US accepts jet from Qatar for use as Air Force One
Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth accepted the $US400 million ($A621 million) Boeing-made jet for use as US President Donald Trump's official plane, the Pentagon said.
Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell said the Defense Department "will work to ensure proper security measures and functional-mission requirements are considered".
He added that the plane was accepted "in accordance with all federal rules and regulations".
Legal experts have questioned the scope of laws relating to gifts from foreign governments that aim to thwart corruption and improper influence.
Democrats have also sought to block the handover.
Qatar has dismissed concerns about the aircraft deal.
Trump has also shrugged off ethical concerns, saying it would be "stupid" not to accept the jet.
He has defended it as a way to save tax dollars.
"Why should our military, and therefore our taxpayers, be forced to pay hundreds of millions of dollars when they can get it for FREE," Trump posted on his social media site.
Retrofitting the luxury plane offered by Qatar's royal family will require significant security upgrades, communications improvements to prevent spies from listening in and the ability to fend off incoming missiles, experts say.
That could cost hundreds of millions of dollars.
The precise costs were not known but could be significant given the cost for Boeing's current effort to build two new Air Force One planes is more than $US5 billion.
The Air Force One program has faced chronic delays over the last decade, with the delivery of two new 747-8s slated for 2027, three years behind the previous schedule.
Boeing in 2018 received a $US3.9 billion contract to build the two planes for use as Air Force One although costs have since risen.
Boeing has also posted $US2.4 billion in charges from the project.
with AP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Perth Now
18 minutes ago
- Perth Now
'Crisis of trust': Epstein furore to hurt Republicans
The uproar over disgraced financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein is undermining public trust in the Trump administration, as well as Republican hopes of retaining control of Congress in the 2026 mid-term elections, two congressmen say. Republican Representative Thomas Massie and Democratic Representative Ro Khanna, who want the House of Representatives to vote on their bipartisan resolution requiring full release of the government's Epstein files, said the lack of transparency is reinforcing public perceptions that the rich and powerful live beyond the reach of the judicial system. "This is going to hurt Republicans in the mid-terms. The voters will be apathetic if we don't hold the rich and powerful accountable," Massie, a hardline conservative from Kentucky, told NBC's Meet the Press program. Republicans hope to add to their current 219-212 House majority - with four seats currently vacant - and 53-47 Senate majority in November 2026, although the US political cycle traditionally punishes the party of the sitting president during midterm elections. The Washington Post reported that Trump was increasingly frustrated with his administration's handling of the furore around Epstein. Even so, the president was hesitant to make personnel changes to avoid creating a "bigger spectacle" as his top officials underestimated the outrage from Trump's own base over the issue, the newspaper reported, citing unnamed sources. Khanna said Attorney General Pam Bondi triggered "a crisis of trust" by saying there was no list of Epstein clients after previously implying that one existed. The change in position unleashed a tsunami of calls for her resignation from Trump's MAGA base. "This is about trust in government," the California Democrat told Meet the Press. "This is about being a reform agent of transparency." President Donald Trump has been frustrated by continued questions about his administration's handling of investigative files related to Epstein's criminal charges and 2019 death by suicide in prison. Massie and Khanna believe they can win enough support from fellow lawmakers to force a vote on their resolution when Congress returns from its summer recess in September. But they face opposition from Republican leaders including House Speaker Mike Johnson, who sent lawmakers home a day early to stymie Democratic efforts to force a vote before the break. Johnson, who also appeared on NBC's Meet the Press, said he favours a non-binding alternative resolution that calls for release of "credible" evidence, but which he said would better protect victims including minors. "The Massie and Khanna discharge petition is reckless in the way that it is drafted and presented," Johnson said. "It does not adequately include those protections." Massie dismissed Johnson's claim as "a straw man" excuse. "Ro and I carefully crafted this legislation so that the victims' names will be redacted," he said. "They're hiding behind that." Trump has tried and failed so far to distract attention from the Epstein controversy six months into his second term. On Saturday, Trump repeated his claims without evidence that 2024 Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris and other Democrats should be prosecuted over payment for endorsements from celebrities including Oprah Winfrey, Beyonce and the Reverend Al Sharpton. Last week he accused former president Barack Obama of "treason" over how his administration treated intelligence about Russian interference in US elections nine years ago, drawing a rebuke from an Obama spokesperson. 1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732) National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service 1800 211 028
