‘Both D Gukesh and Arjun Erigaisi will…': Magnus Carlsen receives Norway Chess 2025 warning from Viswanathan Anand
Speaking during a chat organised by the Sports Journalists Association of Mumbai, Anand said, 'I expect a very exciting battle.'
'Both Gukesh and Arjun will not lack motivation or the determination to go after Magnus. But Magnus is highly motivated by our youngsters if I can still call them that.
'He is highly motivated by the challenge. I mean I've seen him in multiple tournaments whether it's Kolkata or the World Rapid Blitz. He eagerly looks forward to these confrontations and so we have the perfect storm.'
Four Indians GM will participate in Norway; Gukesh, Arjun Erigaisi, Vaishali Rameshbabu and Koneru Humpy. Commenting on them, Anand said, 'Certainly on the men's side, Indian chess is as strong as it's ever been, even more so obviously due to the depth we have. But it's great that Humpy is still competing so successfully and that she'll be joined by Vaishali as well.'
Other than Gukesh, Arjun and Carlsen, the men's Norway Chess lineup consists of Fabiano Caruana, Hikaru Nakamura and Wei Yi. Meanwhile, the women's lineup has Ju Wenjun, Lei Tingjie, Humpy, Anna Muzychuk, Vaishali and Sarasadat Khademalsharieh.
The tournament format will have the Armageddon tiebreak system. If a classical game ends in a draw, players will battle an Armageddon game to decide the winner. There will also be a confessional booth.
Speaking on the innovations, Anand said, 'If you have too many in one tournament, it gets distracting also and there's kind of overload. Armageddon is good because it gives a little something to look forward to at the end of a game in case the game is ending to a draw.'
'I don't know that we have found the perfect value of an armageddon game. It used to be what, 2-1 and then it's a bit more, we're still tweaking the number. There might be some formula which will give the armageddon a bit more importance towards the overall score,' he added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
16 minutes ago
- India.com
Washington Sundar Ignores Harry Brook's Handshake During Jadeja's Century Celebration, Video Goes Viral
ENG vs IND: The 4th Test between India and England at Old Trafford, Manchester, ended in a dramatic draw, thanks to resilient centuries from Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar. On a final day where England eyed a series-clinching win, the Indian duo held firm and denied the hosts a 3-1 lead in the five-match series. Stokes Offers Early Draw, India Decline With India comfortably navigating the final session and both batters closing in on their centuries, England captain Ben Stokes reportedly offered an early handshake to draw the match. However, the Indian camp declined, keen to let Jadeja and Sundar complete their personal milestones. Handshake Snub Goes Viral A moment of light-hearted awkwardness went viral on social media when England's part-time bowler Harry Brook extended a hand to congratulate Jadeja after his century, thinking the match would end there. However, both Jadeja and Sundar continued celebrating their milestones, unintentionally leaving Brook hanging. The incident added an amusing twist to an otherwise tense final day. Moment of the match. Ravindra Jadeja scored 100 and Harry Brook intentionally came forward to call off the match. But Washington Sundar totally ignored him. Brook reaction after that — Selfless (@SelflessCricket) July 27, 2025 Brook, Root Bowl Final Overs as Fast Bowlers Rested England resorted to bowling part-timers Harry Brook and Joe Root during the final stages of the match. With no realistic chance of a win and only pride at stake, Stokes revealed in the post-match presentation that he didn't want to risk injury to any of his key fast bowlers with one Test still to go. 'Yeah, I think all the hard work was done by India. They both (Washi and Jadeja) played incredibly well and it got to that point where there was obviously only one result,' Stokes said. 'There was absolutely no chance I was going to risk any of my big fast bowlers through injuries with one more game to go. Dawsy (Liam Dawson) just bowled so many overs this game his body started to cramp up in the legs, so I wasn't risking any of my frontline bowlers for that last half an hour,' he added. Jadeja's composed ton was a reminder of his growing stature as a dependable Test batter, while Washington Sundar's return to red-ball cricket was marked by grit and poise. His century was particularly important, as it came after a long injury layoff. Together, the pair stitched an unbroken partnership that drained England's hopes on a pitch that had earlier promised plenty of assistance to bowlers. Series Decider Set for The Oval With the series now level at 2-1 in England's favour, the fifth and final Test at The Oval is expected to be a high-stakes encounter. India must win to draw the series, while a draw or win for England will hand them the series trophy.
