UN says over 1,300 Palestinians killed seeking aid in Gaza since May
The UN human rights office said Friday that 1,373 Palestinians have been killed while waiting for aid in the shortage-stricken Gaza Strip since late May, most of them by the Israeli military.
"In total, since 27 May, at least 1,373 Palestinians have been killed while seeking food; 859 in the vicinity of (US- and Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation) sites and 514 along the routes of food convoys," the UN agency's office for the Palestinian territories said in a statement.
"Most of these killings were committed by the Israeli military," it added.
Israeli fire killed 11 in Gaza
Gaza's civil defence agency said 11 people were killed by Israeli gunfire and air strikes on Friday, including two who were waiting near an aid distribution site inside the Palestinian territory.
Civil defence spokesman Mahmud Bassal told AFP that five people were killed in a strike near the southern city of Khan Yunis, and four more in a separate strike on a vehicle in central Gaza's Deir el-Balah.
Read More: France to deliver 40 tonnes of emergency aid to Gaza
The Israeli army told AFP it could not confirm the strikes without specific coordinates.
Two other people were killed and more than 70 injured by Israeli fire while waiting for aid near a food distribution centre run by the US- and Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) between Khan Yunis and the nearby city of Rafah, the civil defence said.
The army did not immediately respond to the report.
Thousands of Gazans have gathered each day near aid distribution points in Gaza, including the four managed by GHF, whose operations have been marred by chaotic scenes and near-daily reports of Israeli forces firing on people waiting to collect rations.
GHF has denied that fatal shootings have occurred in the immediate vicinity of its aid points.
Media restrictions in Gaza and difficulties in accessing many areas mean AFP is unable to independently verify the tolls and details provided by the civil defence agency and other parties.
Israeli restrictions on the entry of goods and aid into Gaza since the start of the war nearly 22 months ago have led to shortages of food and essential goods, including medicine, medical supplies and fuel, which hospitals rely on to power their generators.
Also Read: Leonardo DiCaprio faces backlash over Israel hotel project amid Gaza conflict
The shortages were exacerbated by a more than two-month total blockade on aid imposed by Israel, which began easing the stoppage in late May as GHF was beginning its operations.
Israel's defence ministry body overseeing civil affairs in the Palestinian territories, COGAT, said Friday that more than 200 trucks of aid had been collected and distributed by the UN and international organisations the previous day.
The UN says Gaza requires at least 500 trucks of aid per day.
COGAT added that four tankers of fuel for the UN had entered the Palestinian territory, and that 43 pallets of aid were airdropped in cooperation with the United Arab Emirates, Egypt and Jordan.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
an hour ago
- Express Tribune
India's double game with US
Listen to article At the turn of the century, it became abundantly clear that China was on its way to dethrone the US as the world's sole superpower. No superpower would let its adversary take its place easily. The US has long portrayed itself as a leader of the "free world" and considers the rise of China as a threat to the "rule based order". The US and its allies continue to advance this narrative that China, as a superpower, would be a disaster for the "free world". In order to contain China, the US decided to cozy up with India. For so long India maintained a non-aligned posture but leaned toward the Soviet Union. The US-India ties remained lukewarm. Relations between the two countries soured after India conducted nuclear tests in 1998, prompting US sanctions. However, in the early 2000s a strategic rethinking began in Washington. With China's rise looming large, the US saw India as a natural democratic counterweight in Asia. The big reset happened during President Bush's second term. His administration made a bold bet, integrating India into the global nuclear order despite its non-signatory status regarding NPT. The landmark US-India Civil Nuclear Deal in 2008 became the cornerstone of the new partnership. The US believed a strong India could help balance China's growing influence in the Indo-Pacific region. There was bipartisan consensus in the US about deepening ties with India. After the Bush administration, Democrat leader President Barack Obama continued to pursue strategic partnership. In fact, the relationship between the US and India was taken to the next level. A number of agreements, signed between the two sides over the next two decades, left no ambiguity that India had finally abandoned its non-aligned posture. Some of the agreements include 2016 Logistics Exchange Memorandum of Agreement (enabling mutual use of military bases for refueling and logistics); 2018 Communications Compatibility and Security Agreement (allowing India to access encrypted US military communication equipment); and 2020 Basic Exchange and Cooperation Agreement (allowing shared geospatial intelligence and satellite data for defense targeting). India, which for long procured military hardware from Russia, began to buy defence equipment from the US, like Apache helicopters, P-81 surveillance aircraft, C-130/C 17 transport planes and MH-60R naval choppers. The current US Secretary of State Marco Rubio a few years ago introduced a bill in the Congress, seeking a status for India similar to the one being enjoyed by Israel. The sole purpose of the US warming up to India was to make sure India's support of US endeavours to contain China. But despite the deepening ties, US policymakers and analysts are increasingly disillusioned with India on several fronts. While India continued to take advantage of its strategic partnership with the US, it also maintained close ties with Russia. But the return of President Trump to the White House changed everything. Trump is no longer ready to tolerate India's pursuit of strategic autonomy. Rubio admitted that Indian ties with Russia were a source of "irritation" in the relationship. India continues to buy discounted oil and military hardware from Russia. The Trump Administration insists that India is funding Russia's war against Ukraine through these purchases. India is part of Quad, but resists any formal military alliance or joint patrolling. No appetite to take a strong anti-China stance that would resemble US expectations. The four-day military conflict in May between Pakistan and India also changed the equation. Pakistan's response to the Indian missile strikes shook the western world and the US. There were murmurs in Washington and other western capitals about the Indian military capabilities after its defeat at the hands of Pakistan. But above all, there is a growing realisation in Washington that India is playing a double game — taking full advantage from the US but not ready to align its strategic goals with Washington. India may remain an important player for the US but the relationship may never be the same again.
