
The White House security breach raises concerns among some military spouses and veterans
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
Although Trump has downplayed the security breach as a 'glitch,' Myatt found it deeply concerning because it flouted the strict rules that she and others have had to follow while potentially endangering U.S. sailors like her husband.
Advertisement
'To see these individuals who control our military not taking it seriously sets a precedent that is very scary and could result in dangerous situations for our men and women who serve our country,' Myatt said.
Veterans expected more from officials
The breach occurred March 15 when top national security officials texted plans for upcoming military strikes in Yemen to a group chat in the publicly available Signal app, which provides encrypted communications but can be hacked. The group included the editor-in-chief for The Atlantic magazine, which reported the incident in a story posted online Monday.
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt has said no classified information was posted to the chat. Michael Waltz, Trump's national security adviser, later took 'full responsibility' for the incident.
But Vietnam veteran Edwin J. Thomas says Trump's Cabinet officials should have known better.
Thomas, 78, was visiting the U.S. Army Airborne & Special Operations Museum in Fayetteville, North Carolina, home to Fort Bragg, the nation's largest Army installation.
Thomas, who carried a heavy machine gun during his time in the U.S. Marine Corps, said 'everything should be kept confidential, behind closed doors' during military planning. He doesn't think anyone should be fired, unless they continue to show what he considers poor judgment.
Advertisement
'I think it's incompetence,' said Thomas, who voted for Trump. 'They should have thought about what they were doing at the time when they did it. It's a mistake. If they correct it, that's fine. If they continue to use that app, then I think that's an abuse of power.'
Air Force Reserve veteran David Cameron Wright said it made him angry.
'It makes me think they don't care about our security,' the former senior airman said as he sat by a fountain at North Carolina Veterans Park in Fayetteville.
'I expect more of our people in that type of authority,' he added.
Like Thomas, though, he thinks the White House officials involved should be given a second chance.
'I mean, nobody's perfect,' he said. 'No president, no civilian. Military, nonmilitary. Nobody's perfect.'
Staying safe during deployment
The latest U.S. campaign against the Houthis began with fighter jets launching off the USS Harry S. Truman aircraft carrier and dropping bombs in parts of Yemen, a mission similar to the one Myatt's husband was on last year.
The Eisenhower's carrier strike group protected merchant vessels and allied warships under fire in a vital Red Sea corridor that leads to the Suez Canal. About 7,000 American sailors were waging the most intense running sea battle since World War II.
The Eisenhower's home port is the nation's largest Navy base in Norfolk and its deployment was extended twice. Families were part of a Facebook group connecting them with sailors that was consistently monitored by the Navy, which deleted posts if they contained sensitive information, such as a sailor's photo that could give away the ship's location, Myatt said.
Advertisement
The aircraft carrier had Wi-Fi, enabling sailors to stay in touch with family through texts, WhatsApp and even phone calls. But there were times when the ship went silent.
'If we weren't getting emails, if we weren't getting phone calls, it kind of clued us in that something's happening,' Myatt said. 'Because the ship shut down all communications to protect itself.'
Myatt questioned why White House officials couldn't share the information about the latest strikes in person, possibly in the famed Situation Room depicted in films and television shows.
'What if it was somebody who wanted to take that information and make a whole lot of money off of it?' she said about the accidental inclusion of an outsider in the chat.