Mint
16 minutes ago
- Mint
Washington Sundar turns down Harry Brook's handshake offer, joins Jadeja's century celebrations
Tensions between India and England came to a boil once again on Day 5 of the Manchester Test as England skipper Ben Stokes asked Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar to draw the match in the final hour of play, sensing there was only one result possible from that point. However, Jadeja and Sundar—batting on 89 and 80 respectively—refused to budge, prompting a barrage of comments from the English players about how the two should have maintained their tempo or if they were simply chasing personal milestones against the likes of Harry Brook. The Indian batters, though, were in no mood to let go of the momentum and didn't seem to be paying much heed to the chatter. Jadeja even shifted the responsibility, pointing towards the dressing room and clarifying that it was the call of the captain and coach to continue playing. Soon after, Jadeja brought up his fifth Test century with a big shot off Brook's bowling. As he celebrated, Brook appeared to think the match would now be drawn and extended his hand toward Sundar, suggesting an end. But Sundar paid no attention, instead running across to his partner to celebrate the milestone. A couple of overs later, Sundar too reached his hundred—his maiden Test ton at the international level—and India finally agreed to call it a draw. Jadeja and Sundar walked in after the dismissals of a well-set KL Rahul and Shubman Gill in the first session on Day 5. Jadeja offered a chance to Joe Root at slip off the very first ball he faced, but from there on, the duo looked resolute. They weathered everything England threw at them and ensured only one result was possible. The two left-handers added over 200 runs while batting through two full sessions, tiring out England's bowlers ahead of a quick turnaround before the final Test at The Oval. Their partnership has not only helped India avoid defeat but also kept them alive in the series, with the visitors now trailing 2-1. The young Shubman Gill-led side will have a chance to level the series in the fifth and final Test.
Indian Express
16 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Ben Stokes calls injury replacements ‘absolutely ridiculous'; India coach Gambhir backs substitutions, says ‘I'm all for it'
England skipper Ben Stokes feels 'absolutely ridiculous' to have a conversation on whether teams should be allowed replacement players mid-way through a game in case of a major injury. This came after Indian wicket-keeper batter Rishab Pant fractured his toe during the first innings of the Manchester Test. 'I think it's absolutely ridiculous that there's a conversation around an injury replacement,' Stokes said during the post-match press conference of the fourth Test, where India managed to draw the game with gritty knocks from KL Rahul, Shubman Gill, Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar at Old Trafford on Sunday. 'I think that there would just be too many loopholes for teams to be able to go through. You pick your 11 for a game; injuries are part of the game. I completely understand the concussion replacement: player welfare, player safety. But I think the conversation should just honestly stop around injury replacements because if you stick me in an MRI scanner, I could get someone else in straightaway,' he added. 'If you stick anyone else with an MRI scanner, a bowler is going to show, 'Oh yeah, you've got a bit of inflammation around your knee. Oh sweet, we can get another fresh bowler in'. I just think that conversation should be shut down and stopped,' said Stokes. As per the existing rules, teams can opt for a replacement player in case of concussion, but if there any other external injuries like in the case of Pant fracturing the toe, replacement is not allowed. India head coach Gautam Gambhir had different thoughts from Stokes and said he is all for the replacement. 'Absolutely, I'm all for it,' Gambhir said after the game. 'If the umpires and the match referee sees and feels that is a major injury, I think it's very important. It's very important to have this rule where you can get a substitute, that is, if it's (the injury) very visible. 'There's nothing wrong in doing that, especially in a series like this where it's been such a closely-fought series in the previous three Test matches. Imagine if we would've had to play with 10 men against 11. How unfortunate would this be for us,' added Gambhir. Earlier, Former England captain Michael Vaughan also called for an adjustment in the substitution rule. 'I don't like the fact that we've got four days left in the game, four days of action in what has been an incredible series where we are going to have 10 versus 11,' Vaughan had said to BBC Sports. 'I prefer that you'd have a sub. You know, once they brought in concussion subs, I was crying out, saying, 'Well, just have substitutions then in the first innings of a game.' That would be my stepping point. If it happens in the second innings, I feel that team might kind of break the rules or indulge in a bit of skullduggery. But if it's clear and obvious when someone breaks a hand or a foot or ruptures a calf it's so evident that someone is in real pain and can't carry on. I think it's very clear to me: you should be allowed a sub,' said Vaughan.
