logo
Iran arrests 700 'Israeli agents', but where are the weapons?

Iran arrests 700 'Israeli agents', but where are the weapons?

France 24a day ago

The reports show men in prison jumpsuits confessing that they were recruited as Israeli spies, along with weapons they were supposedly planning to use. Analysts say the confessions are probably coerced, and an analysis of the images by the FRANCE 24 Observers team found no evidence of any Israeli-made weapons among the supposed seizures.
For its part, Iran is attempting to present itself as successfully arresting Israeli operatives and confiscating their weapons. The so-called "seized weapons' and arrested 'Mossad agents' appear to be staged, as there is no credible evidence to substantiate these claims.
The 12-day war between Iran and Israel was, among other things, a devastating blow to Iranian intelligence. The Israeli military had precise intelligence on high-ranking generals, allowing them to successfully target and killing of at least 29 of them. And Israel's intelligence agency, the Mossad, apparently succeeded in recruiting large numbers of Iranians to serve as agents on the ground in the deployment of guided missiles and FPVs.
In the days after the initial Israeli attack on June 13, the Iranian authorities showed numerous images of abandoned vehicles and equipment left behind after their use in Israel's attack. They also showed images of spent munitions, including the casings of Israeli-made short-range Spike missiles, along with cars used to transport these missiles and suicide drones deep into Iran, as well as Israeli makeshift drone factories within the country – all of which reveals that Israeli intelligence had successfully recruited and infiltrated Iran on a large scale.
The Iranian intelligence services have not, however, shown any conclusive evidence to date of weapons they seized intact, before their deployment by supposed agents inside Iran.
The regime in Tehran claims to have arrested 700 Israeli operatives in 12 days, many of whom could potentially face execution. The arrested suspects are accused of planning to use attack drones, building bombs, spying on military sites, and transmitting information to Israel, according to Iranian media.
State media also reported that at least six men accused of spying for Israel in the past had been executed since the Israeli attack on June 13. On June 25, Iran executed three Kurdish men—Edris Ali, Azad Shojaei, and Rasoul Ahmad Mohammad—who had been sentenced to death in 2023 on charges of smuggling assassination tools into the country for Israel. Iran's judiciary reported that three other men – Madjid Mossayebi, Esmaeil Fekri, and Mohammad Amin Shayesteh – had also been executed since June 13.
State-affiliated media in Iran have published reports interviewing purported Israeli agents and showcasing 'seized' weapons.
However, in two instances where state media have presented images of these confiscated weapons, the photographs appear to be either fake or staged.
The first case occurred on June 24, 2025, when the Iranian ministry of intelligence claimed to have seized 402 drones in two cities in southern Iran's Hormozgan province. State media reporting on the seizure broadcast a photograph showing five attack drones with blue batteries. However, the photo is unrelated to Iran. It was taken in Ukraine in May by an Associated Press photographer, and shows attack drones made by the Ukrainian army for use against their Russian enemies.
A TV report on the supposed Hormozgan seizure by state broadcaster IRIB used different images. The report showed stacks of commercially available consumer drones in their original packaging, including models that are too small to carry munitions.
In a second report, on June 24, state media broadcast images of six men in prison uniforms with their backs to the camera being questioned by a security officer. The men say they had been contacted by Mossad via social media and began cooperating with them.
The report also showed a row of various weapons displayed on a table, supposedly seized from the alleged Israeli agents. But nearly all the displayed weapons are manufactured in Iran.
The video showed an Iranian-made man-portable air-defence system, the 'Misagh-3'. It also showed an Iranian-made drone, the 'Shahin-1,' recently added to the Iranian military's arsenal. The video also showed two mortar shells, one of which is made in China, and the other in the former Yugoslavia — both of which are commonly found in Iran's military stock.
The presence of Iranian-made weapons, coupled with the absence of any Israeli or Western-made arms, raises further suspicion that the arrest and seizure may have been staged.
Afghan immigrants new enemies of the state
Since the onset of the 12-day war, rumours and reports circulating on social media have suggested that Afghan nationals are cooperating with Israel as foot soldiers.
These reports allege that some Afghan immigrants in Iran are engaged in spying, planting bombs, and piloting drones on behalf of the Israeli Mossad. State television has also aired reports of arrested Afghan citizens "confessing" to being Israeli assets, transferring sensitive information, and planning to plant bombs at the direction of their Israeli handlers.
According to Iranian media, at least five Afghan nationals have been arrested since the start of the 12-day war. Estimates suggest that between 5 to 8 million Afghan immigrants live in Iran, the majority of whom are considered "illegal" immigrants.
In this context, on June 27, Iranian media announced that police had been ordered to deport all illegal Afghan immigrants. The media also reported that renting property to these immigrants would result in the confiscation of the property.
While anti-Afghan sentiment in Iran has long been prevalent — especially since the most recent wave of immigration beginning in 2021 — this sentiment has surged dramatically since the 12-day war. Historically, Afghan immigrants in Iran have been targets of attacks over crimes such as theft, rape, and drug-related offenses. However, this marks the first time they have faced accusations of espionage and collaboration with Israel.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Iran holds state funeral for military commanders killed in war in Israel
Iran holds state funeral for military commanders killed in war in Israel

