Dublin rally urges Govt to protect Ireland's neutrality
Around a thousand people walked from the Garden of Remembrance to Leinster House chanting "Save our neutrality, keep our Triple Lock".
Around a thousand people marched through Dublin city this afternoon calling on the government to protect Ireland's neutrality.
The protest was led by Opposition and Independent TDs, peace and anti-war groups and Palestine solidarity groups.
It arises from Government plans for new legislation that would change how Ireland decides to deploy members of the Defence Forces abroad to serve on international peacekeeping missions.
The General Scheme of the Defence (Amendment) Bill 2025 would remove what is known as the Triple Lock.
Under the current system, Ireland cannot send peacekeepers overseas without the go ahead from the United Nations, the Government and the Dáil.
The Government's plan is to take away the requirement for the UN's go ahead.
"We've a proud [peacekeeping] tradition ... why should we ask Vladimir Putin, a brutal aggressor for his permission as to where Irish men and women can go to peacekeeping. That is an out-of-date concept," Tánaiste Simon Harris said previously.
The plan would also increase the number of troops that can be deployed without a Dáil vote from 12 to 50.
The draft legislation will be examined over a period of eight weeks, after which a bill will be sent for Government approval.
This proposal has faced strong criticism from opposition politicians, who say the move undermines Ireland's neutrality.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Irish Sun
2 hours ago
- The Irish Sun
Stealth hike in Irish personal injury insurance payouts will hit us all in the pocket – Govt's timing couldn't be worse
INSURANCE premiums are another rising cost in Ireland's affordability crisis, with prices outpacing those in many other European countries. The average cost of 3 The rises can cause real world problems for many people Credit: Getty Images - Getty 3 Minister for Justice Jim O'Callaghan Credit: Alamy 3 Brian Hanley said prices outpace those in many other European countries Credit: social media collect - IVAN COOPER That's almost double the price of the average And there are fears they could shoot up even more, as the proposed personal injury award guidelines are to be increased by almost 17 per cent. These rises can cause real world problems for many people. It could mean driving less or taking Small READ MORE IN OPINION Justice Minister Brian Hanley of the Alliance for Insurance Reform, says the timing of an increase in personal injury awards couldn't be worse for policyholders. IF you are a motorist, small business owner, The Most read in The Irish Sun Now, in the middle of this affordability crisis, the Government is preparing to quietly make things even worse. A proposal is set to be brought to Cabinet to increase personal injury awards by nearly 17 per cent, reversing much of the progress made over the past three years to bring a degree of balance and consistency to injury compensation in Ireland. HIGHER THAN ENGLAND Nobody disputes that people who suffer injuries deserve fair compensation, but Irish awards are already among the highest in Europe. A 2019 analysis by the Personal Injuries Commission showed personal injury awards here were 440 per cent higher than those in That kind of disparity isn't fair — it's unsustainable. The move comes as the latest Central More claims and rising repair costs — driven by inflation — have already pushed up the cost of cover. The one factor helping to contain those costs was a reduction in injury awards. Now, that progress risks being undone. This is especially concerning for Tracy Sheridan, who runs Kidspace play centres in Rathfarnham and Rathcoole and is a board member of the Alliance for Insurance Reform, sees the effect first-hand. HARDER TO KEEP GOING She says: 'Every month we're hearing about premiums going up. The only bright spot had been that awards had come down. If Government raises them now, there'll be no brake on rising insurance costs. It's just not sustainable.' And it's not just businesses feeling the strain. Across the country, voluntary groups, sports clubs and community organisations — many operating on a shoestring — are finding it harder and harder to keep going. They're doing everything right: improving safety, reducing risk, keeping clean records. Yet when the insurance renewal comes around, the premium has risen again. Here's the kicker: for liability insurance, which covers injuries that happen in places like community centres or sports pitches, the cost of claims has actually gone down — by ten per cent in the same six-month period. In a properly functioning market, that should lead to lower premiums, but that hasn't happened. What's worrying is how little public discussion there's been about this planned increase. The Government has been virtually silent for six months, even though this change affects every single policyholder in the country. There's been no proper scrutiny from the In 2021, new Personal Injuries Guidelines were introduced to bring more consistency and fairness. They helped align Irish awards more closely with international norms. FOOT THE BILL Those reforms were a step in the right direction — but they are now at risk of being reversed before they've had a chance to deliver lasting impact. The Central Bank's report makes another key point: legal costs blow up when claims are settled through litigation instead of the Injuries Resolution Board. For liability claims under €100,000 — which account for 94 per cent of all personal injury cases — legal fees go from just €597 at the Injuries Board to over €24,000 for claims settled in litigation. The average award for claimants is actually the same, so you're left asking who really benefits from almost 70 per cent of cases going into litigation? Not claimants and certainly not policyholders. It's the public — motorists, business owners, The Government must now pause this proposal and refer it to the relevant Oireachtas committee. We need transparency, data, and evidence — not quiet decisions made behind closed doors. Let's debate the facts, consult the experts and hear from the people who are paying the premiums. Because if insurance keeps going the way it is going, the damage won't just be financial — it will be social and structural. Ireland needs a personal injury system that is fair for claimants, and affordable for everyone else.
