Is world order in the middle of a tectonic shift?
Till the other day Musk was considered a staunch ally of US president Donald Trump. He was made the head of the now infamous Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). He ruthlessly chucked out many from their jobs citing the need to pare government expenses. His axe also fell on a host of schemes and departments that were considered foundations of the US democracy. Musk wanted the government to be run like a corporate entity. But then, he had run-ins with vice president J. D. Vance and other influential people, which ended in his unceremonious removal from DOGE.
Since then, Trump and Musk have been publicly threatening each other. Musk alleged Trump was named in the Epstein sex case files in a post on X, the short-messaging platform he owns. Later, he deleted the post, but not before an enraged Trump got back at his former ally by threatening to deport him.
Also read | A new 'terror pot' that may be kept boiling for now
Being a beneficiary of government subsidies and doles, Musk knows his ambitions can be fulfilled only by being on the right side of the government. This is why he has launched his political party. Musk feels US citizens are tired of the system and yearn for a new dawn. But the question is, will he succeed? Especially at a time when 'Democrat Socialist" Mamdani is gaining ground in New York.
Mamdani has garnered political support at a pace akin to which Musk amassed wealth. He has won the primaries for the New York mayoral elections and will create history if he wins in November. He would be the first Muslim mayor of New York.
Mamdani, son of celebrated Indian film-maker Mira Nair, became a US citizen in 2018 and married a Syrian Muslim. His father is a Gujarati left-wing intellectual based in Uganda.
Mamdani's views and principles set him apart from his peers. At times, he becomes so aggressive that even his colleagues fear his approach may be extreme. But Mamdani isn't bothered.
Also read | Testimony to the enduring spirit of Indian democracy
During his campaign, Mamdani connected with New York's large immigrant population. He promised free bus rides, and told people he would freeze metro fares the moment he won elections. He promised construction of low-cost housing blocks, fixing rents for residential properties, and the creation of free childcare centres throughout the city. He wants to rein in the state-sponsored grocery shop owners' cartel.
According to estimates, the average New Yorker's expenditure on groceries and essential items has risen by 50% over the past decade to now stand at 10–12% of their total income.
Mamdani also proposes to levy higher taxes on the rich.
India has seen this brand of politics for decades, but, we are also the ones who have exemplified limitations to such politics.
In contrast to India, communist countries such as China and Vietnam have created economic models which give equal opportunity to work with state-sponsored enterprises or pursue private entrepreneurship. Is it due to their success that 70% of the people polled last year in the US showed them gravitating towards the communist model?
Also read | Firm and focused leadership keeps India on course
It is in such a situation that a triangular tussle between Musk, Mamdani and the established political order promises to create history. People who understand the US system know that the country became great as people from varied backgrounds and ideologies had the same opportunity to live and thrive in harmony. With the rise of the right wing, it seemed that this space was shrinking. But Mamdani's rise and civil society's rear-guard actions have once again brought the US to a point where it's still considered a democratic ideal despite being an imperial power.
Today, China and the Global South are challenging US domination. The world order set by the US and the western European nations at the end of World War II has started withering.
This is the reason scholars are talking of a tectonic shift in the systems laid down by the West-backed capitalism and US imperialism. Increasing geopolitical constraints are heightening such apprehensions.
Have we unwittingly reached a crossroads that's leading to a systemic change?
