logo
Russia launches record attacks on Ukraine as country struggles to defend itself

Russia launches record attacks on Ukraine as country struggles to defend itself

The Guardian3 days ago
Night by night, the blitz develops. Russian drones, decoys, cruise and ballistic missiles – increasingly aimed at a single city or location – are being launched in record numbers into Ukraine, straining the country's ability to defend itself and raising questions about how well it can endure another winter of war.
One day earlier this month, 728 drones and 13 missiles were launched, mostly at the western city of Lutsk, home to many Ukrainian airfields. Large salvoes now come more frequently: every three to five days, rather than every 10 to 12, and civilian casualties are rising: 232 people were killed in June, the highest monthly level for three years.
A 1,000-drone attack is anticipated shortly and last weekend a German army major general, Christian Freuding, predicted that the Kremlin's ambition was to attack Ukraine with '2,000 drones simultaneously'. Production of drones and missiles has improved, as have Russian tactics.
Not only are the drones unleashed in larger swarms, with dozens of decoys included, but they are also being flown either much lower or at much higher altitudes, sometimes in a stack to fool the defenders before swooping down steeply to their target. The additional height takes them beyond the range of mobile Ukrainian gunners, whose job has been to shoot them down, relatively cheaply.
Analyses of Ukrainian air force data show that more drones are getting through: from close to 5% in March and April to between 15% and 20% in May and June. Russia is also using its Shahed drones more intelligently, analysts say, to open a path for faster and more dangerous cruise and ballistic missiles because the 50kg (110lb) explosive normally carried by a Shahed only does a relatively limited amount of damage.
Designed in Iran, the delta-winged Shahed 136, or the Russian Geran-2s, are now made in Russia. At least two factories have been identified, one in Izhevsk, and most notably in Yelabuga, more than 700 miles from Ukraine. The modern-looking assembly line was shown off on Russian television a few days ago, with dozens of distinctive fibreglass and carbon-fibre frames positioned to sinister effect in the background.
'The Shahed problem has been foreseeable for some time. Russia has been asking itself: 'What will be the T-34 of this war?'' said Jack Watling, a military expert with the Royal United Services Institute thinktank, referring to the tank that is considered by some to have helped the Soviets defeat the Nazis in the second world war.
Watling said the issue uppermost in the minds of Russian planners was: 'What is the technology that we can invest in that is good and cheap enough and delivers decisive results?'
Two of these are Shahed drones and Iskander missiles in which, he said, Russia has invested heavily in trying to deliver a long-term military-industrial victory.
In the Russian video of the Yelabuga plant, the narrator says that teenagers as young as 15 are invited to work at the factory, coming from a nearby technical college, such has been the Kremlin's focus on trying to keep costs down. The Russian version of the Shahed 136 is cheap, costing roughly between $50,000 (£37,000) to $100,000 each, according to Samuel Bendett, a drone expert with the Centre for Naval Analyses thinktank.
At the same time, component and manufacturing equipment supply for Shaheds has improved. 'China is more directly providing components to Russia,' said Kateryna Stepanenko, from the Institute of the Study of War, likely aided by a direct rail link to China near Yelabuga. 'Integration of Chinese components, where before there was supply from Iran, means the manufacturers now have a lot more available parts,' she said.
Sign up to This is Europe
The most pressing stories and debates for Europeans – from identity to economics to the environment
after newsletter promotion
In Ukraine, there is nervousness. Concern about the available air defence has prompted renewed public lobbying from President Volodymyr Zelenskyy for US Patriot air defence systems, and a promise from Germany to pay for five more. But Patriots are only cost-effectively used against cruise and ballistic missiles, not Shaheds, because the modern PAC-3 interceptor missiles cost about $4m each.
There has been a sustained effort in developing cheap drones to knock out the Shaheds, although details about the counter-drone efforts remain relatively scarce online, partly because the effort is concealed by operational security. A prominent Ukrainian fundraiser, Serhii Sternenko, said a fortnight ago that more than 100 air targets had been shot down as part of his foundation's 'Shahedoriz' project.
That suggests modest progress. Watling argues the problem at the moment is that 'the technology exists but they have not scaled production of them yet'. That may be solved by a partnership announced by Zelenskyy with Google's former CEO Eric Schmidt earlier this month to produce 'interceptor drones', though again details are scant.
At the same time, in the last month Ukrainian officials have been trying to restart efforts to lobby European powers to police the skies over the west of the country. One initiative, Sky Shield, proposed in March, suggested that 120 fighter jets could effectively engage in defensive air policing west of the Dnipro River – but this idea was only deemed practical after a ceasefire that Russia has refused to agree to.
Though air policing has formed part of plans for a post-conflict 'reassurance force' led by the UK and France, there has so far been no appetite for western nations to step forward and protect Ukrainian airspace for fears it would lead to a direct conflict between a Nato country and Russia. 'It's so frustrating: countries send people to fight in Afghanistan for how long to defend from what – but nobody wants to help Ukraine better defend its skies,' said one source involved in the renewed effort.
While there is not much confidence in diplomacy, the balance in the battle of the skies has tipped towards Russia. That could become more ominous if, in the coming weeks, Moscow makes a determined effort to target Ukraine's electricity grid and utility networks before winter.
For now, the heightened level of missile and drone attacks demonstrates that the Russian president, Vladimir Putin, 'remains committed to his goals to have Ukraine surrender and capitulate', said Stepanenko, from the Institute of the Study of War. 'This war is certainly not a stalemate.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why couldn't Britain have dealt with the EU like Trump?
Why couldn't Britain have dealt with the EU like Trump?

