only for America. We have already paid the US $500 million with no submarine in sight, or ever likely to be. This is because we were dumb enough to sign up to a deal, AUKUS, which allows the US not to deliver any submarines without any penalty through a get-out clause.
How many lemons do we have to buy from this used-car salesman (Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq) before we realise that we are being dudded and become more self-reliant.
Under AUKUS, the British are supposed to design and jointly build the new AUKUS-class nuclear-powered submarine. But Britain is struggling to maintain and replace its nine Astute and Vanguard class nuclear submarines with the new Dreadnought class. Another new class, AUKUS, is more a pipedream than a pipeline.
$350 billion for eight pieces of metal under the sea. is so dumb. Ukraine drove the whole Russian fleet out of the Black Sea with some homemade drones.
Worse, the US is pressing us to commit to spending 3.5 per cent of GDP on defence and to commit to join in any war with China over Taiwan. We are paying for submarines we do not need with money we do not have to fight enemies that we need not provoke.
This unreliable US president who does not share our values should cause us to rethink the America alliance. What we need is enough weaponry to ensure that a potential invader would get such a bloodied nose as to deter them - a purely defensive posture.
Public finance: Australia's tax system is an inequitable quagmire. People using their labour get taxed around 30 per cent. People with capital earnings pay a lot less or next to nothing.
Treasurer Jim Chalmers to his credit has convened a productivity summit. He cited the book Abundance by US journalists Ezra Klein and Derek Thompson which described how notionally progressive environmental and social-cause regulation was clogging the provision of affordable housing.
Yes, progressives should be concerned that over-regulation can stifle the very ends that want. But the Abundance was more than that. It also argued that we could have abundance (of cheap or free energy) if over-regulation of the construction of renewables and sabotage by the fossil industry were removed.
They argued that the broad masses could also have abundance if the ultra-wealthy paid more tax.
Chalmers has also flagged tax reform. It is a good start. We do not want capitalists salivating at the thought of deregulation and ignoring tax reform. We have been there before and there has been no abundance or trickle down for those below.
Immigration: Australia should drastically reduce its immigration program. The level of immigration has nothing to do with race because Australia has a non-racial immigration program, so whatever way you change the numbers - up or down - race has nothing to do with it.
READ MORE:
It is about economics, the environment, and quality of life. In the 2023-24 financial year, Australia's net overseas migration was 446,000 people. This is the main reason we have a housing crisis; congestion; and an infrastructure crisis generally.
Our universities are less places to educate and train our people than factories to sell overseas students tickets to permanent residency - headed by CEOs on million-dollar salaries.
In summary, Australia has to stop being so dumb and stop giving so much away - untaxed resources; money to the US and British military-industrial complex; tax breaks and avoidance schemes for the uber-wealthy; an out-of-control migrant intake; and allowing the fossil industries to expand and profit as if there is no climate crisis or a cheaper and better renewable alternative.
Australia now faces four blindingly obvious national pitfalls which, if not met full on, will cause us to tumble into something resembling what Paul Keating called a banana republic.
Keating's was a good wake-up call which worked at the time, and we need another one. The four pitfalls that need an urgent recalibration are as follows.
Unsustainable international trade; a wobbly defence-security position; public-finance arrangements that fuel massive inequality and intergenerational unfairness; and out-of-control immigration.
Let's outline the festering sores first.
International trade: At present Australia exports about $140 billion of low-grade iron ore; $80 billion in LNG; $40 billion worth of coal, three-quarters of which is poor brown coal used to generate electricity. Very little tax is paid, and foreign shareholders get most of the benefit. And we import $30 billion plus in refined fossil fuel.
Long-term this is disastrous. As the world realises that there is a sun in the sky that delivers energy free, our coal will become worthless.
As the world, ever steel-dependent and energy-aware, realises that low-grade iron ore is not worth the transport costs of importing it, we will have to work out a way to refine it here: use it or lose it.
Importing $30 billion worth of fuel is silly when we have the technology and the roof and ground space to generate all the power needed to drive vehicles without any fuel. This transition should happen as quickly as possible.
