OpenAI Fights Court Order Requiring It to Store Deleted ChatGPT Conversations Indefinitely
The court order was issued as part of The New York Times' copyright lawsuit against OpenAI, where it has been accused, alongside Microsoft, of using the newspaper's articles to train its artificial intelligence models.
In a statement, OpenAI chief operating officer Brad Lightcap described the court order as one that "fundamentally conflicts with the privacy commitments we have made to our users. It abandons long-standing privacy norms and weakens privacy protections."
He added that the company believes that The New York Times has overreached with this court order and that OpenAI will continue to appeal the decision.
According to The Verge, OpenAI in May was forced by the court order to preserve "all output log data that would otherwise be deleted," even if a user requests the deletion of a chat or if privacy laws require OpenAI to delete data.
OpenAI said it filed a motion requesting that the magistrate judge reconsider the preservation order, adding, "Highlighting that indefinite retention of user data breaches industry norms and our own policies."
Products impacted by the court order include ChatGPT Free, Plus, Pro, and Team subscription, or if users use the OpenAI API (application-programming interface) without a Zero Data Retention agreement.
Excluded from this arrangement are customers using ChatGPT Enterprise or ChatGPT Edu.
OpenAI noted that the deleted data will not be automatically shared with The New York Times and that it has been securely stored, accessible only under strict legal protocols.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Amazon vs. Microsoft: Which Cloud Computing Giant Is the Better Buy?
Amazon and Microsoft are the two largest cloud computing companies. Microsoft Azure has been growing more quickly, but a strained relationship with OpenAI leaves some questions. Amazon's AWS, meanwhile, has a vertical integration advantage. 10 stocks we like better than Amazon › When it comes to cloud computing, Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN) and Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) are the clear leaders. Both are seeing strong growth, both are leaning heavily into artificial intelligence (AI), and both are investing billions to meet increasing demand. But if I had to pick just one stock to own right now, I'd go with Amazon. Let's break down why. While best known for its e-commerce operations, Amazon basically invented the cloud computing industry due to its own struggles trying to scale up its infrastructure. Today, Amazon Web Services (AWS) is the largest cloud computing provider in the world, with nearly 30% market share. AWS is also both Amazon's most profitable segment and fastest-growing, with revenue climbing 17% last quarter. AI has been a big reason for this. Customers are using AWS solutions like Bedrock and SageMaker to help them build and run their own AI models and apps. Bedrock gives companies access to foundation models they can customize, while SageMaker is more of an end-to-end solution. Once these models are built, they then run on AWS infrastructure, locking customers into a recurring, high-margin business. On top of that, Amazon has built its own custom AI chips through its Annapurna Labs unit. Trainium is designed to train large language models (LLMs), while Inferentia handles inference. These chips are optimized for performance and cost, consuming less power and delivering better results than general-purpose graphic processing units (GPUs) for specific AI tasks. This gives Amazon a cost advantage over rivals like Microsoft and should lead to better operating leverage as usage scales. Beyond the cloud, Amazon is also using AI to improve its e-commerce business, as well. The company is now using agentic AI to power autonomous warehouse robots. These robots continue to become more sophisticated and can perform multiple tasks. Some can even spot damaged goods before they're shipped, improving customer satisfaction and reducing costly returns. It recently just surpassed 1 million robots in its warehouses. It's also using AI to improve efficiency in its logistics operations. AI is helping map out better routes, while mapping tools like Wellspring can help delivery drivers better navigate complicated drop-offs at places like large apartment complexes. Amazon is also using AI tools to help third-party sellers better market products and target customers more effectively. It's worth noting that its sponsored ad business has become one of the largest digital ad platforms in the world and is growing quickly. There's no denying that Microsoft is a powerhouse. The company has long been the dominant player in worker productivity software with programs such as Word, Excel, and PowerPoint, and its Windows operating system powers most non-Apple computers. However, Microsoft's cloud computing unit Azure has been its big growth driver, with AI accelerating that momentum. Last quarter, Azure revenue jumped 33% year over year (35% in constant currency), with AI services making up nearly half of the growth. Azure is currently firing on all cylinders, but Microsoft has been running into capacity constraints. To address that, Microsoft plans to increase its capital spending in fiscal 2026. It will also shift more investment into shorter-lived assets like GPUs and servers, which it said are more directly tied to revenue. Microsoft made an early and aggressive investment in OpenAI, and the ability to give customers access to the start-up's leading LLM is one of the biggest reasons why Azure has been