logo
Harvard student visa ban effort by Trump unlawful, says US judge

Harvard student visa ban effort by Trump unlawful, says US judge

Time of India4 days ago

US judge rules Trump overstepped in attempt to block Harvard's foreign students (Photo: college.harvard.edu)
A US federal judge has blocked President Trump's newest effort to prevent foreign students from attending Harvard University, ruling that the administration's actions exceeded legal authority.
The ruling safeguards the ability of roughly 7,000 international students to continue studying at the prestigious Ivy League institution while the case proceeds.
The move comes after the Trump administration sought to cut Harvard's enrollment of foreign students as part of a broader campaign aimed at forcing changes in the university's policies and governance. A judge in Boston determined that these government efforts threaten fundamental rights related to freedom of speech and academic freedom, according to court documents obtained by the Associated Press.
Government's effort seen as overreach in controlling Harvard
US District Judge Allison Burroughs issued the order Monday, temporarily halting the Trump administration's proclamation issued on June 4, which sought to block foreign students from entering the US to study at Harvard. In her ruling, Judge Burroughs wrote that the government's "misplaced efforts to control a reputable academic institution and squelch diverse viewpoints" pose a threat to free thought and speech, as reported by the Associated Press.
The legal dispute began in May when Harvard sued the Department of Homeland Security after the agency withdrew its certification to host foreign students under the Student and Exchange Visitor Program. This revocation threatened to force the university's international students — who make up approximately 25 percent of its enrollment — to either transfer or risk becoming undocumented in the US.
Harvard calls action retaliation, highlights impact on research funding
Harvard's lawsuit argues that the Trump administration's decision is illegal retaliation after the university refused to comply with government demands to overhaul policies related to campus protests, admissions, and hiring practices.
The administration also cut over $2.6 billion in federal research grants, ended contracts, and threatened to revoke Harvard's tax-exempt status, according to court filings.
"Without its international students, Harvard is not Harvard," the lawsuit states, emphasizing the critical role foreign students play in maintaining the university's global academic stature. Harvard President Alan Garber told the Associated Press that while the university has taken steps to address concerns such as anti-Semitism, it remains committed to protecting its core, legally protected principles even amid federal pressure.
Broader implications for academic freedom and US education
The case has quickly become a focal point in a broader debate over academic freedom and immigration policy in US higher education. Foreign students contribute significantly to research and innovation, and restrictions on their ability to study in the US could have lasting impacts on universities nationwide.
President Trump has publicly criticized Harvard, accusing the institution of liberal bias and citing concerns about "large-scale improprieties."
However, as reported by the Associated Press, Judge Burroughs' ruling underscores that attempts to use immigration policy as leverage against universities risk undermining constitutional rights and academic independence.
The ongoing legal battle will continue to shape policies affecting thousands of international students and the future of elite US institutions like Harvard. For now, the judge's order ensures that foreign students can remain enrolled and study without interruption as the case unfolds.
Is your child ready for the careers of tomorrow? Enroll now and take advantage of our early bird offer! Spaces are limited.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

LGBTQ Pride Month turns into protests in NYC, San Francisco, and other cities amid Trump's crackdown
LGBTQ Pride Month turns into protests in NYC, San Francisco, and other cities amid Trump's crackdown

Hindustan Times

time34 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

LGBTQ Pride Month turns into protests in NYC, San Francisco, and other cities amid Trump's crackdown

The monthlong celebration of LGBTQ Pride reaches its rainbow-laden crescendo as New York and other major cities around the world host major parades and marches on Sunday. Chicago, Seattle, Minneapolis and Toronto, Canada are among the other major North American cities hosting Pride parades on Sunday.(REUTERS) The festivities in Manhattan, home to the nation's oldest and largest Pride celebration, kick off with a march down Fifth Avenue featuring more than 700 participating groups and expected huge crowds. Marchers will wind past the Stonewall Inn, a Greenwich Village gay bar where a 1969 police raid triggered protests and fired up the LGBTQ rights movement. The site is now a national monument. In San Francisco, marchers in another of the world's largest Pride events will head down the city's central Market Street, reaching concert stages set up at the Civic Center Plaza. San Francisco's mammoth City Hall is also among the venues hosting a post-march party. Chicago, Seattle, Minneapolis and Toronto, Canada are among the other major North American cities hosting Pride parades on Sunday. Several global cities including Tokyo, Paris and Sao Paulo, held their events earlier this month while others come later in the year, including London in July and Rio de Janeiro in November. Also Read: Pride Month starts this weekend. Here's what to expect First pride march was held in 1970 The first pride march was held in New York City in 1970 to commemorate the one-year anniversary of the Stonewall uprising. Pride celebrations are typically a daylong mix of jubilant street parties and political protest, but organizers said this year's iterations will take a more defiant stance than recent years. The festivities come days after the tenth anniversary of the Supreme Court's landmark June 26, 2015, ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges that recognized same-sex marriage nationwide. But Republicans, led by President Donald Trump, have sought to roll back LGBTQ friendly policies. Trump's transgenders crackdown Since taking office in January, Trump has specifically targeted transgender people, removing them from the military, preventing federal insurance programs from paying for gender-affirmation surgeries for young people and attempting to keep transgender athletes out of girls and women's sports. The theme for the Manhattan event is, appropriately, 'Rise Up: Pride in Protest." San Francisco's Pride theme is 'Queer Joy is Resistance' while Seattle's is simply 'Louder.' 'This is not a time to be quiet,' Patti Hearn, Seattle Pride's executive director, said in a statement ahead of the event. 'We will stand up. We will speak up. We will get loud.' Among the other headwinds faced by gay rights groups this year is the loss of corporate sponsorship. American companies have pulled back support of Pride events, reflecting a broader walking back of diversity and inclusion efforts amid shifting public sentiment. NYC Pride said earlier this month that about 20% of its corporate sponsors dropped or reduced support, including PepsiCo and Nissan. Organizers of San Francisco Pride said they lost the support of five major corporate donors, including Comcast and Anheuser-Busch.