Defence-security: Australia has always been on the apron strings of Britain or the US. As Britain withdrew to its own in 1942 after the fall of Singapore, we turned to the US. Now the US is withdrawing to its own. Neither of them gave two hoots about Australia. Give us your bodies and money for our wars is all they wanted.
At present, we are committed to a $350-billion-plus program to develop over more than a decade a handful of nuclear-powered submarines and in the meantime to obtain two or three Virginia-class second-hand ones from the US.
Yes, Virginia, there is a Santa Claus, but only for America. We have already paid the US $500 million with no submarine in sight, or ever likely to be. This is because we were dumb enough to sign up to a deal, AUKUS, which allows the US not to deliver any submarines without any penalty through a get-out clause.
How many lemons do we have to buy from this used-car salesman (Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq) before we realise that we are being dudded and become more self-reliant.
Under AUKUS, the British are supposed to design and jointly build the new AUKUS-class nuclear-powered submarine. But Britain is struggling to maintain and replace its nine Astute and Vanguard class nuclear submarines with the new Dreadnought class. Another new class, AUKUS, is more a pipedream than a pipeline.
$350 billion for eight pieces of metal under the sea. is so dumb. Ukraine drove the whole Russian fleet out of the Black Sea with some homemade drones.
Worse, the US is pressing us to commit to spending 3.5 per cent of GDP on defence and to commit to join in any war with China over Taiwan. We are paying for submarines we do not need with money we do not have to fight enemies that we need not provoke.
This unreliable US president who does not share our values should cause us to rethink the America alliance. What we need is enough weaponry to ensure that a potential invader would get such a bloodied nose as to deter them - a purely defensive posture.
Public finance: Australia's tax system is an inequitable quagmire. People using their labour get taxed around 30 per cent. People with capital earnings pay a lot less or next to nothing.
Treasurer Jim Chalmers to his credit has convened a productivity summit. He cited the book Abundance by US journalists Ezra Klein and Derek Thompson which described how notionally progressive environmental and social-cause regulation was clogging the provision of affordable housing.
Yes, progressives should be concerned that over-regulation can stifle the very ends that want. But the Abundance was more than that. It also argued that we could have abundance (of cheap or free energy) if over-regulation of the construction of renewables and sabotage by the fossil industry were removed.
They argued that the broad masses could also have abundance if the ultra-wealthy paid more tax.
Chalmers has also flagged tax reform. It is a good start. We do not want capitalists salivating at the thought of deregulation and ignoring tax reform. We have been there before and there has been no abundance or trickle down for those below.
Immigration: Australia should drastically reduce its immigration program. The level of immigration has nothing to do with race because Australia has a non-racial immigration program, so whatever way you change the numbers - up or down - race has nothing to do with it.
READ MORE:
It is about economics, the environment, and quality of life. In the 2023-24 financial year, Australia's net overseas migration was 446,000 people. This is the main reason we have a housing crisis; congestion; and an infrastructure crisis generally.
Our universities are less places to educate and train our people than factories to sell overseas students tickets to permanent residency - headed by CEOs on million-dollar salaries.
In summary, Australia has to stop being so dumb and stop giving so much away - untaxed resources; money to the US and British military-industrial complex; tax breaks and avoidance schemes for the uber-wealthy; an out-of-control migrant intake; and allowing the fossil industries to expand and profit as if there is no climate crisis or a cheaper and better renewable alternative.
Australia now faces four blindingly obvious national pitfalls which, if not met full on, will cause us to tumble into something resembling what Paul Keating called a banana republic.
Keating's was a good wake-up call which worked at the time, and we need another one. The four pitfalls that need an urgent recalibration are as follows.
Unsustainable international trade; a wobbly defence-security position; public-finance arrangements that fuel massive inequality and intergenerational unfairness; and out-of-control immigration.
Let's outline the festering sores first.
International trade: At present Australia exports about $140 billion of low-grade iron ore; $80 billion in LNG; $40 billion worth of coal, three-quarters of which is poor brown coal used to generate electricity. Very little tax is paid, and foreign shareholders get most of the benefit. And we import $30 billion plus in refined fossil fuel.