Spectator

time25 minutes ago

  • Spectator

Why couldn't Britain have dealt with the EU like Trump?

The more you look at the trade deal negotiated between the US and the EU, the more you want to ask: why couldn't Britain have dealt with the EU like that? Why has every UK Prime Minister since Theresa May acted so feebly in the face of the EU's tactics and ended up getting such a poor deal out of the EU? Trump has get pretty much everything he wanted. Goods imported into the US from the EU will in future be subject to tariffs of 15 per cent – half the rate that Trump had threatened but far higher than existed prior to 'Liberation Day' on 2 April. What has Ursula von der Leyen got in return? Nothing at all, other than the punitive tariffs being dropped. She has agreed to lowering tariffs on imports from the EU, in some cases to zero. She has also agreed to the EU buying more products from the US, including liquified natural gas (LNG), making a mockery of the EU's net-zero policy. Like Britain, the EU has wound down its fossil fuel industry on the pretext that it is yesterday's energy and we won't need it for much longer as we transition to clean renewables – but then it commits itself to buying increased quantities of LNG from the US. Say what you like about Trump, but it is easy to argue that he has proven a far stronger defender of his country's interests than Theresa May, Boris Johnson, Rishi Sunak or Keir Starmer. Britain is nearly as important a destination for EU exports as the US: in 2024, 21 per cent of its exports went to the US and 14 per cent to Britain. Yet no Prime Minister has properly used this leverage to give Britain any advantage. May got nowhere in the end but would have committed Britain to becoming a rule-taker from the EU. Johnson agreed to place an internal UK border down the Irish Sea. Sunak did a little better in trying to resolve this, but then Starmer has put us back closer to where May wanted to take us: agreeing to EU rules on plant and animal products while having no say in the making of those rules. Why did UK Brexit negotiators never threaten punitive tariffs on German cars and French wine? Instead – and in spite of Theresa May's mantra of 'no deal is better than a bad deal' – we acted as if no deal was never an option. Simultaneously, we treated Trump – whose first presidential term lasted throughout the Brexit negotiations – as a kind of oaf who was destroying America's reputation. Had our leaders emulated him rather than scorned him we would be in a lot better position now. It all starts to look a bit different, however, if you look at Trump's trade negotiations from the point of view of consumers rather than producers and ask instead: has Trump really scored such a victory? If you are an American motorist who fancies a new car, your choice has just narrowed, and many of the options available have just increased in price. It is not just consumers, either, who may feel this is not quite the victory for the US it might look like on the surface. Most manufacturers rely on international supply chains. While tariffs may help snuff out some of their competition, they will in future face higher prices of raw materials and components. This does not appear to feature all that much in Trump's mercantilist mind. To him – and not just him, because many world leaders seem to think the same – exporting stuff is a strength and importing stuff a weakness. When you think of things that way, the US has been cheated by the lopsided tariffs which have long existed between the US and the rest of the world. Yet the fact remains that the US has done extremely well out of its low import tariffs. Its economy has grown far faster than those of its more protectionist rivals. So yes, it is easy to admire Trump's negotiating tactics. The whirlwind of the past few months, with threats followed by negotiations and flattery, has been a wonder to watch. It is sad that UK leaders have lacked the courage to act in such a brazen fashion towards the EU. Yet that doesn't mean that the US will end up being the big winner from higher import tariffs. On the contrary, overall the US economy is likely to grow less strongly as a result.