Shashi Shekhar is editor-in-chief, Hindustan. Views are personal.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
33 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Partners Group to acquire majority stake in Infinity Fincorp for Rs 1,950 crore
ETtech Shrikant Ravalkar, Founder, MD & CEO Infinity. Swiss private equity firm Partners Group will acquire a majority stake in Infinity Fincorp Solutions, a Mumbai-based non-bank lender focused on MSMEs, through an investment of Rs 1,950 crore (around $230 million), the companies said on deal, which includes participation from existing shareholder Jungle Ventures, comprises a primary infusion of Rs 600 crore ($70 million) and a secondary purchase of shares from Indium IV (Mauritius) Holdings and other shareholders. ET first reported on the potential transaction on June 20. 'Infinity Fincorp Solutions, a leading non-bank lender in India, has entered into a share purchase and subscription agreement with Partners Group, whereby Partners Group will acquire a significant majority stake in the company,' said the joint statement issued by the two companies on Fincorp plans to use the fresh capital to expand its branch network, invest in technology, and improve customer onboarding and experience. The investment is subject to regulatory approvals. 'We are dedicated to empowering entrepreneurs and business owners across Tier 3 towns in India through flexible, need-based lending solutions that are designed to create a long-term impact,' said Shrikant Ravalkar, founder, managing director and CEO of Infinity Fincorp. 'We welcome Partners Group and intend on leveraging their operational expertise to further broad base our mission of serving the Indian MSME sector.' Founded in 2017, Infinity Fincorp provides secured loans to micro, small, and medium enterprises, primarily in tier II and tier III cities. The company has more than Rs 1,200 crore ($140 million) in assets under management, around 50,000 customers, and operates over 120 branches across eight states. Its customer base spans sectors such as agriculture, manufacturing, and trading. "The MSME segment contributes a significant share of national GDP, and we expect demand for credit will continue to rise. We believe non-bank lenders such as Infinity have advantages in catering to these enterprises due to their highly specialised operations, which are better suited to providing customised solutions,' said Vageesh Gupta, managing director, private equity, Partners to Tracxn, Infinity Fincorp posted a net profit of Rs 25.72 crore in FY24, on revenue of Rs 143.7 latest funding comes after Infinity Fincorp raised $40 million in an extended Series A round in April that was led by Beams Fintech Fund, with participation from True North, Jungle Ventures, and Archerman Capital. In January, the company had raised $35 million from Jungle Ventures, Archerman Capital, and Magnifico. Partners Group, which manages over $150 billion in assets globally, has previously invested in Indian companies such as Darwinbox, Ecom Express, and Vishal Mega Mart. In April, the firm exited Ecom Express by selling its stake to Delhivery in an all-cash deal worth Rs 1,407 crore, alongside co-investors Warburg Pincus and British International Investment. The firm has deployed $2.5 billion in India to date. Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. Markets need to see more than profits from Oyo Can Grasim's anti-competition charge against Asian Paints stand amid intense war Engine fuel switches or something else? One month on, still no word on what crashed AI 171 Delhivery survived the Meesho curveball. Can it keep on delivering profits? Stock Radar: Page Industries breaks out from Cup & Handle formation; stock hits fresh 52-week high For risk-takers with ability to stay invested for the long term: 5 small-caps from different sectors with upside potential of 5 to 32% Multibagger or IBC - Part 14: This auto ancillary with double-digit net margins is now getting EV-focused These mid-cap stocks with 'Strong Buy' & 'Buy' recos can rally over 25%, according to analysts
India Today
33 minutes ago
- India Today
Dubai dreams under scanner as ED questions homebuyers: Report
The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has started questioning several Indian residents who purchased homes in Dubai, asking them to explain the source of funds used for the property deals, reported The Economic Times (ET). Many of these individuals are now under scrutiny as they failed to provide proper bank transaction records showing how the payments were move follows notices issued last year by the Income Tax (I-T) department. The ED, which is now acting on information shared by the tax office, is investigating possible violations under the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) and the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).Sources told ET that most of the recent ED summons were issued to residents in northern THE LAW WORKSUnder Indian rules, any remittance for buying overseas property, investing in shares or making fixed deposits abroad must be done through authorised banking is covered under the Reserve Bank of India's Liberalised Remittance Scheme (LRS), which allows individuals to send up to $250,000 abroad in a financial year after proper many of the questioned transactions did not follow this route. The ED is said to be looking into deals where payments were made using cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin or Ethereum, or through high-limit credit cards issued USED TO BUY DUBAI PROPERTYAnup P. Shah, a partner at tax and legal advisory firm PPS & Co., told ET that there are cases where Indian residents sent cryptocurrency directly from their digital wallets to the wallets of real estate developers in Dubai. 