Hockey Canada sexual assault trial: Legal reckoning nears for ex-Hockey Canada players as judge weighs verdict
After nearly two months of courtroom proceedings, the highly publicized Hockey Canada sexual assault trial involving five former World Junior hockey players has officially wrapped up.
The case, tied to disturbing allegations from a 2018 incident in London, Ontario, will now rest in the hands of Justice Maria Carroccia, who is set to deliver her verdict on July 24.
Hockey Canada
sexual assault trial concludes as judge prepares verdict for July 24
Michael McLeod, Carter Hart, Alex Formenton, Dillon Dubé, and Cal Foote have all pleaded not guilty to charges stemming from what the Crown alleges was a prolonged sexual assault of a woman identified only as E.M., whose identity is protected under a publication ban.
The alleged assault took place after a Hockey Canada gala celebrating the players' 2018 World Junior Championship win.
— globeandmail (@globeandmail)
Throughout the trial, the Crown focused heavily on Canada's affirmative consent laws, arguing that E.M. did not provide ongoing, voluntary consent to the specific sexual acts she was allegedly subjected to. Crown attorneys Meaghan Cunningham and Heather Donkers challenged the defense's portrayal of E.M.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Is it legal? How to get Internet without paying a subscription?
Techno Mag
Learn More
Undo
as a willing participant, asserting instead that fear, intoxication, and pressure created a scenario where consent was neither freely given nor legally valid.
'Literally, any one of those men could have stood up and said, this isn't right. And no one did,' E.M. said during cross-examination. 'No one thought like that. They didn't want to think about if I was actually OK or if I was actually consenting.'
Cunningham emphasized the role of 'willful blindness and recklessness' in the defendants' behavior, saying the accused operated on 'rape myths and mistakes of law about what consent is.'
Defense disputes credibility and suggests alternative narrative
Each defense team presented a differing version of events, many of which depicted E.M. as the instigator. Attorneys attacked her credibility, alleged inconsistencies in her testimony, and claimed she later regretted the encounter. They suggested she fabricated the allegations to protect her reputation and support a civil lawsuit settled in 2022.
The final decision now lies with Carroccia, who has previously sided with the defense on multiple legal matters. All eyes are on July 24, when she will issue a written judgment that could send shockwaves through both the legal world and Canadian hockey.
Also Read:
Alex Ovechkin shows gratitude to Wayne Gretzky and family following ESPY win for breaking NHL goal-scoring record
Catch Rani Rampal's inspiring story on Game On, Episode 4. Watch Here!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Room for reform: HC commutes death sentences of 2 convicts to life terms
1 2 Kolkata: There was a possibility of reform, the Calcutta High Court said on Wednesday while commuting the death sentences of two men. The men, who were convicted of rape and murder of a five-year-old child in 2021, was sentenced to life sentence without remission for 60 years, considering the depravity of the crime. The Jhargram court had convicted the accused in 2023. The two—Fagun Mandi and Rabindra Routh— had kidnapped the child, subjected her to aggravated penetrative sexual assault and strangled her to death before hiding her body. A witness claimed the girl and the convicts had come to his shop around the same time, while some others said they had seen them go to a field, where the girl's body was recovered on Nov 7, 2021. You Can Also Check: Kolkata AQI | Weather in Kolkata | Bank Holidays in Kolkata | Public Holidays in Kolkata The division bench of Justice Debangsu Basak and Justice Md Shabbar Rashidi said the prosecution had proved their case beyond doubt. "The appellants' conducts demonstrate a quality of depravity that shocks the conscience. A balance has to be struck between the gravity of the offence and the quantum of punishment," said the HC, affirming the Jhargram court's conviction. But citing SC judgments, the HC said the "socio economic backwardness and the conduct of the convict post custody and criminal antecedent if any of the convict should be taken into consideration while determining the quantum of sentence". by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo The state said on June 9 that Mandi was a slow learner with severe speech problems. He and his brother worked together on a fishing trawler at sea. The report said Mandi's rectification process was going on well at the correctional home. The report stated Routh was also a slow learner and had dropped out of school after class I. Depressed, he was undergoing psychiatric treatment and his family had claimed ailments, said the state report, pointing out Routh's behaviour at the correctional home was reported to be good. The state said families were socially backward and neither had criminal antecedents. "Considering the appellants' background, mental health status and the nature of the crime, we deem it appropriate to impose life sentence on them without a remission for 60 years," the HC held.