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Expect plenty of cribbin' and moanin' as the budget games begin
The budget games are under way, right enough. Impending decisions about spending priorities for next year and into the future are now the unavoidable context of every political exchange – especially those within Government , some of which you'll see, most of which you won't. They are the subtext of every interview, news story and speech between now and October. As ever, the management of expectations at the centre is essential at this stage. At the recent National Economic Dialogue Paschal Donohoe solemnly warned of deep uncertainty about the future and that (inconveniently) positive headline economic figures so far this year mask 'considerable vulnerabilities'. 'The mood music is changing,' Donohoe warned. His party leader saw 'dark clouds on the horizon'. For the Taoiseach , 'challenging,' was the mot juste. In the Dáil this week, Minister for Public Expenditure Jack Chambers returned to the theme. READ MORE 'We face significant economic uncertainty,' he said. 'Everyone in this House needs to realise the level and degree of ... corporate risks that exists right now.' As the Bert used to say during the late stage hubris of the Celtic Tiger, sure this is all cribbin' and moanin' and talkin' down the country. Still, you can see what they're at. The country and its political system have become accustomed to massive giveaway budgets, and cannot contemplate restraint. Well, let me qualify that thought: everyone can contemplate restraint, just not for themselves. Everyone has a demand for extra spending, sourced from the public purse. Some have a good case; all believe they deserve priority. Much of our media – especially RTÉ – is in the habit of promoting the causes of all comers relentlessly and uncritically. Of course, RTÉ might feel a special affinity with bodies looking for money from the Government. But still. Some context would not go amiss – how much would this cost? What is the existing budget? Where might the money come from? What should not be done in order to pay for this? What taxes should be increased? The list of supplicants for greater public funding is literally unending. A casual glance at a political correspondent's inbox gives a flavour of the requests bombarding the budget ministers: extra provision for education for people with disabilities; extra funding for school capitation; VAT cuts for the embattled hospitality industry; a €25 per week increase in welfare rates; this week's cause celebre – retaining the €1,000 discount on fees for third level students; and so on, and so on. [ The Irish Times view on college fees: Government has a choice to make Opens in new window ] Minister for Justice Jim O'Callaghan played a more subtle hand. Speaking at the Free Legal Advice Centre in Dublin, he said it was clear that Ireland has 'a big problem' with domestic violence. He would like to provide more resources for Flac and for civil legal aid – but 'I'm limited in terms of budget'. He is getting to the heart of the entire question of budgeting: it's all a question of priorities. Few people would quibble with increasing the budget for legal aid to ensure that people can have access to justice and to the protection of the law, when that question is taken in isolation. But governments cannot take any of these questions in isolation – they must weigh it all up as part of a coherent and credible whole of Government budgetary plan. Within the justice budget, for example, how does that measure up as a priority against recruiting more gardaí? Or fixing the problem of prison overcrowding? Or supporting the victims of crime? Or rehabilitating young people who have fallen into criminality? And how should the justice allocation be compared to the other budgets within Government? Should justice be constrained so that we can spend more money on health? On disabilities? On child poverty? Not so simple now, is it? And, yes, you might want to do all these things. But you can't. Anyone who pretends you can isn't being straight. You have to choose. Now let's not feel too bad for Messers Donohoe and Chambers. It may be hard being in charge of budgets during a time of plenty, but it's better than being Rachel Reeves . As the tears rolled down Reeves' cheeks in the House of Commons on Wednesday, both sterling and the UK's standing in the bond markets were headed in the same direction. Whatever the problems of prosperity that Jack and Paschal have to manage, they are far, far preferable to the other kind of problem, now facing Reeves and her prime minister. Better to have surpluses than deficits. So you might think that an overriding national priority would be to maintain steady and stable public finances. To do that, the budget ministers and the leaders of the Government parties have decided, they must eliminate the once-off giveaways of the last three budgets. 'We can't and we won't' continue with them, Donohoe told Ivan Yates on Newstalk on Thursday. But how firm is that determination? My sense is that Donohoe's is rock solid. He is not, however, in charge of the Government. Both Simon Harris and Micheál Martin, while ruling out another goody basket of one-off giveaways, have insisted that they will also seek to help people with rising costs in the budget. Does this signal a middle ground will be found? This week's controversy over student fees shows just how hard it is to withdraw benefits to which voters have become accustomed. Does the Government have the political will and the capacity to restrain itself and take politically difficult but necessary decisions to position the country for future growth and to protect it against future adversity – or will we cross our fingers, plough on and hope for the best? We'll see. But I know one thing: the politics of no hard choices never, ever ends well.