LeMonde

time3 hours ago

  • LeMonde

Iran holds state funeral for military commanders killed in war in Israel

Iran held a state funeral service on Saturday, June 28, for around 60 people, including its military commanders, killed in its war with Israel, after Tehran's top diplomat condemned Donald Trump's comments on supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei as "unacceptable." The proceedings started at 8:00 am local time in the capital Tehran, as government offices and many businesses were closed on Saturday for the occasion. The state broadcaster showed footage of thousands of people donning black clothes, waving Iranian flags, holding pictures of the slain military commanders, chanting slogans of "Death to America" and "Death to Israel" and trampling the flags of Israel and the US on the ground. Images displayed mock-ups of Iranian ballistic missiles as well as coffins draped in Iranian flags and bearing portraits of the deceased commanders in uniform near Enghelab (Revolution) Square in central Tehran, where the march began. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, along with other senior government officials and military commanders – including Esmail Qaani, head of the Quds Force, the foreign operations arm of the Revolutionary Guards – attended the event. Senior advisor to Iran's supreme leader, Ali Shamkhani, who was targeted and wounded during the war, also took part in the ceremony, using a walking cane, state TV showed. Commanders, scientists to be buried A patriotic eulogy blared from loudspeakers as the procession set out across the sprawling metropolis toward Azadi (Freedom) Square, 11 kilometres away. "Boom boom Tel Aviv," read one banner, referring to Iranian missiles fired at Israel during the conflict in retaliation for its attacks on Iran. Among the dead was Mohammad Bagheri, a major general in Iran's Revolutionary Guards and the second-in-command of the armed forces after the Iranian leader. Nuclear scientist Mohammad Mehdi Tehranchi, also killed in the attacks, will be buried with his wife. Revolutionary Guards commander Hossein Salami, who was killed on the first day of the war, will also be laid to rest after Saturday's ceremony, which honored at least 30 other top commanders. Of the 60 people who are to be laid to rest after the ceremony, four are children and four are women.

Iran holds state funeral for killed military leaders, scientists
Iran holds state funeral for killed military leaders, scientists

Euronews

time4 hours ago

  • Euronews

Iran holds state funeral for killed military leaders, scientists

The caskets of Revolutionary Guard's Chief General Hossein Salami, General Amir Ali Hajizadeh and others were driven through the city's Azadi Street. Coffins were draped in the Iranian flag with large portraits of those killed attached. Both Salami and Hajizadeh were killed on the first day of the conflict, June 13, when Israel launched a war it claimed was intended to destroy Iran's nuclear programme. State media reported that the state funerals were for 60 people, including four women and four children, and that more than 1 million people turned out for the procession, though the latter cannot be independently verified. The funeral procession did have a large turnout, which saw mourners line the street waving flags as they chanted "Death to America" and "Death to Israel". Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, was not immediately present at the funeral. Khamenei has not made a public appearance since before the start of the conflict with Israel. Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi was there, alongside other high-profile Iranian military leaders. The Revolutionary Guards were created after the 1979 Islamic Revolution, which saw the overthrow of the Shah of Iran, the country's last monarch. First established as a domestic security force, the Revolutionary Guards has now evolved into a powerful transnational force aiding Tehran's allies in the Middle East and with control over the country's arsenal of ballistic missiles. The Israel-Iran conflict began on 13 June, when Israeli airstrikes began targeting nuclear and military sites in Iran. Tensions soared when the United States got involved last week when it bombed three key nuclear sites. A US-brokered ceasefire was then declared on Tuesday. Iran has always insisted its nuclear programme is for peaceful and civilian purposes only. However Israel views it as a threat and claims its military campaign was necessary to prevent Iran from building an atomic bomb.