News18
3 hours ago
- News18
‘Child's Welfare Overrides Personal Law': Bombay High Court Grants Custody Of 9-Yr-Old To Mother
The HC prioritised the best interests of the boy over Muslim personal law, granting custody to his mother and reinforcing a child-centric interpretation of guardianship statutes In a significant judgment on July 21, the Bombay High Court's Aurangabad bench reaffirmed the primacy of a child's welfare in custody battles, holding that personal laws cannot override the principle of best interest. The case involved a nine-year-old boy whose custody was earlier granted to his father by a family court in Nilanga, Latur, on the grounds that under Muslim personal law, custody of a male child after the age of seven lies with the father. The mother challenged this order, contending that the decision was neither in the child's emotional interest nor supported by material circumstances. Justice Shailesh P Brahme, deciding the appeal, observed that while personal laws offer general guidance on guardianship, the statutory mandate under Section 17 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, requires that the welfare of the child be treated as paramount. The court held that the father's legal entitlement under Muslim personal law could not be the sole deciding factor, particularly when the child had clearly expressed his desire to continue living with his mother, with whom he had developed a strong emotional bond over the years. A significant factor in the High Court's reasoning was the personal interaction between the judge and the child, who was nearly ten years old at the time. The judge recorded that the child was intelligent, emotionally aware, and had clearly communicated his wish to remain with his mother. The boy reportedly described his father and paternal relatives as strangers, showing discomfort and unfamiliarity with them. The court emphasised that the child's preference, especially at this age, deserved considerable weight in a guardianship proceeding. Further, the court noted that the mother ran a small business and had been consistently supporting the child financially and emotionally. In contrast, the father had failed to establish a reliable income or the presence of a supportive caregiving structure at his residence. The absence of a female guardian in the father's household was also taken into account, as it could affect the child's comfort and care. Though the mother had previously not complied with certain interim orders of the family court, including failing to facilitate visitation on a few occasions, the High Court held that such lapses could not be treated as disqualifications when deciding the larger issue of custody. The court clarified that the welfare of the child must remain central, and should not be overshadowed by procedural defaults or used as punitive measures against either parent. The court also took a dim view of the manner in which the family court had conducted the proceedings. The appellant-mother, who was the primary caregiver, was not afforded an adequate opportunity to present her case, and the decision was largely driven by a mechanical application of religious customs rather than a holistic evaluation of the child's needs. Moreover, the father was unable to produce concrete evidence of neglect or harm while the child was in the mother's custody. Referring to precedents such as Gaurav Nagpal v Sumedha Nagpal and Gayatri Bajaj v Jiten Bhalla, the court reiterated that custody disputes must not be settled solely on the basis of legal rights of parents under personal law but must take into account the child's mental, emotional, and developmental needs. Accordingly, the High Court set aside the family court's order and restored the custody of the child to the mother. It granted the father structured visitation rights, including a week during long school vacations and one day a month for supervised meetings. The court directed that all such visits be conducted in a manner that does not disturb the child's schooling, mental peace, or daily routine. Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from politics to crime and society. Stay informed with the latest India news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated! tags : Bombay High Court child custody muslim personal law view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Winnipeg Jets face crucial contract decision on Kyle Connor ahead of free agency
Photo Via Getty Images With one year left on his current deal, Kyle Connor's future with the Winnipeg Jets is coming into sharp focus. The high-scoring winger is expected to command a significant raise, and the Jets have a big decision to make. With over $10 million in cap space and key contracts expiring soon, Winnipeg must decide how far it's willing to go to keep one of its most consistent offensive weapons. Kyle Connor's next contract could exceed $12 million AAV as Winnipeg Jets weigh future Kyle Connor, who turns 29 in December, is entering the final year of his contract with a cap hit of just over $7.1 million. NHL insider Frank Seravalli estimates Connor's next deal could range between $11 million and $12 million AAV, making him one of the highest-paid wingers in the league. For Winnipeg, this is a defining moment, one that could shape the team's future for years. Connor is coming off a career-high 41-goal, 97-point season, further solidifying his status as a top-tier forward. Since his full-time NHL debut in 2017–18, he's been nearly automatic for 30+ goals and 30+ assists. Losing him would be a major blow to Winnipeg's scoring depth and playoff hopes. The Jets have managed their salary cap efficiently, with over $10.5 million in space and contracts like Gustav Nyquist ($3.25M) and Luke Schenn ($2.75M) set to expire after this season. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 20 Pieces of Clothing you should Ditch over 40 Learn More Undo That flexibility could go toward securing Connor's services long-term, if he's willing and if the Jets are ready to commit big money. Winnipeg Jets also navigating key contract challenges with Cole Perfetti and cap space While Connor is the priority, Winnipeg must also address the future of restricted free agent Cole Perfetti, who is expected to land a bridge deal. Balancing both contracts without compromising the roster will be tricky, especially if Connor demands north of $12 million annually. The challenge is further compounded by the Jets' history, like many Canadian teams, particularly in the west, they've struggled to retain marquee American players. Connor fits that mold, which makes this negotiation even more delicate. The Winnipeg Jets are at a crossroads. Kyle Connor is in his prime and remains a critical part of their offensive core. Whether the team is willing to meet his projected asking price will determine not just his future, but the trajectory of the franchise itself. FAQs 1. When was Kyle Connor drafted into the NHL? Kyle Connor was drafted 17th overall by the Winnipeg Jets in the 2015 NHL Draft. 2. What position does Kyle Connor play? Kyle Connor plays as a left winger for the Winnipeg Jets. Also Read: NHL trade rumors: Toronto Maple Leafs exploring trades involving Morgan Rielly, Brandon Carlo, and Nazem Kadri For real-time updates, scores, and highlights, follow our live coverage of the India vs England Test match here. Catch Rani Rampal's inspiring story on Game On, Episode 4. Watch Here!