Trump calls for deal on war in Gaza as signs of progress emerge
Trump calls for deal on war in Gaza as signs of progress emerge

Indian Express

timean hour ago

  • Indian Express

Trump calls for deal on war in Gaza as signs of progress emerge

US President Donald Trump on Sunday pleaded for progress in ceasefire talks in the war in Gaza, calling for a deal that would halt the fighting in the 20-month-long conflict as Israel and Hamas appeared to be inching closer to an agreement. An Israeli official said plans were being made for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to travel to Washington in the coming weeks, a sign there may be movement on a new deal. The official declined to discuss the focus of the visit and spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss plans that had not yet been finalized. 'MAKE THE DEAL IN GAZA. GET THE HOSTAGES BACK!!!' Trump wrote on his social media platform Truth Social early Sunday between posts about a Senate vote on his tax and spending cuts bill. Trump raised expectations Friday for a deal, saying there could be a ceasefire agreement within the next week. Taking questions from reporters, he said, 'We're working on Gaza and trying to get it taken care of.' Trump has repeatedly called for Israel and Hamas to end the war in Gaza. Despite an eight-week ceasefire reached just as Trump was taking office earlier this year, attempts since then to bring the sides toward a new agreement have failed. A top adviser to Netanyahu, Israeli Minister for Strategic Affairs Ron Dermer, was set to travel to Washington this week for talks on a ceasefire. The Gaza message wasn't the only Middle East-related post by Trump. On Saturday evening, he doubled down on his criticism of the legal proceedings against Netanyahu, who is on trial for alleged corruption, calling it 'a POLITICAL WITCH HUNT, very similar to the Witch Hunt that I was forced to endure.' In the post on Truth Social, he said the trial interfered with talks on a Gaza ceasefire. '(Netanyahu) is right now in the process of negotiating a Deal with Hamas, which will include getting the Hostages back. How is it possible that the Prime Minister of Israel can be forced to sit in a Courtroom all day long, over NOTHING,' Trump wrote. The post echoed similar remarks Trump made last week when he called for the trial to be cancelled. It was a dramatic interference by an international ally in the domestic affairs of a sovereign state. And it unnerved many in Israel, despite Trump's popularity in the country. Talks between Israel and Hamas have repeatedly faltered over one major sticking point, whether the war should end as part of any ceasefire agreement. Hamas official Mahmoud Merdawi accused Netanyahu of stalling progress on a deal, saying in remarks on the Telegram messaging app that the Israeli leader insists on a temporary agreement that would free just 10 of the hostages. Netanyahu spokesperson Omer Dostri said 'Hamas was the only obstacle to ending the war,' without addressing Merdawi's claim. Hamas says it is willing to free all the hostages in exchange for a full withdrawal of Israeli troops and an end to the war. Israel rejects that offer, saying it will agree to end the war if Hamas surrenders, disarms and goes into exile, something the group refuses. The war in Gaza began with Oct 7, 2023, attacks by Hamas in which militants killed 1,200 people and took roughly 250 hostage, about 50 of whom remain captive with less than half believed to be alive. Israel's retaliatory response has killed more than 56,000 people, according to local health authorities, who do not distinguish between militants and civilians in their count but say more than half of the dead are women and children. The war has set off a humanitarian catastrophe, displaced most of Gaza's population, often multiple times, and obliterated much of the territory's urban landscape. The Israeli military on Sunday ordered a mass evacuation of Palestinians in large swaths of northern Gaza, an early target of the war that has been severely damaged by multiple rounds of fighting. Col Avichay Adraee, a military spokesperson, posted the order on social media. It includes multiple neighborhoods in eastern and northern Gaza City, as well as the Jabaliya refugee camp. The military will expand its escalating attacks to the city's northern section, calling for people to move southward to the Muwasi area in southern Gaza, Adraee said. After being all but emptied earlier in the war, hundreds of thousands of people are in northern Gaza following their return during a ceasefire earlier this year. An Israeli military offensive currently underway aims to move Palestinians to southern Gaza so forces can more freely operate to combat militants. Rights groups say their movement would amount to forcible displacement.