'Chernobyl' ghost town in Scotland FINALLY demolished after years of crime and drugs
'Chernobyl' ghost town in Scotland FINALLY demolished after years of crime and drugs

Daily Record

timean hour ago

  • Daily Record

'Chernobyl' ghost town in Scotland FINALLY demolished after years of crime and drugs

The Clune Estate in Port Glasgow, which has been likened to a post-apocalyptic film, is finally being flattened after years of neglect and social decline It has long been compared to something from an apocalyptic movie - a decaying ghost town plagued by drugs, blazes and criminality - but now the infamous Clune Estate in Port Glasgow is finally being torn down. ‌ Demolition teams have started the painstaking and cautious job of knocking down what remains of the formerly thriving housing development, with labourers wearing protective gloves and reinforced boots to shield themselves from shattered glass and abandoned syringes scattered across the area. ‌ The development, nicknamed the "Scottish Chernobyl" due to its resemblance to the deserted Ukrainian settlement near the nuclear catastrophe site, had fallen into decay following years of abandonment and social deterioration. ‌ What had previously been a flourishing neighbourhood became a desolate wasteland. In its prime, the Clune Estate was a lively centre, housing dockyard employees from the neighbouring Lithgow facility, reports the Express. Constructed following the Great War, the development boasted its own educational facility, place of worship, retail outlets and civic hall. ‌ Youngsters cycled through the streets during twilight hours and residents felt secure. However, when shipbuilding industry crumbled during the 1990s, the neighbourhood fell apart. ‌ House values crashed, inhabitants departed, and property owners arrived to accommodate benefit recipients via local authority programmes. Gradually, the estate fell into disorder, experiencing 14 blazes within merely eight months during its darkest period. Substance misuse, destruction and lawlessness became so widespread that remaining families escaped. ‌ From 480 homes, merely five residents remained as of this year. Most were eager to escape, with those who remained holding onto memories of happier times. During a visit by MailOnline this week, bulldozers were seen actively demolishing the remnants of flats. A construction worker revealed his constant apprehension about what they might find hidden in the rubble - particularly needles concealed within the debris. ‌ He pointed out the "stubborn" bricks that had resisted demolition. The surrounding ruins of shops and offices, now charred and empty, narrated a tale of years of arson attacks. The local church, school and community centre had all been set alight after their closure. Later, thieves stripped the buildings of lead and copper piping. Now, the council has earmarked the land for new housing as part of a significant regeneration initiative. Plans for reconstruction had been suggested as early as 2007, but until now, little headway had been made. One of the area's most prominent landlords, David Hay Smith, confirmed that a proposal to enhance the estate was put forward more than fourteen years ago - a plan to foster a safer, more optimistic community. It's a vision that may finally come to fruition, as the ghosts of Clune Estate are finally being put to rest.

At least three dead after train derails in southern Germany
At least three dead after train derails in southern Germany

South Wales Guardian

time9 hours ago

  • South Wales Guardian

At least three dead after train derails in southern Germany

Federal and local police said the cause of the crash near Riedlingen remains under investigation. It was not immediately clear how many people had been injured. Roughly 100 people were on board the train at the time of the crash, roughly 98 miles west of Munich. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, in a post on social platform X, said he mourned the victims and passed on his condolences to their families. Deutsche Bahn, Germany's main national railway operator, has been contacted for comment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store