Web3 Promised Freedom—So Why Are We Still Trapped?
Swarm Foundation President and architect of Ethereum Swarm, a decentralized storage infrastructure for a self-sovereign digital society.
One morning in 2010, the future arrived not with a bang but a freeze. Wikileaks, the whistleblowing platform that, depending on whom you asked, either exposed war crimes or endangered national security, found itself financially paralyzed. No court order, no charges, not even a press release. Just a quiet blockade, as Visa, Mastercard and PayPal severed access to its donations. Without legal recourse, Wikileaks was silenced by infrastructure.
In the aftermath, something else stirred. Bitcoin, then a fringe idea, offered a glimpse of resistance: a currency that didn't need permission, couldn't be blocked and ran beyond the reach of gatekeepers. What began as an experiment soon evolved into a broader vision—an internet without chokepoints, where value and information could flow freely.
Over the next decade, a decentralized movement took shape, from blockchains and smart contracts to NFTs, DAOs and decentralized finance protocols. These weren't just new tools; they were a rejection of the surveillance capitalism that had come to define Web2.
As explored in earlier installments of this series, the internet's shift from open protocols to closed platforms eroded user autonomy and transformed individuals from creators into commodities, their data endlessly extracted, analyzed and monetized. Web3 promised to reverse that trajectory. But as decentralization gains momentum, a quieter question emerges: What if we've rebuilt the old architecture with the same dependencies?
For all its boldness, the Web3 stack still leans on the bones of its predecessor. Applications run on centralized APIs, wallets rely on cloud infrastructure, and network attacks can still compromise access to unstoppable applications. This piece further explores the unfinished business of decentralization—not just as a technical challenge but as a deeper reckoning with the foundations we've inherited and the future we hope to build.
The Unravelling Of A Privacy Utopia
On a rainy August morning in Amsterdam, a 29-year-old developer was led away in handcuffs. His alleged crime? Writing code. Not malware, just a tool called Tornado Cash, one of Ethereum's most used privacy protocols. Tornado allowed users to deposit crypto into a shared pool, and when they withdrew, the link between sender and recipient was cryptographically obscured.
A freelancer could keep earnings private. A whistleblower might shield a donation. Even Ethereum's founder, Vitalik Buterin, used it to donate to Ukraine, protecting recipients from retaliation. But on August 8, 2022, the U.S. Treasury sanctioned the protocol, alleging it laundered billions in stolen funds, including crypto tied to North Korea.
Just like that, the walls closed in.
Within hours, the infrastructure buckled.
Infura and Alchemy blocked access. Circle froze $75,000 in USDC. GitHub erased the code. MetaMask, which relies on Infura, returned errors to anyone trying to use Tornado. What had been built as unstoppable was suddenly inaccessible—not from a hack but from legal pressure.
The Infrastructure We Forgot To Decentralize
But Tornado wasn't a one-off—it revealed a deeper fragility. Web3 blockchains may be decentralized, but the systems around them often aren't. Access still depends on centralized internet protocols.
DNS, which maps domains to servers, is controlled by central authorities. BGP, which routes data between providers, can be hijacked. In July 2022, users of dApps on Polygon and Fantom were served phishing prompts via a DNS attack. The chain was untouched, but the interface was swapped. Weeks later, a BGP hijack hit Celer Bridge, rerouting users to a fake front end. Instantly, $235,000 vanished—not from smart contract flaws but from internet-level exploits. The chain didn't lie, but it couldn't protect what wasn't on-chain.
Applications face the same risks. Most users rely on wallets and dApps powered by cloud services like Infura, the default backend for MetaMask. In 2020, an Infura outage disrupted Ethereum. In 2022, a sanctions filter misfire caused MetaMask to block access in Venezuela. The decentralized stack failed at its centralized chokepoint.
The NFT That Became A Poop Emoji
Even NFTs, the poster child of digital permanence, are vulnerable to the same sleight of hand.
