USDA pauses request for personal data of SNAP recipients while lawsuit proceeds
TOPEKA — The Trump administration has paused its demand for the personal data of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program recipients after a lawsuit was filed May 22 by national advocacy organizations.
Kansas Department for Children and Families officials received a letter from the U.S. Department of Agriculture in early May demanding personal information about SNAP recipients in the state. DCF refused to send the data, stating, 'At this time, we are unsure as to the reason for the USDA's request.'
A motion for a temporary restraining order was filed May 27 by counsel for the National Center for Law and Economic Justice, the National Student Legal Defense Network, Protect Democracy Project, the Electronic Privacy Information Center and MAZON: A Jewish Response to Hunger. The same group also filed the lawsuit challenging USDA's access to the protected information, a news release said.
In a sworn declaration, USDA official Shiela Corley said the agency has not collected SNAP recipient data after telling the third-party vendors that maintain the data to hold off on submitting it, the news release said.
'USDA has instructed EBT Processors to refrain from sending any data until USDA completed procedural steps to ensure that data received would be appropriately safeguarded and to satisfy all necessary legal requirements,' her testimony said. 'In accordance with USDA's instruction, EBT Processors have not sent any data to USDA in response to the May 6 letter. Before any of the data described in the May 6 Letter is provided to USDA, USDA intends to publish a new SORN (System of Records Notice) in compliance with the Privacy Act.'
Although Corley's declaration caused the advocacy organizations to drop the motion for the restraining order, the lawsuit will continue, the press release said.
'This is a victory for tens of millions of SNAP recipients and anyone who cares about protecting our personal data against government abuse,' John Davisson, an EPIC official, said in the release. 'Although this fight is just beginning, we're grateful that the USDA acknowledged its legal obligation to safeguard privacy and remain accountable to the public.'
Abby J. Leibman, president and CEO of MAZON, said in the news release that the USDA must consider how its actions affect those facing hunger in the United States.
'The laws and processes protecting privacy exist for vital reasons. Americans are clear that everyone has a high expectation of privacy regarding their personal information — and SNAP applicants do not cede that expectation in exchange for receiving vital support to meet their basic needs,' she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
6 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump wants you to forget the Epstein files. But he started the conversation.
After years of brushing aside evidence surrounding Jeffrey Epstein, namely his connections to the Clinton family, Democrats can now press their advantage and question Trump about his own connection. To the dismay of President Donald Trump, people are still talking about Jeffrey Epstein, and a big reason for that is his adamant denial that there is anything worth finding out about the pedophilic trafficker who was once his friend. The Epstein conspiracy was a key promise from Trump and many of his allies on the campaign trail. The conspiracy right has always been a crowd Trump wanted to appeal to, whether it be through this or the promise that he would release all of the JFK files. Making promises you can't keep to a crowd as volatile as conspiracy theorists is ill-advised, and the Trump administration is feeling the effects of that now. They created this mess by playing with fire, and I have no sympathy for those getting burned as a result. Trump built a conservative coalition. Epstein may shatter it. | Opinion The Trump administration has to deal with a problem it created As a conservative, I have never really been one to obsess over the Epstein conspiracy theory, but it is odd even to me how distraught Trump is over the fact that people are asking questions about Epstein and his connections to him. There is a political answer for his actions: Trump is tired of people demanding answers that don't actually exist. Never did. Remember, Trump made the release of the Epstein files a deliberate promise on the campaign trail. However, Pam Bondi, now the attorney general, Kash Patel, now the FBI director, and Dan Bongino, now the deputy FBI director, all made significant claims surrounding the Epstein files in the wake of their executive appointments. Bondi also made a whole show of releasing binders of information on the Epstein case, which mostly turned out to contain nothing of significant interest, and certainly not the juicy details or a magical client list. Bondi had claimed the list was sitting on her desk during an interview, but has since walked back that claim. All of this appealed to the far right, which loves a good conspiracy theory, particularly one that implicates the Clinton family. Conveniently, until the events of the past week or so, Trump's connections to Epstein were mostly ignored. Your Turn: I believe Trump has access to an Epstein client list. But it no longer helps him. | Opinion Forum Grand promises from Trump and members of his administration have let down those conspiracists who actually believed them. The result is that many now suspect those who made false promises must somehow be in on the cover-up, rather than the likely explanation that they simply promised information that does not exist. The Epstein case is the perfect conspiracy theory The Epstein case is the perfect conspiracy theory because it can be appropriated by both sides of the political aisle to implicate their own political opponents. After years of brushing aside the evidence surrounding the Epstein conspiracy, namely connections to the Clinton family, Democrats can now press their advantage and question Trump about his own connections. Both political parties can implicate their opponents in the Epstein scandal due to how well-connected the billionaire pedophile was. So long as no such list ever materializes, people of all political walks of life can claim that whoever they want to be implicated in the Epstein case are, in fact, implicated. These people conveniently ignore the fact that any such list remaining buried would have had to make it through both the Biden administration and the Trump administration. So the theory of these conspiracists is that a bipartisan cabal of powerful people, who haven't shown any desire to work together for decades, are working together to hide a magical list of possible pedophiles that implicates all of the right people. Odds are, the evidence out there surrounding the Epstein case is, more or less, the real story. But don't expect that to stop conspiracists from using the prospect of more unsealed evidence as ammunition for their claims. And don't expect Trump or MAGA to let up anytime soon. Dace Potas is an opinion columnist for USA TODAY and a graduate of DePaul University with a degree in political science.