Iran's thorny IAEA relations hit new low after Israeli, US strikes
Iran's thorny IAEA relations hit new low after Israeli, US strikes

France 24

time5 hours ago

  • France 24

Iran's thorny IAEA relations hit new low after Israeli, US strikes

The latest phase in Tehran's troubled relations with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) kicked off not long after Israel launched massive, unprecedented strikes on Iran on June 13, killing top Iranian military officials and nuclear scientists. When EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas declared on X that bloc members 'agree' that Iran must never have a nuclear weapon, Iranian foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei fired a social media salvo. 'How can you express concern over Iran's peaceful program that is under the most robust IAEA's inspections and ignore the fact that the Israeli regime has a huge arsenal of #NuclearWeapons?!' Baqaei posted on X. As a signatory to the UN's nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), Iran is required to accept IAEA inspections. Israel is exempt from nuclear inspections since it's one of only five countries not party to the NPT. While Israel neither confirms nor denies that it possesses nuclear arms, the country is estimated to have at least 80 nuclear weapons, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI). It's an old source of grievance among hardliners in the Islamic Republic, and it picked up steam as Israeli bombardments continued. By June 19, Baqaei had IAEA chief Rafael Grossi in his sights. 'You turned IAEA into a tool of convenience for non-NPT members to deprive NPT members of their basic right under Article 4,' the Iranian foreign ministry spokesman told Grossi on X, referring to the treaty's enshrined right to peaceful nuclear activities. The anti-IAEA rhetoric was put into action this week when the Iranian parliament on Wednesday passed a bill to suspend cooperation with the IAEA. The next morning, Iran's constitutional watchdog, the Guardian Council, approved the parliamentary vote. By the end of the day, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi asserted on state TV that the suspension was "binding" following the Guardian Council approval and added that there was 'no doubt about its implementation'. 'Double standards' of a shah-era treaty Iran's decision to suspend cooperation with the IAEA was a regrettable, but not surprising development for diplomats and experts who have worked on the issue for decades. 'It has always been part of the tactics to stop, to interrupt, and to resume the cooperation with the IAEA,' said Jacques Audibert, a diplomat and former negotiator for France on the 2015 Iran nuclear deal. 'Today, they have obvious reasons, because their facilities are supposed to be obliterated. I can imagine that politically it's difficult for them.' 'They've suspended. It's not a withdrawal. And while they're talking about withdrawal from the Non-Proliferation Treaty, they haven't done so. Even so, the suspension of the inspections and of the relationship with the IAEA is going to fuel the narrative that Iran intends to build a weapon,' noted James Dorsey, senior fellow at the Singapore-based S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies and host of the popular podcast, 'The Turbulent World of Middle East Soccer'. Iran signed the NPT in 1968, during the reign of Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, who was ousted in the 1979 Islamic Revolution. For over four decades, the Islamic Republic authorities have railed against the 'double standards' that oblige the country to comply with inspection requirements of a shah-era treaty while Israel goes scot-free, developing nuclear weapons without fear of sanctions or Western disfavour. But Iran, unlike North Korea, has never withdrawn from the landmark UN treaty, fearing a devastating response from Israel, or worse, the USA. That deterrence collapsed this month, with the 12-day war killing at least 627 Iranians and wounding nearly 4,900, according to official figures. Human rights groups say the Iranian death toll exceeds 1,000. Meanwhile Iran's retaliatory strikes on Israel killed 28 people, according to Israeli authorities. While US President Donald Trump announced a 'ceasefire' on Monday, Iran has never used the term, describing the cessation of hostilities as a 'halting of retaliatory strikes' against Israel. At a NATO summit in The Hague this week, Trump compared the US strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities to the 1945 US nuclear attacks on Japan. "When you look at Hiroshima, if you look at Nagasaki, that ended a war, too," Trump said. "This ended a war in a different way." Experts, however, are not at all sure that Trump's touted end of hostilities will hold. 'I think the reason why the United States is insisting on saying, we've done it, we're finished, is that Trump does not want to be drawn into a longer war,' said Dorsey. Playing the long game Trump may be blindsided by the short term, but Iran has a history of playing the long game by adopting a cat-and-mouse strategy with the IAEA. In 2018, when Trump, under his first presidency, withdrew the US from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), also called the 2015 Iran nuclear deal, Tehran waited for a year for Washington to come back to the deal before announcing its partial withdrawal in May 2019. Two years later, Tehran halted its implementation of the Additional Protocol stipulated in the 2015 Iran nuclear deal, which permitted the IAEA enhanced inspection rights – including snap inspections and continuous surveillance. Iran, however, continued to comply with IAEA's Comprehensive Safeguards Agreement after 2021, which permitted access to Iran's declared nuclear sites, until the Israeli strikes this month cut off access to the country. 'Iran adhered to the 2015 international agreement into 2019. When that didn't persuade the Americans to return to the agreement, they progressively started to abandon adherence to various provisions, including the limit on uranium enrichment,' said Dorsey. 