RTÉ News
3 hours ago
- RTÉ News
How high might electricity prices rise to again?
Irish consumers are used to paying more than their European counterparts for electricity. Recent figures from Eurostat show prices here are the third highest across the European Union - almost 30% more than the average for the 27 member states. This means Irish households are paying roughly €350 more per year for their electricity, with the average annual bill here coming in at around €1,800. There are a few notable reasons for this. In comparison with other EU countries, Ireland has a relatively dispersed population with a lot of one-off housing. This makes the cost of maintaining the grid comparatively higher on a per capita basis. While demand - notably from data centres - has grown substantially in recent years, putting increasing pressure on supply. And when demand does peak, importing low-cost electricity from abroad isn't straightforward, given we're on an island with a lack of interconnectivity. Add into the mix volatility in the supply and cost of energy brought about by wars in Ukraine and the Middle East, and Ireland's complicated path to lower-cost electricity is apparent. As a result, both ESB Networks and Eirgrid - the operators of the country's energy system - have spent huge sums on much-need grid improvements in recent years. But all of this comes at a significant cost, which is largely passed on to customers. Network tariffs or grid fees, make up almost a third of an electricity bill - so that is well over €500 yearly based on the average bill. €19 billion network investment would add up to €16 onto bills ESB Networks and Eirgrid are now proposing an investment of nearly €19 billion over the next five years (2026-2030) to maintain and upgrade their networks to meet current and future demand. Such an investment, if approved by the Commission for Regulation of Utilities (CRU), would add up to €16 to customers' electricity bills each year. ESB Networks outlined the acute need for such an investment this week at the Oireachtas Housing Committee. Nicholas Tarrant, CEO of ESB Networks, said the demand for electricity for new homes was twice what it was for houses built during the Celtic Tiger due to the installation of heat pumps and the use of electric vehicles. He said the organisation is seeing "a major increase in demands for connections to the network". However, the CRU (which approves network investment plans) is instead proposing an initial €14.1 billion grid investment between 2026 and 2030 that would see at least €6 added annually to bills. This figure could be increased to €18.08 billion based on ESB Networks and Eirgrid meeting annual delivery targets - which would see the €16 yearly increase come into play. A final decision will be made on this proposal later in the year, but one thing is for sure, household bills will rise. Commissioner at the CRU Fergal Mulligan said the cost to the consumer "will be assessed on a year-by-year basis" and that the level of increase will "depend on a number of factors, including the level of delivery by the network operators and how suppliers choose to recover network costs". The electricity suppliers can individually determine what level of these charges they either absorb or pass onto their customers. Daragh Cassidy from comparison site is hopeful households mightn't have to bear the full cost of this, pointing out that "if the wholesale cost of electricity, which makes up around half of the price we pay for our electricity, were to fall substantially this might cancel out any increase in grid fees over the coming months and years". Further network charges to come into effect later this year However, even if the amount added to bills from future grid investments (from 2026) is relatively low, later this year customers will still be hit by network charges from the current round of approved investment in the network (covering 2012-2025) - and they are expected to be rather substantial. Last year the CRU approved an increase of just over €100 in network charges on customers' bills annually. This year's grid-fee increase - to be determined in the coming months - isn't expected to be that high but will still add more financial pain to energy customers. Cutting back outgoings by avoiding these fees simply isn't an option, homes need electricity, so customers will need to be even more price-conscious to keep costs down. The CRU is encouraging customers to shop around and switch suppliers regularly to get the best deals and minimise the impact of any increase in charges. That's simple but effective advice. If you've been with the same energy provider - electricity and/or gas - for more than a year, the chances are you're paying more than you need to. Suppliers offer new customers the best rates, and it's important to accept this and be prepared to make the switch every year when you're contract is up. And this is a lot easier than many might think. "Everything can be done online in the space of a few minutes, you don't even need to contact your existing provider," Mr Cassidy said. The reality is we have a growing population, we're transitioning towards net-zero, and trying to build more resilience into energy systems. All of this needs to be paid for somehow, so incremental electricity bill rises (aside from those related directly to electricity prices) can be expected as we go further down this path.