Sydney Morning Herald
an hour ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Trump's latest clumsy deal has unintended consequences
The threat of a full-scale trans-Atlantic trade war has been averted with the deal, or at least the outline of one, struck between the US and the European Union at the weekend. As was the case with last week's deal with Japan, however, both sides have differing interpretations of what they've agreed to. There's no disagreement on the baseline tariff of 15 per cent on all EU exports to the US imposed by the deal, which the European Commission president, Ursula von der Leyen, said was 'the best we could get.' Before Trump regained office, the average tariff on EU exports was 2.5 per cent. Exactly what the new rate will apply to, however, isn't clear. Von der Leyen said it would apply to European cars, pharmaceuticals and semiconductors, while Donald Trump said pharmaceuticals were 'unrelated to this deal.' The US has separate investigations of pharmaceuticals and semiconductors underway that could lead to sectoral tariffs on imports of those products – and another bout of confrontation and negotiation. The new baseline tariff was, Trump said, in exchange for the EU 'opening up their countries at zero tariff,' whereas the EU says the agreement for 'zero for zero' tariffs relates to certain strategic products and their parts, like chemicals, semiconductor equipment and some agricultural products, and is a framework agreement that could lead to a lowering of tariffs on other products in future. Loading The deal, like the handful of others the Trump administration has struck in recent weeks, has been described as a 'roadmap' for a detailed agreement rather than a conventional trade deal. There are, therefore, many grey areas in the agreement that will need to be filled in. The agreement, once there is a document to agree to, would also have to be ratified by the European Parliament and the 27 individual national parliaments of the EU's members before it could take effect. All Trump's bigger trade deals involve headlines rather than substantive detail. Like the deal with Japan, it envisages the EU buying a lot of US energy – $US750 billion ($A1.14 billion) of energy over the next three years, as well as weaponry. Trump also said the EU would invest $US600 billion in the US.
The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
Trump's latest clumsy deal has unintended consequences
The threat of a full-scale trans-Atlantic trade war has been averted with the deal, or at least the outline of one, struck between the US and the European Union at the weekend. As was the case with last week's deal with Japan, however, both sides have differing interpretations of what they've agreed to. There's no disagreement on the baseline tariff of 15 per cent on all EU exports to the US imposed by the deal, which the European Commission president, Ursula von der Leyen, said was 'the best we could get.' Before Trump regained office, the average tariff on EU exports was 2.5 per cent. Exactly what the new rate will apply to, however, isn't clear. Von der Leyen said it would apply to European cars, pharmaceuticals and semiconductors, while Donald Trump said pharmaceuticals were 'unrelated to this deal.' The US has separate investigations of pharmaceuticals and semiconductors underway that could lead to sectoral tariffs on imports of those products – and another bout of confrontation and negotiation. The new baseline tariff was, Trump said, in exchange for the EU 'opening up their countries at zero tariff,' whereas the EU says the agreement for 'zero for zero' tariffs relates to certain strategic products and their parts, like chemicals, semiconductor equipment and some agricultural products, and is a framework agreement that could lead to a lowering of tariffs on other products in future. Loading The deal, like the handful of others the Trump administration has struck in recent weeks, has been described as a 'roadmap' for a detailed agreement rather than a conventional trade deal. There are, therefore, many grey areas in the agreement that will need to be filled in. The agreement, once there is a document to agree to, would also have to be ratified by the European Parliament and the 27 individual national parliaments of the EU's members before it could take effect. All Trump's bigger trade deals involve headlines rather than substantive detail. Like the deal with Japan, it envisages the EU buying a lot of US energy – $US750 billion ($A1.14 billion) of energy over the next three years, as well as weaponry. Trump also said the EU would invest $US600 billion in the US.