'The original reason for enriching to 60% was to pressure the United States to return to the agreement. Circumstances have since changed.' Following the US strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, attention has focused on the infamous 408.6 kg of uranium enriched up to 60% that the IAEA in May declared the regime had amassed. Trump and US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth slammed US media for reporting initial intelligence assessments that the strikes only succeeded in pushing back Iran's nuclear program by mere months. They insist the US-Israeli strikes have 'obliterated' and 'decimated' Iran's nuclear capacity. While some Iranian officials admitted the country's nuclear facilities have been heavily damaged, Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei on Thursday insisted that Tehran's enemies 'did not achieve anything from this war. They attacked our nuclear facilities, but they were unable to do anything important.' Audibert is dismissive of the claims and counterclaims on both sides. 'We are in a posturing phase, which is not taking reality into account,' he noted. 'What Khamenei said has no link with reality. He said it's a big victory [for Iran], that Israel almost collapsed, and that Iran slapped the United States in the face. This doesn't make sense. On the other hand, the US defence secretary is trying to explain to everybody that it has been a full success. I'm not putting the two on the same level, but it's the same posturing phase.' Providing a 'pretext' for Israel's 'unlawful attack' For the facts to be established, evidence must be gathered on the ground. While the war on Iran raged for 12 days, the IAEA deemed it impossible to assess the damage to nuclear sites and material on the ground since the UN agency 'lost visibility [on enriched uranium stocks] from the moment hostilities began", Grossi told French TV station France 2 on Wednesday. 'During a war, we cannot inspect, we cannot move. But as soon as hostilities stopped, and especially given the sensitivity surrounding this material, I believe it is in everyone's interest that we resume our activities as soon as possible,' said Grossi. The IAEA chief also slammed Iran's decision to suspend cooperation with the UN watchdog agency. 'Iran's cooperation with us is not a favour, it is a legal obligation as long as Iran remains a signatory to the Non-Proliferation Treaty,' he noted. But Tehran is particularly piqued with the UN nuclear agency after the IAEA board passed a resolution on June 12 declaring that Iran was breaching its non-proliferation obligations. The next day, Israel launched its attacks on Iran. While Israel did not mention the IAEA resolution, US Vice President JD Vance cited the IAEA resolution to make a case for the military action against Iran. In the initial days of the war, Grossi took to the airwaves to repeatedly explain that the IAEA had not assessed that Tehran was building a nuclear weapon. But Grossi's clarifications failed to mollify Iranian authorities. 'This is too late, Mr. Grossi. You obscured this truth in your absolutely biased report,' Iranian foreign ministry spokesman Baqaei said in a post on X, excoriating the IAEA for providing a 'pretext' for Israel's 'unlawful attack on our peaceful nuclear facilities'. On Friday night, amid mounting pressure to establish the facts on the ground, Iran once again slammed Grossi, rejecting his request to visit its nuclear sites. "Grossi's insistence on visiting the bombed sites under the pretext of safeguards is meaningless and possibly even malign in intent," Araghchi said on X. "Iran reserves the right to take any steps in defence of its interests, its people and its sovereignty." Russia wants Iran-IAEA cooperation But apart from its fiery rhetoric, Iran has very little room for maneouvre in its dealings with the IAEA at the UN Security Council. In the event of non-cooperation, such as refusal of access, concealment of materials, or failure to provide justification for the presence of uranium, the IAEA has the right to refer the matter to the UN Security Council, which could result in sanctions, increased diplomatic pressure, or calls for the resumption of negotiations. On the nuclear issue, Iran is isolated at the top rung of the top UN body, with the five veto-holding permanent Security Council members keen to see Tehran back under inspections. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov on Thursday spoke out against Iran suspending cooperation with the IAEA. "We are interested in continuing cooperation between Iran and the IAEA, so that everybody respects Iran's repeated statements that Iran does not have and will not have plans to develop a nuclear weapon," Lavrov said at a press conference in Moscow. During the recent war, Iran's closest allies, Russia and China, provided rhetorical, but very little concrete support for Iran. Both Russia and China are nuclear powers and permanent UN Security Council members with little appetite to handle a nuclear armed Iran further destabilising the Middle East powder keg region. Withdrawing from the NPT risks further isolation since a UN Security Council resolution could see sanctions that add further burdens to Iran's long-suffering population. 'Suspending inspections is a violation [of the NPT],' said Dorsey. 'This is not a free membership, you sign up to obligations and those obligations include the degree of enrichment and they include inspections.' While some members of the international community may understand Iran's position in the immediate aftermath of the devastating Israeli and US strikes, there will be pressure on Iran to fall in line with its nuclear commitments. 'If Iran does not comply, it's going to be interpreted as retaining the freedom to develop a weapon,' said Dorsey. 'Iran is a country that has been sanctioned for much of the existence of the Islamic Republic since 1979. Let's be clear about it, in that sense, Iran is its own worst enemy.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store