Long-term this is disastrous. As the world realises that there is a sun in the sky that delivers energy free, our coal will become worthless.
As the world, ever steel-dependent and energy-aware, realises that low-grade iron ore is not worth the transport costs of importing it, we will have to work out a way to refine it here: use it or lose it.
Importing $30 billion worth of fuel is silly when we have the technology and the roof and ground space to generate all the power needed to drive vehicles without any fuel. This transition should happen as quickly as possible.
Defence-security: Australia has always been on the apron strings of Britain or the US. As Britain withdrew to its own in 1942 after the fall of Singapore, we turned to the US. Now the US is withdrawing to its own. Neither of them gave two hoots about Australia. Give us your bodies and money for our wars is all they wanted.
At present, we are committed to a $350-billion-plus program to develop over more than a decade a handful of nuclear-powered submarines and in the meantime to obtain two or three Virginia-class second-hand ones from the US.
Yes, Virginia, there is a Santa Claus, but only for America. We have already paid the US $500 million with no submarine in sight, or ever likely to be. This is because we were dumb enough to sign up to a deal, AUKUS, which allows the US not to deliver any submarines without any penalty through a get-out clause.
How many lemons do we have to buy from this used-car salesman (Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq) before we realise that we are being dudded and become more self-reliant.
Under AUKUS, the British are supposed to design and jointly build the new AUKUS-class nuclear-powered submarine. But Britain is struggling to maintain and replace its nine Astute and Vanguard class nuclear submarines with the new Dreadnought class. Another new class, AUKUS, is more a pipedream than a pipeline.
$350 billion for eight pieces of metal under the sea. is so dumb. Ukraine drove the whole Russian fleet out of the Black Sea with some homemade drones.
Worse, the US is pressing us to commit to spending 3.5 per cent of GDP on defence and to commit to join in any war with China over Taiwan. We are paying for submarines we do not need with money we do not have to fight enemies that we need not provoke.
This unreliable US president who does not share our values should cause us to rethink the America alliance. What we need is enough weaponry to ensure that a potential invader would get such a bloodied nose as to deter them - a purely defensive posture.
Public finance: Australia's tax system is an inequitable quagmire. People using their labour get taxed around 30 per cent. People with capital earnings pay a lot less or next to nothing.
Treasurer Jim Chalmers to his credit has convened a productivity summit. He cited the book Abundance by US journalists Ezra Klein and Derek Thompson which described how notionally progressive environmental and social-cause regulation was clogging the provision of affordable housing.
Yes, progressives should be concerned that over-regulation can stifle the very ends that want. But the Abundance was more than that. It also argued that we could have abundance (of cheap or free energy) if over-regulation of the construction of renewables and sabotage by the fossil industry were removed.
They argued that the broad masses could also have abundance if the ultra-wealthy paid more tax.
Chalmers has also flagged tax reform. It is a good start. We do not want capitalists salivating at the thought of deregulation and ignoring tax reform. We have been there before and there has been no abundance or trickle down for those below.
Immigration: Australia should drastically reduce its immigration program. The level of immigration has nothing to do with race because Australia has a non-racial immigration program, so whatever way you change the numbers - up or down - race has nothing to do with it.
READ MORE:
It is about economics, the environment, and quality of life. In the 2023-24 financial year, Australia's net overseas migration was 446,000 people. This is the main reason we have a housing crisis; congestion; and an infrastructure crisis generally.
Our universities are less places to educate and train our people than factories to sell overseas students tickets to permanent residency - headed by CEOs on million-dollar salaries.
In summary, Australia has to stop being so dumb and stop giving so much away - untaxed resources; money to the US and British military-industrial complex; tax breaks and avoidance schemes for the uber-wealthy; an out-of-control migrant intake; and allowing the fossil industries to expand and profit as if there is no climate crisis or a cheaper and better renewable alternative.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Glastonbury festival BBC livestream: Outrage as ‘death to IDF' chant airs, Bob Vylan, Kneecap investigated
Glastonbury festival BBC livestream: Outrage as ‘death to IDF' chant airs, Bob Vylan, Kneecap investigated