While Trump and Musk feud, student aid burns: Pell Grant, loan subsidies to face brutal cuts in ‘Big Beautiful Bill'
While Trump and Musk feud, student aid burns: Pell Grant, loan subsidies to face brutal cuts in ‘Big Beautiful Bill'

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

While Trump and Musk feud, student aid burns: Pell Grant, loan subsidies to face brutal cuts in ‘Big Beautiful Bill'

While Trump and Musk feud, student aid burns. As Donald Trump and Elon Musk trade public swipes once again, something far more consequential is smoldering in the background: the future of federal student aid. At the heart of the political wildfire is Trump's so-called 'Big Beautiful Bill' — a sweeping legislative package designed to slash social safety nets under the banner of 'fiscal responsibility.' The House passed its version last month, but the Senate's freshly unveiled draft is fanning the flames even further — and for millions of college students, especially those from low-income families, the heat is rising fast. The bill proposes major changes to Pell Grant eligibility and student loan access, threatening to lock thousands out of higher education entirely. Elon Musk has once again slammed the bill, this time calling it 'utterly insane.' But while Musk argues it doesn't cut enough, Trump wants it signed and sealed — leaving students, families, and educators caught in the middle of a billionaire showdown. The bill isn't law yet. But if it passes, the consequences will be real, swift, and painful. Here's what's at stake — while the billionaires argue. Pell Grants: Fewer students, stricter rules, less aid If you're relying on a Pell Grant to pay for college, this bill could change everything. According to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, over half of current Pell Grant recipients would see a reduction in aid — and at least 10% could lose their grants altogether. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Reporter Wear Bad Fitting Dress In Public? Look At Photos. Vetob Read Now Undo Why? Because the bill raises the bar. To get the maximum $7,395 Pell Grant, students would now have to complete 30 credit hours per year instead of 24. Part-time students? You'll need 15 credits instead of 12. And if you're enrolled less than half-time — forget it. You're out. The idea, on paper, is to push students to progress faster. But real life isn't paper. Many Pell Grant recipients are juggling jobs, caregiving, or both. Adding more coursework isn't a productivity hack — it's a barrier. The ones most affected are those who can't afford to go full time, and that includes a significant number of community college students. According to the American Association of Community Colleges, about 400,000 Pell recipients could see their aid disappear. The era of high-interest degrees Pell Grants aren't the only target. The Big Beautiful Bill would also eliminate subsidized federal loans — the kind that don't accrue interest while students are in school. That means borrowing gets more expensive before you even graduate. But there's more: the bill adds a lifetime cap on how much students can borrow, pegged to the median cost of their program. Sounds neat in theory — until you realize it doesn't adjust for where you live or what you're studying. Planning to become a doctor or lawyer? Good luck. Professional programs are pricey, and these new limits could make them unreachable for all but the wealthy. And when federal support dries up, private lenders step in — often with higher interest rates and fewer protections. In short, students will be forced to pay more to learn less, and many might opt out of college entirely. Low-income families risk losing their only path to college Pell Grants have long been a lifeline for low-income families. They're not loans, they don't accrue interest, and they don't have to be paid back. For families making under $30,000 a year — which accounts for two-thirds of Pell recipients — these grants are often the difference between attending college and not. This bill threatens to cut off that path. Critics argue that it would widen the education gap, especially for Black, Latino, and first-generation college students who are statistically more likely to rely on need-based aid. And while the bill's supporters frame it as a push for 'accountability,' what it really does is shift the burden of higher education back onto those who can least afford it. So, what now? The Senate hasn't passed the bill yet, and with reconciliation rules in play and public drama between Trump and Musk still unfolding, nothing is final. But the stakes are painfully clear. If the bill becomes law, it won't just be another win or loss in the Trump–Musk power struggle. It'll reshape the financial future of millions of American students — and not in a good way. So while the billionaires feud on social media, students, parents, and educators are left watching the fallout. Because if this bill passes, 'beautiful' won't be the word anyone uses to describe what happens next. Is your child ready for the careers of tomorrow? Enroll now and take advantage of our early bird offer! Spaces are limited.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store