When Moxie Marlinspike, cryptographer and creator of Signal, minted an NFT in 2022, it came with a twist. On the NFT marketplace OpenSea, it showed one image; on Rarible, another; and in his wallet, it became a poop emoji.
The experiment exposed how NFT data storage isn't as decentralized as the philosophy suggests. Why? Most NFTs don't store content on-chain—they store pointers to the images as URLs. Web2 URLs resolve to a specific server, and since Moxie controlled the server, he could change the image at will.
The punchline? When OpenSea delisted the NFT, it vanished from Moxie's wallet, too, because wallets like MetaMask pull data from OpenSea's API. If OpenSea didn't list it, it effectively didn't exist.
As Moxie wrote: 'It doesn't functionally matter that my NFT is indelibly on the blockchain … the wallet is just using the OpenSea API.'
Decentralized storage networks exist to mitigate this problem by spreading files across many nodes. But unless data is truly replicated widely, availability still hinges on just a few custodians. Ownership may be decentralized, but visibility depends on centralized infrastructure.
Decentralizing The Full Stack
Web3 still runs on rails it doesn't control. DNS is attackable. Front ends sit on cloud servers. Wallets rely on APIs. RPCs become chokepoints. And when governments or attackers apply pressure, they fold.
To be fair, decentralization is hard. It's slow, expensive and still too technical. Many projects reach for shortcuts: a centralized server here, a hosted front end there. It works—until it doesn't.
Yet there's momentum. Across the ecosystem, developers, researchers and communities are working to rebuild foundations: rethinking storage, improving infrastructure, exploring new privacy approaches and serving front ends in a way that they cannot be tampered with or blinked off with a DNS edit or routing attack.
But we're not there yet. Web3 remains deeply entangled with Web2. Unless we peel it back layer by layer, from front end to routing to RPC, we're still building freedom on fragile ground. Decentralization isn't real until it touches every layer.
For now, Web3 is a dream under construction in search of solid ground.
Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
22 minutes ago
- CNN
‘Musk is right about this': Elizabeth Warren shocked to find agreement with Musk over megabill
CNN's Kaitlan Collins talks with Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) about finding surprising common cause with Elon Musk over their shared objections to President Trump's megabill.
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Mark Zuckerberg overhauled Meta's entire AI org in a risky, multi-billion dollar bet on ‘superintelligence'
Mark Zuckerberg is stacking the deck in the AI race, betting that unlimited capital, top talent, and raw computing power will ensure victory. If the winning hand Zuckerberg is chasing—AI 'superintelligence'— is still very much a vague and theoretical concept, the Meta CEO's remarkable series of moves unveiled Monday instantly changed the reality for everyone else in the game, particularly the pioneering AI startups without Meta's resources. Zuckerberg announced a major revamp of its AI operations on Monday, putting the company's collection of AI businesses and projects under the umbrella of a newly created organization called Meta Superintelligence Labs, or MSL, and appointing Alexandr Wang, the former CEO of data-labeling startup Scale AI, as Meta's first ever Chief AI Officer. 'As the pace of AI progress accelerates, developing superintelligence is coming into sight,' Zuckerberg wrote in an internal memo obtained by Fortune. 'I believe this will be the beginning of a new era for humanity, and I am fully committed to doing what it takes for Meta to lead the way.' He added that the details he would share were about building towards a company vision of 'personal superintelligence for everyone.' The new superintelligence lab, Zuckerberg wrote, 'includes all of our foundations, product, and FAIR teams, as well as a new lab focused on developing the next generation of our models.' He also confirmed that former GitHub CEO and investor Nat Friedman has also joined Meta to partner with Wang to lead MSL, heading Meta's work on AI products and applied research. 