'This violates FEMA regulations,' he said, adding that such cross-border deals bypass authorised dealer banks and fall outside LRS some cases, buyers moved cryptos purchased overseas to settle payments. While these digital assets may have been bought with tax-paid money, moving them via blockchain to buy property abroad, without routing through a bank, can still be considered a violation of Indian exchange control reasons behind such methods vary. Some used crypto to avoid hefty currency conversion fees or India's crypto taxes. Others wanted to preserve their LRS limit or had earlier bought crypto through foreign platforms, which is generally not allowed under Indian TROUBLE LOOMSMany of these individuals did not declare the properties in their income tax returns. Most assumed that the Indian authorities would not find out about physical assets like homes, as countries typically exchange information about bank accounts and financial securities, not real ET reported that Indian officials may have independently gathered the Dubai property data from local sources, possibly with help from another data has now put several people at risk of action under the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act. If they fail to provide proof of legal fund transfers, they could face a tax demand and penalties of up to 120% of the property those who used illegal means, like the hawala network, to send money abroad, the ED may pursue cases under PMLA, treating the properties as proceeds of crime. Once that happens, the assets can be attached or confiscated, and there is no option to settle the matter by paying a fine.'A probe under PMLA will come into play if the I-T department establishes a violation under the Black Money Act, which is a scheduled offence,' an official said as quoted in the ACCEPTED DIGITAL COINSDubai developers have long accepted cryptocurrencies for property purchases. Harshal Bhuta, partner at the CA firm P. R. Bhuta & Co, explained that developers there regularly accept popular cryptos like Bitcoin and Ethereum.'Indian buyers may prefer crypto for the speed and lower fees. These transactions do follow some checks under the anti-money laundering and KYC rules in the UAE. But what is legal under Dubai law isn't automatically allowed under FEMA,' Bhuta warned that depending on the way the payment was structured, the buyer could end up violating several Indian rules, including the breach of LRS limits and use of unapproved cross-border payment modes. As investigations deepen, what was once seen as a convenient way to own a piece of luxury abroad may turn into a legal headache for many.- Ends advertisement
The Print
41 minutes ago
- The Print
SC says ECI's roll revision drive mandated in Constitution, but questions timing
A bench of Justices Sudhanshu Dhulia and Joymalya Bagchi questioned Dwivedi over the exclusion of Aadhaar card in the SIR drive in Bihar and said the ECI had nothing to do with citizenship of a person and it was the Ministry of Home Affairs' domain. The ECI also justified the exercise and said Aadhaar wasn't a 'proof of citizenship'. New Delhi, Jul 10 (PTI) The Supreme Court on Thursday questioned the Election Commission of India on the timing of the Special Intensive Revision drive in poll-bound Bihar saying it went to the 'root of democracy and power to vote' while rejecting the argument that the poll panel did not have any power to carry it out. Dwivedi responded while referring to Article 326 of the Constitution and said every voter has to be an Indian citizen and 'Aadhaar card is not proof of citizenship'. Justice Dhulia said, 'If you are to check citizenship under SIR of electoral rolls in Bihar, then you should have acted early; it is a bit late.' The bench, in the meantime, rejected the submission of the petitioners' counsel that the ECI did not have power to conduct any such exercise in Bihar for it was mandated under the Constitution and the last such exercise happened in 2003. While referring to the petitioners' contentions, the bench said the ECI had to answer three questions as the SIR exercise in Bihar went to 'root of democracy and power to vote'. The questions of the petitioners, including political parties and their leaders aside from civil society members and organisations, deal with the ECI's power to conduct such an exercise and its timing. Dwivedi said with passage of time, electoral rolls need to be revised to look into inclusion or exclusion of voter names with the SIR being the one exercise to do it. He asked if the ECI did not have the power to revise the electoral roll then who did. The poll panel, however, assured the top court of not leaving out anyone from the voter list without an opportunity to be heard. Earlier in the day, the top court commenced hearing on a batch of pleas challenging the Election Commission's decision to undertake a special intensive revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in poll-bound Bihar. Senior advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan, appearing for one of the petitioners, said the revision of electoral rolls can be permitted under the Representation of People Act. The entire SIR will cover around 7.9 crore citizens, he said, and even the voter ID and Aadhaar cards are not being considered. Over 10 petitions have been filed in the SC, including one by NGO 'Association for Democratic Reforms', the lead petitioner. RJD MP Manoj Jha and Trinamool Congress MP Mahua Moitra, Congress' K C Venugopal, NCP (SP) leader Supriya Sule, CPI leader D Raja, Samajwadi Party's Harinder Singh Malik, Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Arvind Sawant, JMM's Sarfraz Ahmed and Dipankar Bhattacharya of CPI (ML) have also moved the top court, seeking direction for quashing the EC order. PTI MNL SJK MNL AMK AMK AMK This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.
