
Operation Spider's Web: Did Ukraine destroy two Russian A-50 surveillance planes?
People are still debating the extent of the damages caused by the surprise Ukrainian drone attack on four Russian air bases on June 1. Kyiv said that the attack, dubbed Operation Spider's Web, resulted in the destruction of 41 Russian aircraft. US officials told Reuters that they estimated that around 20 planes had been hit.
On social media, people have debated not just the number of planes destroyed, but also the type. Aside from a number of nuclear-capable bombers, some have claimed that the Ukrainian strikes also hit other high-value targets, namely two Beriev A-50 planes that were at Ivanovo airbase, located 250 kilometres from Moscow. These A-50s, the Russian equivalent of the American AWAC surveillance planes, are used for detecting aerial targets and for command.
With its radar dome, the A-50 can surveil and co-ordinate the movements of both friendly and enemy aircraft, as well as missiles. Their limited number makes these aircraft even more precious to the Russian army. Currently, there are only seven operational A-50s in the Russian Air Force, according to specialist site TWZ.com.
Supporters of the Kremlin on social media have tried to deny the reports of the destruction of these precious aircraft. Lord Bebo, a Russian influencer who regularly shares disinformation from the Kremlin, took to X on June 3 to say that the news was a 'lie' and that these aircraft weren't damaged. To support his statements, the influencer shared a satellite image showing two intact planes.
However, the image shared by Lord Bebo is misleading. It was taken at Ivanovo air base, and it does show A-50 planes. However, it has nothing to do with the raid on June 1.
We ran this image through a reverse image search (check out our handy guide here) and we discovered that this image was originally published on the American website Business Insider. The photo was taken by the satellite image company Maxar on May 3, 2025, nearly a month before the Ukrainian attack.
On June 4, the Ukrainian security services, the SBU, published a video from a camera that was mounted on one of the drones that attacked on June 1. The video proves that A-50s were indeed hit by Ukraine. At 1'31, you can see two drones hit the radar domes of the planes.
Out-of-service aircraft
However, even if these attacks on the A-50 planes were confirmed, they were possibly not as serious as you might think. If you look closely at the aircraft in the video, then you can see that they seem to be missing some or all of their D-30KP reactors – which means they would not be able to fly.
According to Benjamin Gravisse, a specialist in the Russian armed forces and the person behind the Red Samovar account on X, Ivanovo received about twenty A-50 planes in 1998 that were supposed to essentially serve as 'organ donors", meaning that they would be used for parts for other planes. The planes hit by the drones have a red star on them, which indicates that they are a vestige of the Soviet era and have likely not flown for the past "10 to 15 years", according to the expert on X.
Moreover, as the video released by the SBU cuts off at the moment of drone impact, it isn't possible to know if the planes were destroyed by the strikes or if they were just damaged.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Euronews
4 hours ago
- Euronews
Zelenskyy awards Order of Freedom to Polish President Andrzej Duda
President Duda arrived in Kyiv on Saturday morning for an unannounced visit, the Polish President's Office said on social media. Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andriy Sibiha said the programme of the visit would include a meeting with Zelenskyy and participating in Ukraine's Constitution Day celebrations. "President Duda stood by Ukraine's side in the most difficult times of Russia's full-scale aggression," Ukraine's Minister of Foreign Affairs Andrii Sybiha wrote in a post on Platform X. Sybiha praised Duda as a "true friend of Ukraine". "We are grateful to him and all Poles who have shown true solidarity with Ukraine," he added. The Office of the President of the Republic of Poland also said that President Duda attended the celebration of Ukraine's Constitution Day as the Guest of Honour. During the ceremony, President Duda was honoured with the highest Ukrainian decoration a citizen of a foreign country can receive, the Order of Freedom. According to a decree published on the website of the Office of the President of Ukraine, Duda received this decoration "for outstanding personal merits in strengthening Ukrainian-Polish international cooperation" and "supporting the state sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine." The Polish Interior Ministry also extended its wishes on the occasion of Ukraine's Constitution Day in a message published on X. "We express solidarity with Ukraine, especially in view of its heroic struggle for freedom and independence. We hope that the democratic values, which are the foundation of Ukraine's constitution, can be restored as soon as possible in the currently occupied Ukrainian lands," the ministry wrote. This is the Polish president's farewell visit to Kyiv ahead of the end of his term in August. President Duda, along with the presidents of the Baltic states (Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia), visited Ukraine on the eve of the invasion in 2022, and again last August, when he took part in the celebrations for the 33rd anniversary of Ukraine's independence. In August, Duda will complete his second term as president of Poland. President-elect Karol Nawrocki has stated that he remains committed to helping Ukraine's defence efforts, but opposes Kyiv joining Western alliances such as NATO.

