logo
Bursting of US exceptionalism bubble a boon to Chinese stocks

Bursting of US exceptionalism bubble a boon to Chinese stocks

The facts speak for themselves. On June 9, the Hang Seng China Enterprises Index (HSCEI), a gauge of mainland Chinese stocks listed in Hong Kong, entered a bull market after having risen 22 per cent since its recent low on April 7. The HSCEI and the MSCI China Index, which tracks Chinese companies listed at home and abroad, have largely outperformed all other major equity markets this year.
That the sharp rally in Chinese shares occurred against the backdrop of
deflationary pressures that show no sign of easing,
low consumer confidence , a festering crisis in the property sector and a dramatic escalation in the US-China trade war makes the gains all the more remarkable.
Several factors are at work. One of them, as Morgan Stanley noted in a report on May 20, is global investors'
'deeply underweight' position in Chinese equities following years of extremely bearish sentiment. This has created a 'sizeable allocation upside potential in moving from [an underweight to a neutral position]', Morgan Stanley said.
A more important factor – and the most unexpected one – is the strong conviction on the part of many investors that the long period of
US exceptionalism in markets has come to an end. US President Donald Trump's ruinous
trade policies , blatant
disregard for the rule of law and planned
reckless tax cuts that add to America's ballooning public debt have cast doubt over the perceived safe haven status of US assets, especially the US dollar.
The mantra of 'Tina' –
There Is No Alternative – to US equities has given way to
diversification as investors seek to rebalance their portfolios away from the United States. While there is intense debate about the pace and consequences of diversification, the waning appeal of US assets is a boon to Chinese stocks.
Morgan Stanley says there is a 'higher willingness to add more positions in Chinese equities, fuelled by global diversification demand'. Nomura says 'the fading of the 'US exceptionalism' theme could help Asian equities', with China, India and Japan best placed to capture 'reallocation flows' given the depth and breadth of their stock markets. Goldman Sachs, meanwhile, notes that Chinese stocks tend to perform well when
the yuan strengthens versus the US dollar.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ex-chairman of Hong Kong-listed Neo-China surrenders after 13 years on the run
Ex-chairman of Hong Kong-listed Neo-China surrenders after 13 years on the run

South China Morning Post

timean hour ago

  • South China Morning Post

Ex-chairman of Hong Kong-listed Neo-China surrenders after 13 years on the run

A former top executive of a Hong Kong-listed company surrendered to the city's anti-corruption agency on Tuesday after more than a decade on the run. Advertisement Li Songxiao, the former chairman of Neo-China Group (Holdings), now known as Shanghai Industrial Urban Development Group (SIUD), handed himself over to the Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) over his involvement in fraudulent property deals worth more than HK$330 million (US$42 million). Li had allegedly conspired with two then senior executives, Che Hanshu and Zhang Yaohui, to defraud shareholders and the Hong Kong stock exchange, by inflating the profit and assets of the developers through fraudulent transactions, according to a statement from ICAC. Warrants for the trio were issued in February 2011 by a magistrate, but by that time they had already left Hong Kong, ICAC said. Li, Che and Zhang had conspired with the company's secretary and financial controller to defraud shareholders between November 2003 and July 2007, it added. Li, 59, faces two common law charges of conspiracy to defraud. He is scheduled to appear at Eastern Magistrates' Courts for a mention hearing on Wednesday. Advertisement The charges centre on two property deals in which Neo-China allegedly misled investors – one involving the HK$210 million purchase of Top Fair, and another concerning the HK$123 million sale of its subsidiary, Noble Time Development, to Northwest Link.

Why Asian exporters can't afford a passive approach to US politics
Why Asian exporters can't afford a passive approach to US politics

South China Morning Post

timean hour ago

  • South China Morning Post

Why Asian exporters can't afford a passive approach to US politics

For all the continued dizzying headlines about global tariffs and strategic pauses, one thing remains true: the United States is deploying trade policy not just as economic leverage but as a tool of diplomacy and power. The August 1 deadline for countries, including several in Asia, to negotiate a trade deal or face steep tariffs is no exception. Markets throughout Asia – a region home to some of the most export-reliant economies in the world – are in the crosshairs of US President Donald Trump's 'America first' doctrine. The topic was top of mind at the Association of Southeast Asian Nations regional forum in Kuala Lumpur earlier this month. During the first Trump administration, China faced tariffs that affected a broad range of industries. These continued through the subsequent Biden administration and became embedded in business processes, pricing and distribution. Things are different this time, and the stakes – and the tariffs – are much higher. Trump's constant policy changes related to tariffs offer little relief, and his administration continues to stoke great uncertainty and frustration in global markets and in company boardrooms. For nations whose prosperity depends on steady access to global markets – especially in automobiles, agriculture, manufacturing, textiles and fisheries – tariffs have made conducting business persistently unpredictable. Notably, Trump's new slate of tariffs continues to rock the imported automobiles market , with such global powerhouses as Toyota, Honda and Hyundai feeling the sting. The stakes are no longer confined to profit margins or trade balances; they touch on national reputations, political alliances and long-term viability on the global stage. Yet too often Asian nations respond as if it's still business as usual, which it is not. The geopolitical terrain has shifted and will continue to do so under the current administration. Washington is more than just a diplomatic capital; it's an economic power centre where deals are shaped in the White House, amplified by media echo chambers and driven by electoral calculus. In this environment, silence is a potential vulnerability rather than an expression of neutrality.

Is EU's global clout fading amid gruelling stand-offs with China and the US?
Is EU's global clout fading amid gruelling stand-offs with China and the US?

South China Morning Post

timean hour ago

  • South China Morning Post

Is EU's global clout fading amid gruelling stand-offs with China and the US?

After tense talks in Beijing and a bruising trade blow from Washington, EU bureaucrats are heading into their August break weary and short of wins, as doubts deepen over the bloc's global leverage. Last week's summit in Beijing went off without too much drama, seen as an achievement in itself, given how fraught EU-China ties had become in the run-up to the long-awaited event. But on some of their longest-standing complaints, the Europeans found that Beijing would not budge and was keen to display the confidence and swagger that European officials say has been on show since it forced a climbdown on US tariffs three months ago, according to sources familiar with proceedings. Talks on Ukraine , however, were said to have been open, frank and more meaningful than previous summits, during which European Union officials felt their concerns were dismissed out of hand. Over more than three hours of talks with Chinese President Xi Jinping, the Europeans pushed him again to rein in his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin, only for Xi to point to US President Donald Trump's failure to deliver on a pre-election pledge to end the war in Ukraine in 24 hours as evidence of how little leverage anyone has over the conflict. A repeated motif of the Europeans' face-to-face engagement with Xi is the Chinese leader telling them that he has less leverage over Putin – whom he often describes as a 'good friend' – than they think. But whereas in previous years the EU complained that Xi had batted their assertions about China's support for Russia away, this time there was an in-depth debate.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store