taking market share in the cloud computing space. Microsoft has also deeply integrated OpenAI's technology into its own products. For example, the technology is used to help power its AI assistant copilots in Word, Excel, and other productivity tools. At $30 per month per enterprise user, Microsoft's copilots have been a nice growth driver for the company. Microsoft has also expanded AI beyond Office 365. It's added new copilots focused on cybersecurity and even launched Muse, an AI model designed to help develop and preserve older video games. Meanwhile, its GitHub Copilot has been one of its best-performing, helping drive solid growth for its code-hosting and collaboration platform. However, the company's relationship with OpenAI has become strained. Microsoft is no longer the exclusive data center provider for the company, and the two have been fighting over the terms of Microsoft's investment, including whether it will get access to the intellectual property of OpenAI's pending acquisition of Windsurf. Microsoft's investment in OpenAI is one of the most attractive parts of its story. It's currently entitled to 49% of OpenAI Global LLC's profits, capped at roughly 10 times its nearly $10 billion investment. But OpenAI is looking to renegotiate the deal as it looks to restructure into a for-profit company. Both Amazon and Microsoft are great companies with strong cloud computing platforms and big AI opportunities. However, Amazon has the edge. Amazon's biggest advantage is that its cloud computing platform is vertically integrated. It can provide a wide range of services from custom chips to infrastructure to high-margin services. Its Inferentia and Trainium chips are helping lower its cloud computing costs, and AWS offers a wide array of foundation AI models, both from itself and other leading tech companies. Microsoft, meanwhile, is reliant on expensive chips from Nvidia and AI models from OpenAI, with whom tensions have been growing. Microsoft is looking to develop its own AI chips, but it was recently reported that its next-generation Maia AI chip has been delayed. Azure has been growing more quickly than AWS, but it faces a lot more unanswered questions at the moment. Microsoft is a solid stock to own long-term, but right now, Amazon is the better buy. Before you buy stock in Amazon, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Amazon wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $699,558!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $976,677!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,060% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 180% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 30, 2025 John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Geoffrey Seiler has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Amazon, Apple, Microsoft, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Amazon vs. Microsoft: Which Cloud Computing Giant Is the Better Buy? was originally published by The Motley Fool
Bloomberg
9 hours ago
- Bloomberg
We're Losing the Plot on AI in Universities
An artificial intelligence furor that's consuming Singapore's academic community reveals how we've lost the plot over the role the hyped-up technology should play in higher education. A student at Nanyang Technological University said in a Reddit post that she used a digital tool to alphabetize her citations for a term paper. When it was flagged for typos, she was then accused of breaking the rules over the use of generative AI for the assignment. It snowballed when two more students came forward with similar complaints, one alleging that she was penalized for using ChatGPT to help with initial research, even though she says she did not use the bot to draft the essay.
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Before You Buy That 'Cheap' Stock, Read the Proxy, Not The Pitch Deck
The deeper you dig into companies, the more dysfunction you find. This is not due to businesses being inherently broken, but rather because the incentives are flawed. On the surface, stocks can look cheap. Screens flag low multiples, analyst notes highlight growth potential, and management sounds confident on the call. But beneath that narrative, capital often gets quietly misallocated. Empire-building creeps in. Decisions tilt toward boosting bonuses, not shareholder value. And the metrics that matter most, the ones buried in incentive structures and insider behavior, go ignored by most investors. As Amazon Doubles Down on Robotaxis, Is AMZN Stock a Buy? Why Citi Thinks Micron Stock Is Headed to $150 After Earnings Beat OpenAI's Partnership With Microsoft is Good, Says CEO Sam Altman; There's 'Tension,' But Already Planning 'Next Decade Together' Markets move fast. Keep up by reading our FREE midday Barchart Brief newsletter for exclusive charts, analysis, and headlines. This is where the true significance emerges. If you don't monitor executive pay and insider moves, you're overlooking potential value leaks or, crucially, unlocked opportunities. These aren't soft signals. They're hard tells. The clues are in the proxy filings, the timing of stock sales, and the structure of performance hurdles. This issue isn't about corporate morality. It's about money. For investors who know where to look, misaligned governance isn't a red flag; it's a roadmap to alpha. Capital Allocation. The Hidden Cost Of Ego Capital allocation is where the quiet destruction of value often begins and it's rarely about incompetence. It's about incentives. Expect empire building when a CEO's bonus is based on top-line growth instead of return on invested capital (ROIC). That usually means overpaying for acquisitions, not because they're strategic, but because they build legacy. Cash gets hoarded instead of returned, while buybacks and dividends are treated as afterthoughts, despite being the most shareholder-friendly tools available. Look closer and you'll see companies issuing millions in stock-based compensation while continuing to dilute shareholders by printing more shares. Others hang onto underperforming divisions year after year, not because they add value but because breaking them up would shrink the C-suite. This isn't hypothetical. We've seen it in sprawling conglomerates that refuse to divest low-ROIC segments, in tech firms obsessed with topline over profit, and in boards that rubber-stamp comp plans designed to reward size not efficiency. The result? On paper, a stock appears inexpensive, yet it lacks the structural ability to increase value. The investor takeaway is simple: Read the proxy. Please disregard the glossy investor deck. What's buried in the footnotes of a compensation plan tells you far more than the income statement. Incentives, not narratives, dictate capital allocation in this context. Executive Compensation: Where The Real Priorities Lie At The Edge, we track dozens of these triggers across spinoffs, restructurings, and breakups. Why? Executive behavior concerning value unlocks more insights than any analyst report. When comp plans prioritize optics over outcomes, it's a red flag. However, when the incentives align with the creation of real shareholder value, it's a positive sign. Take (VLTO): Prior to the spin from Danaher, we flagged their LTIP structure as heavily performance-driven, measured on metrics like ROIC and TSR over three years, not revenue padding. This clarity indicated that management was pursuing a long-term strategy, and the market has appropriately rewarded them. In contrast, (ILMN) became a textbook example of what happens when executive compensation favors empire-building over accountability. Executive pay isn't just about fairness, it's about foresight. If management wins regardless of shareholder outcomes, you won't. Insider Behavior: The Tells You Can't Ignore In a world of carefully managed narratives, insider behavior is one of the few signals that's hard to fake. When insiders buy during periods of structural change, before the narrative becomes clear, it indicates strong conviction. When insiders are selling after the story has played out and retail investors have piled in, it often indicates a market peak. It's not just about the transaction; it's about timing, size, and frequency. Does a solitary, minor purchase follow a challenging quarter? That's merely surface-level activity. However, when multiple buys occur across management tiers, a phenomenon known as a bullish cluster, it signals a significant underlying trend. (ECG) serves as a prime example. In February 2025, three insiders—Marcy Maximillian J, Ryan Edward A, and Michael Della Rocca—each bought stock worth between $49k and $53k within days of one another. There was no flashy announcement or hype. Instead, they acted with a quiet conviction. Shortly after, ECG's stock surged nearly 69%, well before the market narrative caught up. Don't chase headlines; track behavior. And when the people who know the business best put real capital to work, we take notice. In a noisy market, that kind of signal is gold. Spinoffs: The Ultimate Incentive Transparency Test If you want to see what management really believes, watch what happens during a spinoff. Spinoffs compel executives to reveal their true intentions. Incentives get reset, structures rebuilt, and priorities laid bare, usually for the first time. The Form 10 is often more revealing than any investor deck, offering a raw look at how aligned (or not) leadership is with future shareholders. What should investors watch for? Start with the comp plan. 'Founder-like' pay structures where leadership takes equity over salary and ties it to long-term value creation are a bullish tell. If the former executives from the parent company maintain significant ownership in the spin-off and avoid selling their shares immediately after the separation, that is another positive indicator. When they tie equity awards to real performance hurdles (ROIC, TSR), rather than just revenue optics, it demonstrates their alignment with the right metrics. In spinoffs, incentives reset and clarity reaches its peak. Study these transactions closely because they offer the cleanest read on intent. If the incentives align, value usually follows. What Smart Investors Do Differently Smart investors don't just screen for valuation; they screen for behavior. They know governance isn't a checkbox. It's a signal. They probe beyond the earnings deck to understand who, how, and why they are receiving compensation. They treat insider behavior and compensation structure as core parts of the thesis, not footnotes. This is why you will outperform in special situations: You are not buying stories. You're buying setups, where incentives align, risk is asymmetric, and behavior signals what spreadsheets can't. Value Is Leaking. Are You Watching? Most investors chase earnings and price targets. But value doesn't leak from spreadsheets; it leaks from boardrooms. You're missing the setup and the upside if you're not monitoring insiders' actions, their compensation, and their beliefs. Incentives shape outcomes. Behavior reveals conviction. And in special situations, that's where the real alpha lives. On the date of publication, Jim Osman did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