LeMonde
7 hours ago
- LeMonde
Supreme Court boosts Trump over federal judges, raising fears of an unchecked presidency
On June 27, the conservative justices of the US Supreme Court handed Donald Trump a political victory, which he loudly celebrated. By restricting federal judges' power to suspend executive orders, the Supreme Court chose to rule against the broader judiciary, of which it is the highest authority. This judicial deference follows that of Congress, where Republican majorities in both the Senate and the House of Representatives had already relinquished much of their authority in the face of Trump. It is hardly debatable that universal injunctions, which allow a single federal judge to block a presidential order, have always been seen as excessive by the party occupying the White House. The six conservative justices – who in their ruling denounced what they considered an abuse of power, over the objections of the three progressive justices – found nothing to object to when these injunctions targeted orders signed by Democrat Joe Biden between 2021 to 2025. This clear bias is compounded by the context. The Supreme Court had been asked to review the legality of an order abolishing jus soli – the right to citizenship by birthplace – which clearly violates the 14 th Amendment of the Constitution. Rather than ruling on substance, which would have been uncomfortable for the Trump administration, the Court chose to focus on procedure. While it maintained a path for legal challenges by ruling that such an order cannot take immediate effect, allowing for class action suits, this evasive tactic, in addition to the chaos it could create depending on the political leanings of each state, risks further damaging an already tarnished reputation. A trampled past Even before the July 1, 2024, decision granting Trump broad immunity for actions taken during his first term, the conservative majority had consistently worked to strengthen executive power. The new leeway given to the Republican president to dismiss federal agency heads without just cause – except for the Federal Reserve – confirmed this intent. It is troubling that this effort to roll back the American system of checks and balances, especially those added to the US institutional framework following the excesses of Republican President Richard Nixon, coincides with Trump's return to power. From his baseless and outrageous challenge of the 2020 presidential election results to the astonishing hoarding of classified documents at his private residence after his ignominious departure from office, Trump has amply demonstrated his disregard for norms and the law. , the decree overturning jus soli, introduced into the US Constitution in 1868, provided fresh evidence of this contempt. It is, unfortunately, likely that this increase in presidential power will outlast the next change of administration. As long as Congress remains paralyzed by division, it is unlikely that a Democratic president would willingly give up these expanded powers. It is therefore regrettable that a political movement that champions a return to "American greatness" should so trample its own institutional heritage. The US has nothing to gain from this.


Sustainability Times
8 hours ago
- Sustainability Times
'$14 Billion Wiped Out': Massive Wave of Hydrogen, Battery, and Solar Projects Cancelled or Delayed Across the U.S. in Energy Collapse
IN A NUTSHELL 💡 Over $14 billion in green energy projects have been canceled or postponed in the U.S. due to political uncertainties. in green energy projects have been canceled or postponed in the U.S. due to political uncertainties. 🔧 The cancellations have resulted in the loss of 10,000 potential jobs in the renewable energy sector. in the renewable energy sector. 🏛️ Proposed tax reforms by Republicans threaten the tax credits established by the Inflation Reduction Act . . 🌍 Republican-led states, despite benefiting from clean energy, are the most affected, jeopardizing both economic growth and environmental goals. The green energy sector in the United States is facing unexpected challenges, with over $14 billion in projects either canceled or postponed this year alone. Political uncertainty, largely influenced by proposed tax reforms, is the primary culprit. Ironically, many of the states most affected are Republican-led, which have historically benefited from advancements in renewable energy. This situation highlights the complex interplay between politics and the burgeoning clean energy industry, creating a ripple effect that impacts employment and economic growth across the nation. Visible Impact on Employment According to recent analyses, the cancellation of green energy projects has resulted in the loss of 10,000 potential jobs in the renewable sector. These jobs were tied to crucial technologies such as solar, wind, battery storage, and hydrogen energy. For instance, the Kore Power battery plant in Arizona and two electric vehicle production sites by BorgWarner in Michigan have been halted. Additionally, Bosch has put a significant investment of $200 million on hold for a hydrogen fuel cell plant in South Carolina. These projects were not just about job creation; they were integral to advancing sustainable technologies. The pause on these initiatives underscores the importance of tax credits provided by the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). This legislation, passed under the Biden Administration, was designed to support emerging green technologies. However, proposed changes in tax policy threaten to dismantle these incentives, making the future uncertain for many planned and ongoing projects. 'Crazy French Invention Turns Waves Into Power': Breakwaters Now Generate Clean Energy Nonstop With This Shocking Coastal Technology Republican States Face Greater Impact Ironically, Republican-led states and districts are bearing the brunt of these cancellations. More than $12 billion in projects have been affected in these areas, which have seen substantial growth in renewable energy. Over the years, states like Georgia and Tennessee have invested heavily in the battery and electric vehicle supply chains. These investments have not only boosted employment but have also positioned these states as leaders in the clean energy transition. Yet, the proposed fiscal reforms threaten to halt progress, potentially reversing years of growth and investment. The consequences extend beyond economic setbacks; they could undermine efforts to combat climate change, as these states are pivotal in the national strategy to reduce carbon emissions. The risk of job losses and stalled technological advancements looms large, with potential ripple effects across the broader economy. 'From Black Dust to Bright Power': These Abandoned Coal Mines Are Now Massive 300 GW Solar Energy Giants Changing the Game Forever The Role of Political Uncertainty The central issue behind these project cancellations is the proposed tax reform by Republicans in the House of Representatives. This reform aims to dismantle significant portions of the tax credits established by the Inflation Reduction Act. These credits are vital for sustaining investment in clean technologies. Without them, many companies are reconsidering their commitment to the U.S. market, leading to a re-evaluation of planned projects. Political uncertainty not only deters investment but also creates a volatile environment for innovation. Companies are less likely to invest in long-term projects if there is a risk that supportive policies could be revoked. This unpredictability may discourage future investments and collaborations, crucial for advancing the country's renewable energy goals. 'America's First Nuclear Reactor in 50 Years': This Ultra-Compact Power Source Will Deliver Electricity Where No Grid Can Reach The Future of Clean Energy Initiatives The current situation raises critical questions about the future of clean energy in the United States. While the potential of renewable energy remains vast, the political climate poses significant challenges. The need for bipartisan support in fostering a stable and conducive environment for green investments is more urgent than ever. As we move forward, it is crucial to consider how policy decisions impact not only the economy but also the environment and society at large. The stakes are high, and the decisions made today will shape the country's energy landscape for years to come. Will the U.S. manage to overcome these political hurdles and continue its path toward a sustainable future? Our author used artificial intelligence to enhance this article. Did you like it? 4.4/5 (26)