7NEWS

time5 hours ago

  • 7NEWS

Glastonbury festival BBC livestream: Outrage as ‘death to IDF' chant airs, Bob Vylan, Kneecap investigated

British authorities have issued a strong condemnation after rap punk duo Bob Vylan led the crowd in chants at the Glastonbury Festival calling for 'free, free Palestine' and 'death, death to the IDF' during a set broadcast live by the BBC. The performance, which took place on the West Holts Stage just ahead of Belfast rap trio Kneecap, prompted the government to describe the comments as unacceptable. A BBC spokesperson stated that some of the remarks were 'deeply offensive,' with a warning about 'very strong and discriminatory language' displayed on screen. The broadcaster confirmed the set would not be available for replay on BBC iPlayer. Police have announced they are reviewing video footage of both Bob Vylan's and Kneecap's performances to determine if any laws were broken. A statement from Glastonbury Festival said it 'does not condone hate speech or incitement to violence of any kind from its performers.' Following the incident, Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy contacted the BBC director general to request an urgent explanation regarding the broadcaster's due diligence before airing the act. The government also expressed approval of the decision not to re-broadcast the performance. Loading Instagram Post Kneecap, who performed after Bob Vylan, have been in the spotlight recently after band member Liam Óg Ó hAnnaidh (Mo Chara) was charged with a terrorism offence for allegedly displaying the flag of banned group Hezbollah at a previous concert—a charge he denies. Kneecap's Saturday set, watched by thousands, included expletive-laden chants directed at UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, who had previously described their festival appearance as 'not appropriate.' Ó hAnnaidh is currently on bail following a recent court hearing. Avon and Somerset Police confirmed they are assessing video evidence from both acts to decide whether a criminal investigation is warranted. 'Glastonbury, I'm a free man,' Mo Chara said after appearing on stage. 'The prime minister of your country - not mine - said he didn't want us to play, so f*** Keir Starmer,' Mo Chara told the crowd, wearing the keffiyeh scarf associated with Palestinians. At least 30,000 people, hundreds of them with Palestinian flags, crammed into the West Holts stage in blazing sunshine to watch the trio, causing organisers to close the area. After opening their set with Better Way to Live, which mixes English and Irish, another of the group's members - M?gla? Bap, otherwise known as Naoise ? Caireall?in - said Mo Chara would be back in court for a 'trumped up terrorism charge'. Mo Chara told the crowd the situation over the lawsuit was stressful but it was minimal compared to what the Palestinians were going through every day. Later in the set, Mo Chara accused Israel of committing war crimes, saying, 'There's no hiding it.' Irwin Kelly, 40, said the trio got the crowd really involved in the set. 'Obviously it had a bit of controversy surrounding it,' he said. 'But it's art, it's performance.' The Israeli embassy in the United Kingdom earlier said it was 'deeply disturbed by the inflammatory and hateful rhetoric expressed on stage at the Glastonbury Festival'. It did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Kneecap's statements. Access to the area around the West Holts Stage was closed about 45 minutes before Kneecap's performance after groups of fans arrived to form a sea of Irish and Palestinian flags. Starmer told the Sun newspaper this month it was 'not appropriate' for Kneecap to appear at the famed music festival in the southwest of England. Opposition leader Kemi Badenoch had said the public broadcaster BBC, which livestreams the festival, should not show Kneecap, and 30 music industry bosses asked organisers to pull the band from the line-up, according to a letter leaked by DJ Toddla T, cited by the Guardian newspaper. In response, more than 100 musicians have signed a public letter in support of the group. The BBC said on Saturday Kneecap's set would not be live-streamed but said the performance is likely to be made available on-demand later. Kneecap manager Dan Lambert told Reuters the group had expected calls for the performance to be cancelled. During the hour-long set, Kneecap thanked organisers Michael and Emily Eavis for not bowing to the pressure. Kneecap, whose third member has the stage name DJ Pr?va?, has said they do not support Hamas or Hezbollah. Mo Chara said on Friday the group were 'playing characters' on stage, and it was up to the audience to interpret their messages. The performance followed months of debate over the band's inclusion, after frontman Liam O'Hanna (stage name Mo Chara) was charged with a terrorism offence for allegedly displaying a Hezbollah flag and making supportive remarks about Hamas and Hezbollah at a London concert last year. Both groups are banned in the UK, and expressing support for them is an offence. O'Hanna, who appeared in court earlier this month, has denied the charge and described his legal troubles as minimal compared to the suffering of Palestinians. On stage, O'Hanna wore his trademark keffiyeh and gave a 'shout out' to the Palestine Action Group, which has also recently been banned under anti-terror laws. Fellow band member DJ Provai wore a t-shirt dedicated to the campaign group. Kneecap's set was just one highlight of a festival that also saw surprise performances from Britpop legends Pulp and Scottish singer Lewis Capaldi, as well as headline acts including Neil Young and Olivia Rodrigo.