'Nat has served on our Meta Advisory Group for the last year, so he already has a good sense of our roadmap and what we need to do,' Zuckerberg wrote. Fortune reported last week that Friedman is also connected with Wang and Scale – he is a longtime and active Scale investor and co-hosted the secretive Scale AI Security Summit in Utah in November 2023. Meta has embarked on an extraordinary hiring spree in recent weeks, bringing Wang on board as part of a $14.3 billion deal with Scale, and recruiting top researchers from OpenAI with rumored $100 million compensation offers. In Zuckerberg's internal memo on Monday, he named eleven top researchers who had joined Meta from OpenAI, Anthropic and Google. For OpenAI, which kicked off the generative AI craze with the release of ChatGPT in late 2022, Meta's aggressive hiring spree represents a critical threat. OpenAI's chief research officer Mark Chen described the situation as feeling like someone 'breaking into our home,' calling the talent loss 'theft.' OpenAI said it had begun recalibrating compensation and crafting 'creative' retention packages to stay competitive. While OpenAI has a longstanding partnership with Microsoft, which has invested more than $13 billion in OpenAI, the relationship between the two companies has reportedly grown strained over the past year. As Meta increasingly seeks to move into OpenAI's territory however, the Sam Altman led startup may need to find allies with deep pockets. OpenAI recently began using AI chips made by Google, according to media reports, signaling a growing bond between the two companies, even though Google's Gemini LLMs compete directly with OpenAI. With an internet advertising business that generates more than $40 billion every quarter, Meta can afford to bankroll a no-holds-barred AI batter even it doesn't immediately deliver a profit. Still, Meta's latest moves carry plenty of risks. In making Wang chief AI officer, Meta has chosen someone who is not a computer scientist to lead all of its AI efforts—a choice that may not go over well with Meta's deep bench of AI scientists and PhDs, many of whom have already decamped. Zuckerberg noted in his memo that he and Wang had worked together for several years and said 'I consider him to be the most impressive founder of his generation.' There is also no agreed-upon formal definition of 'superintelligence,' though it is typically refers to an intelligence that vastly surpasses human capabilities in virtually all domains, including scientific creativity, general wisdom, and social skills—exceeding human cognition across the board. Superintelligence is generally perceived as going beyond artificial general intelligence, or AGI, which, though also vague, typically refers to an AI system with human-level intelligence across a wide range of work-related tasks. That is, it can reason, plan, solve problems, understand language, and learn in a generalizable way, much like a human. Zuckerberg claimed that Meta is 'uniquely positioned to deliver superintelligence to the world,' pointing to its efforts to build out data centers supporting more computing power than smaller labs – it is currently spending tens of billions on data centers and is raising more. The Financial Times reported last week that Meta is seeking $29 billion from private capital firms for its all-in push to build AI data centers. Of course, Microsoft and Google are also spending tens of billions of dollars in cap ex to build out their AI infrastructure. And OpenAI has said it intends to invest $500 billion with partners including Softbank in the coming years to build out its Stargate network of AI datacenters. If the race to Superintelligence is a test of wills and capital, Zuckerberg seems to be betting that he can outlast the competition. This story was originally featured on
New York Times
26 minutes ago
- New York Times
NBA free agency 2025 tracker, live updates: Latest deals, news, reaction and more as negotiating window opens
The Hawks' Dejounte Murray trade with New Orleans keeps on paying dividends. Not only did Atlanta obtain the pick that went to the Celtics for Kristaps Porziņģis and defensive stopper Dyson Daniels, but also the $25 million trade exception that deal generated now has been used to acquire Nickeil Alexander-Walker from the Minnesota Timberwolves. Atlanta will still have several million of that exception left over, as well as its full $14.1 million nontaxpayer midlevel exception and a $13 million exception from the Bogdan Bogdanović trade. But as a practical consequence, a hugely productive offseason in Atlanta is now down to smaller moves. Atlanta sent only a second-round pick to Minnesota in the sign-and-trade to assure it topped every other team on the market, ultimately going a shade over the nontaxpayer midlevel exception to get Alexander-Walker. The Hawks still have roughly $13 million remaining below the tax line with at least two more roster spots to fill, and seem likely to target another guard based on current needs. For its trouble, Minnesota will receive a trade exception for roughly $14.4 million. The Wolves are hugely unlikely to use it this season because they're way over the first apron, but it's a possibility for next summer.