'This isn't a partisan issue,' Myatt added. 'Whether you are a Republican or a Democrat, that should not matter. This is a situation that affects every single American regardless of how you voted.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Boston Globe
5 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Trump announces 15% tariff deal with South Korea, says he'll impose 25% tariff on India
The South Korean investment fund Trump announced evokes a similar $550 billion account pledged by Japan in a successful bid to lower its threatened tariffs. As with the Japanese pledge, likened to a sovereign wealth fund, spending from the South Korean account on investments in the United States would be directed by Trump himself, the president said. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Trump also said South Korea had agreed to 'accept American product including Cars and Trucks, Agriculture, etc.' That is likely to take the form of an agreement by Seoul to accept cars and trucks built to US motor vehicle safety standards, without subjecting them to additional requirements. Advertisement It was not immediately clear if the agreement would guarantee discounted tariffs on automobiles and auto parts from South Korea — a key point of tension in recent negotiations between the countries. South Korea will purchase $100 billion in liquefied natural gas or other energy products, Trump said. The pledge comes on top of a European Union promise to buy $750 billion of American energy over three years — and amid increasing questions about how the United States can fulfill the volumes being established in the country's trade frameworks with other nations. Advertisement Trump has emphasized investments in the United States and purchase commitments — especially those tied to the nation's oil and gas bounty — in reaching framework trade agreements. The 15 percent tariff rate for South Korea is the culmination of months of talks and helps Seoul — the US's sixth-biggest trading partner — avert a 25 percent levy that was set to take effect Aug. 1, alongside fresh penalties for dozens of US trading partners. The negotiations were especially delicate for the young government in South Korea, as President Lee Jae Myung considered allowing the US greater access to South Korea's beef and rice markets — a politically sensitive topic that spurred widespread protests back in 2008. Trump said the South Korean president would be visiting Washington within the next two weeks for a bilateral meeting. Concessions by Lee risk torpedoing his honeymoon period in office by angering farmers and fracturing his party. His victory in June's election after months of political turmoil prompted an uptick in sentiment among businesses and consumers and a surge in stocks to record levels. But the nation was also playing catch-up in the trade talks to prevent higher universal tariffs damaging a fragile economy that's just emerging from a contraction. South Korea already has a free trade agreement with the US and its corporate giants pledged tens of billions of dollars of investments as the trade talks were ongoing. As for India, Trump said that in addition to high tariffs on US goods, the country's trade with Russia is also a concern. Advertisement Trump told reporters on Wednesday the two countries were still in the middle of negotiations on trade despite the tariffs slated to begin in a few days. 'We're talking to India now,' the president said. 'We'll see what happens.' The Indian government said Wednesday it's studying the implications of Trump's tariffs announcement. India and the United States have been engaged in negotiations on concluding a 'fair, balanced and mutually beneficial' bilateral trade agreement over the last few months, and New Delhi remains committed to that objective, India's Trade Ministry said in a statement. Trump on Wednesday signed separate orders to Trump also said on Truth Social that the United States has reached a deal with Pakistan that includes the development of its oil reserves. Meanwhile, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent was briefing him on trade talks with China. Trump's announcement comes after Advertisement While Trump has effectively wielded tariffs as a cudgel to reset There's also the possibility of more tariffs coming on trade partners with Russia as well as on pharmaceutical drugs and computer chips. Kevin Hassett, director of the White House National Economic Council, said Trump and US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer would announce the Russia-related tariff rates on India at a later date. Trump's approach of putting a 15 percent tariff on America's long-standing allies in the EU is also generating pushback, possibly causing European partners as well as Canada to seek alternatives to US leadership on the world stage. French President Emmanuel Macron said Wednesday in the aftermath of the trade framework that Europe 'does not see itself sufficiently' as a global power, saying in a cabinet meeting that negotiations with the United States will continue as the agreement gets formalized. 'To be free, you have to be feared,' Macron said. 'We have not been feared enough. There is a greater urgency than ever to accelerate the European agenda for sovereignty and competitiveness.' Material from the Associated Press was used in this story.