Lotus denies plan to close UK factory
Lotus denies plan to close UK factory

The Advertiser

time7 hours ago

  • The Advertiser

Lotus denies plan to close UK factory

British sports car maker Lotus has denied reports it is considering closing its only UK plant, and shifting to the US. Multiple publications, including the BBC, Automotive News and the Financial Times, are reporting Lotus is contemplating closing its plant in Hethel, about 20 minutes south of Norwich. Lotus and parent Geely initially refused to comment on the reports, but on Saturday Lotus put out an official press statement: "Lotus Cars is continuing normal operations, and there are no plans to close the factory. We are actively exploring strategic options to enhance efficiency and ensure global competitiveness in the evolving market. "We have invested significantly in R&D and operations in the UK, over the past six years. Lotus remains committed to the UK, and its customers, employees, dealers, suppliers, as well as its proud British heritage." The company also said "the UK is the heart of the Lotus brand", while also noting the UK is its "largest commercial market in Europe". Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now. Hethel, the company's only factory in the UK, currently produces the Emira coupe (below) for sale around the world. If Hethel is mothballed, Emira production may be moved to the Volvo's plant in Charleston, South Carolina, which currently underutilised. In a call with investors last week, Feng Qingfeng, CEO of Lotus Technology, said "localisation [of production in US] is a feasible plan" given President Trump's constantly changing tariff policy on foreign-made cars. Production at Hethel has been paused to since mid-May to manage supply chain issues related to US tariffs, and a halt in shipment of Emiras to the US. The Financial Times believes closure of Hethel could happen as early as 2026, and would see around 1300 people lose their jobs. The company's growing losses saw it already fire 270 people in April this year, following on from multiple rounds of job cuts over the last few years. Despite those job losses, Geely and Lotus said they were committed to the UK. Moving production from the UK to Volvo's plant in the US would allow Lotus to avoid the wildly fluctuating tariff situation in the US, one of the brand's key markets. Earlier this year President Trump announced tariffs on UK-built cars would rise from 2.5 per cent to 25 per cent, but this was quickly dropped to 10 per cent, but only for the first 100,000 vehicles per year, after the two nations completed a trade deal. Founded in 1952 by Colin Chapman, the company's ethos of simplifying and adding lightness has seen it produce many celebrated sports cars, but the firm has teetered on a financial knife-edge for decades. After Chapman's death, Lotus has been successively owned by GM, Romano Artioli (who at the time also owned Bugatti), and Malaysian automaker Proton. Current ownership of the storied sports car brand is a little complicated. Chinese automaker Geely — which also owns Volvo, Polestar, Lynk & Co, Zeekr, LEVC and Smart — bought a 51 per cent of Lotus from Proton in 2017. Geely then split the brand in two, with UK-based Lotus Cars responsible for the marque's sports cars, and a new firm Lotus Technology, based in Wuhan, China, in charge of expanding the brand into electric SUVs and sedans. In February 2024 Lotus Technology was floated by merging with a special purpose acquisition company backed by LVMH, the luxury conglomerate that owns Louis Vuitton, Moët & Chandon, Dior, Bulgari, TAG Heuer, and many others. This April, the companies announced Lotus Technology would buy out Geely's 51 per cent stake in Lotus. Although the brand's new EVs helped grow the brand's sales to 12,134 last year — a 74 per cent increase over 2023 — Lotus Technology has bled hundreds of millions of dollars in red ink, and its shares are down 84 per cent. Last year the 6862 Chinese-made Eletre SUVs and Emeya sedans (above) found new homes, while sales of the Emira were up 102 per cent to 5272. If Lotus does end manufacturing in Britain, it will follow other car makers in closing factories in the UK. In March this year Vauxhall closed its Luton factory, which once made Bedford vehicles, and most recently made the Opel/Vauxhall Vivaro, Citroen Dispatch, and its many siblings. Prior to this Honda closed its Swindon plant in 2021, and Ford closed its engine factory in Bridgend, Wales in 2020. MORE: Everything Lotus Content originally sourced from: British sports car maker Lotus has denied reports it is considering closing its only UK plant, and shifting to the US. Multiple publications, including the BBC, Automotive News and the Financial Times, are reporting Lotus is contemplating closing its plant in Hethel, about 20 minutes south of Norwich. Lotus and parent Geely initially refused to comment on the reports, but on Saturday Lotus put out an official press statement: "Lotus Cars is continuing normal operations, and there are no plans to close the factory. We are actively exploring strategic options to enhance efficiency and ensure global competitiveness in the evolving market. "We have invested significantly in R&D and operations in the UK, over the past six years. Lotus remains committed to the UK, and its customers, employees, dealers, suppliers, as well as its proud British heritage." The company also said "the UK is the heart of the Lotus brand", while also noting the UK is its "largest commercial market in Europe". Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now. Hethel, the company's only factory in the UK, currently produces the Emira coupe (below) for sale around the world. If Hethel is mothballed, Emira production may be moved to the Volvo's plant in Charleston, South Carolina, which currently underutilised. In a call with investors last week, Feng Qingfeng, CEO of Lotus Technology, said "localisation [of production in US] is a feasible plan" given President Trump's constantly changing tariff policy on foreign-made cars. Production at Hethel has been paused to since mid-May to manage supply chain issues related to US tariffs, and a halt in shipment of Emiras to the US. The Financial Times believes closure of Hethel could happen as early as 2026, and would see around 1300 people lose their jobs. The company's growing losses saw it already fire 270 people in April this year, following on from multiple rounds of job cuts over the last few years. Despite those job losses, Geely and Lotus said they were committed to the UK. Moving production from the UK to Volvo's plant in the US would allow Lotus to avoid the wildly fluctuating tariff situation in the US, one of the brand's key markets. Earlier this year President Trump announced tariffs on UK-built cars would rise from 2.5 per cent to 25 per cent, but this was quickly dropped to 10 per cent, but only for the first 100,000 vehicles per year, after the two nations completed a trade deal. Founded in 1952 by Colin Chapman, the company's ethos of simplifying and adding lightness has seen it produce many celebrated sports cars, but the firm has teetered on a financial knife-edge for decades. After Chapman's death, Lotus has been successively owned by GM, Romano Artioli (who at the time also owned Bugatti), and Malaysian automaker Proton. Current ownership of the storied sports car brand is a little complicated. Chinese automaker Geely — which also owns Volvo, Polestar, Lynk & Co, Zeekr, LEVC and Smart — bought a 51 per cent of Lotus from Proton in 2017. Geely then split the brand in two, with UK-based Lotus Cars responsible for the marque's sports cars, and a new firm Lotus Technology, based in Wuhan, China, in charge of expanding the brand into electric SUVs and sedans. In February 2024 Lotus Technology was floated by merging with a special purpose acquisition company backed by LVMH, the luxury conglomerate that owns Louis Vuitton, Moët & Chandon, Dior, Bulgari, TAG Heuer, and many others. This April, the companies announced Lotus Technology would buy out Geely's 51 per cent stake in Lotus. Although the brand's new EVs helped grow the brand's sales to 12,134 last year — a 74 per cent increase over 2023 — Lotus Technology has bled hundreds of millions of dollars in red ink, and its shares are down 84 per cent. Last year the 6862 Chinese-made Eletre SUVs and Emeya sedans (above) found new homes, while sales of the Emira were up 102 per cent to 5272. If Lotus does end manufacturing in Britain, it will follow other car makers in closing factories in the UK. In March this year Vauxhall closed its Luton factory, which once made Bedford vehicles, and most recently made the Opel/Vauxhall Vivaro, Citroen Dispatch, and its many siblings. Prior to this Honda closed its Swindon plant in 2021, and Ford closed its engine factory in Bridgend, Wales in 2020. MORE: Everything Lotus Content originally sourced from: British sports car maker Lotus has denied reports it is considering closing its only UK plant, and shifting to the US. Multiple publications, including the BBC, Automotive News and the Financial Times, are reporting Lotus is contemplating closing its plant in Hethel, about 20 minutes south of Norwich. Lotus and parent Geely initially refused to comment on the reports, but on Saturday Lotus put out an official press statement: "Lotus Cars is continuing normal operations, and there are no plans to close the factory. We are actively exploring strategic options to enhance efficiency and ensure global competitiveness in the evolving market. "We have invested significantly in R&D and operations in the UK, over the past six years. Lotus remains committed to the UK, and its customers, employees, dealers, suppliers, as well as its proud British heritage." The company also said "the UK is the heart of the Lotus brand", while also noting the UK is its "largest commercial market in Europe". Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now. Hethel, the company's only factory in the UK, currently produces the Emira coupe (below) for sale around the world. If Hethel is mothballed, Emira production may be moved to the Volvo's plant in Charleston, South Carolina, which currently underutilised. In a call with investors last week, Feng Qingfeng, CEO of Lotus Technology, said "localisation [of production in US] is a feasible plan" given President Trump's constantly changing tariff policy on foreign-made cars. Production at Hethel has been paused to since mid-May to manage supply chain issues related to US tariffs, and a halt in shipment of Emiras to the US. The Financial Times believes closure of Hethel could happen as early as 2026, and would see around 1300 people lose their jobs. The company's growing losses saw it already fire 270 people in April this year, following on from multiple rounds of job cuts over the last few years. Despite those job losses, Geely and Lotus said they were committed to the UK. Moving production from the UK to Volvo's plant in the US would allow Lotus to avoid the wildly fluctuating tariff situation in the US, one of the brand's key markets. Earlier this year President Trump announced tariffs on UK-built cars would rise from 2.5 per cent to 25 per cent, but this was quickly dropped to 10 per cent, but only for the first 100,000 vehicles per year, after the two nations completed a trade deal. Founded in 1952 by Colin Chapman, the company's ethos of simplifying and adding lightness has seen it produce many celebrated sports cars, but the firm has teetered on a financial knife-edge for decades. After Chapman's death, Lotus has been successively owned by GM, Romano Artioli (who at the time also owned Bugatti), and Malaysian automaker Proton. Current ownership of the storied sports car brand is a little