Business Recorder
4 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Iran sets up new defence council after war with Israel
TEHRAN: Iran's top security body has approved the creation of a new defence council, state media reported on Sunday, more than a month after a ceasefire ended a 12-day war with Israel. 'The Supreme National Security Council approved the establishment of the National Defence Council,' state television said. The new body – which will be chaired by the president and include top military commanders among other senior officials and ministers – will be tasked with 'reviewing defence strategies' and 'enhancing the capabilities of Iran's armed forces', it added. 'Indo-Pak, Iran-Israel wars increase importance of Pakistan' On Friday, the Fars news agency said the decision comes as part of broader structural changes to Iran's security apparatus. The move comes in the wake of a conflict with Israel that, according to official figures, left more than 1,000 people dead in Iran and 29 in Israel. The war began on June 13, when Israel launched strikes on military, nuclear and residential sites in Iran. Iran responded with retaliatory attacks on Israeli territory. A ceasefire announced by the United States has been in place since June 24.
Express Tribune
4 hours ago
- Express Tribune
US tariff plan set with little wiggle room, Trump aide says
US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said tariff rates are 'pretty much set'.PHOTO: AFP/Jim WATSON New US tariff rates are "pretty much set" with little immediate room for negotiation, Donald Trump's trade advisor said in remarks aired Sunday, also defending the president's politically driven levies against Brazil. Trump, who has wielded tariffs as a tool of American economic might, has set tariff rates for dozens of economies including the European Union at between 10 and 41 percent come August 7, his new hard deadline for the duties. In a pre-taped interview broadcast Sunday on CBS's "Face the Nation," US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said "the coming days" are not likely to see changes in the tariff rates. Read More: Pakistan hit with 19pc tariff as Trump targets dozens of countries with new duties "A lot of these are set rates pursuant to deals. Some of these deals are announced, some are not, others depend on the level of the trade deficit or surplus we may have with the country," Greer said. "These tariff rates are pretty much set." Undoubtedly some trade ministers "want to talk more and see how they can work in a different way with the United States," he added. But "we're seeing truly the contours of the president's tariff plan right now with these rates." Last Thursday, the former real estate developer announced hiked tariff rates on dozens of US trade partners. They will kick in on August 7 instead of August 1, which had previously been touted as a hard the countries facing steep new levies is Brazil. South America's largest economy is being hit with 50 percent tariffs on exports to the United States -- albeit with significant exemptions for key products such as aircraft and orange juice. Trump has openly admitted he is punishing Brazil for prosecuting his political ally Jair Bolsonaro, the ex-president accused of plotting a coup in a bid to cling to power. The US president has described the case as a "witch hunt." Also Read: The new trade colonialism reer said it was not unusual for Trump to use tariff tools for geopolitical purposes. "The president has seen in Brazil, like he's seen in other countries, a misuse of law, a misuse of democracy," Greer told CBS. "It is normal to use these tools for geopolitical issues." Trump was "elected to assess the foreign affairs situation... and take appropriate action," he added. Meanwhile White House economic advisor Kevin Hassett said that while talks are expected to continue over the next week with some US trade partners, he concurred with Greer's tariffs assessment in that the bulk of the rates "are more or less locked in." Asked by the host of NBC's Sunday talk show "Meet the Press with Kristen Welker" if Trump could change tariff rates should financial markets react negatively, Hassett said: "I would rule it out, because these are the final deals." Legal challenges have been filed against some of Trump's tariffs arguing he overstepped his authority. An appeals court panel on Thursday appeared skeptical of the government's arguments, though the case may be ultimately decided at the Supreme Court.