USA Today
36 minutes ago
- USA Today
Donald Trump's Jan. 6 pardons cast a long shadow over justice six months later
President Donald Trump has done more than pardon J6 rioters. He's also targeting the FBI investigators as he weaponized the Department of Justice. On this, the six-month anniversary of President Donald Trump's sweeping pardons for more than 1,500 people accused or convicted of invading and ransacking the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, let's check in on some of the people arrested for that riot and how the president's team is rewriting history to make the FBI and Department of Justice the bad guys. People Trump pardoned for Jan. 6 crimes have since been arrested for soliciting a minor for sex, for commercial burglary and for home invasion. And the FBI agents and federal prosecutors who worked on those Jan. 6 cases have been demonized by Trump as his administration ends their careers for the offense of doing their jobs. One J6er tried to use Trump's pardon to beat child porn charges Kyle Travis Colton, a California man arrested and accused in December 2023 for using a flagpole to assault a police officer at the Capitol on Jan. 6, pleaded guilty in October 2024. Trump pardoned him three and a half months later. But Colton had more trouble with the law. An FBI search when he was arrested found Colton's computer held "copious images and videos depicting graphic sexual abuse of young children." Colton's attorney argued that Trump's pardon applied to his child porn, too, because it was discovered as part of the Jan. 6 investigation. A federal judge didn't buy that, and a jury in California convicted Colton on July 15. He faces a mandatory minimum of five years in prison when sentenced on Oct. 27. Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, a good government nonprofit known as CREW, tracks pardoned insurrectionists accused of other crimes before or after the Jan. 6 riot. Matthew Huttle, an Indiana man sentenced to six months in prison for crimes he committed on Jan. 6, pulled a gun and struggled with a sheriff's deputy during a traffic stop six days after Trump pardoned him. The deputy shot and killed him. Edward Kelley of Tennessee was convicted in November 2024 for assaulting police officers at the Capitol on Jan. 6. Trump pardoned him before he was sentenced. But Kelley was also convicted in November 2024 on charges that he conspired to kill the FBI agents who investigated him. His lawyers had argued that Trump's pardon should also apply to the murder plot. He was sentenced to life in prison earlier this month. What's the messaging on election results going forward? Noah Bookbinder, CREW's president, told me he expects more people pardoned for Jan. 6 crimes will be re-arrested. And he worries that federal investigators and prosecutors now know they face retaliation if their work runs counter to what Trump wants. "These are people who showed their lawlessness and who feel empowered," Bookbinder said. "And so there's a very specific danger there, on the flip side of that, at the Department of Justice, that attorneys who work at the department and agents who work at the FBI feel very uncertain in their roles, uncertain that they can do their jobs without facing consequences if the president and the administration see anything that these Justice Department personnel do as adverse to their interests." The Jan. 6 insurrection was a failed bid to overturn the free and fair 2020 election, egged on by Trump, who continues to routinely lie about how American elections are run. So what happens if Trump doesn't like the results of next year's midterm elections, when control of Congress is up for grabs? "I think we have to assume, going forward, that a lot of people in this country are going to feel like they don't have to accept the results of elections if they don't like those results, particularly if those results are seen as going against Donald Trump," Bookbinder said, "and that using force to get to the election results they want is OK and is even encouraged." Republicans have made it clear they want to target law enforcement Just look at the DOJ team Trump has assembled and ask yourself if they prioritize justice or pleasing the president. Emil Bove, a senior DOJ official who privately represented Trump when he was convicted of 34 felonies in a 2024 business fraud criminal case, saw his appointment for a lifetime seat on a federal appeals court advance on a party-line vote in a Senate committee on July 17. This happened despite a letter sent to the Senate from more than 900 former DOJ employees, accusing Bove of being a "leader in the assault" on the careers of prosecutors and FBI agents who did their jobs investigating Jan. 6 to hold rioters accountable. Trump, who sparked the Jan. 6 riot, campaigned on retribution. Bove is his retribution delivery boy. The DOJ alumni noted Bove's "breathtaking act of hypocrisy," since he had previously overseen parts of the Jan. 6 investigation as an assistant U.S. Attorney in New York before pivoting to target his colleagues for the same thing. Then there's Jared Wise, a former FBI supervisory special agent from Oregon who was accused of rooting for rioters to attack police officers at the Capitol on Jan. 6 and was indicted for that in May 2023. He was standing trial on Jan. 20 when Trump was sworn in for a second term and included Wise in his sweeping pardons. The DOJ dropped his case that day. Wise got more than a reprieve from responsibility. Trump gave him a job. At the DOJ. In the so-called "Weaponization Working Group," which grew out of Trump's Jan. 20 executive order – the same day Wise got his pardon – which whined that the DOJ had "ruthlessly prosecuted more than 1,500 individuals" for crimes committed on Jan. 6. Read between the lines, and what you really see is that Trump knew Jan. 6 was a stain on our democracy and was directly his fault. So he wants to rewrite that history, to make himself the victim of the calamity he caused. And he's building a team to do just that. So the next time a MAGA crowd decides to storm a government building, beating police officers, smashing windows, stealing computers and smearing their feces on the walls, ask yourself if Team Trumpers like Wise will root for rioters while searching for ways to blame Trump's perceived enemies. Will Bove, if a full Senate vote gives him a lifetime federal judgeship, consider cases according to the strictures of the U.S. Constitution – or just focus on whatever result Trump wants? Trump has twisted and transformed the Republican Party in many ways. The GOP used to tout "law and order" as a bedrock of democracy. Justice is now a team sport, where accountability for action can be canceled with adulation for authority. Follow USA TODAY columnist Chris Brennan on X, formerly known as Twitter: @ByChrisBrennan. Sign up for his weekly newsletter, Translating Politics, here.
Bloomberg
37 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
What Happens When the World's Population Starts Shrinking?
Welcome back to The Forecast from Bloomberg Weekend, where we help you think about the future — from next week to next decade. This weekend we're looking at depopulation — as well as whether Trump will fire Powell, elderly college students and more.