complicated. Chinese automaker Geely — which also owns Volvo, Polestar, Lynk & Co, Zeekr, LEVC and Smart — bought a 51 per cent of Lotus from Proton in 2017. Geely then split the brand in two, with UK-based Lotus Cars responsible for the marque's sports cars, and a new firm Lotus Technology, based in Wuhan, China, in charge of expanding the brand into electric SUVs and sedans. In February 2024 Lotus Technology was floated by merging with a special purpose acquisition company backed by LVMH, the luxury conglomerate that owns Louis Vuitton, Moët & Chandon, Dior, Bulgari, TAG Heuer, and many others. This April, the companies announced Lotus Technology would buy out Geely's 51 per cent stake in Lotus. Although the brand's new EVs helped grow the brand's sales to 12,134 last year — a 74 per cent increase over 2023 — Lotus Technology has bled hundreds of millions of dollars in red ink, and its shares are down 84 per cent. Last year the 6862 Chinese-made Eletre SUVs and Emeya sedans (above) found new homes, while sales of the Emira were up 102 per cent to 5272. If Lotus does end manufacturing in Britain, it will follow other car makers in closing factories in the UK. In March this year Vauxhall closed its Luton factory, which once made Bedford vehicles, and most recently made the Opel/Vauxhall Vivaro, Citroen Dispatch, and its many siblings. Prior to this Honda closed its Swindon plant in 2021, and Ford closed its engine factory in Bridgend, Wales in 2020. MORE: Everything Lotus Content originally sourced from: British sports car maker Lotus has denied reports it is considering closing its only UK plant, and shifting to the US. Multiple publications, including the BBC, Automotive News and the Financial Times, are reporting Lotus is contemplating closing its plant in Hethel, about 20 minutes south of Norwich. Lotus and parent Geely initially refused to comment on the reports, but on Saturday Lotus put out an official press statement: "Lotus Cars is continuing normal operations, and there are no plans to close the factory. We are actively exploring strategic options to enhance efficiency and ensure global competitiveness in the evolving market. "We have invested significantly in R&D and operations in the UK, over the past six years. Lotus remains committed to the UK, and its customers, employees, dealers, suppliers, as well as its proud British heritage." The company also said "the UK is the heart of the Lotus brand", while also noting the UK is its "largest commercial market in Europe". Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now. Hethel, the company's only factory in the UK, currently produces the Emira coupe (below) for sale around the world. If Hethel is mothballed, Emira production may be moved to the Volvo's plant in Charleston, South Carolina, which currently underutilised. In a call with investors last week, Feng Qingfeng, CEO of Lotus Technology, said "localisation [of production in US] is a feasible plan" given President Trump's constantly changing tariff policy on foreign-made cars. Production at Hethel has been paused to since mid-May to manage supply chain issues related to US tariffs, and a halt in shipment of Emiras to the US. The Financial Times believes closure of Hethel could happen as early as 2026, and would see around 1300 people lose their jobs. The company's growing losses saw it already fire 270 people in April this year, following on from multiple rounds of job cuts over the last few years. Despite those job losses, Geely and Lotus said they were committed to the UK. Moving production from the UK to Volvo's plant in the US would allow Lotus to avoid the wildly fluctuating tariff situation in the US, one of the brand's key markets. Earlier this year President Trump announced tariffs on UK-built cars would rise from 2.5 per cent to 25 per cent, but this was quickly dropped to 10 per cent, but only for the first 100,000 vehicles per year, after the two nations completed a trade deal. Founded in 1952 by Colin Chapman, the company's ethos of simplifying and adding lightness has seen it produce many celebrated sports cars, but the firm has teetered on a financial knife-edge for decades. After Chapman's death, Lotus has been successively owned by GM, Romano Artioli (who at the time also owned Bugatti), and Malaysian automaker Proton. Current ownership of the storied sports car brand is a little complicated. Chinese automaker Geely — which also owns Volvo, Polestar, Lynk & Co, Zeekr, LEVC and Smart — bought a 51 per cent of Lotus from Proton in 2017. Geely then split the brand in two, with UK-based Lotus Cars responsible for the marque's sports cars, and a new firm Lotus Technology, based in Wuhan, China, in charge of expanding the brand into electric SUVs and sedans. In February 2024 Lotus Technology was floated by merging with a special purpose acquisition company backed by LVMH, the luxury conglomerate that owns Louis Vuitton, Moët & Chandon, Dior, Bulgari, TAG Heuer, and many others. This April, the companies announced Lotus Technology would buy out Geely's 51 per cent stake in Lotus. Although the brand's new EVs helped grow the brand's sales to 12,134 last year — a 74 per cent increase over 2023 — Lotus Technology has bled hundreds of millions of dollars in red ink, and its shares are down 84 per cent. Last year the 6862 Chinese-made Eletre SUVs and Emeya sedans (above) found new homes, while sales of the Emira were up 102 per cent to 5272. If Lotus does end manufacturing in Britain, it will follow other car makers in closing factories in the UK. In March this year Vauxhall closed its Luton factory, which once made Bedford vehicles, and most recently made the Opel/Vauxhall Vivaro, Citroen Dispatch, and its many siblings. Prior to this Honda closed its Swindon plant in 2021, and Ford closed its engine factory in Bridgend, Wales in 2020. MORE: Everything Lotus Content originally sourced from:

Police probe UK bands for ‘hate speech' during Glastonbury set
Police probe UK bands for ‘hate speech' during Glastonbury set

Courier-Mail

time7 hours ago

  • Courier-Mail

Police probe UK bands for ‘hate speech' during Glastonbury set

Don't miss out on the headlines from Music Festivals. Followed categories will be added to My News. Police have put UK bands Bob Vylan and Kneecap on notice following their controversial performances at the Glastonbury festival on Saturday. Avon and Somerset Police are examining video footage from the famed music festival to determine if criminal offences were committed when bands Bob Vylan and Kneecap took to the stage. The investigation was sparked after British punk duo Bob Vylan led festival-goers in chanting 'free, free Palestine' and 'death, death to the IDF' – referencing the Israel Defense Forces – to the packed-out crowd, many of whom were waving Palestinian flags. Bobby Vylan of Bob Vylan performs on stage during Glastonbury festival. Picture:The singer crowd-surfs while chanting 'free, free Palestine' and 'death, death to the IDF'. Picture:Irish rap trio Kneecap took to the West Holts Stage after Bob Vylan and followed suit, encouraging concertgoers to chant 'free Palestine' during their set. While onstage, band member Naoise O Caireallain, who performs as Moglai Bap, also slammed UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer as their fans waved banners and wore face paint to support the band. 'The Prime Minister of your country, not mine, said he didn't want us to play, so f**k Keir Starmer,' he told the crowd. Provaí of Kneecap makes a statement during day four at Glastonbury. Picture:The performance came just one after before JJ O Dochartaigh, aka DJ Próvaí, was seen wearing an anti-Israel campaign group 'Palestine Action' T-shirt in a social media post. The stage incidents have since prompted police to review video evidence from both performances to assess whether to proceed with criminal investigations. Dochartaigh also wore a 'We Are All Palestine Action' T-shirt ahead of the band's performance. Picture: X 'We are aware of the comments made by acts on the West Holts Stage at Glastonbury Festival this afternoon,' Avon and Somerset Police tweeted on X. 'Video evidence will be assessed by officers to determine whether any offences may have been committed that would require a criminal investigation.' The performances have also drawn criticism from the UK government, with a spokesperson saying in a statement, 'We strongly condemn the threatening comments made by Bob Vylan at Glastonbury.' Mo Chara and Móglaí Bap of Kneecap during their Glastonbury set. Picture:Social media has also exploded with outrage over the bands' controversial appearances, with US rapper Azealia Banks among the voices condemning the performances. 'That is actually crazy. To allow an artist to incite a mob and shout death upon anyone at a major music festival is CRAZZZZYYYY,' she tweeted on X. 'And like how does he think that's going to accomplish anything? Wooooow the UK is losing its mind.' 'There's nothing worse than artists who lose their sense of subjectivity. The art of 'doing everything to express what I feel' should be a matter for therapy, not for performance,' another echoed. 'Way to turn a music festival into hate festival. So sad and crazy,' another commented. While some X users argued that the bands were simply exercising their 'freedom of speech', their comments were mostly drowned out. 'This is NOT free speech. This IS HATE SPEECH! Absolutely disgusting that this allowed,' one tweeted, with another noting, 'I remember when music festivals were about coming together around music and unity with fellow humans. I guess this one is a Nazi death rally … glad I'm too old for this.' Originally published as Police probe UK bands for 'hate speech' during Glastonbury set

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store