The Hill
5 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump calls GOP's Hawley ‘second tier' senator after stock trading ban bill advances
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump lashed out at Sen. Josh Hawley on Wednesday after the Republican's proposal to ban stock trading by members of Congress — and the president and vice president — won bipartisan approval to advance in a committee vote. It's the second time in as many days that Trump laid into senators in his own party as the president tries, sometimes without success, to publicly pressure them to fall in line. A day earlier Trump tore into veteran GOP Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa over an obscure Senate procedure regarding nominations. Trump called Hawley a 'second rate Senator.' GOP senators had been working with the White House on the stock trade bill, and proposed a carve-out to shield the president from the ban, but it failed. But Trump complained that Hawley joined with Democrats to block another amendment that would have investigated the stock trades of Democratic Rep. Nancy Pelosi, the speaker emerita. 'Why would one 'Republican,' Senator Josh Hawley from the Great State of Missouri, join with all of the Democrats, to block a Review,' Trump said. Hawley did not immediately respond to Trump's post. But Hawley's legislation with the panel's top Democrat, Sen. Gary Peters of Michigan, sailed out of the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs on a bipartisan vote over the objections of the other Republicans, who have majority control. 'We have an opportunity here today to do something that the public has wanted to do for decades,' Hawley told the panel. 'And that is to ban members of Congress from profiting on information that frankly only members of Congress have on the buying and selling of stock.' Stock trading by members of Congress has long been an issue that the parties have tried to tackle, especially as some elected officials have become wealthy while in elected office. During the COVID-19 pandemic, in particular, it was disclosed that lawmakers were trading as information about the health crisis as it became known. Insider trading laws don't always apply to the types of information lawmakers receive. In a joint statement, Hawley and Peters said the legislation, called the Honest Act, builds on an earlier bill and would ban members of Congress, the president, vice president and their spouses from holding, buying or selling stock. If the bill were to become law, it would immediately prohibit elected officials, including the president, from buying stocks and would ban them from selling stocks for 90 days after enactment. It also requires the elected officials to divest from all covered investments, starting at the beginning of their next term in office. 'We are one step closer to getting this bill passed into law and finally barring bad actors from taking advantage of their positions for their own financial gain,' Peters said in a statement. But during the committee hearing, tensions flared as Republicans sought other approaches. GOP Sen. Rick Scott of Florida proposed one amendment that would exempt the president, the vice president, their spouses and dependent children, from the legislation, and another that would have required a report on Pelosi's trades. Both were defeated, with Hawley joining the Democrats. One Republican, Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, said the overall bill is 'legislative demagoguery.' 'We do have insider trading laws. We have financial disclosure. Trust me, we have financial disclosure,' Johnson said. 'So I don't see the necessity of this.' Trump's post criticizing Hawley comes after a similar blowback directed Tuesday night at Grassley. In that post, Trump pressured Grassley to do away with the Senate's longtime 'blue slip' custom that often forces bipartisan support on presidential nominations of federal judges. The practice requires both senators in a state to agree to push a nominee forward for a vote. Trump told Grassley to do away with the practice. 'Senator Grassley must step up,' Trump said, while claiming that he helped the senator, who was first elected in 1980, to win reelection. Grassley earlier Wednesday said he was 'offended' by what the president said.


New York Post
5 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump's economy is already proving the doomsayers completely wrong
So much for the prophecies of Trumponomics doom: Not only did the US economy grow at a 3% rate in the second quarter, the growth was all in the private sector as the government portion shrank. Meanwhile, ADP reports that private-sector employment rose by 104,000 jobs in July, with annual wages jumping 4.4% — well above the rate of inflation, which also remains markedly lower than the conventional-wisdom crew predicted. That is, growth was half again the consensus forecast for April-June, while July looks like a huge boon for American workers — all as many of President Donald Trump's policies have only begun to kick in. Advertisement ADP reports that private-sector employment rose by 104,000 jobs in July, with annual wages jumping 4.4% — well above the rate of inflation. AP Trump's tariffs have neither crashed the economy nor kicked off fresh inflation — though of course those predictions largely came from 'experts' who never expected the bane of Bidenflation. For all Federal Reserve chief Jerome Powell's fussing, the Fed's preferred gauge of inflation, the Personal Consumption Expenditures index, was up just 2.1% in Q2, down from 3.7% in Q1. As for the (very real) issue of federal debt: It surely can't hurt that Uncle Sam's spending and 'investment' fell at a 3.7% rate in the second quarter, after a 4.6% annualized drop in the first. Advertisement Bizarrely, that counts as harming GDP in the official stats, even though the nation's plainly far better off with the wealth-creating private sector booming while the wealth-consuming public sector goes on a (modest) diet. Meanwhile, Trump deregulation should offer a huge boost to the economy, with a single move — the repeal of the EPA's Obama-era 'climate endangerment' finding, expected to boost GDP by $150 billion to $440 billion a year. Advertisement The president's push for more and cheaper energy will be another a huge, anti-inflationary spur to growth, and added reason for optimism among consumers and producers. Trump's first term was a huge win for working Americans up until COVID escaped from that Wuhan lab; now the second term is shaping up even better . . . for everyone except the professional doomsayers, anyway.